Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-10980HK vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Intel Core i9-10885H

Intel Core i9-10980HK

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10980HK

The Intel Core i9-10980HK is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 5.3 GHz (all 8 cores up to 4.4 GHz) and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.3 GHz can be only achieved below 65°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost), between 65 and 85°C, 5.2 GHz are the maximum and above that 5.1 with restrictions (Turbo Boost 3.0).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9980HK, the 10980HK probably offers only increased base clock rates (and maybe multi core turbo clocks). Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i7-10750H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the similar (and later released) Core i9-10885H (2.4 - 5.3 GHz).

Performance

The performance of the Core i9-10980HK should be higher than the old Core i9-9980HK (2.4 - 5 GHz) thanks to the increased turbo clock speeds. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration. At the time of announcement, the i9-10980HK is the fastest Comet Lake-H CPU and fastest laptop CPU on the market. 

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9980HK. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Beware, the CPU was not yet released at the time of writing and the information is based on leaks and early information.

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 5900HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS is a processor for big (gaming) laptops based on the Cezanne generation. The R9 5900HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3 GHz (guaranteed base clock) to 4.6 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process. Compared to the 5900HX (up to 54 W), the 5900HS is configured with a TDP of 35 W.

The new Zen 3 microarchitecture offers a significantly higher IPC (instructions per clock) compared to Zen 2. For desktop processors AMD claims 19 percent on average and in applications reviews showed around 12% gains at the same clock speed.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 iGPU with 8 CUs at up to 2100 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 16 MB of Level 3 cache can be found on the chip.

Performance

The average 5900HS in our database matches the Core i7-12650H, the Core i9-11900H and the Core i9-11980HK in multi-thread performance. Surprisingly enough, it manages to come unbelievably close to the more power-hungry Ryzen 9 5900HX. This is a great CPU in all respects, and laptop makers as well as mini-PC manufacturers are taking notice.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 80 W, the Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC is among the fastest laptops powered by the 5900HS that we know of. It can be at least 10% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 35 W that laptop makers aren't really required to stick to. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The Ryzen 9 5900HS is built with TSMC's 7 nm process for average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-10885H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10885H

The Intel Core i9-10885H is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 5.3 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i9-10855H supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP. 

Performance

The performance of the Core i9-10885H should be slightly above the older Core i9-9980HK top model, thanks to the potential higher single core turbo. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration. At the time of announcement, the i9-10885H is the second fastest Comet Lake-H CPU behind the Core i9-10980HK.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9880H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelIntel Core i9-10980HKAMD Ryzen 9 5900HSIntel Core i9-10885H
SeriesIntel Comet LakeAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)Intel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-HCezanne-HS (Zen 3)Comet Lake-H
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10980HK « 2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS « 3 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS2.8 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS3 - 4.2 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H « 2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2400 - 5300 MHz3000 - 4600 MHz2400 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB2 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 168 / 16
TDP45 Watt35 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm7 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA1440FP6FCBGA1440
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1250 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$583 U.S.$556 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10980HK
36.4 pt (50%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 5900HS
39.9 pt (55%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10885H
36.2 pt (50%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9597     avg: 10605     median: 10590.5 (10%)     max: 11641 Points
min: 11426     avg: 12533     median: 12745.5 (12%)     max: 13214 Points
min: 8802     avg: 9438     median: 9438 (9%)     max: 10074 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1228     avg: 1277     median: 1287 (55%)     max: 1305 Points
min: 1457     avg: 1474     median: 1475.5 (63%)     max: 1488 Points
min: 1284     avg: 1290     median: 1289.5 (55%)     max: 1295 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 465     avg: 488.2     median: 489 (54%)     max: 507 Points
min: 560     avg: 572     median: 571.5 (64%)     max: 584 Points
min: 460     avg: 487.3     median: 489 (54%)     max: 513 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3526     avg: 3933     median: 3883 (9%)     max: 4487 Points
min: 4414     avg: 4843     median: 4895.5 (12%)     max: 5167 Points
min: 2798     avg: 3400     median: 3639 (9%)     max: 3762 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1606     avg: 1739     median: 1737 (11%)     max: 1862 Points
min: 1927     avg: 2053     median: 2041 (13%)     max: 2180 Points
min: 1264     avg: 1502     median: 1517 (10%)     max: 1726 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 198     avg: 206.7     median: 206 (62%)     max: 219 Points
min: 211     avg: 231     median: 236.5 (71%)     max: 240 Points
min: 197     avg: 206.7     median: 211 (64%)     max: 212 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
24.9 Points (32%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.8 Points (70%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6380 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
41235 Points (30%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
71832 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
12016 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
131.2 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6869 Points (11%)
6420 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 43786     avg: 47126     median: 47455 (27%)     max: 49275 MIPS
min: 47553     avg: 55451     median: 57286 (33%)     max: 59680 MIPS
min: 36740     avg: 40519     median: 41823 (24%)     max: 42993 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5081     avg: 5386     median: 5437 (65%)     max: 5542 MIPS
min: 5540     avg: 5663     median: 5653 (68%)     max: 5804 MIPS
min: 5397     avg: 5551     median: 5589 (67%)     max: 5668 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
98.2 fps (34%)
80.5 fps (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
238.5 fps (55%)
217.8 fps (50%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 12     avg: 13     median: 13 (23%)     max: 14.6 fps
min: 12.7     avg: 14.3     median: 14.6 (26%)     max: 15.4 fps
min: 10.6     avg: 11.5     median: 11.3 (20%)     max: 12.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.1 GB/s (26%)
9.9 GB/s (26%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 239     avg: 277.4     median: 279 (2%)     max: 299 Seconds
min: 230.9     avg: 254.5     median: 241 (2%)     max: 305 Seconds
min: 283     avg: 311     median: 302 (2%)     max: 348 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.561     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.596 sec
min: 0.51     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.538 sec
min: 0.564     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.572 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13573     avg: 13765     median: 13765 (29%)     max: 13957 Points
12101 Points (26%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.8 s (2%)
7.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.2 s (1%)
16.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
449 s (2%)
433.9 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 54332     avg: 56780     median: 56779.5 (50%)     max: 59227 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 13629     avg: 16455     median: 16268 (44%)     max: 19000 Points
min: 14968     avg: 15607     median: 15002 (41%)     max: 16852 Points
min: 12279     avg: 14604     median: 14291 (39%)     max: 17242 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
76855 Points (62%)
31296 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
77245 Points (63%)
30997 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
67714 Points (57%)
92395 Points (78%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 14150     avg: 15807     median: 16163 (41%)     max: 17016 Points
min: 16965     avg: 17453     median: 17509 (44%)     max: 17828 Points
min: 11176     avg: 12814     median: 12814 (32%)     max: 14452 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 19789     avg: 21270     median: 21190.5 (38%)     max: 22476 Points
min: 23339     avg: 24112     median: 24106 (43%)     max: 24896 Points
min: 17249     avg: 19483     median: 20594 (37%)     max: 20606 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8448     avg: 9352     median: 9439 (40%)     max: 10020 Points
min: 8261     avg: 8843     median: 8988.5 (38%)     max: 9134 Points
min: 6510     avg: 7798     median: 8203 (35%)     max: 8682 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1283     avg: 1339     median: 1347.5 (57%)     max: 1401 Points
min: 1410     avg: 1485     median: 1497 (63%)     max: 1547 Points
min: 1216     avg: 1303     median: 1317 (56%)     max: 1376 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7634     avg: 8175     median: 8155.5 (15%)     max: 8666 Points
min: 7767     avg: 7848     median: 7867 (14%)     max: 7910 Points
min: 6529     avg: 7045     median: 6914 (12%)     max: 7693 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1222     avg: 1317     median: 1349 (6%)     max: 1380 Points
1502 Points (7%)
min: 1234     avg: 1281     median: 1280.5 (6%)     max: 1327 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7597     avg: 7969     median: 8010 (25%)     max: 8300 Points
7784 Points (25%)
min: 6598     avg: 7172     median: 7172 (23%)     max: 7746 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5615     avg: 5935     median: 5971 (60%)     max: 6218 Points
min: 6311     avg: 6361     median: 6361 (64%)     max: 6411 Points
min: 5672     avg: 5676     median: 5675.5 (57%)     max: 5679 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 29927     avg: 31196     median: 30973 (35%)     max: 32688 Points
min: 31610     avg: 31805     median: 31805 (35%)     max: 32000 Points
min: 26114     avg: 29009     median: 29009 (32%)     max: 31904 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5687 Points (77%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
30205 Points (74%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 722     avg: 748     median: 745 (1%)     max: 764 ms
min: 597     avg: 616     median: 607 (1%)     max: 654 ms
min: 730     avg: 738     median: 734 (1%)     max: 749 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
57793 Points (52%)
65400 Points (59%)
58398 Points (52%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 232     avg: 242.9     median: 243 (51%)     max: 252 Points
min: 255     avg: 272.8     median: 275.5 (57%)     max: 285 Points
min: 233     avg: 234.3     median: 234 (49%)     max: 236 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1414 Points (54%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 139     avg: 149.5     median: 149.5 (26%)     max: 160 Watt
min: 46.3     avg: 66.5     median: 67 (12%)     max: 86.3 Watt
min: 78.1     avg: 103.7     median: 116.4 (20%)     max: 116.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 147     avg: 170.5     median: 170.5 (31%)     max: 194 Watt
min: 66.7     avg: 78.5     median: 69.5 (13%)     max: 99.2 Watt
min: 125.2     avg: 131.2     median: 126 (23%)     max: 142.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
16.8 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 9.05     avg: 10.2     median: 10.2 (8%)     max: 11.4 Points per Watt
min: 21.1     avg: 27.2     median: 27.7 (21%)     max: 32.7 Points per Watt
min: 10.1     avg: 11.5     median: 10.7 (8%)     max: 13.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10980HK → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS → 109% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10885H → 94% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 05. 12:58:03

#0 checking url part for id 11873 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13015 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11962 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.042s ... 0.043s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.043s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11873 +0.021s ... 0.064s

#8 got single benchmarks 11873 +0.075s ... 0.138s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13015 +0.018s ... 0.157s

#10 got single benchmarks 13015 +0.035s ... 0.191s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11962 +0.017s ... 0.208s

#12 got single benchmarks 11962 +0.029s ... 0.237s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.237s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.521s ... 0.758s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.758s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)