Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The APU comes with 12 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.1 GHz, the 16 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 890M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support.

Of the 12 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores and 8 are smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter run at significantly lower clock speeds than the former.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the HX 370 supports LPDDR5x-8000 and DDR5-5600 RAM, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

Given the IPC improvement, we expect 4 Zen 5 cores combined with 8 Zen 5c cores to perform about as well as 16 Zen 4 cores meaning there is a real chance of the HX 370 dethroning the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a laptop powered by the HX 370.

Graphics

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer right now. It features 16 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) running at up to 2,900 MHz. We expect the graphics adapter to deliver gaming performance good enough for playing 2023 and 2024 games in 1080p (Low detail settings).

Naturally, the 890M is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The HX 370 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of mid 2024, energy efficiency.

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

► remove from comparison Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

The Intel Core Ultra 5 258V is an upper mid-range Lunar Lake family processor. This is an SoC for use in tablets and laptops of the slimmer kind that was unveiled in Autumn 2024. It sports 4 new Skymont E-cores and 4 new Lion Cove P-cores running at up to 3.7 GHz and 4.8 GHz respectively, along with the new Arc 140V iGPU and 32 GB of on-package LPDDR5x-8533 RAM. A new 47 TOPS neural engine, Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 5 SSD support are included as well.

The only difference between this chip and the Ultra 7 256V is the amount of on-package, non-replaceable RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB respectively.

Architecture and Features

Lunar Lake is built using the Foveros technology (stacking several dies on top of each other and next to each other), just like Meteor Lake was. The new chips make use of the enormous BGA2833 socket interface. Of the 8 cores, not a single one is Hyper-Threading-enabled which is the opposite of what AMD currently does with its Zen 5/5c chips.

Intel claims Lion Cove cores bring a 14% IPC improvement over Redwood Cove. For Skymont and Crestmont, the difference is much higher at 68%. Several tweaks and improvements are present here, such as the Low Latency Fabric that is supposed to make small data transfers between cores/caches a lot faster. The 258V has a very healthy 12 MB of level 3 cache; elsewhere, it has 4 PCIe 5 and 4 PCIe 4 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices, including NVMe SSDs at up to 15.75 GB/s. Thunderbolt 4 support is onboard by default, as is support for CNVi WiFi 7 + BT 5.4 cards from Intel. The 47 TOPS "AI Boost" neural engine is present along with technologies such as Threat Detection to make AI-enabled applications such as the Windows Defender more powerful.

Intel is predicted to get short of on-package RAM in subsequent CPU generations.

Performance

Based on the time we've had with 2 systems powered by the 258V, the chip's multi-thread performance is as good as that of the Core Ultra 7 165U and the Core i7-1360P. Please note that one of the two systems had a higher long-term TDP power target than the Intel-recommended value: 32 W vs 17 W.

Generally speaking, the 288V, 268V, 266V, 258V, 256V are faster than the 238V, 236V, 228V and 226V due to the difference in their last-level cache size (8 MB vs 12 MB) as well as clock speeds. However, the difference in performance between the slowest Lunar Lake chip, the 226V, and the fastest chip, the 288V is fairly small at around 10% to 15%. It depends on the TDP figures of the laptops being pitted against each other more than on anything else.

Graphics

The Arc Graphics 140V is here to replace the Arc 8 iGPU. Its 8 Xe² architecture "cores" run at up to 1,950 MHz and it also has 8 ray tracing units at its disposal. The adapter is DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled and able to HW-decode a long list of popular video codecs such as h.266 VVC, h.265 HEVC, h.264 AVC, AV1 and VP9. Three SUHD 4320p monitors can be used simultaneously with this iGPU.

All 2023 and 2024 games are playable at 1080p on low graphics settings or higher with this iGPU. We got well over 30 fps in Ghost of Tsushima and almost 40 fps in Baldur's Gate 3. This means the Radeon 780M gets left behind while the Radeon 890M reigns supreme.

Power consumption

This 2nd generation Core Ultra processor is supposed to consume 17 W when under long-term workloads. The Intel-recommended short-term power limit for the chip sits at 37 W.

ModelAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
CodenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)Lunar Lake
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)Intel Lunar Lake
Clock2000 - 5100 MHz2200 - 4800 MHz
L2 Cache12 MB14 MB
L3 Cache24 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
8 / 8
4 x 4.8 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
TDP28 Watt17 Watt
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt37 Watt
Technology4 nm3 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP8BGA2833
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ALPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, USB 4, AI Boost NPU (47 TOPS), Thread Director, PSE, Threat Detection, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNi, FMA3, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1950 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
Series: Lunar Lake Lunar Lake
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V « 2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V compare2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V compare2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V compare2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V compare2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V compare2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
L1 Cache1.4 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.1 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Core Ultra 7 258V
38.2 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 113.6     avg: 116.6     median: 116 (65%)     max: 121 Points
min: 107.8     avg: 118.6     median: 119.7 (67%)     max: 123 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 621     avg: 1060     median: 1135 (21%)     max: 1284 Points
min: 406     avg: 552     median: 572 (11%)     max: 660 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10435     avg: 20440     median: 21761 (20%)     max: 23902 Points
min: 7920     avg: 10141     median: 10358.5 (10%)     max: 11097 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1921     avg: 2010     median: 2018 (85%)     max: 2049 Points
min: 1664     avg: 1852     median: 1860 (78%)     max: 1947 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 753     avg: 789     median: 791 (86%)     max: 804 Points
min: 643     avg: 710     median: 715.5 (78%)     max: 749 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6449     avg: 8372     median: 8830 (22%)     max: 9280 Points
min: 3130     avg: 3936     median: 4027.5 (10%)     max: 4314 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2498.13     avg: 3220     median: 3409.5 (22%)     max: 3551 Points
min: 1280     avg: 1572     median: 1597.5 (10%)     max: 1656 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 192.1     avg: 299.8     median: 307 (85%)     max: 315 Points
min: 258     avg: 283.6     median: 285.5 (79%)     max: 298 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 38.84     avg: 40.2     median: 40.7 (53%)     max: 41.17 Points
19.7 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.68     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.7 Points
3.4 Points (80%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8639     avg: 8701     median: 8668 (52%)     max: 8797 Points
9982 Points (60%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 53766     avg: 55510     median: 56074 (41%)     max: 56689 Points
36479 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 96857     avg: 100361     median: 100569 (64%)     max: 103657 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 15698     avg: 15853     median: 15927 (19%)     max: 15935 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 50.536     avg: 69.8     median: 79.4 (1%)     max: 79.442 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.701     avg: 3.1     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.743 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
296.1 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
9.2 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4008     avg: 4286     median: 4090 (6%)     max: 4759 Points
8536 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 66154     avg: 78114     median: 80572.5 (46%)     max: 83714 MIPS
min: 28482     avg: 34718     median: 35758 (21%)     max: 36724 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5859     avg: 6144     median: 6135 (72%)     max: 6497 MIPS
min: 5265     avg: 5684     median: 5691.5 (67%)     max: 5869 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 169.8     avg: 175.5     median: 171.5 (57%)     max: 185.1 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 304.5     avg: 313.5     median: 306 (71%)     max: 330 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.3     avg: 25.1     median: 26.1 (46%)     max: 28.7 fps
min: 9.65     avg: 12.3     median: 12.4 (22%)     max: 14.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.6     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (47%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
1.2 GB/s (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.5     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (45%)     max: 2.7 GB/s
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 15.3     avg: 15.7     median: 15.3 (40%)     max: 16.6 GB/s
7.6 GB/s (20%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 208     avg: 239.2     median: 221 (3%)     max: 306 Seconds
min: 509     avg: 601     median: 585.5 (7%)     max: 772 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 139     avg: 156.5     median: 148 (1%)     max: 192 Seconds
min: 315     avg: 359.3     median: 353.5 (2%)     max: 452 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3892     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.529 sec
min: 0.443     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4852 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13761     avg: 16184     median: 16571.5 (35%)     max: 17466 Points
10693 Points (23%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.224     avg: 8.3     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.43 s
8.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.504     avg: 17.6     median: 17.6 (1%)     max: 17.767 s
17.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
418.4 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 66119     avg: 73944     median: 75793 (58%)     max: 77565 Points
40813 Points (31%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17129     avg: 20239     median: 20686 (51%)     max: 23282 Points
min: 12322     avg: 14859     median: 15291 (38%)     max: 15903 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 50952     avg: 59510     median: 61220 (50%)     max: 67655 Points
94008 Points (76%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 50955     avg: 60322     median: 61072 (50%)     max: 67802 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 48351     avg: 58447     median: 59313.5 (48%)     max: 66810 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16960     avg: 19395     median: 19571 (50%)     max: 21349 Points
min: 10515     avg: 13408     median: 13744 (35%)     max: 14569 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24918     avg: 29844     median: 30184.5 (54%)     max: 33844 Points
min: 15893     avg: 20642     median: 21092 (38%)     max: 22333 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8866     avg: 10400     median: 10519 (44%)     max: 12293 Points
min: 2097     avg: 6580     median: 7002 (30%)     max: 8295 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2780     avg: 2881     median: 2876 (72%)     max: 2965 Points
min: 2593     avg: 2740     median: 2755.5 (69%)     max: 2795 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 11973     avg: 14488     median: 14896 (58%)     max: 15994 Points
min: 9311     avg: 10876     median: 10972.5 (43%)     max: 11334 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2645     avg: 2952     median: 3105 (99%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12664     avg: 18473     median: 21003 (86%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1957     avg: 2083     median: 2098 (82%)     max: 2160 Points
min: 1891     avg: 1995     median: 2005.5 (78%)     max: 2046 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11394     avg: 14057     median: 14301 (26%)     max: 15759 Points
min: 7717     avg: 9514     median: 9654 (17%)     max: 9864 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1827     avg: 1941     median: 1947 (8%)     max: 2041 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12962     avg: 14070     median: 14244 (45%)     max: 14828 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7480     avg: 8044     median: 8033.5 (80%)     max: 8628 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 42842     avg: 52269     median: 54586.5 (54%)     max: 57060 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 419     avg: 441.1     median: 438 (1%)     max: 503 ms
min: 468     avg: 484.5     median: 475 (1%)     max: 559 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 64079     avg: 107304     median: 107598 (79%)     max: 124105 Points
min: 94615     avg: 107955     median: 112290 (82%)     max: 113526 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 210     avg: 256.3     median: 262 (72%)     max: 277 Points
min: 199.5     avg: 269.7     median: 279.5 (77%)     max: 291 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 252     avg: 307     median: 319 (57%)     max: 347 Points
min: 219     avg: 284.2     median: 294.5 (53%)     max: 314 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1402     avg: 1766     median: 1778 (66%)     max: 1981 Points
min: 1590     avg: 1689     median: 1706.5 (64%)     max: 1742 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.6     avg: 90.8     median: 90.8 (16%)     max: 133.7 Watt
min: 28     avg: 44.8     median: 44.3 (8%)     max: 55.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.3     avg: 94.2     median: 104 (19%)     max: 130.3 Watt
min: 38.2     avg: 53.6     median: 54.1 (10%)     max: 61.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.89     avg: 9.1     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 19.6 Watt
min: 1.484     avg: 4.5     median: 4.3 (3%)     max: 7.21 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.31     avg: 9.5     median: 9.2 (10%)     max: 12.8 Watt
min: 2.25     avg: 5.1     median: 5.5 (6%)     max: 9.04 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 26.9     avg: 36.1     median: 31.4 (23%)     max: 54.9 Points per Watt
min: 26.1     avg: 29.6     median: 29.2 (22%)     max: 33.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 → 100% n=40

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 258V → 80% n=40

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 10. 03:14:58

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17543 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17995 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754788498s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 08 Aug 2025 14:21:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17543 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 17543 +0.028s ... 0.04s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17995 +0.005s ... 0.044s

#10 got single benchmarks 17995 +0.026s ... 0.07s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.07s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.068s ... 0.138s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.139s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)