Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Intel Core i7-1370P vs AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is a powerful Phoenix family chip that saw the light of day in H1 2023. The processor features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at 3.8 GHz. The highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.1 GHz.

Not only does this APU has full might of the Zen 4 architecture at its disposal, it also comes with the new Ryzen AI technology that's set to make generative AI more ubiquitous than ever before. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is coming after Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies; time will tell if this move by AMD is a good idea.

Perhaps more importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is set to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

Elsewhere, the 7840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7840HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-12700H, Core i7-12850HX, Core i9-12900H, Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The 7840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-1370P

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1370P

The Intel Core i7-1370P is the flagship Alder Lake-P CPU, which is to say, an expensive 28 W part meant for use in ultra-light (yet actively cooled) laptops. This CPU will probably be announced in early 2023 and it has 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) mated to 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture) according to a leak on Geekbench. The P-cores are Hyper-Threading-enabled for whopping 20 threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock speeds can reach up to 5.2 GHz for the performance cluster (1.9 GHz base speed) and 1.4 GHz to 3.9 GHz for the efficiency cluster. The CPU is quite similar to the older Core i7-1280P but probably offers higher clock speeds.

Full vPro feature set is supported by this Core i7 ("Enterprise" tier, allowing for remote device management).

Architecture

The i7 is a continuation of Intel's efforts to use the ARM-developed big.LITTLE technology for its own benefit. A single "little" Alder Lake core is supposed to be just as fast as a Skylake core (as found in the venerable Core i7-6700HQ among other options) which is six years old at this point. All of a Core i7-1280P's CPU cores enjoy access to 24 MB of L3 cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 64 GB of LPDDR5-5200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR4x-4267 or DDR4-3200 RAM. Just like the other 12th Gen Intel Core processors, Core i7-1280P comes with Thread Director which is a new functionality designed to help Windows 11 decide which cores to use for what workload for best performance and efficiency possible. Hardware acceleration of AI algorithms is supported via GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). PCI-Express 5.0 support has not found its way into Alder Lake P processors, so users will have to be content with PCI-Express 4.0 for the time being. The CPU still only supports PCIe 4.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets soldered permanently on to the motherboard (BGA1744 socket interface).

Performance

Multi-thread performance is most comparable to AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Intel Core i9-11980HK. Which is impressive but comes with a catch; long-term performance sustainability will be rather poor unless the Power Limits are very high and the cooling solution is a truly capable one.

Graphics

The built-in graphics adapter in the form of the 96 EU Iris Xe running at up to 1.5 GHz has seen no change from what was built into the 11th Gen Tiger Lake-UP3 processors, like a i7-1165G7, which is hardly a downside as this iGPU is loaded with modern features such as AV1 video decoding capability and SUHD 4320p monitor support. 

Power Consumption

The i7's base power consumption (also known as the default TDP value or PL1) is 28 W, with 64 W being its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption (also known as the PL2). The "Minimum Assured" power consumption is fairly high at 20 watts. All in all, an active cooling solution is nearly a must.

Core i7-1370P is built with Intel's third-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7.

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is a powerful Phoenix family APU that saw the light of day in H1 2023. Its 8 cores are powered by the Zen 4 architecture and are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads. 4.0 GHz is the base clock speed and the highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.2 GHz.

The 7940HS introduces Ryzen AI which is AMD's answer to Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies. The Radeon 780M serves as the integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is set to give applications such as DaVinci Resolve and Photoshop quite a bit of generative AI magic.

More importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

The 7940HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600, including ECC-enabled memory). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7940HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-12900HK and also, somewhat disappointingly, the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 80 W, the ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY is among the fastest laptops built around the 7940HS that we know of. It can be about 15% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding most video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1, but more importantly it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 7940HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 7840HSIntel Core i7-1370PAMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Intel Raptor Lake-PAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
CodenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Raptor Lake-PPhoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1370P « 1.4 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1360P1.6 - 5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1350P1.4 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1340P1.4 - 4.6 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz1400 - 5200 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB1.2 MB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB11.5 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1614 / 20
6 x 5.2 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
8 x 3.9 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
8 / 16
TDP35 Watt28 Watt35 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FCBGA1744FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEThread DirectorDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7840HS
45.6 pt (63%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1370P
43.5 pt (60%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7940HS
46.2 pt (64%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 101     avg: 104.5     median: 105 (73%)     max: 107 Points
90 Points (63%)
min: 104     avg: 106     median: 106 (74%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 880     avg: 918     median: 918 (17%)     max: 956 Points
366 Points (7%)
min: 824     avg: 912     median: 937.5 (17%)     max: 972 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15515     avg: 16393     median: 16194.5 (15%)     max: 17214 Points
min: 12778     avg: 13559     median: 13159 (12%)     max: 14741 Points
min: 15556     avg: 16952     median: 16985 (16%)     max: 18131 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1718     avg: 1770     median: 1775 (75%)     max: 1812 Points
min: 1750     avg: 1887     median: 1915 (81%)     max: 1995 Points
min: 1733     avg: 1787     median: 1791 (76%)     max: 1832 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 668     avg: 687     median: 689 (77%)     max: 705 Points
min: 675     avg: 723     median: 729 (81%)     max: 764 Points
min: 680     avg: 701     median: 702 (78%)     max: 714 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6061     avg: 6395     median: 6346.5 (15%)     max: 6744 Points
min: 5079     avg: 5293     median: 5148 (13%)     max: 5651 Points
min: 6277     avg: 6635     median: 6640 (16%)     max: 7111 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2473     avg: 2592     median: 2573 (16%)     max: 2729 Points
min: 2052     avg: 2316     median: 2404 (15%)     max: 2492 Points
min: 2470     avg: 2687     median: 2663 (17%)     max: 2848 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 270     avg: 277.7     median: 278.5 (84%)     max: 286 Points
min: 258     avg: 268.7     median: 264 (80%)     max: 284 Points
min: 277     avg: 283.7     median: 284 (86%)     max: 288 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.7     avg: 30     median: 30 (39%)     max: 30.25 Points
min: 29.8     avg: 30.3     median: 30.3 (39%)     max: 30.88 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (82%)     max: 3.33 Points
min: 3.34     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (85%)     max: 3.46 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7574     avg: 7642     median: 7641.5 (46%)     max: 7709 Points
min: 7798     avg: 7881     median: 7880.5 (48%)     max: 7963 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 45602     avg: 47933     median: 47933 (35%)     max: 50264 Points
min: 47982     avg: 48914     median: 48913.5 (35%)     max: 49845 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 83726     avg: 85395     median: 85395 (59%)     max: 87064 Points
min: 84721     avg: 86625     median: 86625 (60%)     max: 88529 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14015     avg: 14096     median: 14096 (17%)     max: 14177 Points
min: 14300     avg: 14516     median: 14515.5 (18%)     max: 14731 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 71.922     avg: 72.4     median: 72.4 (1%)     max: 72.819 s
min: 66.801     avg: 82.5     median: 82.5 (1%)     max: 98.222 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.626     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (1%)     max: 2.658 s
min: 2.648     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 2.698 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6428     avg: 7064     median: 7063.5 (11%)     max: 7699 Points
min: 7439     avg: 7465     median: 7464.5 (12%)     max: 7490 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 59538     avg: 69127     median: 70330 (40%)     max: 73035 MIPS
min: 48229     avg: 52228     median: 53407 (31%)     max: 55049 MIPS
min: 66408     avg: 70832     median: 70707 (41%)     max: 73434 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6049     avg: 6561     median: 6618 (79%)     max: 6754 MIPS
min: 6140     avg: 6334     median: 6176 (74%)     max: 6687 MIPS
min: 6417     avg: 6643     median: 6642 (79%)     max: 6776 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 144.1     avg: 146.7     median: 146.7 (51%)     max: 149.3 fps
min: 140.8     avg: 145.8     median: 145.8 (51%)     max: 150.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 281.5     avg: 289.8     median: 289.8 (67%)     max: 298 fps
min: 292.5     avg: 298.5     median: 298.5 (69%)     max: 304.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.7     avg: 19.8     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 21.8 fps
min: 9.65     avg: 13.2     median: 14.5 (25%)     max: 15.5 fps
min: 20.1     avg: 21.1     median: 20.9 (37%)     max: 22.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (0%)
min: 1.3     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (0%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14.7     avg: 14.8     median: 14.8 (39%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
min: 14.8     avg: 15     median: 15 (39%)     max: 15.1 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 298     avg: 324.4     median: 318.5 (4%)     max: 463 Seconds
min: 444     avg: 563     median: 472 (6%)     max: 774 Seconds
min: 287     avg: 306.9     median: 305 (4%)     max: 331 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 185     avg: 198.6     median: 196 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
min: 246     avg: 297.7     median: 258 (2%)     max: 389 Seconds
min: 182     avg: 190.4     median: 188.5 (1%)     max: 202 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4184     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4739 sec
min: 0.4244     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4649 sec
min: 0.4159     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4467 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15312     avg: 15685     median: 15663 (33%)     max: 16073 Points
min: 14891     avg: 15553     median: 15689 (33%)     max: 15851 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.112     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (2%)     max: 8.774 s
min: 7.058     avg: 7.3     median: 7.3 (2%)     max: 7.442 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.697     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (1%)     max: 21.271 s
min: 17.513     avg: 18     median: 18 (1%)     max: 18.402 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 655.388     avg: 690     median: 689.9 (3%)     max: 724.411 s
min: 529.929     avg: 531     median: 531.4 (2%)     max: 532.8 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 76708     avg: 82457     median: 83358.5 (73%)     max: 85884 Points
min: 74246     avg: 80834     median: 80476.5 (70%)     max: 86583 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17320     avg: 22172     median: 22611 (61%)     max: 25584 Points
min: 13806     avg: 15963     median: 16281 (44%)     max: 17803 Points
min: 16799     avg: 22601     median: 22587.5 (61%)     max: 25006 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 77280     avg: 89035     median: 91414 (74%)     max: 93910 Points
min: 79935     avg: 88670     median: 89772 (73%)     max: 96559 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 84349     avg: 89853     median: 91645 (74%)     max: 93208 Points
min: 79450     avg: 88483     median: 89602 (73%)     max: 96418 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 84416     avg: 91454     median: 92596 (78%)     max: 95508 Points
min: 85305     avg: 91108     median: 92030 (78%)     max: 96047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13602     avg: 19764     median: 20637 (52%)     max: 21602 Points
min: 7878     avg: 11614     median: 11614 (29%)     max: 15350 Points
min: 13400     avg: 19703     median: 21112 (53%)     max: 21353 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24338     avg: 27673     median: 27816 (50%)     max: 29343 Points
min: 12349     avg: 17660     median: 17659.5 (31%)     max: 22970 Points
min: 24034     avg: 28329     median: 28504 (51%)     max: 30876 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8903     avg: 10942     median: 11131 (47%)     max: 12218 Points
min: 4929     avg: 6987     median: 6987 (29%)     max: 9045 Points
min: 10388     avg: 11211     median: 11210 (47%)     max: 12212 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2585     avg: 2661     median: 2670 (72%)     max: 2721 Points
min: 2639     avg: 2642     median: 2641.5 (71%)     max: 2644 Points
min: 2426     avg: 2618     median: 2630 (71%)     max: 2746 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 12111     avg: 12994     median: 13112 (52%)     max: 13498 Points
min: 12497     avg: 12694     median: 12694 (50%)     max: 12891 Points
min: 9899     avg: 12185     median: 12249 (48%)     max: 13470 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1837     avg: 1966     median: 1963.5 (83%)     max: 2017 Points
min: 1655     avg: 1843     median: 1871.5 (79%)     max: 1974 Points
min: 1823     avg: 1982     median: 1994.5 (84%)     max: 2032 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8446     avg: 11674     median: 11874 (21%)     max: 12339 Points
min: 10184     avg: 11028     median: 11048.5 (20%)     max: 11832 Points
min: 11207     avg: 11870     median: 11837.5 (21%)     max: 12500 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1834     avg: 1891     median: 1895.5 (8%)     max: 1936 Points
1939 Points (8%)
min: 1764     avg: 1874     median: 1906 (8%)     max: 1918 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8572     avg: 11483     median: 11905 (38%)     max: 12278 Points
11474 Points (36%)
min: 11232     avg: 11567     median: 11454 (36%)     max: 12127 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7924     avg: 8100     median: 8148 (81%)     max: 8166 Points
min: 7410     avg: 7856     median: 7904 (79%)     max: 8253 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47599     avg: 48417     median: 48498 (53%)     max: 48906 Points
min: 45905     avg: 46966     median: 46270 (51%)     max: 48723 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 485     avg: 509     median: 512 (1%)     max: 544 ms
min: 479     avg: 484     median: 485 (1%)     max: 487 ms
min: 481     avg: 497.2     median: 499 (1%)     max: 515 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 91356     avg: 91588     median: 91577 (82%)     max: 91831 Points
89067 Points (80%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 232     avg: 263.8     median: 263 (76%)     max: 319 Points
285 Points (82%)
min: 234     avg: 261.2     median: 263 (76%)     max: 271 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 288     avg: 317.1     median: 321 (67%)     max: 339 Points
min: 288     avg: 302     median: 296.5 (62%)     max: 327 Points
min: 302     avg: 319.9     median: 317 (66%)     max: 349 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1566     avg: 1763     median: 1801 (69%)     max: 1891 Points
min: 1728     avg: 1795     median: 1827 (70%)     max: 1830 Points
min: 1674     avg: 1784     median: 1792 (69%)     max: 1861 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 64.7     avg: 93.2     median: 87.2 (15%)     max: 137.9 Watt
min: 36.7     avg: 53     median: 60.3 (10%)     max: 62.1 Watt
min: 70     avg: 103.1     median: 105.2 (18%)     max: 130.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 74.7     avg: 98.9     median: 88.8 (16%)     max: 135.7 Watt
60.6 Watt (11%)
min: 73     avg: 107.5     median: 110.4 (20%)     max: 134 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.73     avg: 13.9     median: 11.6 (8%)     max: 59.2 Watt
min: 3.23     avg: 6.9     median: 5.9 (4%)     max: 12.5 Watt
min: 4.81     avg: 13.3     median: 15.5 (10%)     max: 20.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.09     avg: 13.7     median: 12.6 (14%)     max: 35.5 Watt
min: 8.39     avg: 9.8     median: 9.8 (11%)     max: 11.3 Watt
min: 9.82     avg: 15.9     median: 15.6 (17%)     max: 21.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 20.1     avg: 28.1     median: 29.7 (22%)     max: 33.2 Points per Watt
min: 21.9     avg: 26.5     median: 25.5 (19%)     max: 33.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS → 100% n=28

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1370P → 88% n=28

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS → 101% n=28

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 15. 21:56:36

#0 checking url part for id 14948 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14657 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14946 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.048s ... 0.049s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.049s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14948 +0.019s ... 0.068s

#8 got single benchmarks 14948 +0.062s ... 0.131s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14657 +0.019s ... 0.15s

#10 got single benchmarks 14657 +0.016s ... 0.166s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14946 +0.017s ... 0.184s

#12 got single benchmarks 14946 +0.049s ... 0.233s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.233s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.611s ... 0.844s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.844s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)