NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro P5000 Max-Q (official Nvidia Quadro P5000 with Max-Q Design) is a mobile high-end workstation graphics card for notebooks. It is the power efficient variant of the normal Quadro P5000 for laptops and offers slightly reduced clock speeds (1101 - 1366 MHz versus 1164 - 1506 MHz) and a greatly reduced power consumption (80 versus 100 Watt TGP). Similar to the consumer GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (Laptop), it is based on a slimmed-down GP104 chip with 2048 shaders. The graphics card is designed for the Kaby Lake generation.
The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers , which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.
Performance
The theoretical performance should be slightly below the normal Quadro P4000 due to the reduced clock speeds.
Power Consumption
With an TGP of 80 Watt, the P5000 Max-Q is only slightly higher rated (5 Watt) as the much slower Quadro P3000 (75 Watt) and therefore similar sized laptops can use the P5000 Max-Q.
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia T500 Mobile (formerly known as Quadro T500) for laptops is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer GeForce MX450 and features the same 896 cores and a 64 Bit memory bus. Currently it is available with 2 or 4 GB graphics RAM (GDDR5 or GDDR6). The TDP ranges between 18 - 25 Watt depending on the variant. As the MX450, the T500 also supports PCIe 4.0. The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC.
The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards, the T500 does not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro T2000 with Max-Q Design is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer desktop GTX 1650 Ti therefore currently between a mobile GTX 1650 and GTX 1660 Ti . The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC. Compared to the normal Quadro T2000 , the Max-Q variants are clocked lower and work in a more efficient state. Currently, we know of two variants with different clock speeds and power consumptions (35 and 40 W).
Model Shader TGP (W) Base (MHz) Boost (MHz) Quadro T2000 Mobile 1024 60 1575 1785 Quadro T2000 Max-Q 1024 40 1200 1620 Quadro T2000 Max-Q 1024 35 930 1500 GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop) 1024 75? 1530 1725 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 1536 80 1455 1590 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 896 50 1395 1560
The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.
The performance in professional apps should be clearly lower than a normal (Max-P) Quadro T2000 due to the lower clock speeds, but still ahead the slower Quadro T1000 due to the higher shader count. Compared to consumer cards, the mobile GTX 1650 should be still slower.
Thanks to the relative low power consumption of the Quadro T2000 Max-Q, the GPU is suited for thin and light laptops. The used TU116 chip is manufactured in 12nm FFN at TSMC.
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q Quadro Turing Series Codename N17E-Q5 Max-Q N19P-Q3 MAX-Q Architecture Pascal Turing Turing Pipelines 2048 - unified 896 - unified 1024 - unified Core Speed 1101 - 1366 (Boost) MHz 1365 - 1695 (Boost) MHz 930 / 1200 - 1500 / 1620 (Boost) MHz Memory Speed 6006 MHz 10000 MHz 8000 MHz Memory Bus Width 256 Bit 64 Bit 128 Bit Memory Type GDDR5 GDDR5, GDDR6 GDDR5 Max. Amount of Memory 16 GB 4 GB 4 GB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 Power Consumption 100 Watt 25 Watt 35 - 40 Watt technology 16 nm 12 nm 12 nm Features Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus Notebook Size large medium sized medium sized Date of Announcement 11.01.2017 27.05.2019 27.05.2019 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.com Transistors 4.7 Billion
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T500 Laptop GPU
1.9 pt (6%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1627 avg: 1953 median: 1958 (6%) max: 2270 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 72% 92% 80%
min: 3348 avg: 3352 median: 3352 (10%) max: 3356 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 54% 70% 61%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1554 avg: 1814 median: 1787.5 (5%) max: 2127 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 73% 91% 77%
min: 3066 avg: 3094 median: 3094 (8%) max: 3122 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 56% 70% 59%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
75193 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 15562 avg: 15975 median: 15851 (17%) max: 16513 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 94% 96% 100%
min: 21582 avg: 24992 median: 24991.5 (27%) max: 28401 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 73% 76%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 22719 avg: 24657 median: 23453 (6%) max: 27800 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 84% 82%
min: 39803 avg: 41106 median: 41106 (11%) max: 42409 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 64% 62%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3406 avg: 4047 median: 3973.5 (7%) max: 4833 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 70% 90% 74%
min: 7320 avg: 7544 median: 7543.5 (13%) max: 7767 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 51% 65% 54%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3696 avg: 4322 median: 4224.5 (5%) max: 5141 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 72% 90% 74%
min: 8107 avg: 8262 median: 8261.5 (9%) max: 8416 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 51% 64% 53%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
80696 Points (10%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 6293 avg: 7692 median: 8132 (11%) max: 8212 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 99% 77% 99% 100%
min: 11695 avg: 11907 median: 11907 (17%) max: 12119 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 59% 76% 77%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 6767 avg: 7808 median: 7995.5 (7%) max: 8475 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 80% 95% 93%
min: 11454 avg: 11461 median: 11461 (10%) max: 11468 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 65% 77% 76%
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
39269 Points (11%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
36812 Points (21%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
31133 Points (41%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
36376 Points (48%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 86%
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 94 avg: 97.4 median: 97.4 (24%) max: 100.8 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 74.5 avg: 74.6 median: 74.6 (11%) max: 74.6 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 37.81 avg: 40.3 median: 40.3 (9%) max: 42.75 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 28.57 avg: 32.1 median: 32.1 (8%) max: 35.53 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 50.4 avg: 50.7 median: 50.7 (14%) max: 51 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 6.31 avg: 7.1 median: 7.1 (6%) max: 7.79 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 88.3 avg: 89 median: 89 (36%) max: 89.6 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 88.9 avg: 90.5 median: 90.5 (15%) max: 92 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 93.7 avg: 93.9 median: 93.9 (16%) max: 94 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 64.9 avg: 80.7 median: 82.1 (22%) max: 93.6 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 86% 90% 69%
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 97.2 avg: 100.6 median: 100.6 (27%) max: 103.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 82% 85% 66%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 71.2 avg: 79.2 median: 77.5 (9%) max: 90.8 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 78% 91% 80%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 139.4 avg: 141.6 median: 141.6 (16%) max: 143.8 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 57% 66% 58%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 16.01 avg: 18.9 median: 16.9 (4%) max: 23.87 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 100% 71% 67%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 37.56 avg: 40 median: 40 (9%) max: 42.39 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 100% 49% 46%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 24.84 avg: 29.6 median: 28.7 (6%) max: 36.14 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 73% 86% 69%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 41.71 avg: 44.9 median: 44.9 (9%) max: 48.02 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 63% 74% 59%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 48.47 avg: 53.5 median: 51.9 (6%) max: 62 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 81% 86% 78%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 105.7 avg: 108 median: 108 (12%) max: 110.2 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 54% 58% 52%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 8.57 avg: 9.6 median: 8.7 (3%) max: 12.41 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 69% 71% 69%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 14.87 avg: 15.3 median: 15.3 (5%) max: 15.66 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 60% 62% 60%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 55.8 avg: 62.1 median: 59.2 (9%) max: 74.3 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 77% 83% 75%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 109.6 avg: 113.2 median: 113.2 (17%) max: 116.8 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 57% 61% 56%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 81.9 avg: 88.6 median: 88.3 (10%) max: 95.8 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 88% 97% 85%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 134.6 avg: 139.3 median: 139.3 (15%) max: 143.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 67% 74% 66%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 45.15 avg: 51 median: 50.4 (9%) max: 57.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 83% 91% 78%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 88.9 avg: 91.1 median: 91.1 (16%) max: 93.3 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 60% 66% 56%
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 37.82 avg: 40.2 median: 39.1 (8%) max: 43.59 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 90% 87%
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 66.2 avg: 76 median: 68.8 (11%) max: 93.1 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 74% 71%
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 10.73 avg: 12.1 median: 11 (8%) max: 14.74 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 74% 73%
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 59 avg: 65.5 median: 59.3 (9%) max: 78.1 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 76% 76%
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 8.62 avg: 9.7 median: 8.7 (7%) max: 11.96 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 72% 72%
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 29.28 avg: 34.7 median: 32.7 (16%) max: 41.95 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 70% 78%
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 16.48 avg: 19.2 median: 18 (12%) max: 23.22 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 77% 71%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 19.56 avg: 23.3 median: 21.6 (10%) max: 28.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 75% 68%
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
5840 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
156.6 fps (54%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
141.2 fps (49%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 90% 100%
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 134 avg: 168.8 median: 173 (10%) max: 195 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 69% 99% 78%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 216 avg: 220 median: 220 (13%) max: 224 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 63% 91% 72%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
64.8 fps (12%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
133.4 fps (10%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
119 fps (13%)
150.8 fps (17%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 79%
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
183 fps (4%)
234.9 fps (5%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 78%
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
236 fps (14%)
255.2 fps (15%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 92%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
503 fps (4%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
622 fps (5%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 81%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
653 Samples/s (3%)
1640 Samples/s (7%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 40%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1976 Samples/s (3%)
3050 Samples/s (5%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 65%
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4734 Points (5%)
6331 Points (7%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 75%
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.1 avg: 47.1 median: 47.1 (7%) max: 49 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W 100% 101%
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.6 avg: 43.7 median: 43.7 (6%) max: 50.8 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W 100% 102%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 37.1 avg: 49.9 median: 53 (12%) max: 59.6 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 102% 106% 100%
min: 76.7 avg: 83.3 median: 83.3 (18%) max: 89.9 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 100% 109% 104%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3674 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (38%) max: 0.4555 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 92% 100% 81%
min: 0.3604 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (36%) max: 0.4355 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 89% 100% 81%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.439 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (37%) max: 0.4617 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W 95% 100%
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 36.1 avg: 38.1 median: 38.1 (61%) max: 40.1 dB(A)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 90% 100%
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 34.7 avg: 36.9 median: 36.9 (59%) max: 39 dB(A)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 91% 100%
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU → 0% n= Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q → 0% n=
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
T500 Laptop GPU:
10.9 15 ~ 13 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
182 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
96 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
78 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
55 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
263.3 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
77.5 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
47.6 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
35.1 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
147.4 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
85.5 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
58.1 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
141.3 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
50.3 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
44.5 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
64.2 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
53.1 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
47 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
179 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
94.7 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
77.7 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
51 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
123.4 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
56 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
35.8 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
27.3 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
120.2 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
40.4 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
28.3 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
148.4 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
60.3 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
36.3 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
24.4 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
27.9 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
12.9 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
9.8 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
271 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
86.1 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
69.9 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
40.3 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
83 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
58 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
55 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
50 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
91.5 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
41.7 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
31.2 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
24.6 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
144 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
86.4 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
72.7 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
64.9 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
71 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
53 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
45 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
25 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
101 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
56 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
48 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
42 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
108 113 ~ 111 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
31 72 ~ 52 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
25 34 ~ 30 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
22 33 ~ 28 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
21 32 ~ 27 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
91.9 101 ~ 96 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
76 87 ~ 82 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
64.8 73 ~ 69 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
47.2 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
91 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
25.7 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
145 153 ~ 149 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
132 140 ~ 136 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
118 130 ~ 124 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
108 118 ~ 113 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
181 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
107.6 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
62.5 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
133 148 ~ 141 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
19 23.2 ~ 21 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
79.5 fps
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU low med. high ultra QHD 4K Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 31 17 13 10.1 Immortals Fenyx Rising 65 35 29 24 Star Wars Squadrons 54.7 47.2 42.4 F1 2020 100 59.8 44 29.3 Strange Brigade 111 34 29 25 17.9 9.6 Far Cry 5 52 30 28 27 X-Plane 11.11 70 63 55 29.4 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 50 24 17 12.4 5.73 Dota 2 Reborn 128 118 90 79 27.7 The Witcher 3 96 52 29 20 GTA V 141 97 42 21 13.2 14 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 5 2 2 6 3 6 4 1 7 1 1 3 5
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 2020 182 96 78 55 Gears Tactics 263.3 77.5 47.6 35.1 Doom Eternal 147.4 85.5 58.1 Hunt Showdown 141.3 50.3 44.5 Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 64.2 53.1 47 GRID 2019 179 94.7 77.7 51 Borderlands 3 123.4 56 35.8 27.3 Control 120.2 40.4 28.3 Total War: Three Kingdoms 148.4 60.3 36.3 24.4 Anno 1800 27.86 12.9 9.8 Dirt Rally 2.0 271 86.1 69.9 40.3 Far Cry New Dawn 83 58 55 50 Metro Exodus 91.5 41.74 31.2 24.6 Apex Legends 144 86.4 72.7 64.9 Assassin´s Creed Odyssey 71 53 45 25 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 101 56 48 42 X-Plane 11.11 96 82 69 47.2 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 91 45 33 25.7 13 Dota 2 Reborn 149 136 124 113 46 The Witcher 3 181 107.6 62.5 33 BioShock Infinite 79.5 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 6 12 1 8 10 1 2 11 6 1 4 8 3 1 1 2
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.27
log 16. 15:09:53
#0 checking url part for id 8084 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10605 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9886 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:38:48 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.12s ... 0.121s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.121s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.121s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8084 +0.035s ... 0.156s
#9 got single benchmarks 8084 +0s ... 0.156s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10605 +0.019s ... 0.175s
#11 got single benchmarks 10605 +0.019s ... 0.193s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9886 +0.002s ... 0.195s
#13 got single benchmarks 9886 +0.014s ... 0.209s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.209s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.337s ... 0.546s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.546s
#17 Got 190 rows for game benchmarks. +0.031s ... 0.577s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.577s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.016s ... 0.594s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.057s ... 0.65s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.65s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.653s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)