Verdict — Quality Hardware With Lacking Graphics
The HyperX Omen 15 is an interesting option in the midrange gaming category. Its strengths lie in the beautiful 3K OLED display and strong looks despite the use of plastic surfaces. The heavy weight indubitably has its drawbacks, but it also contributes to a sense of quality that lighter budget gaming laptops tend to lack. The spacious and comfortable keyboard and easy serviceability deserve praise as well as they take advantage of the relatively thick profile.
The biggest drawback is arguably the 85 W GeForce RTX 5070 which can feel underpowered against the otherwise crisp 3K 1800p display. While older titles run well, newer titles like Forza Horizon 6 or Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced begin to struggle at 1440p or higher even with DLSS upscaling or FG enabled. Thus, you'll have to play around with minute settings more carefully than usual to fit the native 3K resolution.
Other gaming laptops with the exact same RTX 5070 GPU tend to run 10 to 20 percent faster than our Omen 15 such as the Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 or even HP's own HyperX Omen 16. The deficit is largely due to the higher TGP ceilings that most other models in the gaming category tend to offer.
It's unfortunate that the current Omen 15 offers no RTX 5070 Ti options as that would have addressed our main gripe with the model. The existing chassis design has the potential to support an RTX 5070 Ti based on our temperature and power findings. Instead, users will have to upgrade to the pricier and even larger Omen Max series for graphics options higher than the regular RTX 5070.
Pros
Cons
Price and Availability
The HyperX Omen 15 as reviewed is now shipping directly from the manufacturer for $2150.
The HyperX Omen 15 is part of HP's midrange gaming laptop series in contrast to the lower-end Victus series and enthusiast-level Omen Max series. Our last 15-inch Omen model was all the way back in 2021 and so a lot has changed since then.
Our test unit comes fully configured with the Core Ultra 9 386H Panther Lake CPU, 85 W GeForce RTX 5070 GPU, and 1800p 120 Hz OLED display for approximately $2150. Lesser SKUs may come with lower resolution IPS displays or slower RTX options.
Competitors in this space include other budget-midrange gaming laptops like the Acer Nitro V 15, Gigabyte G5 KF5, or the MSI Cyborg 15.
More HP reviews:
Specifications
Case
The chassis takes inspiration from the recent Omen 16 with its similar build and plastic materials. Overall quality is better than expected for the midrange category even if it doesn't feel as sleek or luxurious as a Razer Blade or MSI Stealth.
Connectivity
Port options are somewhat barebones despite the sizable form factor. Additionally, note that the USB-C port along the rear does not support Thunderbolt likely to keep costs in check.
Communication
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Webcam
2 MP camera integrates IR but no privacy shutter.
Maintenance
Upgradeable components include two DDR5 SODIMM slots and two M.2 PCIe4 2280 SSD slots. The latter is particularly notable as even the larger Omen 16 doesn't support two full-length 2280 M.2 SSDs as shown below.
Sustainability
Portions of the keyboard consist of post-consumer recycled plastic while the packaging is largely cardboard and paper with a bit of plastic for the AC adapter.
Accessories And Warranty
There are no extras in the box other than the AC adapter and paperwork. The usual one-year limited warranty applies.
Input Devices
The model adopts the keyboard and clickpad of the recent Omen 16 for the same typing experience albeit with slight changes to the font.
Display
Three display options are available as follows all with VRR support as standard. None support touch or G-Sync.
- 1920 x 1200, 165 Hz, IPS, 400 nits, 100% sRGB, matte
- 2560 x 1600, 180 Hz, IPS, 500 nits, 100% sRGB, matte
- 2880 x 1800, 120 Hz, OLED, 500 nits SDR, 1100 nits HDR, 100% DCI-P3, glossy
The OLED panel in particular is better than most options on other midrange gaming laptops in terms of resolution and HDR support. However, users who don't value full P3 colors may want to consider the lower resolution and less expensive IPS options especially since they arguably pair better with the RTX 5070 and aren't nearly as reflective.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 480.4 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.14 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 0.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}
94.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.5% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
CCT: 6482 K
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Samsung SDC422E, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3", 120 Hz | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 EF25QBA63.E, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.3", 165 Hz | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 BOEhydis NE156FHM-NXA, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 165 Hz | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG CMN N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 Sharp SHP153F (LQ156M1JW30), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 360 Hz | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng CMN1560, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -0% | -52% | -48% | -20% | -52% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.5 | 99.9 0% | 40.3 -59% | 43.4 -56% | 67.9 -32% | 43 -57% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 60.3 -40% | 64.8 -35% | 98.9 -1% | 64.3 -36% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 94.7 | 94.1 -1% | 41.6 -56% | 44.9 -53% | 68.8 -27% | 34.7 -63% |
| Response Times | 20% | -4811% | -3706% | -1654% | -3798% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.54 ? | 0.41 ? 24% | 39 ? -7122% | 27.6 ? -5011% | 13 ? -2307% | 28.6 ? -5196% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.8 ? | 0.65 ? 19% | 20.8 ? -2500% | 20 ? -2400% | 8.8 ? -1000% | 20 ? -2400% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 959.32 ? | 1298.2 ? | ||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 30 | 25 17% | ||||
| Screen | -22% | -92% | -137% | -59% | -131% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 480.4 | 484.5 1% | 382 -20% | 286 -40% | 342 -29% | 324 -33% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 482 | 495 3% | 347 -28% | 272 -44% | 308 -36% | 303 -37% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 95 -3% | 86 -12% | 87 -11% | 87 -11% | 87 -11% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.31 | 0.17 | 0.29 | 0.26 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.14 | 3.4 -8% | 4.34 -38% | 4.61 -47% | 2.46 22% | 4.7 -50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.13 | 6.01 2% | 19.19 -213% | 19.59 -220% | 4.12 33% | 18.19 -197% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.7 | 1.6 -129% | 2.4 -243% | 3.9 -457% | 3.03 -333% | 3.9 -457% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.22 99% | 2.165 102% | 2.236 98% | 2.51 88% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6482 100% | 6762 96% | 7024 93% | 6792 96% | 7056 92% | 7541 86% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.59 | 3.56 | 2.99 | 0.82 | 2.93 | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1232 | 1682 | 1179 | 1246 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
-6% | -1652% /
-939% | -1297% /
-761% | -578% /
-338% | -1327% /
-776% |
* ... smaller is better
The display comes very well calibrated against the P3 standard with average grayscale and color deltaE values of only 0.7 and 3.14, respectively.
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.38 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.42 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.6 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.27 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.27 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 959.32 Hz Amplitude: 30 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 959.32 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 959.32 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7600 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Performance
Testing Conditions
We set Windows and Omen Gaming Hub to Performance mode prior to running the benchmarks below.
Processor Performance
The Core Ultra 9 386H is within just 10 to 15 percent of the older Core i9-14900HX champion in terms of raw multi-thread performance while demanding much less power in the process.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench 2026: CPU Multi
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) -1! | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 -1! | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M24) -3! | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV -1! | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 -3! | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 -1! | |
| Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH -3! | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG -1! | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng -1! | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 -1! | |
| MSI Thin GF63 12VE -3! | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (873 - 1271, n=11) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (118.1 - 126.8, n=11) | |
| Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Cinebench 2026 / CPU Multi | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (3799 - 5151, n=7) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench 2026: CPU Multi
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 -1! | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr -1! | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H -1! | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 -1! | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG -1! | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 -1! | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (10001 - 21921, n=11) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (53370 - 113595, n=11) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (2776 - 5604, n=11) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (5314 - 7333, n=11) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (28414 - 61578, n=11) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (46362 - 72112, n=11) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (669 - 1287, n=11) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (5138 - 11672, n=11) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (54042 - 89891, n=11) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (4051 - 4858, n=10) | |
System Performance
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Geekbench AI: Single Precision GPU 1.7 | Half Precision GPU 1.7 | Quantized GPU 1.7
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 -5! | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG -5! | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 -5! | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng -3! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Geekbench AI / Single Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Geekbench AI / Half Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Geekbench AI / Quantized GPU 1.7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 9701 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (75437 - 129946, n=11) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (81021 - 118858, n=11) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (75959 - 135096, n=11) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (87.2 - 118.6, n=11) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latency
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
The Samsung MZVMX1T0HCLD PCIe4 SSD would return unusual CDM benchmark write results even after multiple tries. It otherwise operated normally during regular use and when running other benchmarks including DiskSpd.
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance
Since most gaming laptops with the same GeForce RTX 5070 tend to be 100 W or greater, the 85 W version in our HP falls a bit short by just a few percentage points on average. Running on the quieter Balanced mode instead of Performance mode would entail a further 8 percent hit to graphics performance as shown by our Fire Strike table below.
| Power Profile | Graphics Score | Physics Score | Combined Score |
| Performance Mode | 33399 | 29525 | 11398 |
| Balanced Mode | 30778 (-8%) | 29430 (-0%) | 11330 (-1%) |
| Battery Power | 23779 (-29%) | 21560 (-27%) | 7778 (-32%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 33758 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 52108 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 27540 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 12675 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2588 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 -2! | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG -2! | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Forza Horizon 6 | |
| 1920x1080 medium AA:T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (105 - 118, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| 1920x1080 extreme AA:T | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (74 - 77, n=2) | |
| 1920x1080 extreme + RT AA:T | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (23 - 42, n=2) | |
| 2560x1440 extreme + RT AA:T | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (15 - 25, n=2) | |
| 2560x1440 extreme + RT + DLSS perf. AA:T | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (18 - 30, n=2) | |
| F1 24 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| NVIDIA KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 1-Click OC | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (63.8 - 94.7, n=21) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| NVIDIA KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 1-Click OC | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (40.3 - 60, n=21) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Quality DLSS AF:16x | |
| NVIDIA KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 1-Click OC | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (62.9 - 94, n=18) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Extended Raytracing AA:T | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (47 - 47, n=2) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Extended Raytracing + DLSS Balanced AA:T | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Extended Raytracing AA:T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (34 - 35, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 181.8 | 175.2 | 130.8 | 114.4 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 163.6 | 147.7 | 144.1 | 137.1 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 208 | 160.3 | 124.6 | 92.6 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 105.7 | 97.5 | 80.4 | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 457 | 317 | 265 | 228 | 153 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 170.5 | 145 | 128.9 | 129.2 | 127.1 | 86.9 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 139.6 | 123.2 | 106.8 | 96.9 | 68.2 | 59.3 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 224 | 239 | 220 | 80.1 | 78.3 | 51.7 |
| Forza Horizon 6 (2026) | 105 | 77 | 42 | 30 | 25 | |
| Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced (2026) | 80 | 72 | 47 | 62 | 34 |
Emissions
System Noise
Fan noise when gaming is similar to competitors at the low 50 dB(A) range meaning that the HP doesn't run any louder despite its cooler-than-expected temperatures. If gaming on the slower Balanced mode, fan noise would drop considerably from 52.3 dB(A) to 46.4 dB(A).
Noise level
| Idle |
| 25.1 / 25.1 / 26 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 45.7 / 52.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.8 dB(A) | ||
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | -8% | -2% | -2% | -1% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.8 | 22.7 8% | 24 3% | 24 3% | 23 7% | 24 3% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25.1 | 22.8 9% | 28 -12% | 25 -0% | 23 8% | 28 -12% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25.1 | 22.8 9% | 29 -16% | 28 -12% | 23 8% | 29 -16% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 26 | 26.6 -2% | 33 -27% | 33 -27% | 27.87 -7% | 30 -15% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 45.7 | 42.7 7% | 48 -5% | 44 4% | 54.82 -20% | 40 12% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 52.3 | 52 1% | 52 1% | 45 14% | 54.82 -5% | 46 12% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 52.2 | 51.9 1% | 54 -3% | 50 4% | 54.82 -5% | 48 8% |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
Surface temperatures when gaming are cooler than expected with hot spots only in the mid 30 C range.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.6 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.6 °C / 76.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+4.2 °C / 7.5 F).
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -41% | -33% | -47% | -61% | -34% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 33.8 | 42.2 -25% | 46 -36% | 46 -36% | 50 -48% | 43 -27% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 32.4 | 49 -51% | 49 -51% | 45 -39% | 66 -104% | 43 -33% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 22.8 | 31.8 -39% | 28 -23% | 36 -58% | 32 -40% | 37 -62% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 24.4 | 35.8 -47% | 30 -23% | 38 -56% | 37 -52% | 28 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
Stress Test
The system would boost to 3.4 GHz, 80 W, and 88 C when initiating Prime95 stress before falling to 3.0 GHz, 60 W, and 72 C roughly 30 seconds later to represent limited Turbo Boost sustainability. We expected better for a dedicated gaming laptop with an H-series CPU, but at least the dip is relatively minor.
GPU power draw when running Cyberpunk 2077 on Balanced mode and Performance mode would average 69 W and 84 W, respectively, which aligns with our 3DMark and fan noise observations above.
| CPU Clock (GHz) | GPU Clock (MHz) | Average CPU Temperature (°C) | Average GPU Temperature (°C) | |
| System Idle | -- | -- | 41 | 38 |
| Prime95 Stress | 3.0 | -- | 72 | 44 |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 2.3 | 1837 | 66 | 61 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 Stress (Balanced mode) | 1.4 | 2182 | 61 | 61 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 Stress (Performance mode) | 1.8 | 2625 | 62 | 63 |
Speakers
HP Omen 15-ga0931nr audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Energy Management
Power Consumption
Our HP demands noticeably less power than the Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 by about 25 percent when running games. Of course, the Lenovo system sports the faster CPU and targets higher TGP ceilings with the same RTX 5070 for slightly faster gaming performance on average.
| Off / Standby | 0.32 / 0.84 Watt |
| Idle | 4.6 / 6.4 / 15.4 Watt |
| Load |
74.1 / 186.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, , OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3" | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, , OLED, 2560x1600, 15.3" | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPMSJ-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -44% | -55% | -46% | -41% | -15% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 4.6 | 6.9 -50% | 16.8 -265% | 14.9 -224% | 5.2 -13% | 7.9 -72% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 6.4 | 8.3 -30% | 17.6 -175% | 16.3 -155% | 19.6 -206% | 9.2 -44% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 15.4 | 31 -101% | 19.8 -29% | 22.2 -44% | 23 -49% | 13.5 12% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 74.1 | 90.2 -22% | 66 11% | 72 3% | 84 -13% | 78 -5% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 132.2 | 179.1 -35% | 106.5 19% | 90.3 32% | 144 -9% | 128.4 3% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 131.8 | 179.7 -36% | 105 20% | 89.6 32% | 144 -9% | 126.7 4% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 186.7 | 247 -32% | 119 36% | 117 37% | 165 12% | 187 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
Battery Life
WLAN runtime is above average for a gaming laptop at just over 9 hours when set to iGPU mode.
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 70 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 80 Wh | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 76 Wh | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 55.2 Wh | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 70 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -3% | -40% | -41% | -21% | -53% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 9.2 | 8.9 -3% | 5.5 -40% | 5.4 -41% | 7.3 -21% | 4.3 -53% |
| H.264 (h) | 6.1 | |||||
| Load (h) | 1.1 |
Notebookcheck Rating
The 2026 HP HyperX Omen 15 combines a striking 3K OLED display with a strong chassis and a slightly underpowered GeForce RTX 5070.
HP Omen 15-ga0931nr
- 10/14/2026 v8
Allen Ngo
Total Sustainability Score: Potential Competitors in Comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 85.6%  | HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Intel Core Ultra 9 386H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory | List Price: 2000 USD | 2.3 kg | 23.6 mm | 15.30" 2880x1800 222 PPI OLED |
2. 86.7%  | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory | List Price: 2300 USD | 1.9 kg | 19.95 mm | 15.30" 2560x1600 197 PPI OLED |
3. 73.7%  | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1049 EUR | 2.1 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
4. 75.2%  | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Intel Core 7 240H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1099 EUR | 2.2 kg | 23.2 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
5. 76.3%  | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 Intel Core i7-13620H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 899 Euro | 2 kg | 22.7 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
6. 75.8%  | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1000 EUR | 2.4 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
No comments for this article
