Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

A budget gamer for $1,200: HP Victus 15 RTX 5050 laptop review

Saving measures.

With the RTX 5050 version of the Victus 15, HP is offering one of the most affordable gaming laptops based on Nvidia's Blackwell architecture. We put the 15-inch model through its paces and discuss all its pros and cons in this article.
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Andrew Dickson) Published 🇩🇪
Nvidia Geforce Blackwell RTX 5000 Intel Raptor Lake Gaming Laptop

Verdict - Affordable with cut corners

At a current price of around $1,200, the review model Victus 15-fa2160ng doesn't have it all its own way in a competitive market. Compared to other RTX 5050 laptops, the price is commendable and finds itself on the lower end of the scale. However, for a similar price, there's also the Lenovo LOQ Essential 15, which, according to the spec sheet, aims to turn customer's heads with a better display (100% sRGB). Unlike its Lenovo competitors, the Full HD IPS panel installed in the Victus 15 has to put up with a poor color gamut, which makes content appear rather washed out. To make matters worse, the first RTX 5060 laptops are already being sold at a relatively small premium, with some of them (depending on the application) offering a decent, if not earth-shattering performance boost. 

Basically, buyers will know what to expect in the $1,000 segment. The plastic case and speakers are of average quality, as are the battery capacity and connectivity (no USB 4). However, the upgrade options have turned out to be quite positive. In addition to two M.2 slots, the 15-inch model also includes two SO-DIMM banks. Noise and temperature production under load are also better than a number of competing devices.

Pros

+ consistent performance
+ two RAM as well as two SSD slots
+ moderate emissions

Cons

- CPU somewhat outdated
- limited color space
- no card reader

Price and availability

The HP Victus 15-fa2160ng can be purchased on various online stores starting at around $1,200.

The Victus 15’s competitors include other affordable gaming notebooks with an RTX 5050 or RTX 5060, such as the Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1, the Lenovo LOQ 15 and HP's own Omen 16, all of which appear in the comparison tables along with the Victus 15, which is powered by the RTX 4050.

Specifications

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (Victus 15 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-13420H 8 x 1.5 - 4.6 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2212 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 80 W TDP, GDDR7, ForceWare 581.57, Optimus
Memory
24 GB 
, SO-DIMM DDR5-5600, two slots (one empty)
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, CMN1560, IPS, Full-HD, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU, 512 GB 
, NVMe-SSD, two M.2 2280 slots (one empty)
Soundcard
Intel Alder Point-M/P PCH - HD Audio
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Line-In/Out
Networking
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek RTL8852BE (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 23.5 x 358 x 255 ( = 0.93 x 14.09 x 10.04 in)
Battery
70 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4 Cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: HD 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 200 W Power Supply, Omen Gaming Hub, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.356 kg ( = 83.11 oz / 5.19 pounds), Power Supply: 660 g ( = 23.28 oz / 1.46 pounds)
Price
1000 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case

One area you shouldn't expect particularly high quality is the case. The 15-inch devices' surfaces are entirely made of plastic and tend to rattle here and there. The build quality, however, is beyond reproach, with all elements of the review device blending seamlessly together. The display's maximum opening angle of around 135° is neither small nor especially large.

HP Victus 15
HP Victus 15
HP Victus 15
HP Victus 15

At 2.4 kg, the Victus 15 is more or less in line with its 15- and 16-inch counterparts, although the 17-inch Erazer Scout is just under 0.3 kg heavier. The HP laptop's height of almost 2.4 cm (without its feet) is also not out of the ordinary.

Size comparison

397 mm / 15.6 in 276 mm / 10.9 in 26 mm / 1.024 in 2.7 kg5.97 lbs360 mm / 14.2 in 259 mm / 10.2 in 24 mm / 0.945 in 2.4 kg5.39 lbs358 mm / 14.1 in 255 mm / 10 in 24 mm / 0.945 in 2.3 kg5.13 lbs358 mm / 14.1 in 255 mm / 10 in 23.5 mm / 0.925 in 2.4 kg5.19 lbs357.5 mm / 14.1 in 269 mm / 10.6 in 23.7 mm / 0.933 in 2.4 kg5.28 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Features

Interfaces

The connectivity proves to be somewhat lacking. Buyers will not only have to do without modern USB protocols, but also without a card reader. However, the port distribution is quite well-designed, since they are located at the rear of the sides, and therefore hardly interfere during mouse use.

Left side: DC-IN, USB-A 3.0, Line in/out
Left side: DC-IN, USB-A 3.0, Line in/out
Right side: USB-C 3.0 (DP 1.4 + PD), RJ45 LAN, USB-A 3.0, HDMI 2.1
Right side: USB-C 3.0 (DP 1.4 + PD), RJ45 LAN, USB-A 3.0, HDMI 2.1

Communication

The installed Realtek Wi-Fi module (RTL8852BE) is somewhat faster than the MediaTek chip found in its predecessor, but it still can't reach truly high speeds. Only the Erazer Scout's performance managed to impress us in our test comparison field.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1301 (579min - 1471max) MBit/s +59%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1862, n=120, last 2 years)
1225 MBit/s +49%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Realtek RTL8852BE
943 (903min - 985max) MBit/s +15%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Realtek RTL8852BE
823 (788min - 855max) MBit/s 0%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Realtek RTL8852BE
820 (780min - 855max) MBit/s
Average Realtek RTL8852BE
  (536 - 943, n=64)
788 MBit/s -4%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
MediaTek MT7921
713 (682min - 751max) MBit/s -13%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1618 (985min - 1684max) MBit/s +68%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1745, n=120, last 2 years)
1422 MBit/s +48%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Realtek RTL8852BE
963 (944min - 972max) MBit/s
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Realtek RTL8852BE
935 (908min - 952max) MBit/s -3%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Realtek RTL8852BE
890 (438min - 961max) MBit/s -8%
Average Realtek RTL8852BE
  (455 - 985, n=65)
862 MBit/s -10%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
MediaTek MT7921
730 (716min - 738max) MBit/s -24%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø820 (780-855)
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø713 (682-751)
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1282 (579-1471)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø823 (788-855)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø943 (903-985)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø962 (944-972)
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø729 (716-738)
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1617 (985-1684)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø934 (908-952)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø875 (438-961)

Webcam

As with most laptops, the webcam quality is best left unsaid. Both the color accuracy and the image sharpness also leave a lot to be desired.

ColorChecker
12.7 ∆E
15 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
16 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
12 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
0.6 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
2 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Victus 15-fa2160ng: 13.11 ∆E min: 0.6 - max: 20.89 ∆E

Accessories

The laptop comes with a few information booklets and a 200-watt power supply.

Maintenance

The base plate is secured by seven small Phillips screws and several hooks, some of which are very tight. Under the hood, you have access to every component (see photos).

HP Victus 15
HP Victus 15
HP Victus 15
HP Victus 15

Sustainability

Unfortunately, HP still uses various plastic films for its packaging material.

Warranty

The warranty in Germany covers 12 months.

Input devices

Keyboard

The input devices are relatively good, without inspiring enthusiasm. The keyboard uses the entire width of the case and features a full-size numeric keypad and white, single-level backlighting. We'd describe the layout as a touch confusing - especially when it comes to the upper right corner and the position of the power button, as well as the "Insert," "Print Screen," and "Delete" keys. Some users may also long for larger arrows.

HP Victus 15

Touchpad

The touchpad delivers discreet performance. Its 12.5 x 8 cm surface offers solid gliding characteristics and is mostly responsive. However, the click surfaces tend to rattle - as is the case with numerous other laptops.

Display

Unfortunately, the Victus 15 doesn't boast a vivid display. Unlike some competitors, the 144 Hz panel is weak, particularly in terms of color coverage. While 64% sRGB is slightly better than its predecessor, it's still pretty underwhelming.

296
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
324
cd/m²
292
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
313
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
CMN1560 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 324 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 303.1 cd/m² Minimum: 23 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 324 cd/m²
Contrast: 1246:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.7 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
calibrated: 2.93
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
34.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
64.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
43% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
CCT: 7541 K
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
CMN1560, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
BOE094D, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
BOEhydis NV173FHM-NX4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 144 Hz
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
CSOT MNF601BA1-4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AUODBB2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 144 Hz
Display
-1%
-4%
70%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage (%)
43
39.2
-9%
37.7
-12%
67.3
57%
40
-7%
sRGB Coverage (%)
64.3
57.9
-10%
56.3
-12%
99.2
54%
58.1
-10%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)
34.7
40.5
17%
39
12%
69.1
99%
38.7
12%
Response Times
18%
25%
-13%
3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)
28.6 ?(13.4, 15.2)
23.8 ?(11.1, 12.7)
17%
21.4 ?(10.4, 11)
25%
33.9 ?(15.5, 18.4)
-19%
27.6 ?(12.9, 14.7)
3%
Response Time Black / White * (ms)
20 ?(10.7, 9.3)
16.3 ?(7.6, 8.7)
18%
15 ?(7.7, 7.3)
25%
21.2 ?(10.2, 11)
-6%
19.4 ?(9.6, 9.8)
3%
PWM Frequency (Hz)
Screen
-10%
-5%
35%
2%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
324
273
-16%
279
-14%
318
-2%
328
1%
Brightness (cd/m²)
303
249
-18%
260
-14%
300
-1%
313
3%
Brightness Distribution (%)
87
84
-3%
90
3%
89
2%
91
5%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
0.26
0.28
-8%
0.24
8%
0.2
23%
0.26
-0%
Contrast (:1)
1246
975
-22%
1163
-7%
1590
28%
1262
1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.7
5.19
-10%
4.97
-6%
1.33
72%
4.73
-1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
18.19
21.16
-16%
20.52
-13%
4.42
76%
17.47
4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.93
4.54
-55%
4.58
-56%
0.94
68%
4.22
-44%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.9
1.7
56%
1.7
56%
1.9
51%
2.05
47%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.148 102%
2.201 100%
2.187 101%
2.63 84%
CCT
7541 86%
6819 95%
6937 94%
6678 97%
6718 97%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
2% / -4%
5% / -0%
31% / 36%
1% / 1%

* ... smaller is better

In its factory state, the panel is generally not color-accurate due to having a strong blue hue, which can, however, be corrected by calibration.

CalMAN: Gray scales
CalMAN: Gray scales
CalMAN: Color saturation
CalMAN: Color saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Gray scales (calibrated)
CalMAN: Gray scales (calibrated)
CalMAN: Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)

Providing you don't take the laptop outside or into the sun, the rest of the results are solid. This starts with a black level of 0.26 cd/m², which, combined with a brightness of approximately 300 cd/m², results in an IPS-typical contrast ratio of more than 1,200:1. Viewing angles and response times are also decent.

HP Victus 15 vs sRGB
HP Victus 15 vs sRGB
HP Victus 15 vs AdobeRGB
HP Victus 15 vs AdobeRGB
HP Victus 15 vs DCI-P3
HP Victus 15 vs DCI-P3
Daylight
Daylight
Subpixels
Subpixels
Viewing angle
Viewing angle

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.7 ms rise
↘ 9.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.4 ms rise
↘ 15.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

100 % brightness
100 % brightness
75 % brightness
75 % brightness
50 % brightness
50 % brightness
25 % brightness
25 % brightness
0 % brightness
0 % brightness

Performance

While the review configuration's 24 GB of DDR5 RAM is quite respectable, at 512 GB, the SSD could be larger. HP is also using an outdated processor for price reasons.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

Test conditions

The Omen Gaming Hub offers four operating modes, with our tests being based on the performance profile.

Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Mode Silent Eco Standard Performance
Cyberpunk 2077 Noise 35 dB(A) 37 dB(A) 41 dB(A) 46 dB(A)
Cyberpunk 2077 Performance (FHD/Ultra) 38.7fps 56.7fps 67.3fps 71fps
Cyberpunk 2077 GPU Power Draw ~30 W ~60 W ~70 W ~80 W
Cinebench R15 Multi Score 1,422 points 839 points 1,703 points 1,756 points

Processor

In the meantime, the Core i5-13420H is a few years old and still manufactured using the outdated 10nm process. The Raptor Lake model contains four performance cores, including Hyper-Threading and eight efficiency cores without HT. This allows a total of 20 threads to be processed simultaneously. In the benchmark test, the Victus 15 ended up at the bottom of the test field, although the predecessor's Core i5-13500H and the Core 5 210H found in the Scout 17 E1 are often only marginally faster. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 7 250 offers more than 30 % additional performance, and the Ryzen 9 8940HX housed in the Omen 16, almost 70 %.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Test

0215430645860107512901505172019352150236525802795301032253440365538704085Tooltip
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Intel Core i5-13420H: Ø1493 (1461.13-1737.69)
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng Intel Core i5-13500H: Ø1859 (1813.15-2238.76)
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Intel Core 5 210H: Ø1790 (1711.45-1850.05)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250: Ø2469 (2446.48-2543.88)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX: Ø4084 (4037.14-4295.53)
CPU Performance rating - Percent
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
85.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
84.7 pt
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250
65.8 pt
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H
55.3 pt
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng -4!
Intel Core i5-13500H
51.8 pt
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
 
50.2 pt
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H
49.1 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
27145 Points +145%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 40970, n=145, last 2 years)
25153 Points +127%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250
16154 Points +46%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H
14081 Points +27%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H
12609 Points +14%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H
11084 Points
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (8691 - 11871, n=4)
10374 Points -6%
Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2267, n=145, last 2 years)
1978 Points +17%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
1917 Points +13%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H
1767 Points +5%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H
1704 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (1673 - 1705, n=4)
1691 Points 0%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H
1689 Points
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250
1649 Points -2%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
10439 Points +146%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 16108, n=144, last 2 years)
9687 Points +128%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250
6320 Points +49%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H
5345 Points +26%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H
4855 Points +14%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H
4252 Points
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (3329 - 4524, n=4)
4079 Points -4%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 870, n=144, last 2 years)
764 Points +18%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
745 Points +15%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250
694 Points +7%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H
685 Points +6%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H
655 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (641 - 655, n=4)
649 Points 0%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H
647 Points
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
4296 (4037.14min - 4295.53max) Points +147%
Average of class Gaming
  (1537 - 6271, n=144, last 2 years)
3893 Points +124%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250
2544 (2446.48min - 2543.88max) Points +46%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H
2239 (1813.15min - 2238.76max) Points +29%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H
1850 (1711.45min - 1850.05max) Points +6%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H
1738 (1461.13min - 1737.69max) Points
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (1492 - 1815, n=4)
1679 Points -3%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (188.8 - 343, n=143, last 2 years)
293 Points +25%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
292 Points +24%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250
279 Points +19%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H
247 Points +5%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H
243 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (235 - 244, n=4)
240 Points +2%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H
235 Points
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (289 - 403, n=4)
330 Seconds * -3%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H
319 Seconds *
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H
265 Seconds * +17%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H
260 Seconds * +18%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250
204 Seconds * +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (80 - 517, n=140, last 2 years)
154.2 Seconds * +52%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
116 Seconds * +64%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
103455 MIPS +156%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 148086, n=142, last 2 years)
91186 MIPS +126%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250
63475 MIPS +57%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H
52066 MIPS +29%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H
45778 MIPS +13%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H
40421 MIPS
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (35680 - 44970, n=4)
39427 MIPS -2%
7z b 4 -mmt1
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
7407 MIPS +48%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250
6485 MIPS +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7508, n=142, last 2 years)
6392 MIPS +28%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H
5519 MIPS +10%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H
5324 MIPS +6%
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (5003 - 5331, n=4)
5214 MIPS +4%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H
5003 MIPS
Geekbench 6.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 22104, n=142, last 2 years)
15595 Points +85%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
11447 Points +36%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250
9956 Points +18%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H
9453 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (7216 - 9262, n=4)
8541 Points +1%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H
8444 Points
Single-Core
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
2816 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3253, n=142, last 2 years)
2778 Points +25%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250
2586 Points +16%
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (2231 - 2365, n=4)
2292 Points +3%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H
2231 Points
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H
2199 Points -1%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 27010, n=141, last 2 years)
16726 Points +114%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
13357 Points +71%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250
9720 Points +24%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H
8899 Points +14%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H
7811 Points
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (6895 - 8336, n=4)
7742 Points -1%
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2423, n=141, last 2 years)
2001 Points +26%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
1961 Points +24%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250
1911 Points +21%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H
1734 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (1583 - 1669, n=4)
1631 Points +3%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H
1583 Points
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (7.7 - 44.3, n=142, last 2 years)
27.1 fps +124%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
25.7 fps +112%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250
18.1 fps +50%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H
14.6 fps +21%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H
14.4 fps +19%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H
12.1 fps
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (8.75 - 13.3, n=4)
11.5 fps -5%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H
69.8 s *
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H
65.5 s * +6%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H
64.1 s * +8%
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (46.5 - 69.8, n=4)
59.5 s * +15%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250
53.5 s * +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 88.8, n=141, last 2 years)
47.6 s * +32%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
45.9 s * +34%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H
0.545 sec *
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (0.501 - 0.545, n=4)
0.521 sec * +4%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H
0.51 sec * +6%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H
0.4932 sec * +10%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250
0.4471 sec * +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3551 - 0.759, n=143, last 2 years)
0.4281 sec * +21%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
0.4215 sec * +23%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
235 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1738 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
144.2 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4252 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
647 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1689 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11084 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
518 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
95 Points
Help
Performance rating
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
94.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
73.3 pt
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
57 pt
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
38.3 pt
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
37.2 pt
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
32.8 pt
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
 
32.8 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
43311 KRay/s +323%
Average of class Gaming
  (7192 - 85542, n=140, last 2 years)
28185 KRay/s +176%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
24656 KRay/s +141%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
12857 KRay/s +26%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
11489 KRay/s +12%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
10227 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (7922 - 11106, n=4)
9941 KRay/s -3%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
171374 Points +234%
Average of class Gaming
  (35040 - 252486, n=140, last 2 years)
127261 Points +148%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
98709 Points +92%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
61679 Points +20%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
57595 Points +12%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
51376 Points
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (40587 - 59715, n=4)
51293 Points 0%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
7988 MB/s +224%
Average of class Gaming
  (1728 - 10389, n=140, last 2 years)
5850 MB/s +137%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
4563 MB/s +85%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
2621 MB/s +6%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
2468 MB/s
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (1724 - 2634, n=4)
2285 MB/s -7%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
2180 MB/s -12%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
169334 Points +143%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=140, last 2 years)
119677 Points +71%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
114915 Points +65%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
77835 Points +12%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
76434 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (69803 - 74956, n=4)
71512 Points +2%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
69803 Points
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
26855 Points +308%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
14798 Points +125%
Average of class Gaming
  (5020 - 33636, n=140, last 2 years)
14395 Points +118%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
7538 Points +14%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
6589 Points
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (5485 - 6625, n=4)
6330 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
5715 Points -13%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
90684 Points +255%
Average of class Gaming
  (17585 - 134044, n=140, last 2 years)
65586 Points +157%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
53836 Points +111%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
28657 Points +12%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
26483 Points +4%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
25553 Points
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (19684 - 27607, n=4)
24713 Points -3%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
150768 MB/s +205%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 247074, n=140, last 2 years)
109362 MB/s +121%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
68090 MB/s +38%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
62657 MB/s +27%
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (35531 - 93100, n=4)
56477 MB/s +14%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
51414 MB/s +4%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
49420 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
1784 MB/s +145%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2531, n=140, last 2 years)
1532 MB/s +110%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
1074 MB/s +48%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
947 MB/s +30%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
728 MB/s
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (509 - 744, n=4)
674 MB/s -7%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
635 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
23193 KRay/s +316%
Average of class Gaming
  (3856 - 45446, n=140, last 2 years)
15086 KRay/s +171%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
13039 KRay/s +134%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
6106 KRay/s +9%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
5928 KRay/s +6%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
5577 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (4283 - 5831, n=4)
5353 KRay/s -4%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 62916, n=140, last 2 years)
42854 MPixel/s +92%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
37988 MPixel/s +70%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
26998 MPixel/s +21%
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (12330 - 37044, n=4)
23774 MPixel/s +6%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
23228 MPixel/s +4%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
22348 MPixel/s
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
18283 MPixel/s -18%

System performance

The system's performance is sometimes affected by its rather weak SSD (more on that later). Applications sometimes take a bit longer to launch or load than on comparable devices.

Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance rating
Average of class Gaming
 
92.3 pt
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
88.9 pt
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 -2!
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
80.8 pt
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 -4!
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
71.9 pt
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng -5!
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
71 pt
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
65.7 pt
Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
 
65.7 pt
PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=119, last 2 years)
8073 Points +39%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
8054 Points +38%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
7304 Points +25%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
6812 Points +17%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
5828 Points
Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)
5828 Points 0%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (8840 - 12600, n=123, last 2 years)
10754 Points +22%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
10709 Points +21%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
10292 Points +16%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
9521 Points +8%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
9067 Points +3%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
8840 Points
Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)
8840 Points 0%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
9831 Points +44%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=119, last 2 years)
9830 Points +44%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
9226 Points +35%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
8890 Points +30%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
6845 Points
Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)
6845 Points 0%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (7440 - 19351, n=119, last 2 years)
13674 Points +54%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
13465 Points +52%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
11137 Points +25%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
10134 Points +14%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
8879 Points
Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)
8879 Points 0%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=114, last 2 years)
1984 Points +45%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
1903 Points +39%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
1746 Points +28%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
1618 Points +18%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
1366 Points
Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)
1366 Points 0%
CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2211, n=114, last 2 years)
1863 Points +34%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
1831 Points +32%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
1764 Points +27%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
1585 Points +14%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
1386 Points
Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)
1386 Points 0%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2729, n=114, last 2 years)
2215 Points +60%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
2112 Points +52%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
1757 Points +27%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
1706 Points +23%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
1387 Points
Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)
1387 Points 0%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=114, last 2 years)
1736 Points +39%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
1664 Points +33%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
1562 Points +25%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
1471 Points +18%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
1249 Points
Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)
1249 Points 0%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
322 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (237 - 532, n=117, last 2 years)
315 Points +28%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
267 Points +8%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
247 Points
Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)
247 Points 0%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (176.4 - 345, n=113, last 2 years)
284 Points +26%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
253 Points +12%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
240 Points +6%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
226 Points
Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)
226 Points 0%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
577 ms *
Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)
577 ms * -0%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
545 ms * +6%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
543 ms * +6%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
534 ms * +7%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
509 ms * +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (397 - 674, n=127, last 2 years)
473 ms * +18%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
5828 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming
  (21750 - 104987, n=140, last 2 years)
70703 MB/s +109%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
58240 MB/s +72%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
44253 MB/s +31%
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (22003 - 59609, n=4)
37838 MB/s +12%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
35838 MB/s +6%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
33849 MB/s
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
29102 MB/s -14%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming
  (22956 - 104349, n=140, last 2 years)
73602 MB/s +97%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
58128 MB/s +56%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
46858 MB/s +26%
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (23759 - 68085, n=4)
42242 MB/s +13%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
37325 MB/s
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
35634 MB/s -5%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
30770 MB/s -18%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming
  (22297 - 133486, n=140, last 2 years)
72141 MB/s +103%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
58085 MB/s +63%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
46904 MB/s +32%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
42376 MB/s +19%
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (21429 - 62529, n=4)
38997 MB/s +10%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
35568 MB/s
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
32239 MB/s -9%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
103.6 ns *
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=140, last 2 years)
101.6 ns * +2%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
99.9 ns * +4%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
98.4 ns * +5%
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (90.2 - 103.6, n=4)
96.6 ns * +7%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
87.5 ns * +16%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
83.5 ns * +19%

* ... smaller is better

DPC latencies

Latency is also less than perfect. The LatencyMon tool identified potential issues for certain applications.

LatencyMon
LatencyMon
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
4787 μs * -29%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
3702 μs *
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
3622 μs * +2%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
1425.3 μs * +61%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
1229.6 μs * +67%

* ... smaller is better

Mass storage

As previously mentioned, the SSD isn't among the fastest models. It achieved solid sequential results and didn't throttle in the loop test. This is an area where most of the competitors still have their noses in front - even its predecessor.

Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4987 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2844 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 461.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 443.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2146 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2757 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 61.31 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 150.9 MB/s
Drive Performance rating - Percent
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
91 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
77.9 pt
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
68.6 pt
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
61.4 pt
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
60.8 pt
Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
 
52.4 pt
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
49.2 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
3632 (3569.55min - 3631.92max) MB/s +55%
Average of class Gaming
  (281 - 8300, n=125, last 2 years)
3495 MB/s +49%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
3031 (2761.74min - 3031.45max) MB/s +29%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
2866 (2793.62min - 2866.04max) MB/s +22%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
2751 (2717.09min - 2750.83max) MB/s +17%
Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (2348 - 2738, n=2)
2543 MB/s +8%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
2348 (1978.66min - 2347.68max) MB/s
seq write
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
5256 (5197.58min - 5255.67max) MB/s +84%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
4251 (3917.4min - 4251.35max) MB/s +49%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 9699, n=125, last 2 years)
3986 MB/s +40%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
3704 (3259.18min - 3704.34max) MB/s +30%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
3526 (3357.33min - 3526.44max) MB/s +24%
Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (2853 - 2887, n=2)
2870 MB/s +1%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
2853 (2754.08min - 2853.34max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
7258 (6649.77min - 7257.61max) MB/s +44%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
7004 (5842.1min - 7004.24max) MB/s +39%
Average of class Gaming
  (2644 - 15056, n=125, last 2 years)
6911 MB/s +37%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
6270 (5201.78min - 6270.02max) MB/s +25%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
5846 (5427.01min - 5846.07max) MB/s +16%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
5029 (4142.71min - 5029.17max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (5008 - 5029, n=2)
5019 MB/s 0%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
6103 (6005.82min - 6102.92max) MB/s +118%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
5750 (5600.99min - 5749.76max) MB/s +105%
Average of class Gaming
  (1281 - 13519, n=125, last 2 years)
5564 MB/s +99%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
5471 (5285.79min - 5471.43max) MB/s +95%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
5013 (4747.47min - 5013.45max) MB/s +79%
Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (2801 - 2873, n=2)
2837 MB/s +1%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
2801 (2775.9min - 2801.17max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
76.5 (75.54min - 76.49max) MB/s +24%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.2 - 110.2, n=125, last 2 years)
69.3 MB/s +12%
Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (61.8 - 61.9, n=2)
61.9 MB/s 0%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
61.8 (60.32min - 61.82max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
61.6 (60.1min - 61.6max) MB/s 0%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
58 (56.64min - 57.95max) MB/s -6%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
51.7 (50.4min - 51.66max) MB/s -16%
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
247 (242.52min - 246.64max) MB/s +63%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=125, last 2 years)
211 MB/s +39%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
179.1 (173.23min - 179.12max) MB/s +18%
Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (152 - 170.2, n=2)
161.1 MB/s +6%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
152 (148.54min - 152max) MB/s
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
137.8 (136.03min - 137.79max) MB/s -9%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
96.7 (95.77min - 96.65max) MB/s -36%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
4137 (4111.19min - 4136.71max) MB/s +341%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 8067, n=125, last 2 years)
2574 MB/s +174%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
2354 (2337.78min - 2354max) MB/s +151%
Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (939 - 1751, n=2)
1345 MB/s +43%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
939 (881.99min - 939.36max) MB/s
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
889 (844.18min - 889.18max) MB/s -5%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
864 (769.87min - 864.23max) MB/s -8%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
3371 (3357.07min - 3370.53max) MB/s +556%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
2348 (2236.98min - 2347.75max) MB/s +357%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 5653, n=125, last 2 years)
2158 MB/s +320%
Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (514 - 1626, n=2)
1070 MB/s +108%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
514 (503.15min - 513.84max) MB/s
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
452 (444.25min - 452.18max) MB/s -12%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
356 (352.83min - 355.66max) MB/s -31%
AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
8387 Points +124%
Average of class Gaming
  (2858 - 13854, n=123, last 2 years)
6906 Points +84%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
5084 Points +36%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
4983 Points +33%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
4745 Points +27%
Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (3745 - 3775, n=2)
3760 Points 0%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
3745 Points
Score Read
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
3093 Points +169%
Average of class Gaming
  (953 - 4418, n=123, last 2 years)
2375 Points +107%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
1672 Points +46%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
1384 Points +21%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
1331 Points +16%
Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (1148 - 1479, n=2)
1314 Points +14%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
1148 Points
Score Write
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
3725 Points +81%
Average of class Gaming
  (1375 - 7208, n=123, last 2 years)
3375 Points +64%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
3046 Points +48%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
2843 Points +38%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
2555 Points +24%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
2059 Points
Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (1608 - 2059, n=2)
1834 Points -11%
Seq Read
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
5402.1 MB/s +66%
Average of class Gaming
  (2272 - 9890, n=123, last 2 years)
5274 MB/s +63%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
5161.69 MB/s +59%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
4595 MB/s +42%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
4523.34 MB/s +39%
Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (3245 - 3935, n=2)
3590 MB/s +11%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
3244.89 MB/s
Seq Write
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
5036.34 MB/s +166%
Average of class Gaming
  (114.5 - 9926, n=123, last 2 years)
3941 MB/s +108%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
3249 MB/s +71%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
2706.08 MB/s +43%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
2348.36 MB/s +24%
Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (1896 - 2410, n=2)
2153 MB/s +14%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
1896.49 MB/s
4K Read
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
79.42 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 108.4, n=123, last 2 years)
68.5 MB/s +12%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
61.02 MB/s
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
58.8 MB/s -4%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
58.66 MB/s -4%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
56.57 MB/s -7%
Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (50 - 61, n=2)
55.5 MB/s -9%
4K Write
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
251.38 MB/s +35%
Average of class Gaming
  (75.6 - 512, n=123, last 2 years)
218 MB/s +17%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
189.4 MB/s +2%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
185.71 MB/s
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
180.28 MB/s -3%
Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (153.7 - 185.7, n=2)
169.7 MB/s -9%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
75.56 MB/s -59%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
2473.44 MB/s +224%
Average of class Gaming
  (517 - 3630, n=123, last 2 years)
1781 MB/s +134%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
1160.79 MB/s +52%
Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (763 - 1036, n=2)
899 MB/s +18%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
866 MB/s +14%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
762.74 MB/s
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
758.5 MB/s -1%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
3146.3 MB/s +87%
Average of class Gaming
  (991 - 5909, n=123, last 2 years)
2766 MB/s +64%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
2532 MB/s +50%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
2392.18 MB/s +42%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
2068.42 MB/s +23%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
1683.79 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (1213 - 1684, n=2)
1448 MB/s -14%
Access Time Read
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
0.146 ms *
Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (0.051 - 0.146, n=2)
0.0985 ms * +33%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
0.098 ms * +33%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
0.095 ms * +35%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
0.075 ms * +49%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
0.069 ms * +53%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=123, last 2 years)
0.05744 ms * +61%
Access Time Write
Average of class Gaming
  (0.012 - 0.277, n=123, last 2 years)
0.04041 ms * -102%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
0.022 ms * -10%
Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (0.02 - 0.023, n=2)
0.0215 ms * -8%
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
0.021 ms * -5%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
0.02 ms *
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
0.019 ms * +5%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
0.015 ms * +25%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036573010951460182521902555292032853650401543804745511054755840620565706935Tooltip
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4980 (2883.06-5021.63)
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3764 (3113.91-6375.34)
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5817 (5172.14-5840.63)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5490 (1238.79-7073.06)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7228 (5964.95-7269.15)

GPU performance

HP has opted to use a limited TGP for its graphics card. While the RTX 5050 in the Scout 17 E1 runs at a maximum of 115 watts, the Victus 15 only uses a maximum of 80 watts, something clearly evident from the measurements. Medion's competitor gains a few percent in 3DMark tests, although the predecessor's RTX 4050 lags behind by about 15%. Meanwhile, the RTX 5060 achieves an increase of 18 to 27%.

3DMark Performance rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
100 pt
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
86.1 pt
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
79.8 pt
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
70.6 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
 
69.1 pt
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
67.7 pt
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
57.6 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (13523 - 80022, n=137, last 2 years)
48379 Points +51%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
41341 Points +29%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
36563 Points +14%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
33119 Points +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (32115 - 33119, n=3)
32485 Points +1%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
32115 Points
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
28713 Points -11%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (6487 - 62849, n=151, last 2 years)
36024 Points +33%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
33014 Points +22%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
30913 Points +14%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
28040 Points +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (26850 - 28040, n=3)
27305 Points +1%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
27025 Points
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
21949 Points -19%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (2295 - 25984, n=148, last 2 years)
14924 Points +62%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
12135 Points +32%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
11655 Points +27%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
9784 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (9202 - 9814, n=3)
9600 Points +4%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
9202 Points
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
7843 Points -15%
3DMark 11 Performance
25519 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
50444 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
22488 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
9098 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-13500H
30 Seconds * -7%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Intel Core 5 210H
29 Seconds * -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (28 - 29, n=2)
28.5 Seconds * -2%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Intel Core i5-13420H
28 Seconds *
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 250
21 Seconds * +25%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
21 Seconds * +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=139, last 2 years)
19.2 Seconds * +31%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-13500H
52 Seconds * -4%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Intel Core 5 210H
50 Seconds * -0%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Intel Core i5-13420H
50 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (50 - 50, n=2)
50 Seconds * -0%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 250
38 Seconds * +24%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
38 Seconds * +24%
Average of class Gaming
  (15 - 110, n=140, last 2 years)
31.9 Seconds * +36%

* ... smaller is better

Gaming performance

You shouldn't expect the RTX 5050 to exceed its native 1,920 x 1,080 pixels when gaming, but if you exclude extremely demanding or poorly optimized games such as Oblivion Remastered and Borderlands 4, most titles run smoothly in Full HD even at maximum settings. Anyone seeking higher frame rates could consider upscaling in addition to reducing the detail level. Using DLSS Quality, for example, the frame rate in Battlefield 6 rose from 54 to 69fps, and with quadruple frame generation, it even peaked at 149fps, although subjectively the image appeared very uneven.

Performance rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
99 pt
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX
88.9 pt
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250
80.7 pt
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H
75.5 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
 
71.6 pt
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H
66.3 pt
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.7 - 169.9, n=141, last 2 years)
101.1 fps +42%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250
88.6 (71min) fps +25%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX
86.6 (59min) fps +22%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H
76.9 (63min) fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (71 - 76.9, n=3)
74.4 fps +5%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H
71 (56min) fps
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (37.2 - 246, n=107, last 2 years)
134.8 fps +68%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX
109.1 fps +36%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250
101 (49.2min, 62.3P0.1, 91.9P1) fps +26%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H
86.3 (77.3min, 77.6P0.1, 78.9P1) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (80.4 - 86.3, n=3)
82.5 fps +3%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H
80.4 (32.8min, 47.1P0.1, 69.4P1) fps
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX
127.5 (2.93min, 83.3P1) fps +45%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 186.9, n=130, last 2 years)
124.3 fps +41%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H
117.6 (27.6min, 83.3P1) fps +33%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250
108.7 (8.82min, 76.9P1) fps +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (88.1 - 117.6, n=3)
106.2 fps +21%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H
88.1 (18min, 55.6P1) fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 215, n=141, last 2 years)
135.9 fps +58%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250
118.1 fps +37%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX
111 fps +29%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H
102 fps +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (86.2 - 102, n=3)
96.2 fps +12%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H
86.2 fps
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 456, n=129, last 2 years)
260 fps +50%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250
223 (32.5min, 170P1) fps +29%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX
217.8 (86.3min, 152.5P1) fps +26%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H
189.6 (107.2min, 138.3P1) fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (173.4 - 189.7, n=3)
184.2 fps +6%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H
173.4 (80.7min, 122.2P1) fps
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX
161.6 (132.4min) fps +39%
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 248, n=143, last 2 years)
154.3 fps +33%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250
121.5 (104.6min) fps +5%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H
119.9 (92.2min) fps +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (116.2 - 119.9, n=2)
118.1 fps +2%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H
116.2 (96.1min) fps
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (33.4 - 150.2, n=146, last 2 years)
103.9 fps +59%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX
93.9 fps +43%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H
77.1 fps +18%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250
72.1 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (65.5 - 77.1, n=2)
71.3 fps +9%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H
65.5 fps
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 155.1 132.2 88.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 126.2 121.7 116.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 105.2 86.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 76.2 65.5
Strange Brigade (2018) 234 192.2 173.4
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 96.9 82.4 80.4
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 92 78.8 71
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) 72.3 54.7 53.8
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) 47.4 33.9
Space Marine 2 (2024) 54.8 54.3 52.8
Stalker 2 (2024) 42 38.9 33.8
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) 83.2 67.6 46.8
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered (2025) 48.3 45.1 22.9
F1 25 (2025) 96 93 18
Borderlands 4 (2025) 35.7 29.6 16
Battlefield 6 (2025) 87.7 73.6 53.9
Performance rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
100 pt
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250
73.9 pt
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H
72.1 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
 
67.4 pt
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H
62.5 pt
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (22.9 - 61.9, n=15, last 2 years)
39.4 fps +72%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250
26.5 (9.18min, 9.5P0.1, 13.9P1) fps +16%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H
25 (4.14min, 6.43P0.1, 18.6P1) fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (22.9 - 25, n=2)
24 fps +5%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H
22.9 (6.7min, 7.24P0.1, 11.7P1) fps
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (46.8 - 130.3, n=14, last 2 years)
82 fps +75%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250
61.1 (48.6min, 48.8P0.1, 50.9P1) fps +31%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H
51.6 (41.3min, 42P0.1, 43.1P1) fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (46.8 - 51.6, n=2)
49.2 fps +5%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H
46.8 (31min, 31.9P0.1, 38.7P1) fps
Stalker 2 - 1920x1080 Epic Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (33.8 - 147.6, n=17, last 2 years)
57.6 fps +70%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250
42 (18.3min, 21.8P0.1, 29.9P1) fps +24%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H
39.9 (30.4min, 30.4P0.1, 33.2P1) fps +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (33.8 - 39.9, n=2)
36.9 fps +9%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H
33.8 (24.5min, 24.6P0.1, 25.7P1) fps
Space Marine 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (52.8 - 108, n=15, last 2 years)
79 fps +50%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H
70.8 (46.3min, 51P0.1, 58.1P1) fps +34%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250
65.2 (45.7min, 49P0.1, 50P1) fps +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (52.8 - 70.8, n=2)
61.8 fps +17%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H
52.8 (26min, 28.7P0.1, 35.8P1) fps
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 - 1920x1080 High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (33.9 - 86.1, n=17, last 2 years)
53.1 fps +57%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250
40.8 (37min, 37.6P0.1, 38.2P1) fps +20%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H
35.1 (32.4min, 32.6P0.1, 33.5P1) fps +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (33.9 - 35.1, n=2)
34.5 fps +2%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H
33.9 (23.3min, 27.8P0.1, 31.1P1) fps
Horizon Forbidden West - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (14.7 - 140.3, n=21, last 2 years)
76.2 fps +42%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H
62 (50min, 50.3P0.1, 51P1) fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (53.8 - 62, n=2)
57.9 fps +8%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H
53.8 (33.4min, 37P0.1, 41.8P1) fps
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250
52.9 (35.4min, 36.5P0.1, 40.5P1) fps -2%

One positive aspect in the long-term test with Cyberpunk 2077 was the absence of any anomalies relating to throttling or the like.

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop: Ø65.9 (61.8-66.6)
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop: Ø69.1 (66.5-69.6)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø80 (76.1-80.8)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø78.2 (74.1-78.9)

Emissions

Noise emissions

In 3D-based operations, the Victus 15 is quieter than the competition, although the average recorded noise level of 46 dB(A) during Cyberpunk 2077 is by no means quiet. Compared to its predecessor, the noise levels under load don't seem to have increased. When the laptop is inactive, the fans are still constantly active in performance mode, reaching just under 30 dB(A).

Noise level

Idle
28 / 29 / 30 dB(A)
Load
40 / 48 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2048.341.140.838.441.72539.538.536.535.938.43142.747.344.243.445.24029.931.229.631.530.85036.627.230.528.835.56326.624.734.924.131.78019.618.317.515.626.410021.517.517.315.825.912523.718181628.61602619.419.917.128.12002824.722.622.230.62502620.320.116.129.531526.717.219.213.131.14003023.420.911.933.850030.82221.911.336.663028.818.419.610.735.480029.417.119.71136100029.714.41911.236.9125030.413.918.110.537.4160029.113.3171136.9200028.713.617.511.537250028.514.317.811.837.7315027.214.117.612.435.1400027.312.916.312.434.4500027.413.113.312.633.9630023.4131312.735.180001913.413.212.931.31000016.713.513.112.725.91250014.91312.912.321.91600013.212.111.911.718.9SPL4027.929.724.347.7N3.411.20.66.2median 27.3median 14.3median 17.8median 12.4median 33.9Delta3.82.72.91.74hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Victus 15-fa2160ng
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
Noise
-2%
-9%
-32%
1%
off / environment * (dB)
24
25
-4%
24
-0%
25
-4%
23
4%
Idle Minimum * (dB)
28
29
-4%
27
4%
43
-54%
23
18%
Idle Average * (dB)
29
30
-3%
29
-0%
45
-55%
23
21%
Idle Maximum * (dB)
30
31
-3%
32
-7%
48
-60%
27.64
8%
Load Average * (dB)
40
40
-0%
47
-18%
53
-33%
49.5
-24%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)
46
55
-20%
51
-11%
49.5
-8%
Load Maximum * (dB)
48
48
-0%
58
-21%
53
-10%
52.73
-10%
Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)
42

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

 The perfectly acceptable maximum case temperatures on the top and bottom of 43°C are quite moderate. In idle mode, most areas remain below the 30°C mark.

Max. Load
 38 °C
100 F
43 °C
109 F
42 °C
108 F
 
 29 °C
84 F
40 °C
104 F
37 °C
99 F
 
 23 °C
73 F
27 °C
81 F
28 °C
82 F
 
Maximum: 43 °C = 109 F
Average: 34.1 °C = 93 F
43 °C
109 F
42 °C
108 F
37 °C
99 F
39 °C
102 F
41 °C
106 F
27 °C
81 F
28 °C
82 F
27 °C
81 F
23 °C
73 F
Maximum: 43 °C = 109 F
Average: 34.1 °C = 93 F
Power Supply (max.)  42 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
Heat
13%
-2%
-10%
9%
Maximum Upper Side * (°C)
43
42
2%
42
2%
49
-14%
36
16%
Maximum Bottom * (°C)
43
42
2%
45
-5%
58
-35%
37
14%
Idle Upper Side * (°C)
37
24
35%
30
19%
32
14%
30
19%
Idle Bottom * (°C)
28
24
14%
35
-25%
29
-4%
32
-14%

* ... smaller is better

Stress test

The components also don't get excessively hot, and the CPU and GPU settled to 74 °C and 77 °C, in the stress test using the Furmark and Prime95 tools.

Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077

Speakers

When it comes to sound quality, the Victus 15 outperforms the Erazer Scout 17. Overall, however, the sound can still only be described as mid-range. As is very often the case, the bass is particularly lacking.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.448.92535.941.83143.448.94031.532.45028.828.36324.127.28015.620.610015.820.91251632.116017.139.420022.247.825016.155.931513.159.640011.965.550011.365.963010.767.78001165.9100011.266.4125010.568.816001171.1200011.573.1250011.869.5315012.467.8400012.470.9500012.674.9630012.772.4800012.973.41000012.774.51250012.360.91600011.755.7SPL24.383N0.656.6median 12.4median 66.4Delta1.77.535.53734.435.143.842.93030.725.624.424.125.915.72213.120.113.330.514.839.918.148.613.854.312.952.213.457.213.158.912.164.211.370.811.267.611.363.711.560.111.562.612.46812.56512.767.913.459.213.459.113.251.51347.412.54812.155.824.676.80.637.2median 12.9median 58.90.67.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Victus 15-fa2160ngMedion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Energy management

Power consumption

Thanks in no small part to its limited TGP, the 15-inch model is generally more economical than the competition. 8 to 13 watts in idle mode and 78 to 187 watts under load are acceptable for the performance on offer.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 1.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 7.9 / 9.2 / 13.5 Watt
Load midlight 78 / 187 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-2%
-41%
-52%
-28%
-76%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
7.9
5
37%
13.5
-71%
20
-153%
7.8
1%
Idle Average * (Watt)
9.2
9
2%
14.8
-61%
20.7
-125%
8.8
4%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
13.5
22
-63%
22.9
-70%
22.7
-68%
21.5
-59%
Load Average * (Watt)
78
72
8%
87
-12%
71
9%
119
-53%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt)
128.4
173.4
-35%
153.1
-19%
192
-50%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)
126.7
171.9
-36%
151.1
-19%
164.5
-30%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
187
176
6%
195
-4%
172
8%
208
-11%
Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt)
113

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø131.4 (125.3-135)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.2 (7.86-13.5)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø128.4 (124.2-135.8)

Power consumption with an external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø72.6 (64.4-96)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø96.2 (69.7-117.5)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø122.2 (115.4-134.2)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø16.6 (15.1-24.3)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø126.7 (113-133.1)

Battery runtime

The runtime test was conducted using balanced mode. Interestingly, despite the identical battery capacity of 70 Wh, the runtime was significantly worse than its predecessor. Instead of around 7.5 hours, the new Victus 15 only kept going for just under 4 hours while surfing the internet, and this is comparable to both the Scout 17 E1 and the Lenovo LOQ 15.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
4h 15min
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 70 Wh
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 53 Wh
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 70 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery runtime
74%
-9%
5%
16%
52%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
4.3
7.5
74%
3.9
-9%
4.5
5%
5
16%
Reader / Idle (h)
6.9
Load (h)
1.3
1.3
H.264 (h)
5.1

Notebookcheck overall rating

With the RTX 5050 and RTX 5060 laptop prices often being quite similar, things are currently hot in the $1,000 segment. Before purchasing the Victus 15, you should be aware that HP has achieved this moderate price as a result of various cost-cutting measures, including the display.

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng - 10/24/2025 v8
Florian Glaser

Chassis
69 / 98 → 71%
Keyboard
79%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
56 / 80 → 70%
Weight
61 / 10-68 → 87%
Battery
59 / 95 → 62%
Display
75%
Games Performance
77%
Application Performance
77%
AI Performance
82%
Temperature
89 / 95 → 94%
Noise
73 / 90 → 82%
Audio
74%
Camera
35 / 75 → 46%
Average
57%
76%
Gaming - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
76.8%
Repairability
50%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 29%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Height
Display
1.
75.8%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘
24 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $885.00
HP Victus 15 Intel i5-13420H...
2. $649.00
HP Victus 15 Gaming Laptop 1...
3. $899.00
HP Victus 15.6" FHD 144Hz Ga...
List Price: 1000 EUR
2.4 kg23.5 mm15.60"
1920x1080
141 PPI
IPS
2.
84% v7 (old)
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. 
15.6" FHD 1920(RGB)*1080 144...
2. $12.00
RAKSTORE Laptop CPU Cooling ...
3. $129.99
WARWOLFTEAM New Screen Compa...
List Price: 1000 EUR
2.3 kg24 mm15.60"
1920x1080
141 PPI
IPS
3.
76.8%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB
List Price: 1250 EUR2.7 kg26 mm17.30"
1920x1080
127 PPI
IPS
4.
77.5%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $1,569.00
Lenovo LOQ Gaming Laptop, 15...
2. $37.99
Ruilezyo 300W Laptop Charger...
3. $101.68
New KrystalPix LCD Display F...
2.4 kg24 mm15.60"
1920x1080
141 PPI
IPS
5.
82.5%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $19.99
BestParts New CPU+GPU Coolin...
2. $16.99
Fleshy Leaf CPU+GPU Cooling ...
3. $35.99
Replacement Backlit Keyboard...
List Price: 1500 Euro
2.4 kg23.7 mm16.00"
1920x1200
162 PPI
IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > A budget gamer for $1,200: HP Victus 15 RTX 5050 laptop review
Florian Glaser, 2025-10-27 (Update: 2025-10-27)