Verdict - Affordable with cut corners
At a current price of around $1,200, the review model Victus 15-fa2160ng doesn't have it all its own way in a competitive market. Compared to other RTX 5050 laptops, the price is commendable and finds itself on the lower end of the scale. However, for a similar price, there's also the Lenovo LOQ Essential 15, which, according to the spec sheet, aims to turn customer's heads with a better display (100% sRGB). Unlike its Lenovo competitors, the Full HD IPS panel installed in the Victus 15 has to put up with a poor color gamut, which makes content appear rather washed out. To make matters worse, the first RTX 5060 laptops are already being sold at a relatively small premium, with some of them (depending on the application) offering a decent, if not earth-shattering performance boost.
Basically, buyers will know what to expect in the $1,000 segment. The plastic case and speakers are of average quality, as are the battery capacity and connectivity (no USB 4). However, the upgrade options have turned out to be quite positive. In addition to two M.2 slots, the 15-inch model also includes two SO-DIMM banks. Noise and temperature production under load are also better than a number of competing devices.
Pros
Cons
Price and availability
The HP Victus 15-fa2160ng can be purchased on various online stores starting at around $1,200.
The Victus 15’s competitors include other affordable gaming notebooks with an RTX 5050 or RTX 5060, such as the Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1, the Lenovo LOQ 15 and HP's own Omen 16, all of which appear in the comparison tables along with the Victus 15, which is powered by the RTX 4050.
Specifications
Case
One area you shouldn't expect particularly high quality is the case. The 15-inch devices' surfaces are entirely made of plastic and tend to rattle here and there. The build quality, however, is beyond reproach, with all elements of the review device blending seamlessly together. The display's maximum opening angle of around 135° is neither small nor especially large.
At 2.4 kg, the Victus 15 is more or less in line with its 15- and 16-inch counterparts, although the 17-inch Erazer Scout is just under 0.3 kg heavier. The HP laptop's height of almost 2.4 cm (without its feet) is also not out of the ordinary.
Features
Interfaces
The connectivity proves to be somewhat lacking. Buyers will not only have to do without modern USB protocols, but also without a card reader. However, the port distribution is quite well-designed, since they are located at the rear of the sides, and therefore hardly interfere during mouse use.
Communication
The installed Realtek Wi-Fi module (RTL8852BE) is somewhat faster than the MediaTek chip found in its predecessor, but it still can't reach truly high speeds. Only the Erazer Scout's performance managed to impress us in our test comparison field.
Webcam
As with most laptops, the webcam quality is best left unsaid. Both the color accuracy and the image sharpness also leave a lot to be desired.

Accessories
The laptop comes with a few information booklets and a 200-watt power supply.
Maintenance
The base plate is secured by seven small Phillips screws and several hooks, some of which are very tight. Under the hood, you have access to every component (see photos).
Sustainability
Unfortunately, HP still uses various plastic films for its packaging material.
Warranty
The warranty in Germany covers 12 months.
Input devices
Keyboard
The input devices are relatively good, without inspiring enthusiasm. The keyboard uses the entire width of the case and features a full-size numeric keypad and white, single-level backlighting. We'd describe the layout as a touch confusing - especially when it comes to the upper right corner and the position of the power button, as well as the "Insert," "Print Screen," and "Delete" keys. Some users may also long for larger arrows.
Touchpad
The touchpad delivers discreet performance. Its 12.5 x 8 cm surface offers solid gliding characteristics and is mostly responsive. However, the click surfaces tend to rattle - as is the case with numerous other laptops.
Display
Unfortunately, the Victus 15 doesn't boast a vivid display. Unlike some competitors, the 144 Hz panel is weak, particularly in terms of color coverage. While 64% sRGB is slightly better than its predecessor, it's still pretty underwhelming.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 324 cd/m²
Contrast: 1246:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.7 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
calibrated: 2.93
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
34.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
64.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
43% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
CCT: 7541 K
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng CMN1560, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng BOE094D, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 BOEhydis NV173FHM-NX4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 144 Hz | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 CSOT MNF601BA1-4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AUODBB2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 144 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -4% | 70% | -2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 43 | 39.2 -9% | 37.7 -12% | 67.3 57% | 40 -7% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 64.3 | 57.9 -10% | 56.3 -12% | 99.2 54% | 58.1 -10% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 34.7 | 40.5 17% | 39 12% | 69.1 99% | 38.7 12% |
| Response Times | 18% | 25% | -13% | 3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 28.6 ? | 23.8 ? 17% | 21.4 ? 25% | 33.9 ? -19% | 27.6 ? 3% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 20 ? | 16.3 ? 18% | 15 ? 25% | 21.2 ? -6% | 19.4 ? 3% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | |||||
| Screen | -10% | -5% | 35% | 2% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 324 | 273 -16% | 279 -14% | 318 -2% | 328 1% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 303 | 249 -18% | 260 -14% | 300 -1% | 313 3% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 87 | 84 -3% | 90 3% | 89 2% | 91 5% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.26 | 0.28 -8% | 0.24 8% | 0.2 23% | 0.26 -0% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1246 | 975 -22% | 1163 -7% | 1590 28% | 1262 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 5.19 -10% | 4.97 -6% | 1.33 72% | 4.73 -1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.19 | 21.16 -16% | 20.52 -13% | 4.42 76% | 17.47 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.93 | 4.54 -55% | 4.58 -56% | 0.94 68% | 4.22 -44% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 1.7 56% | 1.7 56% | 1.9 51% | 2.05 47% |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.148 102% | 2.201 100% | 2.187 101% | 2.63 84% |
| CCT | 7541 86% | 6819 95% | 6937 94% | 6678 97% | 6718 97% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
-4% | 5% /
-0% | 31% /
36% | 1% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
In its factory state, the panel is generally not color-accurate due to having a strong blue hue, which can, however, be corrected by calibration.
Providing you don't take the laptop outside or into the sun, the rest of the results are solid. This starts with a black level of 0.26 cd/m², which, combined with a brightness of approximately 300 cd/m², results in an IPS-typical contrast ratio of more than 1,200:1. Viewing angles and response times are also decent.
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.7 ms rise | |
| ↘ 9.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 28.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.4 ms rise | |
| ↘ 15.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Performance
While the review configuration's 24 GB of DDR5 RAM is quite respectable, at 512 GB, the SSD could be larger. HP is also using an outdated processor for price reasons.
Test conditions
| Mode | Silent | Eco | Standard | Performance |
| Cyberpunk 2077 Noise | 35 dB(A) | 37 dB(A) | 41 dB(A) | 46 dB(A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 Performance (FHD/Ultra) | 38.7fps | 56.7fps | 67.3fps | 71fps |
| Cyberpunk 2077 GPU Power Draw | ~30 W | ~60 W | ~70 W | ~80 W |
| Cinebench R15 Multi Score | 1,422 points | 839 points | 1,703 points | 1,756 points |
Processor
In the meantime, the Core i5-13420H is a few years old and still manufactured using the outdated 10nm process. The Raptor Lake model contains four performance cores, including Hyper-Threading and eight efficiency cores without HT. This allows a total of 20 threads to be processed simultaneously. In the benchmark test, the Victus 15 ended up at the bottom of the test field, although the predecessor's Core i5-13500H and the Core 5 210H found in the Scout 17 E1 are often only marginally faster. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 7 250 offers more than 30 % additional performance, and the Ryzen 9 8940HX housed in the Omen 16, almost 70 %.
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (7922 - 11106, n=4) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (40587 - 59715, n=4) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (1724 - 2634, n=4) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (69803 - 74956, n=4) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (5485 - 6625, n=4) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (19684 - 27607, n=4) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 247074, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (35531 - 93100, n=4) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (509 - 744, n=4) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (4283 - 5831, n=4) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (12330 - 37044, n=4) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
System performance
The system's performance is sometimes affected by its rather weak SSD (more on that later). Applications sometimes take a bit longer to launch or load than on comparable devices.
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 -2! | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 -4! | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng -5! | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average of class Gaming (8840 - 12600, n=123, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=117, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 345, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=127, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 5828 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 104987, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (22003 - 59609, n=4) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (23759 - 68085, n=4) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (21429 - 62529, n=4) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (90.2 - 103.6, n=4) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latencies
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
* ... smaller is better
Mass storage
As previously mentioned, the SSD isn't among the fastest models. It achieved solid sequential results and didn't throttle in the loop test. This is an area where most of the competitors still have their noses in front - even its predecessor.
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU performance
HP has opted to use a limited TGP for its graphics card. While the RTX 5050 in the Scout 17 E1 runs at a maximum of 115 watts, the Victus 15 only uses a maximum of 80 watts, something clearly evident from the measurements. Medion's competitor gains a few percent in 3DMark tests, although the predecessor's RTX 4050 lags behind by about 15%. Meanwhile, the RTX 5060 achieves an increase of 18 to 27%.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 25519 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 50444 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 22488 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9098 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Gaming performance
You shouldn't expect the RTX 5050 to exceed its native 1,920 x 1,080 pixels when gaming, but if you exclude extremely demanding or poorly optimized games such as Oblivion Remastered and Borderlands 4, most titles run smoothly in Full HD even at maximum settings. Anyone seeking higher frame rates could consider upscaling in addition to reducing the detail level. Using DLSS Quality, for example, the frame rate in Battlefield 6 rose from 54 to 69fps, and with quadruple frame generation, it even peaked at 149fps, although subjectively the image appeared very uneven.
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (17.7 - 169.9, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (71 - 76.9, n=3) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (37.2 - 246, n=107, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (80.4 - 86.3, n=3) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=130, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (88.1 - 117.6, n=3) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 215, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (86.2 - 102, n=3) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 456, n=129, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (173.4 - 189.7, n=3) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 248, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (116.2 - 119.9, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 155.1 | 132.2 | 88.1 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 126.2 | 121.7 | 116.2 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 105.2 | 86.2 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 76.2 | 65.5 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 234 | 192.2 | 173.4 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 96.9 | 82.4 | 80.4 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 92 | 78.8 | 71 | |
| Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 72.3 | 54.7 | 53.8 | |
| Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) | 47.4 | 33.9 | ||
| Space Marine 2 (2024) | 54.8 | 54.3 | 52.8 | |
| Stalker 2 (2024) | 42 | 38.9 | 33.8 | |
| Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) | 83.2 | 67.6 | 46.8 | |
| The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered (2025) | 48.3 | 45.1 | 22.9 | |
| F1 25 (2025) | 96 | 93 | 18 | |
| Borderlands 4 (2025) | 35.7 | 29.6 | 16 | |
| Battlefield 6 (2025) | 87.7 | 73.6 | 53.9 |
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (22.9 - 61.9, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (22.9 - 25, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (46.8 - 130.3, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (46.8 - 51.6, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Space Marine 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (52.8 - 108, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (52.8 - 70.8, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 - 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (33.9 - 86.1, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (33.9 - 35.1, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Horizon Forbidden West - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (14.7 - 140.3, n=21, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (53.8 - 62, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
One positive aspect in the long-term test with Cyberpunk 2077 was the absence of any anomalies relating to throttling or the like.
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
Emissions
Noise emissions
In 3D-based operations, the Victus 15 is quieter than the competition, although the average recorded noise level of 46 dB(A) during Cyberpunk 2077 is by no means quiet. Compared to its predecessor, the noise levels under load don't seem to have increased. When the laptop is inactive, the fans are still constantly active in performance mode, reaching just under 30 dB(A).
Noise level
| Idle |
| 28 / 29 / 30 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 40 / 48 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | -9% | -32% | 1% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24 | 25 -4% | 24 -0% | 25 -4% | 23 4% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 28 | 29 -4% | 27 4% | 43 -54% | 23 18% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 29 | 30 -3% | 29 -0% | 45 -55% | 23 21% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 30 | 31 -3% | 32 -7% | 48 -60% | 27.64 8% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 40 | 40 -0% | 47 -18% | 53 -33% | 49.5 -24% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 46 | 55 -20% | 51 -11% | 49.5 -8% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 48 | 48 -0% | 58 -21% | 53 -10% | 52.73 -10% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 42 |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
The perfectly acceptable maximum case temperatures on the top and bottom of 43°C are quite moderate. In idle mode, most areas remain below the 30°C mark.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 13% | -2% | -10% | 9% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 43 | 42 2% | 42 2% | 49 -14% | 36 16% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 43 | 42 2% | 45 -5% | 58 -35% | 37 14% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 37 | 24 35% | 30 19% | 32 14% | 30 19% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 28 | 24 14% | 35 -25% | 29 -4% | 32 -14% |
* ... smaller is better
Stress test
Speakers
When it comes to sound quality, the Victus 15 outperforms the Erazer Scout 17. Overall, however, the sound can still only be described as mid-range. As is very often the case, the bass is particularly lacking.
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Energy management
Power consumption
Thanks in no small part to its limited TGP, the 15-inch model is generally more economical than the competition. 8 to 13 watts in idle mode and 78 to 187 watts under load are acceptable for the performance on offer.
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | -41% | -52% | -28% | -76% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 7.9 | 5 37% | 13.5 -71% | 20 -153% | 7.8 1% | 14.1 ? -78% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 9.2 | 9 2% | 14.8 -61% | 20.7 -125% | 8.8 4% | 20 ? -117% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 13.5 | 22 -63% | 22.9 -70% | 22.7 -68% | 21.5 -59% | 27 ? -100% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 78 | 72 8% | 87 -12% | 71 9% | 119 -53% | 111.3 ? -43% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 128.4 | 173.4 -35% | 153.1 -19% | 192 -50% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 126.7 | 171.9 -36% | 151.1 -19% | 164.5 -30% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 187 | 176 6% | 195 -4% | 172 8% | 208 -11% | 262 ? -40% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 113 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
Battery runtime
The runtime test was conducted using balanced mode. Interestingly, despite the identical battery capacity of 70 Wh, the runtime was significantly worse than its predecessor. Instead of around 7.5 hours, the new Victus 15 only kept going for just under 4 hours while surfing the internet, and this is comparable to both the Scout 17 E1 and the Lenovo LOQ 15.
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 70 Wh | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 53 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 70 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 74% | -9% | 5% | 16% | 52% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 4.3 | 7.5 74% | 3.9 -9% | 4.5 5% | 5 16% | 6.55 ? 52% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 6.9 | 9.79 ? | ||||
| Load (h) | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.42 ? | |||
| H.264 (h) | 5.1 | 7.74 ? |
Notebookcheck overall rating
With the RTX 5050 and RTX 5060 laptop prices often being quite similar, things are currently hot in the $1,000 segment. Before purchasing the Victus 15, you should be aware that HP has achieved this moderate price as a result of various cost-cutting measures, including the display.
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
- 10/24/2025 v8
Florian Glaser
Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $885.00 HP Victus 15 Intel i5-13420H... 2. $649.00 HP Victus 15 Gaming Laptop 1... 3. $899.00 HP Victus 15.6" FHD 144Hz Ga... List Price: 1000 EUR | 2.4 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng Intel Core i5-13500H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. 15.6" FHD 1920(RGB)*1080 144... 2. $12.00 RAKSTORE Laptop CPU Cooling ... 3. $129.99 WARWOLFTEAM New Screen Compa... List Price: 1000 EUR | 2.3 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Intel Core 5 210H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB | List Price: 1250 EUR | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 127 PPI IPS | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,569.00 Lenovo LOQ Gaming Laptop, 15... 2. $37.99 Ruilezyo 300W Laptop Charger... 3. $101.68 New KrystalPix LCD Display F... | 2.4 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $19.99 BestParts New CPU+GPU Coolin... 2. $16.99 Fleshy Leaf CPU+GPU Cooling ... 3. $35.99 Replacement Backlit Keyboard... List Price: 1500 Euro | 2.4 kg | 23.7 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.




























































