Qualcomm Adreno 640 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Qualcomm Adreno 640 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 640 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SoC. The chip will be available from early 2019 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 640 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 630, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 845 SoC. The enhanced performance is achieved by the Adreno 640 having 50% more FP16 and FP32 compute units (ALUs) than the Adreno 630, while its 7 nm FinFET manufacturing process makes it 20% more efficient too.
The Adreno 640 will also support the Vulkan 1.1 API, something which is possible for other Adreno 600 series GPUs too.
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 ► remove from comparison
The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 (GT3e) is a processor graphics card for Kaby Lake models announced in January 2017. As the successor to the Intel Iris Graphics 540 (Skylake), the Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used for 15-Watt ULV models and is equipped with 64 MB eDRAM cache. There should not be any big changes compared to the Iris Graphics 540.
The so called GT3e version of the Kaby Lake GPU still has 48 Execution Units (EUs), which can reach up to 1050 MHz depending on the model. Besides eDRAM cache, the Iris 640 can also access the system memory (2x 64 Bit DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866/DDR4-2400) via processor interface.
Compared to the Iris Plus 650 from the 28-Watt models, the Iris 640 only has a slightly lower maximum clock as well as the lower TDP, so the utilization of the Turbo Boost potential should be worse.
Performance
The exact performance of the Iris Plus Graphics 640 depends on the CPU model, because maximum clock as well as the size of the L3 cache can differ a bit. The system memory (DDR3/DDR4) will influence the performance as well.
The fastest chips are high-clocked Core i7 models like the Core i7-7660U . Depending on the game, the Iris Plus 640 will probably be similar to the previous model somewhere between a dedicated GeForce 920M and GeForce 940M and is usually limited to low settings in modern games.
Features
The reworked video engine now fully supports hardware decoding of H.265/HEVC videos. Contrary to Skylake, however, Kaby Lake can now also decode H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The video output is possible via DP 1.2/eDP 1.3 (up to 3840 x 2160 @60 Hz), whereas HDMI is also supported in the older 1.4a standard. An HDMI 2.0 output can be added via converter from DisplayPort. The GPU can drive up to three displays simultaneously.
Power Consumption
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used for 15-Watt ULV processor and therefore thin notebooks and Ultrabooks.
Qualcomm Adreno 640 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 Gen. 9.5 Series Shared Memory yes yes API DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4 technology 10 nm 14 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 QuickSync Date of Announcement 12.02.2018 03.01.2017 Codename Kaby Lake GT3e Architecture Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake Pipelines 48 - unified Core Speed 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHz Memory Bus Width 64/128 Bit Memory Type DDR3/DDR4 Max. Amount of Memory 64 MB
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 467 avg: 499.8 median: 494.5 (1%) max: 543 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 413 avg: 442.5 median: 437 (1%) max: 483 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 97354 avg: 108080 median: 106829 (12%) max: 118129 Points
min: 142163 avg: 147298 median: 145481 (16%) max: 154251 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 7558 avg: 8025 median: 8067 (9%) max: 8711 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 10486 avg: 11119 median: 11248 (3%) max: 11495 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1236 avg: 1349 median: 1310 (2%) max: 1509 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1315 avg: 1411 median: 1393.5 (2%) max: 1541 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 5268 avg: 7441 median: 7659 (33%) max: 8661 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 6358 avg: 9988 median: 10199 (22%) max: 12070 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 3969 avg: 6014 median: 6182 (31%) max: 6981 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5184 avg: 7016 median: 7072.5 (21%) max: 8218 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3079 avg: 3323 median: 3436 (2%) max: 3455 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 864 avg: 936 median: 970 (1%) max: 974 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2136 avg: 2440 median: 2561 (4%) max: 2664 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1980 avg: 2275 median: 2379 (2%) max: 2493 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
min: 13164 avg: 14118 median: 14117.5 (18%) max: 15071 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
6.5 fps (2%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 8824 avg: 9678 median: 9703 (7%) max: 10506 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
46.1 fps (16%)
Cinebench R15 + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 41.32 avg: 54 median: 56.2 (3%) max: 62.3 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8 avg: 98.2 median: 97.8 (98%) max: 99.3 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
6.6 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 8.5 avg: 17.5 median: 17 (3%) max: 39 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 16 avg: 40.5 median: 42 (3%) max: 47 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 22 avg: 40.2 median: 42 (5%) max: 48 fps
40.7 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 35 avg: 64.4 median: 69 (1%) max: 79 fps
56.1 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 50 avg: 94.7 median: 99.5 (6%) max: 112 fps
31.2 fps (2%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 + Qualcomm Adreno 640 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 85 avg: 158.9 median: 166 (1%) max: 185 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
171 fps (1%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 204205 avg: 204715 median: 204715 (26%) max: 205225 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
64.9 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
2968 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
2419 Points (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 315 avg: 325 median: 325 (1%) max: 335 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 748 avg: 779 median: 778.5 (1%) max: 809 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 1575 avg: 1677 median: 1677 (2%) max: 1779 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 10504 avg: 18251 median: 14922.5 (15%) max: 40654 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 4244 avg: 11804 median: 5422.5 (9%) max: 44840 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 30.8 avg: 33.6 median: 31.5 (4%) max: 38.5 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28 avg: 33.5 median: 33.5 (5%) max: 38.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 31.7 avg: 34.9 median: 34.9 (8%) max: 38.1 Watt
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
7.8 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.1 fps per Watt (9%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
33.4 dB(A) (53%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 748 avg: 823 median: 823 (32%) max: 898 MHz
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
min: 570 avg: 634 median: 634 (25%) max: 698 MHz
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 640 → 100% n=5 Average Benchmarks Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 → 90% n=5
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Adreno 640:
30 30 [X] Xiaomi Pad 5 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 GHz
Adreno 640
min:
30 fps, max:
30 fps
~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 640:
59 60 [X] OnePlus 7 Pro 1.28.2.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
58 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7 1.29.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] LG G8s ThinQ 1.29.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7T 1.31.1.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7T Pro 1.31.1.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 640:
30 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.32.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
30 fps, max:
31 fps
59 60 [X] OnePlus 7 Pro 1.28.2.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7 1.29.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] LG G8s ThinQ 1.29.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
53 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7T 1.31.1.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
1 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7T Pro 1.31.1.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
50 fps, max:
60 fps
60 61 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.32.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
60 fps, max:
63 fps
62 [X] Google Pixel 4 1.31.1.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
35 fps, max:
63 fps
~ 57 fps
100%
Adreno 640:
59 60 [X] OnePlus 7 Pro 1.18.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
2 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7T Pro 1.19.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 640:
59 60 [X] OnePlus 7 Pro 1.18.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
2 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7T Pro 1.19.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
52 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
13.8 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
28 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
69.5 (!) [X] Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 Intel Core i7-7660U 2.5GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640
min:
59 fps, max:
78 fps
fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
38.8 (!) [X] Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 Intel Core i7-7660U 2.5GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640
min:
34 fps, max:
43 fps
fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
33 38 ~ 36 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
15 15 ~ 15 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
22.9 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
99 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
48 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
31.8 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
39.9 45.4 ~ 43 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
17.9 18.1 ~ 18 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
14.8 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
33.8 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
20.4 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
16 16.6 ~ 16 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
30.8 33.5 ~ 32 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
11.8 12.7 ~ 12 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
42.9 45 ~ 44 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
31.4 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
22.9 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
121 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
91 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
31.6 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
17.8 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
19.6 24.2 ~ 22 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
9.2 11.1 ~ 10 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
20.2 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
19.5 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
24.9 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
28 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
13 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
23.5 25.8 ~ 25 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
16.7 19.4 ~ 18 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
9.1 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
14.2 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
44.7 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
26.2 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
12.9 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
68 92 ~ 80 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
55 63.7 ~ 59 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
27.6 29.5 ~ 29 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
19.8 23 ~ 21 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
13.4 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
4 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
56.7 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
28.9 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
11.8 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
28.6 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
20.2 20.8 ~ 21 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
43.1 60.3 ~ 52 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
29.7 42 ~ 36 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
23.2 30.7 ~ 27 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
8.2 9.9 ~ 9 fps
100%
Adreno 640:
60 120 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.6.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
118 fps, max:
121 fps
~ 90 fps
100%
Adreno 640:
28 [X] LG G8s ThinQ 1.6.3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
26 fps, max:
30 fps
30 [X] OnePlus 7 Pro 1.5.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] OnePlus 7 1.5.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] OnePlus 7T 1.7.3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] OnePlus 7T Pro 1.8.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 60 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.8.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
44 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.8.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
56 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 36 fps
100%
Adreno 640:
28 [X] LG G8s ThinQ 1.6.3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
24 fps, max:
30 fps
29 30 [X] OnePlus 7 Pro 1.5.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] OnePlus 7 1.5.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] OnePlus 7T 1.7.3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] OnePlus 7T Pro 1.8.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
25 fps, max:
31 fps
60 ~ 33 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
61 68.2 ~ 65 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
40.2 45.1 ~ 43 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
33.5 38.3 ~ 36 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
10.7 12.5 ~ 12 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
103 132.6 ~ 118 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
54.1 68.7 ~ 61 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
37 47.1 ~ 42 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
17.2 21.6 ~ 19 fps
100%
Adreno 640:
120 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.62.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
118 fps, max:
121 fps
fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
35.2 fps
100%
Adreno 640:
60 120 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.112.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
118 fps, max:
121 fps
~ 90 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
28.5 fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 640 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 15. 22:23:06
#0 checking url part for id 9446 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 7656 +0s ... 0s
#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 May 2024 05:40:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#4 composed specs +0.087s ... 0.088s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.088s
#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.088s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9446 +0.027s ... 0.115s
#8 got single benchmarks 9446 +0.065s ... 0.179s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7656 +0.002s ... 0.181s
#10 got single benchmarks 7656 +0.016s ... 0.197s
#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.197s
#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.166s ... 0.363s
#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.363s
#14 Got 201 rows for game benchmarks. +0.035s ... 0.398s
#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.398s
#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.025s ... 0.423s
#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.085s ... 0.509s
#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.509s
#19 return log +0.04s ... 0.549s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
