Qualcomm Adreno 619L vs ARM Mali-G52 MP2 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Qualcomm Adreno 619L ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 619L is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).
The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G52 MP2 (or G52MC2) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2020 in the MediaTek Helio G80 with a clock speed of up to 950 MHz.
The G52 is based on the Bifrost architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. ARM claims that the G52 series offers 30% more performance density and 15% better energy efficiency compared to the ARM Mali G51 series.
The performance of the G52MP2 in our benchmarks (in the Helio G80) is comparable to the Adreno 61 2 and ARM Mali-G72 MP3 (thanks to the high clock speed of the G52MP2).
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.
Qualcomm Adreno 642L ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 642L is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SoC . The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642L GPU offers a 40% improved performance over the Adreno 620 (compared to the specified +50% of the 642 in the SD 780G), its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.
The Adreno 642L supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 778G and therefore also the 642L is manufactured in the modern 6nm UEV process at TSMC that should provide a good power efficiency.
Qualcomm Adreno 619L ARM Mali-G52 MP2 Qualcomm Adreno 642L Adreno 600 Series Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost Shared Memory yes no yes API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 8 nm 12 nm 6 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL® ES 1.1, 2.0, 3.1, 3.2
Vulkan 1.0
OpenCL™ 1.1, 1.2, 2.0 Full Profile,
RenderScript OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Date of Announcement 15.12.2015 06.03.2018 07.05.2021 Pipelines 2 - unified Core Speed 950 (Boost) MHz Cache L2: 128 KB Link to Manufacturer Page developer.arm.com
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
44899 Points (5%)
min: 22232 avg: 24576 median: 25142 (3%) max: 27034 Points
min: 88482 avg: 89308 median: 89307.5 (10%) max: 90133 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3122 avg: 3225 median: 3224.5 (14%) max: 3327 Points
min: 1595 avg: 1884 median: 1837 (8%) max: 2243 Points
min: 6398 avg: 6666 median: 6638 (29%) max: 7281 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3307 avg: 3311 median: 3311 (7%) max: 3315 Points
min: 1464 avg: 1739 median: 1688.5 (4%) max: 2069 Points
min: 7199 avg: 7627 median: 7536 (17%) max: 8605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2308 avg: 2328 median: 2328 (12%) max: 2348 Points
min: 596 avg: 1364 median: 1408 (7%) max: 1628 Points
min: 5032 avg: 5413 median: 5393.5 (27%) max: 5763 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2120 avg: 2154 median: 2153.5 (6%) max: 2187 Points
min: 530 avg: 1213 median: 1248 (4%) max: 1875 Points
min: 5103 avg: 5654 median: 5612 (17%) max: 6240 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 809 avg: 818 median: 817.5 (0%) max: 826 Points
min: 289 avg: 696 median: 716.5 (0%) max: 757 Points
min: 2321 avg: 2517 median: 2493.5 (1%) max: 2831 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
247 Points (0%)
min: 72 avg: 175.6 median: 180 (0%) max: 201 Points
min: 681 avg: 696 median: 687.5 (1%) max: 768 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.6 avg: 1.4 median: 1.5 (1%) max: 1.7 fps
min: 5.9 avg: 6.2 median: 6.1 (2%) max: 6.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
5.8 fps (1%)
min: 1.4 avg: 3.3 median: 3.3 (1%) max: 4.1 fps
min: 13 avg: 13.6 median: 13.5 (2%) max: 15 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 15 avg: 15.5 median: 15.5 (1%) max: 16 fps
min: 3.9 avg: 8.9 median: 9 (1%) max: 11 fps
min: 34 avg: 36.4 median: 36 (3%) max: 40 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 14 avg: 14.5 median: 14.5 (2%) max: 15 fps
min: 3.8 avg: 8.7 median: 9.2 (1%) max: 13 fps
min: 33 avg: 33.7 median: 33 (4%) max: 37 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
26 fps (1%)
min: 6.4 avg: 14.3 median: 15 (0%) max: 16 fps
min: 56 avg: 57.7 median: 57 (1%) max: 64 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 36 avg: 36.5 median: 36.5 (2%) max: 37 fps
min: 1 avg: 22.8 median: 24 (1%) max: 27 fps
min: 77 avg: 79.1 median: 78 (5%) max: 89 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 72 avg: 72.5 median: 72.5 (1%) max: 73 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G52 MP2 min: 18 avg: 40.9 median: 43 (0%) max: 46 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
min: 132 avg: 134.9 median: 133 (1%) max: 148 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
76440 Points (10%)
min: 15389 avg: 39780 median: 38986 (5%) max: 60674 Points
min: 135972 avg: 157798 median: 157454 (20%) max: 175807 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 22.78 avg: 22.8 median: 22.8 (0%) max: 22.85 fps
min: 12.07 avg: 16.6 median: 17.4 (0%) max: 18.95 fps
min: 45.96 avg: 49.6 median: 46.9 (0%) max: 54.4 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
529 Points (0%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
997 Points (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
13095 Points (13%)
min: 12281 avg: 20861 median: 22840 (23%) max: 25138 Points
min: 23666 avg: 31803 median: 30994 (31%) max: 38436 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
1751 Points (3%)
min: 14908 avg: 16129 median: 15593.5 (27%) max: 18264 Points
min: 26134 avg: 36660 median: 40236 (70%) max: 43000 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
2.4 Watt (1%)
min: 2.42 avg: 4.6 median: 4.2 (2%) max: 7.73 Watt
min: 0 avg: 4.3 median: 4 (2%) max: 9.27 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100% n=17 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G52 MP2 → 117% n=17 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 351% n=17
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Mali-G52 MP2:
30 [X] Lenovo Tab M9 1.7.3
Mediatek Helio G80 2GHz
Mali-G52 MP2
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] Realme C55 2.0.2
Mediatek Helio G88 1.8GHz
Mali-G52 MP2
min:
25 fps, max:
31 fps
30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 642L:
59 59 ~ 59 fps
Mali-G52 MP2:
30 [X] Lenovo Tab M9 1.7.3
Mediatek Helio G80 2GHz
Mali-G52 MP2
min:
26 fps, max:
31 fps
30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 642L:
51 60 ~ 56 fps
102%
Adreno 642L:
61 [X] Xiaomi 12 Lite 3.4.0.5930
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 642L
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Mali-G52 MP2:
26 [X] Xiaomi Redmi 13C 4.4.0_20481013_20559831
Mediatek Helio G85 1.8GHz
Mali-G52 MP2
min:
18 fps, max:
35 fps
fps
Mali-G52 MP2:
15 [X] Xiaomi Redmi 13C 4.4.0_20481013_20559831
Mediatek Helio G85 1.8GHz
Mali-G52 MP2
min:
11 fps, max:
19 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 619L:
39 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 619L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 642L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 619L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Mali-G52 MP2:
28 29 30 [X] Realme 6i 2.2.2a
Mediatek Helio G80 2GHz
Mali-G52 MP2
min:
5 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Realme C3 2.2.2a
Mediatek Helio G70 2GHz
Mali-G52 MP2
min:
11 fps, max:
31 fps
30 ~ 29 fps
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
97%
Mali-G52 MP2:
24 27 30 [X] Realme 6i 2.2.2a
Mediatek Helio G80 2GHz
Mali-G52 MP2
min:
11 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Realme C3 2.2.2a
Mediatek Helio G70 2GHz
Mali-G52 MP2
min:
8 fps, max:
31 fps
30 ~ 28 fps
103%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Mali-G52 MP2:
60 [X] Realme 6i 1.66.2
Mediatek Helio G80 2GHz
Mali-G52 MP2
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] Realme C3 1.66.2
Mediatek Helio G70 2GHz
Mali-G52 MP2
min:
50 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 60 fps
Adreno 642L:
90 [X] Motorola Edge 30 2.36.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G 1.9GHz
Adreno 642L
min:
82 fps, max:
91 fps
fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G52 MP2 → 92% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 90%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 113% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 115%
Qualcomm Adreno 642L low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 59 56 League of Legends: Wild Rift 61 Armajet 89 PUBG Mobile 58 40 38 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 30 30 Subway Surfers 90 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 1 2 3 1 1
Qualcomm Adreno 619L low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 60 PUBG Mobile 40 40 30 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 29 Real Racing 3 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 2 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.27
log 17. 07:53:09
#0 checking url part for id 10573 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10399 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 10945 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:38:48 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.124s ... 0.125s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.125s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.125s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10573 +0.041s ... 0.166s
#9 got single benchmarks 10573 +0.012s ... 0.177s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10399 +0.002s ... 0.179s
#11 got single benchmarks 10399 +0.125s ... 0.304s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10945 +0.002s ... 0.307s
#13 got single benchmarks 10945 +0.05s ... 0.357s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.357s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.223s ... 0.58s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.58s
#17 Got 149 rows for game benchmarks. +0.045s ... 0.625s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.625s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.63s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.027s ... 0.657s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.657s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.659s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)