Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G review - A powerful 120-Hz smartphone that is destined to fail?

More than 1000 Nits in the affordable mid-range. With its light build, 120-Hz OLED display, and 5000-mAh battery, the Galaxy M52 5G should be interesting not only for Galaxy fans, particularly since the Samsung smartphone also supports microSD cards and uses a powerful chipset with the Snapdragon 778G. But there is still a major drawback...
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G

One of the highlights of the Galaxy M52 5G might be the 6.7-inch Super-AMOLED Plus display, which offers a refresh rate of 120 Hz and an FHD+ resolution. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G used here, which is accompanied by 6 GB of RAM and 128 GB internal UFS storage in the German version, is quite impressive at a recommended retail price of 379 Euros (~$431). 

In the recent past, the defining characteristic of the Galaxy M series was the relatively powerful battery. For example, the Galaxy M51 had a 7000-mAh battery. At a capacity of 5000 mAh, the battery of the Galaxy M52 5G is still fairly large but doesn't stand out from the masses anymore.

Find out in this review, how the newest mid-range smartphone from Samsung fares against the powerful competitors in this price segment, particularly the very similar Galaxy A52s 5G

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G (Galaxy M Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
Display
6.70 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, Super AMOLED Plus, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB Type-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.4 x 164.2 x 76.4 ( = 0.29 x 6.46 x 3.01 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/1.8) + 12MP (f/2.2, wide angle lens) + 5MP (f/2.4, macro)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.2)
Additional features
Speakers: mono, Keyboard: virtual, 15W charger, USB cable, OneUI, 24 Months Warranty, SAR value: 0.789W/​kg head, 1.4W/​kg body, Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
173 g ( = 6.1 oz / 0.38 pounds), Power Supply: 56 g ( = 1.98 oz / 0.12 pounds)
Price
379 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors for Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.7 %
01/2022
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
173 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
86.4 %
12/2021
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
158 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
81.5 %
11/2021
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
185 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
85.1 %
09/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
86 %
05/2021
Xiaomi Poco F3
SD 870, Adreno 650
196 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
85.1 %
08/2021
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9
189 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080

Case - Galaxy M52 5G with a punch hole

Colors of the Galaxy M52 5G
Colors of the Galaxy M52 5G

We find the visual appearance of the Galaxy M52 5G very attractive. The 6.7-inch OLED display is framed by slim bezels on the side, and thanks to the punch hole, the bezel on top also turns out fairly slim, leading to an efficient display-to-surface ratio of almost 87% at the front of the device. However, compared to the Galaxy A52s 5G, there is some cost-cutting in terms of the display glass - or at least the Samsung M series smartphone doesn't use Gorilla Glass. 

Some more cost-cutting also becomes apparent in the case of the Galaxy M52 5G. The Samsung smartphone doesn't offer an IP certification, so that there is no protection from dust or splashes, and the metal frame of the A52s 5G was replaced with one of plastic in the Galaxy M52 5G. However, the haptics, workmanship, and choice of materials are still at a good level. The built-in keys sit tightly in the frame, and their pressure points feel comfortably firm.

In contrast to some other representatives of the mid-range, the Samsung smartphone is relatively light at 173 grams (~6.1 oz). The plastic back of the Galaxy M52 5G, which is available in Icy Blue, Blazing Black, and White color options, surely has an effect on this. All color versions have a striped appearance in common, but unfortunately this hardly hides any fingerprints due to the shiny surface, and it often looks dirty from some greasy smudges.

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G

Size Comparison

166 mm / 6.54 inch 76 mm / 2.99 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 185 g0.4079 lbs164.2 mm / 6.46 inch 76.4 mm / 3.01 inch 7.4 mm / 0.2913 inch 173 g0.3814 lbs163.7 mm / 6.44 inch 76.4 mm / 3.01 inch 7.8 mm / 0.3071 inch 196 g0.4321 lbs159.9 mm / 6.3 inch 75.1 mm / 2.96 inch 8.4 mm / 0.3307 inch 189 g0.4167 lbs159.1 mm / 6.26 inch 73.3 mm / 2.89 inch 8.3 mm / 0.3268 inch 189 g0.4167 lbs160.53 mm / 6.32 inch 75.73 mm / 2.98 inch 6.81 mm / 0.2681 inch 158 g0.3483 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch 105 mm / 4.13 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Equipment - Samsung smartphone without a 3.5-mm audio port

In contrast to the Galaxy A52s 5G, buyers of the M52 5G unfortunately have to make do without a headphone jack. The UFS storage offers a capacity of 128 GB, and a 256-GB option is not available. Due to the operating system and preinstalled apps, the actually available storage space is significantly smaller at 107 GB. However, you can expand the internal storage by using a microSD card.   

The 5000-mAh battery can be charged via the Type-C port that supports the USB 2.0 standard and recognizes external peripheral devices such as storage sticks via USB-OTG without any problems in the test. Wireless transfer of the display contents to external monitors via Miracast is also supported.

You can watch video contents on Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, or other streaming services in HD quality, since it is certified for Widevine L1. The Camera2 API of the Galaxy M52 5G is available at Level 3. 

Right case side (keys)
Right case side (keys)
Left case side (card slot)
Left case side (card slot)
Top (microphone)
Top (microphone)
Bottom (microphone, USB port, speaker)
Bottom (microphone, USB port, speaker)

microSD Card Reader

The integrated microSD slot supports the current SDHC and SDXC standards up to 1 TB. In combination with our AV PRO V60 reference storage card (128 GB), the microSD performance in the Cross Platform Disk Test is convincing, and when copying data, the Samsung smartphone also operates at an above average level with a speed of 50 MB/s.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
52.4 MB/s +5%
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
50 MB/s
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
14.81 MB/s -70%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
14.5 MB/s -71%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.4 (28.4-47)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.4 (26-46.9)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø70.3 (42.4-73.5)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.3 (16.9-80.9)

Software - Galaxy M52 5G with Android 11

As usual, Samsung combines the Android operating system with its own in-house One UI surface in version 3.1, which also includes the Bixby smart assistant. However, the mid-range model does not offer an extra desktop mode via Samsung DeX.

Samsung's Knox security environment is integrated into the software and hardware of the Galaxy M52 5G. Another interesting feature that is also used by other manufacturers at this point is "RAM Plus." This allows the Galaxy smartphone to analyze the user behavior and offer up to 4 GB additional virtual working memory. The Settings menu also includes an extensive always-on display functionality.

At the time of this test, the Galaxy M52 5G is based on Android 11 with the security patches from November 2021. Even though Samsung doesn't list an official date for the update to Android 12, the Korean manufacturer already announced that Galaxy devices will get regular security updates for at least 4 years after their initial introduction. Among others, the M51 predecessor is also listed here. However, in contrast to the Galaxy A series, the M series is only provided with updates every quarter. 

The M52 5G probably won't get three major Android updates like the flagships, but there might be two years of updates and with that, two major Android versions. We expect an update to Android 12 including OneUI 4 with the new look-and-feel of the start screen and extensive personalization options as well as a privacy dashboard in Q2/Q3 of 2022.

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G

Communication and GNSS - Samsung smartphone with 5G

In terms of the communication modules, Samsung uses an NFC chip for Near Field Communication and Bluetooth 5.0. In addition, the X53 modem of the Snapdragon 778G supports the 5G standard with a series of frequencies below 6 GHz.

The chipset in the Galaxy M52 5G also offers access to the mobile Internet via 4G with a total of 13 LTE bands, covering all the LTE frequencies relevant for German-speaking countries, including LTE Band 20 and Band 28. However, traveling abroad, for example to the USA, might create some problems, since Band 13 and 25 are not covered.

In the WLAN network, the mid-range smartphone offers a fast standard for wireless networks with WiFi 6. This allows for high transfer rates, and in combination with our Netgear Nighthawk AX12 reference router, the Galaxy M52 5G shows a level that is as solid as that of the A52s 5G sibling model. Values higher than 400 Mbit/s on average aren't bad, but those of the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE or OnePlus Nord 2 5G are even significantly better.    

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
888 (842min - 904max) MBit/s +96%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
884 (444min - 914max) MBit/s +95%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
845 (779min - 895max) MBit/s +86%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
461 (433min - 470max) MBit/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
454 (425min - 462max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
191 (2min - 344max) MBit/s -58%
iperf3 receive AX12
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
877 (657min - 928max) MBit/s +108%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
766 (339min - 805max) MBit/s +82%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
654 (311min - 702max) MBit/s +55%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
425 (413min - 432max) MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
421 (357min - 433max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s -11%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
235 MBit/s -44%
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810855Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø420 (357-433)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø754 (339-805)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø454 (425-462)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø845 (779-895)
Locating indoors
Locating indoors
Locating outdoors
Locating outdoors

In order to evaluate the locating accuracy of our test unit in practice, we record a route in parallel with the Garmin Venu 2 for comparison. The location is determined via the GPS (L1), GLONASS, BeiDou, and Galileo (E1) satellite systems as well as SBAS support. 

The deviations are relatively low, with the difference between the mid-range smartphone and smartwatch being only about 20 meters (~66 ft) at the end of the 4-km (~2.5 miles) test route. In the detailed route of the GPS recording, the Galaxy M52 5G also impresses us with similarly accurate locating capabilities as the Garmin device, allowing us to recommend the Samsung smartphone for navigation tasks in the private arena. 

The satellite fix outdoors succeeds quickly with an accuracy of about 3 meters (~10 ft), and even indoors, the Galaxy M52 5G is able to determine its location very quickly and accurately.

Garmin Venu 2 locating
Garmin Venu 2 locating
Garmin Venu 2 locating
Garmin Venu 2 locating
Garmin Venu 2 locating
Garmin Venu 2 locating
Galaxy M52 5G locating
Galaxy M52 5G locating
Galaxy M52 5G locating
Galaxy M52 5G locating
Galaxy M52 5G locating
Galaxy M52 5G locating

Telephone Functions and Voice Quality - Samsung Galaxy M52 5G with VoLTE

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G

We really like the voice quality of the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G. There are also some useful calling features such as WLAN calling and VoLTE included onboard, where the voice data is transferred via the 4G mobile communication network. 

If you use the earpiece, the Galaxy smartphone delivers an easily understandable voice reproduction. Although the delivery via the mono speaker sounds slightly duller and a bit tinny, using the speaker for a video call still works well. To do this, we used the Skype app in our test. 

Cameras - Samsung smartphone with a triple camera

Selfie taken with the Galaxy M52 5G
Selfie taken with the Galaxy M52 5G
Portrait mode of the Galaxy M52 5G
Portrait mode of the Galaxy M52 5G

While the front camera is housed behind a small punch hole and offers a resolution of 32 MP, selfies are recorded using pixel binning, resulting in pictures that only have an 8-MP resolution. Pictures taken with the front camera in daylight look really good, but the quality quickly diminishes in weaker light conditions.

The camera setup in the back of the Galaxy M52 5G also looks very similar to that of the A52 model. Buyers of the Galaxy smartphone receive a 64-MP main sensor that is accompanied by a 12-MP wide angle lens and a 5-MP macro sensor. The Sony IMX682 combines four pixels each into a more light sensitive super pixel by default. This results in 16-MP images, but you can also use the full resolution with a special mode.

In contrast to the Galaxy A52s 5G, the main camera has to make do without an optical image stabilizer. In daylight, the results end up at a decent mid-range level, and the Galaxy M52 5G is able to score with good dynamics in our test photos. However, you can still see some slight deficits in terms of image sharpness, and the same goes for the color reproduction. 

Using the ColorChecker Passport, we analyze the color reproduction of the 64-MP lens in controlled light conditions compared to the actual reference colors. In addition to the brighter illumination typical for smartphones, the Galaxy M52 5G also shows fairly large deviations in the ColorChecker. However, the color accuracy is still acceptable for this price range. 

While the macro lens will probably only offer few advantages in everyday usage, the 12-MP ultra-wide angle camera distinguishes itself with a viewing angle of 123 degrees. Even though wide angle recordings from our test unit offer a better quality that that of the entry-level Galaxy's, the M52 5G doesn't really impress us in this regard. The edges are blurred to a significant degree, and the basic sharpness is low.   

Videos can be recorded at UHD and 30 fps at most, while 60 fps are also possible in a Full-HD recording. Fortunately, you can also switch between the main and the wide angle camera while recording a video.

Wide angle recording
Wide angle recording
Main camera
2x zoom
4x zoom
10x zoom (max)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G test
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G test
Test Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G test

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraLow LightWeitwinkel
click to load images
ColorChecker
18.7 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
11 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
7 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
12 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M52 5G: 12.28 ∆E min: 2.09 - max: 19.56 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
49.8 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
59.5 ∆E
49.5 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
29 ∆E
58.3 ∆E
60.2 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
66.7 ∆E
41.5 ∆E
42 ∆E
70.4 ∆E
65.9 ∆E
50 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M52 5G: 43.78 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 70.37 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty - Charging the Galaxy M52 5G only at 15 watts

15W charger of the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
15W charger of the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

The box of the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G includes a modular charger (USB-A) and a data or charging cable (USB-A to USB-C). Although the Galaxy smartphone supports a quick charge function up to 25 watts, the included charger offers only 15 watts. 

Samsung offers a 24-month warranty for its smartphone. In contrast to the Galaxy A52s 5G, you cannot order Samsung Care+ with the M model. At the time of the test, the manufacturer also does not offer any specific accessories for the Galaxy M52 5G. This is unfortunate, since the mid-range smartphone doesn't include a case. Owners of the Samsung smartphone will also look in vain for a 25-Watt charger in the online store. 

Input Devices and Operation - Samsung smartphone with face unlocking

Even though the Galaxy M52 5G has an OLED panel, the active fingerprint sensor is located in the frame of the case. The biometric finger recognition is usually accurate, but at times we have to reposition our finger, for it to be recognized. In addition, the speed of the sensor isn't really very high. 

As an additional unlocking option, simple 2D face recognition is available, which is implemented via the front camera. The recognition rate is convincing, but the 2D face unlocking function isn't very secure.

Inputs on the 6.7-inch AMOLED display are accurately and quickly recognized up to the corners of the touchscreen. Thanks to the high refresh rate of 120 Hz, the Samsung smartphone offers a smooth operation.

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G test
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G test
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G test

Display - Galaxy M52 5G with OLED

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

The 16.5-cm (6.7 in) Infinity-O display of the Galaxy M52 5G is based on the in-house Super-AMOLED technology. While the manufacturer officially does not advertise an HDR10 certification, according to the "DRM Info" app, the OLED panel, which has a resolution of 2400 x 1080 pixels, supports HDR contents. Considering the brightness of 1012 cd/m² that we measured in the APL50 test, users should also benefit from this, particularly since the APL50 also leaves some headroom.  

To control the brightness, the mid-range smartphone uses pulse width modulation at a low frequency of 236 Hz. The OLED flickering is noticeable across the whole spectrum in the Samsung smartphone. We do not see a DC Dimming mode in the Settings menu.   

The refresh rate of the display can be set to either 60 or 120 Hz. There is no adaptive control. This means that the panel of the Galaxy M smartphone is unable to adjust automatically to the displayed content, like the Premium devices of the manufacturer, for example. 

667
cd/m²
667
cd/m²
694
cd/m²
667
cd/m²
666
cd/m²
695
cd/m²
663
cd/m²
659
cd/m²
692
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Super AMOLED Plus tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 695 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 674.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 666 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.28 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.246
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi Poco F3
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Screen
35%
-42%
1%
38%
-26%
Brightness middle
666
797
20%
420
-37%
736
11%
889
33%
594
-11%
Brightness
674
800
19%
428
-36%
751
11%
902
34%
594
-12%
Brightness Distribution
95
97
2%
89
-6%
96
1%
95
0%
99
4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.28
0.9
61%
3.15
-38%
2.18
4%
0.9
61%
2.74
-20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.28
2
53%
7.1
-66%
5.69
-33%
1.9
56%
6
-40%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
1.1
54%
4
-67%
2.1
12%
1.3
46%
4.2
-75%
Gamma
2.246 98%
2.26 97%
2.233 99%
2.27 97%
2.26 97%
2.278 97%
CCT
6538 99%
6397 102%
7413 88%
6563 99%
6614 98%
7322 89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 235.8 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 235.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 235.8 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The Galaxy M52 5G does not offer a lot of setting options for color adjustment, but at least users can choose among two different profiles. While the color temperature can be adjusted in the Standard profile, you cannot change the separate parameters such as Saturation or Gamma. 

In our tests with the CalMAN software and spectral photometer, the AMOLED panel of the Samsung smartphone appears to have a decent calibration and delivers satisfactory color deviations for this price class (in the Natural profile). Due to the OLED technology where separate pixels can be completely turned off, there is an "absolute" black, and the contrast (theoretically) tends towards being infinite.

Color Accuracy (Target Color Space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
Color Accuracy (Target Color Space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
Color Space (Target Color Space: AdobeRGB; profile: Natural)
Color Space (Target Color Space: AdobeRGB; profile: Natural)
Color Space (Target Color Space: P3; profile: Natural)
Color Space (Target Color Space: P3; profile: Natural)
Color Space (Target Color Space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
Color Space (Target Color Space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
Grayscale (Target Color Space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
Grayscale (Target Color Space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
Saturation (Target Color Space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
Saturation (Target Color Space: sRGB; profile: Natural)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Due to the relatively high brightness, the Galaxy M52 5G shows itself well-equipped in daily usage also outdoors. Even in direct sun light with some reflections on the glass surface, the image contents should still remain easily readable due to the high brightness and contrast.  

The viewing angle stability of the AMOLED panel is very good, and you can only notice a slight loss in brightness from very steep viewing angles.

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G test
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G test

Performance - Samsung smartphone with a Qualcomm SoC

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G processor running in the Galaxy M52 5G contains eight cores distributed in two clusters. The Cortex A78 cluster offers four cores (2.4 GHz), while the remaining four cores are based on the A55 architecture (1.8 GHz). The "G" in the processor label indicates some specialization for games. According to Qualcomm, several WiFi features were adjusted for this, and the Adreno 642L graphics unit was accelerated.

In everyday operation, the mid-range processor in combination with the built-in 6 GB of LPDDR4x-RAM ensures a good system performance. Thanks to the fast 120-Hz display, animations are rendered smoothly and the load times of applications are also fairly short. However, other mid-range smartphones such as the OnePlus Nord 2 5G set a significantly faster standard with the UFS 3.1 specification. This is also demonstrated by our measurements in AndroBench.  

In our benchmark package, the Samsung smartphone follows the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G sibling model, which also uses the Snapdragon 778G. The overall results are at a good performance level for this price class, even if the Poco F3 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 offers even more power.    

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
765 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
787 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
511 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
771 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
998 Points +30%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
809 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (765 - 791, n=11)
781 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=216, last 2 years)
914 Points +19%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2795 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2962 Points +6%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1627 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2808 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3368 Points +21%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
2463 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2785 - 3000, n=11)
2882 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=216, last 2 years)
2997 Points +7%
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2353 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2281 Points -3%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1637 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2216 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3587 Points +52%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4501 Points +91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2216 - 2548, n=11)
2329 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 9992, n=86, last 2 years)
4246 Points +80%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2254 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2207 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1584 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2359 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3606 Points +60%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4726 Points +110%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2207 - 2359, n=10)
2254 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (434 - 10711, n=78, last 2 years)
4051 Points +80%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
11754 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10755 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
8694 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
12625 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
13610 Points +16%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
8486 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (9330 - 13296, n=10)
11553 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=212, last 2 years)
11756 Points 0%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6409 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6389 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3783 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6352 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6326 - 6409, n=7)
6367 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)
3766 Points -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
7242 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
7238 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3948 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
7241 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (7138 - 7276, n=7)
7221 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)
4186 Points -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4535 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4529 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3283 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4442 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4410 - 4605, n=7)
4498 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)
3082 Points -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6398 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6458 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3859 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6559 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7970 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6398 - 6703, n=7)
6584 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)
9351 Points +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
7199 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
7608 Points +6%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
4038 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
7496 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12033 Points +67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (7199 - 7618, n=7)
7489 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)
16352 Points +127%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6394 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4224 Points -34%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3102 Points -51%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4563 Points -29%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3653 Points -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4224 - 6394, n=7)
4892 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)
4426 Points -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5065 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5036 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2653 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4967 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4967 - 5096, n=9)
5032 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=103, last 2 years)
2770 Points -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5189 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5213 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2537 Points -51%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5140 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5134 - 5218, n=9)
5186 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=103, last 2 years)
2769 Points -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4532 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4501 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3182 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4444 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4423 - 4723, n=9)
4539 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=103, last 2 years)
3166 Points -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5032 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5236 Points +4%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2745 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5355 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7377 Points +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5032 - 5469, n=9)
5337 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=180, last 2 years)
6789 Points +35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5103 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5651 Points +11%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2637 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5591 Points +10%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
9498 Points +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5103 - 5651, n=9)
5550 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=179, last 2 years)
9811 Points +92%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4522 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4166 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3189 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4664 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4140 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4166 - 4942, n=9)
4710 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=179, last 2 years)
4236 Points -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4256 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4299 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2537 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4250 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4002 - 4810, n=9)
4278 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6439, n=97, last 2 years)
2687 Points -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5323 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5338 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2428 Points -54%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5263 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5263 - 5370, n=9)
5315 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=97, last 2 years)
2871 Points -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2578 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2557 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2793 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2539 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2137 - 3523, n=9)
2578 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 3525, n=97, last 2 years)
2676 Points +4%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2465 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2505 Points +2%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1252 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2490 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4288 Points +74%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4208 Points +71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2464 - 2505, n=10)
2483 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 9839, n=134, last 2 years)
2569 Points +4%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2321 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2500 Points +8%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1226 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2485 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4271 Points +84%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4214 Points +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2321 - 2501, n=10)
2466 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=202, last 2 years)
6307 Points +172%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
690 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
695 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
364 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
690 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1223 Points +77%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1283 Points +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (686 - 695, n=10)
691 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 5226, n=206, last 2 years)
1697 Points +146%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
684 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
688 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
352 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
687 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1222 Points +79%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1256 Points +84%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (681 - 690, n=10)
686 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=201, last 2 years)
1705 Points +149%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
107 fps
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
89 fps -17%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
58 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
108 fps +1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
71 fps -34%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
59 fps -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (60 - 116, n=11)
93 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 165, n=182, last 2 years)
84.5 fps -21%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
132 fps
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
133 fps +1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
69 fps -48%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
132 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
200 fps +52%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
178 fps +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (132 - 134, n=11)
132.7 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=182, last 2 years)
247 fps +87%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
68 fps
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
69 fps +1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
47 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
69 fps +1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
60 fps -12%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
60 fps -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (59 - 69, n=11)
65.9 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=184, last 2 years)
72 fps +6%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
77 fps
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
79 fps +3%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
41 fps -47%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
77 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
119 fps +55%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
124 fps +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (77 - 79, n=11)
77.8 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.2 - 363, n=184, last 2 years)
140.6 fps +83%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
49 fps
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
51 fps +4%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
24 fps -51%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
49 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
59 fps +20%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
58 fps +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (48 - 53, n=11)
49.5 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=184, last 2 years)
60.8 fps +24%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
56 fps
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
57 fps +2%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
27 fps -52%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
56 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
81 fps +45%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
77 fps +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (56 - 58, n=11)
56.5 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 279, n=184, last 2 years)
99.1 fps +77%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
28 fps
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
29 fps +4%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
14 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
28 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
44 fps +57%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
41 fps +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (28 - 31, n=11)
28.8 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 117, n=184, last 2 years)
43.3 fps +55%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
33 fps
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
33 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
17 fps -48%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
33 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
48 fps +45%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
47 fps +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (33 - 34, n=11)
33.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 166, n=184, last 2 years)
59.9 fps +82%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
30 fps
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
33 fps +10%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
15 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
30 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
49 fps +63%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
48 fps +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (30 - 35, n=11)
31.5 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=224, last 2 years)
43.8 fps +46%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
34 fps
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
39 fps +15%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
17 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
34 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
57 fps +68%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
54 fps +59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (34 - 39, n=11)
35.8 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=224, last 2 years)
64.4 fps +89%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
19 fps
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
20 fps +5%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
9.6 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
19 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
33 fps +74%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
31 fps +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (19 - 22, n=11)
19.7 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 105, n=224, last 2 years)
32.5 fps +71%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
13 fps
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
14 fps +8%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
6.1 fps -53%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
13 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
22 fps +69%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
21 fps +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (13 - 14, n=11)
13.4 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=224, last 2 years)
25.6 fps +97%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
503392 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
509185 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
325377 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
438254 Points -13%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
680139 Points +35%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
604538 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (438254 - 540593, n=11)
501252 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points +47%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
136987 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
Points -100%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
12743 Points -91%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
139024 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
111838 Points -18%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
71083 Points -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (136987 - 140376, n=6)
138766 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)
21146 Points -85%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4321 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4809 Points +11%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2783 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4349 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
6356 Points +47%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
5130 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4079 - 5002, n=11)
4549 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)
5745 Points +33%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
8963 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10455 Points +17%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
4183 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
9089 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
9997 Points +12%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
9622 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (8751 - 10816, n=11)
9736 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)
9678 Points +8%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
3956 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4957 Points +25%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3556 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4269 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7692 Points +94%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
7277 Points +84%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (3956 - 6372, n=11)
4968 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)
6250 Points +58%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6654 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6729 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2837 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6783 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12801 Points +92%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
7754 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6594 - 6783, n=11)
6686 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)
14101 Points +112%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
1386 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1534 Points +11%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1382 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
1359 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1658 Points +20%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1276 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (1155 - 1534, n=11)
1336 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)
1494 Points +8%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
7658 Points
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
6559 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
7622 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12855 Points +68%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
21710 Points +183%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (7622 - 19875, n=5)
12471 Points +63%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=149, last 2 years)
21860 Points +185%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=172, last 2 years)
105.8 Points +42%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
86.2 Points +16%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
75.1 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (58.8 - 86.8, n=11)
75.1 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G (Chrome96)
74.4 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
71.8 Points -3%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
51.1 Points -31%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94)
38.28 Points -49%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
155.3 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (102.6 - 155.3, n=7)
132.5 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G (Chrome96)
120.7 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
118.1 Points -2%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
108.8 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
105.4 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)
104.3 Points -14%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94)
75.3 Points -38%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min +104%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
74.8 runs/min +42%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
61.5 runs/min +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (52.5 - 61.5, n=9)
56.2 runs/min +7%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chome 93)
53.2 runs/min +1%
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G (Chrome96)
52.5 runs/min
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chome 92)
50.2 runs/min -4%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94)
35.3 runs/min -33%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points +32%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
125 Points +24%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
113 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
107 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (93 - 131, n=10)
107 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G (Chrome96)
101 Points
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
69 Points -32%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94)
57 Points -44%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=210, last 2 years)
33573 Points +32%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
31915 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (23915 - 31915, n=11)
27285 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
26577 Points +4%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
26207 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G (Chrome96)
25433 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
25119 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94)
17637 Points -31%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94)
2475 ms * -38%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
1809 ms * -1%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
1802 ms * -1%
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G (Chrome96)
1788 ms *
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
1744 ms * +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (1323 - 1893, n=11)
1620 ms * +9%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years)
1599 ms * +11%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
1323 ms * +26%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy M52 5GXiaomi 11 Lite 5G NEMotorola Edge 20 LiteSamsung Galaxy A52s 5GXiaomi Poco F3OnePlus Nord 2 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
16%
-6%
3%
27%
81%
-23%
72%
Sequential Read 256KB
907
944
4%
954
5%
951
5%
1378
52%
1827
101%
Sequential Write 256KB
487.3
679
39%
478.3
-2%
486.5
0%
684
40%
1256
158%
Random Read 4KB
165
208.7
26%
141.4
-14%
168.2
2%
208
26%
223.7
36%
152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113)
-7%
Random Write 4KB
187.8
178.8
-5%
161.9
-14%
192.5
3%
170.6
-9%
239
27%
131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113)
-30%

Games - The Galaxy M52 5G reaches more than 100 fps

The fact that you can also play demanding games smoothly on the Galaxy M52 5G is ensured by the Adreno 642L, which includes selected Snapdragon Elite gaming functions such as the "Game Smoother" or the "Game Network Latency Manager." In addition, Samsung implements its in-house "Game Booster," which is supposed to control the temperature and RAM usage, among other things. 

However, buyers of the Galaxy smartphone should still understand that the M52 5G is not a gaming smartphone. For example, PUBG Mobile can only be played in the HD setting, and the highest detail level (UHD) cannot be selected. We take a more detailed look at the gaming performance with the GameBench app. The Adreno 642L is able to reach about 40 fps at medium graphics settings and significantly higher with 60 fps at low detail settings.

Even though the Armajet arena shooter, which supports 144 fps in theory, is not reproduced with constant frame rates, the Samsung mid-range smartphone still reaches more than 100 fps at times. Our measurements show 89 frames per second on average.  

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G; Armajet: Ø88.7 (74-113)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.7 (54-61)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø39.9 (38-41)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.9 (37-41)

Emissions - The Samsung Galaxy M52 5G gets quite warm

Temperatures

GFXBench benchmark
GFXBench benchmark

The inhouse cooling system doesn't always keep the heat development of the Snapdragon SoC under control. In contrast to the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE, the case of the Galaxy smartphone can get relatively warm and even hot under longer loads. We measure a maximum value of almost 45 °C (113 °F). On the other hand, it hardly gets warm during idle operation. 

The Galaxy M52 5G completes the battery test of GFXBench without any problems, even in the demanding Manhattan test (OpenGL ES 3.1). The Wild Life stress tests also run without any problems.  

Max. Load
 44.4 °C
112 F
39.4 °C
103 F
35.9 °C
97 F
 
 44.6 °C
112 F
39.3 °C
103 F
35.9 °C
97 F
 
 44.5 °C
112 F
39 °C
102 F
35.7 °C
96 F
 
Maximum: 44.6 °C = 112 F
Average: 39.9 °C = 104 F
30.6 °C
87 F
37.1 °C
99 F
38.7 °C
102 F
33.1 °C
92 F
38.7 °C
102 F
44.5 °C
112 F
34.3 °C
94 F
39.4 °C
103 F
43.4 °C
110 F
Maximum: 44.5 °C = 112 F
Average: 37.8 °C = 100 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.4 (7.46min) % +1%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.2 (14.8min) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.9 (14.8min) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.9 (14.8min) %
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82.2 (3521min) % -17%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.4 % -38%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 (4.14min) % 0%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 (4.14min) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.5 (4.12min) %
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.8 (2.21min) % -1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82.2 (1002min) % -17%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66.6 (858min) % -33%
0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø4.14 (4.12-4.14)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø4.15 (4.14-4.17)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø2.22 (2.21-2.24)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø4.14 (4.14-4.15)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.8 (14.8-15)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø14.9 (14.8-15)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.49 (7.46-7.51)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.8 (14.8-15)

Speaker

Unfortunately, the M52 5G has to make do without the stereo sound of the Galaxy A52s 5G sibling model. The mono speaker offers a solid sound experience, but not more than that. The low frequency range sounds a bit thin, but the mids and highs are reproduced fairly linear.   

Wired headphones or external speakers can be connected via the USB-C connection. Those who prefer Bluetooth for wireless sound output can also use the SBC, AAC, aptX, and LDAC audio codecs. However, we miss some codecs such as LHDC or aptX HD and aptX Adaptive. 

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204039.22532.433.73127.627.74029.932.35034.934.5632729.28017.820.310014.21612513.323.216010.235.12008.842.42509.648.43157.350.54007.354.35009.259.963012.96180017.365100012.970.8125010.971.916009.772.2200010.266.9250011.665.231501368.8400013.967.9500015.266.3630015.769.4800015.866.61000017.164.71250016.162.21600016.657.8SPL25.880.3N0.746.2median 12.9median 64.7Delta2.99.631.841.52433.116.127.727.629.332.331.723.431.922312233.92133.617.94513.348.515.257.113.260.611.56312.268.612.368.713.371.214.573.312.27711.277.211.778.212.178.612.777.813.676.513.182.713.679.913.172.713.66913.660.313.5532589.30.677.9median 13.3median 71.21.310.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy M52 5GXiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Life - Galaxy M52 5G with 5000 mAh

Power Consumption

Using the included 15-Watt charger, the 5000-mAh battery can be completely recharged in about 115 minutes. The power consumption is inconspicuous compared to the mid-range competitors. 

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.3 / 1.6 Watt
Load midlight 3.9 / 7.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
4250 mAh
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F3
4520 mAh
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
4500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-8%
13%
-6%
-2%
-15%
-28%
-14%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.78
13%
0.8
11%
1.2
-33%
0.76
16%
0.8
11%
1.106 ?(0.78 - 2.5, n=10)
-23%
Idle Average *
1.3
1.97
-52%
1.2
8%
1.4
-8%
1.29
1%
1.2
8%
2.07 ?(1.13 - 5, n=10)
-59%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
1.99
-24%
1.5
6%
1.7
-6%
1.45
9%
1.6
-0%
2.32 ?(1.44 - 5.6, n=10)
-45%
Load Average *
3.9
3.23
17%
3.7
5%
3.6
8%
4.6
-18%
5.7
-46%
Load Maximum *
7.4
7.08
4%
4.7
36%
6.9
7%
8.87
-20%
10.9
-47%
7.81 ?(6.29 - 14, n=10)
-6%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G: Ø4.59 (1.054-9.22)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.70.91.11.31.61.822.22.42.72.93.13.33.63.844.2Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.17 (3.96-4.44)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.24 (1.078-1.502)

Battery Life

The battery life of the Galaxy M52 5G turns out at a good level for a smartphone with a fixed 120-Hz frame rate. It is easiest to compare our competing devices with the brightness adjusted to 150 cd/m². Lasting almost 13 hours in our WLAN test and more than 21 hours in the video test, the Galaxy M52 5G ends up in the middle of our comparison field. However, the predecessor of the Samsung smartphone offers a significantly better battery life.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
49h 13min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 57min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 26min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 02min
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
4250 mAh
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F3
4520 mAh
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
-16%
8%
-7%
-9%
-3%
Reader / Idle
2953
1648
-44%
2163
-27%
1897
-36%
1562
-47%
1926
-35%
H.264
1286
1215
-6%
1443
12%
1109
-14%
918
-29%
1126
-12%
WiFi v1.3
777
705
-9%
972
25%
721
-7%
805
4%
958
23%
Load
242
233
-4%
294
21%
309
28%
329
36%
272
12%

Pros

+ low weight
+ bright 120-Hz OLED panel
+ good battery life
+ decent equipment
+ accurate locating

Cons

- corresponding 25W charger not included
- fairly high heat development
- wide angle camera
- no stereo sound

Verdict on the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G

Testing the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G. Test unit provided by NBB.com (notebooksbilliger.de)
Testing the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G. Test unit provided by NBB.com (notebooksbilliger.de)

With the Galaxy M52 5G, Samsung succeeded in creating an attractive and light mid-range smartphone, which doesn't have too much bulk despite its large size. The successor to the Galaxy M51 convinces us with a successful combination of a bright 120-Hz OLED display, fast Qualcomm processor, accurate locating capabilities, and good battery life. 

Without the large 7000-mAh battery of its predecessor, the Galaxy M52 5G loses some of its identity. 

However, with the M52 5G, Samsung lost sight of the "DNA" of its Galaxy M series, consisting of a very long battery life due to a huge battery capacity, which is also to some extent the reason for the existence of the M52 5G in the Galaxy family. The similarities to Galaxy A52s 5G, which is similarly priced and better in many areas, make the representative of the M series look worse in the direct comparison than it really is.    

If your budget supports this, we would rather recommend an A model from Samsung (A52 5G or A52s 5G). In addition, with its Lite versions of the Mi 11 generation, (11 Lite 5G or 11 Lite 5G NE), Xiaomi offers a similar concept of a light-yet-powerful mid-range smartphone, with both Xiaomi smartphones offering a better overall package than the Galaxy M52 G in combination with a low price.

Price and Availability

At the time of this test, interested buyers can purchase the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G from local web shops in various European and Asian countries such as Samsung India or Amazon India.

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G - 08/30/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
49 / 70 → 69%
Weight
90%
Battery
91%
Display
91%
Games Performance
53 / 64 → 82%
Application Performance
73 / 86 → 85%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
64%
Average
78%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 2 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Samsung Galaxy M52 5G review - A powerful 120-Hz smartphone that is destined to fail?
Marcus Herbrich, 2022-01- 2 (Update: 2022-01- 6)