Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 185H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is the top-of-the-line Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 6, are SMT-enabled and run at up to 5.1 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.8 GHz. The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.35 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while the rest of the chip is turned off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes that this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 9 185H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 185H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official Intel performance data, then the 185H is not a whole lot faster than the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.35 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is about as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 9 series processor has a "base" power consumption of 45 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. A powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 185H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Plus X1P-64-100

The Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 is a moderately fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops that debuted in April 2024. The X1P-64-100 has 10 Oryon CPU cores (10 threads) running at no more than 3.4 GHz. Other key features include the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The chip's smarter X Elite series brothers including first and foremost the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 are thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU but with more CPU cores enabled, higher GPU clock speeds, higher CPU clock speeds and possibly higher power targets as well.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if it is is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The Qualcomm SoC is said to have 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

Its multi-thread performance is very close to that of the Intel Core i7-13700H and the 9-core Apple M4, meaning this is a pretty fast CPU that's good for most tasks one could possibly throw at it in 2024.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 iGPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it supposedly delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that delivers up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is rather underwhelming; while slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno is not fast enough to outpace the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1P-64-100 is most likely going to be less power-hungry than its more powerful X Elite brothers. Expect to see anything between 10 W and 35 W under long-term workloads because that's what Ryzen U chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 125H

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H is a mid-range Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 14 cores (4 + 8 + 2) and 18 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 4, are HT-enabled and run at up to 4.5 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island), run at up to 3.6 GHz. The 7-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.20 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 5 125H comes with 18 MB of L3 cache which is a significant reduction compared to the 24 MB that the 155H, the 165H and the 185H have. The processor has a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s; it supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the 125H features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support. It is also worth mentioning that Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 125H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

While we have no way of knowing what the 125H will be like, as of December 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 7735HS (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.75 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 7-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.20 GHz is set to overshadow the Radeon 760M; just like the 8-core Arc GPU, this graphics adapter is set to be miles ahead of the aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. As long as one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

The Base power consumption, in the case of the 125H, is 28 W while its maximum Turbo power consumption is supposed to be within 115 W. A powerful cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

This Core Ultra 5 series processor is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 9 185HQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
CodenameMeteor Lake-HOryonMeteor Lake-H
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HQualcomm Snapdragon XIntel Meteor Lake-H
Series: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-1003.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 « - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H « 3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz <=3400 MHz3600 - 4500 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB6 MB18 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
10 / 10
10 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
14 / 18
4 x 4.5 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP45 Watt28 Watt
Technology7 nm4 nm7 nm
max. Temp.110 °C110 °C
SocketBGA2049BGA2049
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Essen., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSIntel Arc 7-Core iGPU ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86ARMx86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.qualcomm.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache2.3 MB
L2 Cache12 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 185H
39.2 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X Plus X1P-64-100
30.9 pt (51%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 5 125H
35.7 pt (59%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 103     avg: 108.2     median: 108.1 (61%)     max: 112.2 Points
109 Points (61%)
min: 97     avg: 100.2     median: 100 (56%)     max: 102.2 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 828     avg: 1003     median: 1021 (19%)     max: 1096 Points
795 Points (15%)
min: 331     avg: 638     median: 668 (12%)     max: 815 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12688     avg: 18030     median: 18338 (17%)     max: 19851 Points
8644 Points (8%)
min: 9194     avg: 12514     median: 12989 (12%)     max: 14564 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1620     avg: 1818     median: 1812 (76%)     max: 1912 Points
1129 Points (47%)
min: 1549     avg: 1661     median: 1655 (70%)     max: 1735 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 622     avg: 701     median: 702 (76%)     max: 735 Points
420 Points (46%)
min: 622     avg: 640     median: 633 (69%)     max: 664 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4843     avg: 6957     median: 7192 (18%)     max: 7651 Points
3252 Points (8%)
min: 3673     avg: 4830     median: 4948 (12%)     max: 5618 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1581.9     avg: 2762     median: 2853 (18%)     max: 3165 Points
1989 Points (13%)
min: 1700     avg: 1996     median: 2077 (13%)     max: 2245 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 238     avg: 267.1     median: 268 (74%)     max: 281 Points
209 Points (58%)
min: 235     avg: 242.6     median: 246 (68%)     max: 251 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 33.95     avg: 34.7     median: 34.6 (45%)     max: 35.55 Points
21.3 Points (27%)
min: 21.9     avg: 25.6     median: 26.7 (34%)     max: 27.02 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.11     avg: 3.2     median: 3.1 (75%)     max: 3.27 Points
2.2 Points (52%)
min: 2.86     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (70%)     max: 3.03 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9719     avg: 9994     median: 9977.5 (60%)     max: 10300 Points
2661 Points (16%)
min: 8948     avg: 9295     median: 9334.5 (56%)     max: 9561 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 59935     avg: 63422     median: 63273.5 (46%)     max: 67204 Points
17854 Points (13%)
min: 45559     avg: 50476     median: 51477.5 (37%)     max: 53390 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 88902     avg: 90904     median: 91265.5 (58%)     max: 92183 Points
min: 78788     avg: 78803     median: 78802.5 (50%)     max: 78817 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 13892     avg: 14147     median: 14161 (17%)     max: 14374 Points
min: 12858     avg: 13070     median: 13069.5 (16%)     max: 13281 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 87.408     avg: 215.6     median: 165.1 (2%)     max: 441.275 s
242.1 s (3%)
min: 148.994     avg: 231     median: 247 (3%)     max: 296.9 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.254     avg: 4.3     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 8.1 s
8.1 s (2%)
min: 4.107     avg: 6     median: 4.5 (1%)     max: 9.5 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6724     avg: 9769     median: 7940 (13%)     max: 17856 Points
11885 Points (19%)
min: 5594     avg: 7773     median: 6209 (10%)     max: 13080 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 52522     avg: 70203     median: 71934 (41%)     max: 76331 MIPS
37289 MIPS (21%)
0 MIPS (0%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4502     avg: 5480     median: 5560 (66%)     max: 5781 MIPS
4652 MIPS (55%)
min: 4663     avg: 4950     median: 5004 (59%)     max: 5136 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 153.6     avg: 159.7     median: 159.9 (53%)     max: 165.6 fps
min: 129.6     avg: 132     median: 132.3 (44%)     max: 134 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 300.5     avg: 322.4     median: 326.3 (75%)     max: 336.5 fps
min: 304.5     avg: 306.1     median: 305.3 (70%)     max: 308.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.1     avg: 20.1     median: 20.6 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
6.5 fps (11%)
min: 9.7     avg: 13.5     median: 13.8 (24%)     max: 16.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.96     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (32%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
min: 0.817     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (25%)     max: 0.869 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.4     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (31%)     max: 2.3 GB/s
min: 1.2     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (24%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.9     avg: 10.8     median: 11.3 (29%)     max: 12.1 GB/s
min: 8.8     avg: 8.9     median: 9 (23%)     max: 9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 280     avg: 331.7     median: 309 (4%)     max: 538 Seconds
751 Seconds (10%)
min: 391     avg: 500     median: 435 (6%)     max: 671 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 163     avg: 188.6     median: 177 (1%)     max: 285 Seconds
402 Seconds (3%)
min: 228     avg: 278.7     median: 248 (2%)     max: 364 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4313     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.503 sec
0.7 sec (16%)
min: 0.4898     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.565 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9854     avg: 13153     median: 13074 (28%)     max: 15529 Points
min: 12498     avg: 13652     median: 13866 (30%)     max: 13971 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.6     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 7.256 s
17.5 s (4%)
min: 7.4     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.744 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 14.786     avg: 14.9     median: 14.9 (1%)     max: 15.15 s
37.5 s (2%)
min: 16.446     avg: 16.6     median: 16.5 (1%)     max: 16.967 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 304.446     avg: 358     median: 366.9 (2%)     max: 402.742 s
873 s (4%)
min: 394.697     avg: 406.3     median: 403.6 (2%)     max: 423.565 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 73186     avg: 76512     median: 75742.5 (58%)     max: 80494 Points
min: 43778     avg: 65927     median: 71115.5 (55%)     max: 71915 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12693     avg: 21337     median: 22169.5 (55%)     max: 24629 Points
13595 Points (33%)
min: 12766     avg: 16294     median: 16940 (42%)     max: 17992 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 74638     avg: 81658     median: 76996.5 (63%)     max: 100241 Points
min: 69572     avg: 72139     median: 72618 (59%)     max: 73481 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 73618     avg: 82055     median: 75494 (61%)     max: 100192 Points
min: 69751     avg: 71822     median: 72061.5 (58%)     max: 73412 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78677     avg: 89559     median: 91059 (76%)     max: 102469 Points
min: 79411     avg: 83102     median: 84374 (70%)     max: 85520 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 14341     avg: 18938     median: 18896 (48%)     max: 21425 Points
min: 14164     avg: 14874     median: 14955 (38%)     max: 15261 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21106     avg: 28071     median: 28964.5 (52%)     max: 30623 Points
16496 Points (29%)
min: 16291     avg: 21020     median: 21944 (39%)     max: 22978 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6307     avg: 10957     median: 11454.5 (48%)     max: 12209 Points
4652 Points (20%)
min: 6216     avg: 8197     median: 8719 (37%)     max: 9182 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2199     avg: 2483     median: 2495 (62%)     max: 2573 Points
2445 Points (61%)
min: 2199     avg: 2277     median: 2288 (57%)     max: 2316 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 12825     avg: 13823     median: 13974 (54%)     max: 14540 Points
13278 Points (52%)
min: 11087     avg: 11404     median: 11411.5 (44%)     max: 11749 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2410     avg: 2931     median: 3105 (99%)     max: 3105 Points
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12735     avg: 18936     median: 21003 (86%)     max: 21003 Points
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1700     avg: 1828     median: 1852 (72%)     max: 1902 Points
min: 1593     avg: 1657     median: 1668 (65%)     max: 1699 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10441     avg: 13368     median: 13566 (24%)     max: 14230 Points
min: 9069     avg: 10217     median: 10309 (18%)     max: 10856 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1695     avg: 1788     median: 1799 (8%)     max: 1830 Points
min: 1596     avg: 1628     median: 1627.5 (7%)     max: 1659 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13228     avg: 13612     median: 13736 (43%)     max: 13972 Points
min: 10676     avg: 10712     median: 10711.5 (34%)     max: 10747 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7040     avg: 7372     median: 7422 (74%)     max: 7602 Points
min: 6734     avg: 6816     median: 6750 (67%)     max: 6964 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47960     avg: 49362     median: 49781.5 (50%)     max: 49924 Points
min: 38648     avg: 38726     median: 38736 (39%)     max: 38793 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 494     avg: 524     median: 522 (1%)     max: 594 ms
460.8 ms (1%)
min: 560     avg: 580     median: 575 (1%)     max: 607 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 90543     avg: 95362     median: 96090 (73%)     max: 98144 Points
80936 Points (61%)
min: 85765     avg: 86220     median: 86219.5 (65%)     max: 86674 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 237     avg: 258.7     median: 260 (71%)     max: 271 Points
256 Points (70%)
min: 222     avg: 231.3     median: 231 (63%)     max: 240 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 237     avg: 279.4     median: 286 (51%)     max: 301 Points
399 Points (72%)
min: 245     avg: 253.7     median: 254 (46%)     max: 263 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1589     avg: 1774     median: 1770 (66%)     max: 1971 Points
1216 Points (45%)
min: 1480     avg: 1558     median: 1540.5 (58%)     max: 1633 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 44.4     avg: 113.4     median: 123.8 (21%)     max: 176.1 Watt
min: 41.3     avg: 64.4     median: 62.2 (11%)     max: 90.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 88     avg: 129.5     median: 124.6 (23%)     max: 171.8 Watt
40.6 Watt (7%)
min: 56.7     avg: 70.7     median: 64.3 (12%)     max: 89.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.1     avg: 12.4     median: 11.7 (8%)     max: 21.4 Watt
5.3 Watt (4%)
min: 4.31     avg: 8     median: 6.4 (4%)     max: 14.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.18     avg: 13.7     median: 11.9 (13%)     max: 28.8 Watt
4 Watt (4%)
min: 5.71     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (7%)     max: 7.68 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 17.8     avg: 27.4     median: 24.2 (18%)     max: 67 Points per Watt
49 Points per Watt (37%)
min: 24     avg: 28     median: 28 (21%)     max: 31.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 185H → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 → 67% n=34

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 125H → 80% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 29. 19:47:49

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16921 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17589 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 16911 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753811269s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:17:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.011s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16921 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 16921 +0.034s ... 0.05s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 17589 +0.004s ... 0.055s

#11 got single benchmarks 17589 +0.005s ... 0.059s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 16911 +0.004s ... 0.064s

#13 got single benchmarks 16911 +0.016s ... 0.08s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.08s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.032s ... 0.112s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.069s ... 0.181s

#17 return log +0s ... 0.182s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)