Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is a powerful Hawk Point family chip that we believe to be a Ryzen 7 7840HS in disguise but with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The R7 8845HS was brought to life in H2 2023; it features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say that there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD uncorks its 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology meaning the new processors are expected to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs. Dozens of popular apps such as DaVinci Resolve support this technology, as of late 2023.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8845HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8845HS is a 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The R7 8845HS is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The APU comes with 12 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.1 GHz, the 16 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 890M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support.

Of the 12 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores and 8 are smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter run at significantly lower clock speeds than the former.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the HX 370 supports LPDDR5x-8000 and DDR5-5600 RAM, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

Given the IPC improvement, we expect 4 Zen 5 cores combined with 8 Zen 5c cores to perform about as well as 16 Zen 4 cores meaning there is a real chance of the HX 370 dethroning the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a laptop powered by the HX 370.

Graphics

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer right now. It features 16 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) running at up to 2,900 MHz. We expect the graphics adapter to deliver gaming performance good enough for playing 2023 and 2024 games in 1080p (Low detail settings).

Naturally, the 890M is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The HX 370 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of mid 2024, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 8845HSAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Strix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 H 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz2000 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB12 MB
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
TDP45 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)
NPU / AI16 TOPS INT850 TOPS INT8
Chip AI38 TOPS INT880 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8845HS
39.9 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.2 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 102     avg: 104.4     median: 103.8 (58%)     max: 107.8 Points
min: 113.6     avg: 116.9     median: 117 (66%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 567     avg: 869     median: 902 (17%)     max: 956 Points
min: 621     avg: 1078     median: 1152 (21%)     max: 1299 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14895     avg: 16165     median: 16192 (15%)     max: 18037 Points
min: 10435     avg: 20619     median: 21897 (20%)     max: 23902 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1623     avg: 1751     median: 1769 (74%)     max: 1783 Points
min: 1921     avg: 2011     median: 2018.5 (85%)     max: 2049 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 673     avg: 686     median: 685 (75%)     max: 698 Points
min: 753     avg: 789     median: 791 (86%)     max: 804 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5808     avg: 6317     median: 6346 (15%)     max: 7026 Points
min: 6449     avg: 8404     median: 8817 (21%)     max: 9280 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2342     avg: 2563     median: 2575 (16%)     max: 2908 Points
min: 2498.13     avg: 3248     median: 3448 (22%)     max: 3551 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 269     avg: 276     median: 276 (76%)     max: 283 Points
min: 188.8     avg: 295.3     median: 307 (85%)     max: 315 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.28     avg: 29.8     median: 29.8 (39%)     max: 30.3 Points
min: 38.84     avg: 40.1     median: 40.1 (52%)     max: 41.17 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (79%)     max: 3.34 Points
min: 3.59     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.7 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7426     avg: 7545     median: 7523 (45%)     max: 7685 Points
min: 8437     avg: 8635     median: 8653.5 (52%)     max: 8797 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 47332     avg: 47532     median: 47500 (34%)     max: 47764 Points
min: 52505     avg: 54759     median: 54920 (40%)     max: 56689 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 85872     avg: 86827     median: 86827 (55%)     max: 87782 Points
min: 96857     avg: 99802     median: 99347 (63%)     max: 103657 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14163     avg: 14360     median: 14360 (17%)     max: 14557 Points
min: 15381     avg: 15735     median: 15812.5 (19%)     max: 15935 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 70.718     avg: 113.2     median: 98.9 (1%)     max: 170 s
min: 50.536     avg: 73.5     median: 79.4 (1%)     max: 84.476 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.703     avg: 3.6     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 5.3 s
min: 2.701     avg: 3     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.743 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7275     avg: 11203     median: 7327 (12%)     max: 19008 Points
min: 4008     avg: 4416     median: 4424.5 (7%)     max: 4806 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 62669     avg: 68390     median: 68354 (39%)     max: 74664 MIPS
min: 66154     avg: 78686     median: 80868 (46%)     max: 84735 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5197     avg: 6319     median: 6393 (75%)     max: 6714 MIPS
min: 5859     avg: 6174     median: 6179 (73%)     max: 6497 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 143.7     avg: 146.8     median: 146.8 (4%)     max: 149.8 fps
min: 164.85     avg: 172.8     median: 170.6 (4%)     max: 185.1 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 286.5     avg: 287.8     median: 287.8 (7%)     max: 289 fps
min: 300     avg: 310.1     median: 305.3 (8%)     max: 330 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 18.6     avg: 20.1     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
min: 20.3     avg: 25.4     median: 26.3 (46%)     max: 28.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
min: 1.6     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (47%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2     avg: 2     median: 2 (34%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
min: 2.5     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (46%)     max: 2.8 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14     avg: 14.4     median: 14.4 (38%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
min: 15.3     avg: 15.6     median: 15.3 (40%)     max: 16.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 288     avg: 326.8     median: 318 (4%)     max: 367 Seconds
min: 208     avg: 236.7     median: 221 (3%)     max: 306 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 179     avg: 200.9     median: 198 (1%)     max: 216 Seconds
min: 139     avg: 154.9     median: 147.5 (1%)     max: 192 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4304     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4935 sec
min: 0.3892     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.529 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15091     avg: 15422     median: 15313 (33%)     max: 15969 Points
min: 13761     avg: 16238     median: 16563 (35%)     max: 17466 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.1     avg: 7.2     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.331 s
min: 8.224     avg: 8.4     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.482 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.6     avg: 17.8     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 18.138 s
min: 17.504     avg: 17.7     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 17.914 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 659.5     avg: 662     median: 662.4 (3%)     max: 665.289 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 82048     avg: 82541     median: 82586.5 (63%)     max: 82943 Points
min: 66119     avg: 74245     median: 76054 (58%)     max: 77565 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 19492     avg: 22379     median: 22207 (55%)     max: 26212 Points
min: 17129     avg: 20432     median: 20777.5 (51%)     max: 24599 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 81620     avg: 84501     median: 84429 (69%)     max: 88462 Points
min: 50952     avg: 60316     median: 61356.5 (50%)     max: 67655 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 81607     avg: 85179     median: 85402 (69%)     max: 88305 Points
min: 50955     avg: 61354     median: 63791.5 (52%)     max: 67802 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 83958     avg: 87188     median: 85870 (69%)     max: 93052 Points
min: 48351     avg: 58447     median: 59313.5 (48%)     max: 66810 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 18507     avg: 20158     median: 20268.5 (51%)     max: 22215 Points
min: 16960     avg: 19488     median: 19578 (50%)     max: 21349 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 25099     avg: 27322     median: 27428 (49%)     max: 30715 Points
min: 24918     avg: 30106     median: 30538 (54%)     max: 33844 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8550     avg: 11247     median: 10853 (46%)     max: 19164 Points
min: 8866     avg: 10478     median: 10630 (45%)     max: 12293 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2510     avg: 2624     median: 2630 (64%)     max: 2698 Points
min: 2780     avg: 2886     median: 2877 (70%)     max: 2965 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 11073     avg: 12854     median: 12998 (50%)     max: 14014 Points
min: 11973     avg: 14641     median: 15043 (58%)     max: 16311 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2523     avg: 2562     median: 2577 (82%)     max: 2587 Points
min: 2645     avg: 2748     median: 2766 (88%)     max: 2844 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12556     avg: 12666     median: 12719 (52%)     max: 12722 Points
min: 12289     avg: 13899     median: 14313 (59%)     max: 15017 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1765     avg: 1931     median: 1949 (74%)     max: 2004 Points
min: 1957     avg: 2087     median: 2097 (80%)     max: 2175 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11256     avg: 11906     median: 11864 (21%)     max: 12726 Points
min: 11394     avg: 14281     median: 14477.5 (26%)     max: 16322 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1869     avg: 1895     median: 1898 (8%)     max: 1914 Points
min: 1827     avg: 1936     median: 1942 (8%)     max: 2041 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11742     avg: 12016     median: 12086 (38%)     max: 12109 Points
min: 12962     avg: 14257     median: 14353 (45%)     max: 15009 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8034     avg: 8109     median: 8077.5 (81%)     max: 8245 Points
min: 7480     avg: 7996     median: 7804 (78%)     max: 8628 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47602     avg: 48576     median: 48614.5 (48%)     max: 49473 Points
min: 42842     avg: 52953     median: 54787 (54%)     max: 57060 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 496     avg: 534     median: 527 (1%)     max: 664 ms
min: 307.8     avg: 433.4     median: 433.5 (1%)     max: 503 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85632     avg: 90739     median: 90496 (66%)     max: 96330 Points
min: 64079     avg: 111154     median: 122035 (89%)     max: 125813 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 176.4     avg: 255.2     median: 256.5 (70%)     max: 314 Points
min: 210     avg: 258.6     median: 259 (71%)     max: 345 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 275     avg: 304.2     median: 305 (55%)     max: 334 Points
min: 252     avg: 311.3     median: 321 (58%)     max: 363 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1531     avg: 1772     median: 1795.5 (67%)     max: 1939 Points
min: 1402     avg: 1793     median: 1785 (67%)     max: 2040 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 42.5     avg: 82.2     median: 81.1 (14%)     max: 147.2 Watt
min: 45.6     avg: 90.6     median: 93 (16%)     max: 133.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39     avg: 79.3     median: 78.1 (14%)     max: 145.6 Watt
min: 46.3     avg: 95.3     median: 101.8 (19%)     max: 130.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.78     avg: 9     median: 7.1 (5%)     max: 16.5 Watt
min: 4.58     avg: 8.8     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 19.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.42     avg: 8.9     median: 7.8 (9%)     max: 16.4 Watt
min: 6.31     avg: 9.4     median: 9.2 (11%)     max: 12.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20     avg: 35.5     median: 33.7 (25%)     max: 66.2 Points per Watt
min: 26.9     avg: 35.8     median: 32.4 (24%)     max: 54.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS → 100% n=54

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 → 110% n=54

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 15. 00:52:20

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16399 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17543 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760482339s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 Oct 2025 05:18:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16399 +0.005s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 16399 +0.023s ... 0.034s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17543 +0.005s ... 0.038s

#10 got single benchmarks 17543 +0.033s ... 0.071s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.071s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.076s ... 0.148s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.149s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)