NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs NVIDIA Quadro M620

NVIDIA Quadro M500M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro M500M

The Nvidia Quadro M500M is a DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM108 chip with 384 shader cores and manufactured in 28 nm by TSMC. The Quadro M500M is the successor to the Quadro K620M which is also based on the Maxwell GM108 but lists a higher memory bandwidth of 16 vs. 14.4 GB/s. Therefore, it is also similar to the consumer GeForce 930M.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than with GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Architecture

Compared to Kepler, Maxwell has been optimized in several details to increase power efficiency. Smaller Streaming Multiprocessors (SMM) with only 128 ALUs (Kepler: 192) and an optimized scheduler should lead to better utilization of the shaders. Nvidia promises that a Maxwell SMM with 128 ALUs can offer 90% of the performance of a Kepler SMX with 192 ALUs. GM108 features 3 SMMs and thus 384 shader cores, 24 TMUs and 8 ROPs (64-bit interface).

Another optimization is the massively enlarged L2 cache. The larger size can reduce some of the memory traffic to allow for a relatively narrow memory interface without significantly hurting performance.

GM108 supports DirectX 11.2 (feature level 11.0 only) as well as DirectX 12.

Performance

The performance should be slightly below the Quadro K620M (same chip, but slightly more memory bandwidth) and therefore positioned in the entry-level of dedicated graphics chips. For 3D games the Quadro M500M should be similar to the GeForce 930M. Therefore, only low-demanding games should run fluently.

Features

The feature set should include support for up to four active displays. High-resolution monitors of up to 3840x2160 pixels can be connected using DisplayPort 1.2 or HDMI 1.4a (HDMI 2.0 not supported). HD-Audio codecs, such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD, can be transmitted via bitstream mode through the HDMI port. However, as most laptops will feature Optimus, the integrated GPU will likely have direct control over the display ports and may limit the feature set available by the Nvidia Kepler cards.

Using CUDA or OpenCL, the cores of the Quadro M500M can be used for general calculations.

GM108 integrates the sixth generation of the PureVideo HD video engine (VP6), offering a better decoding performance for H.264 and MPEG-2 videos. Of course, VP6 supports all features of previous generations (4K support, PIP, video encoding via NVENC API).

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M500M (and M600M, K620M) is rated at 30 W. Therefore, the GPU is best suited for laptops 13 - 14-inches in size and above. The M500M also supports Optimus to automatically switch between an integrated graphics card and the Nvidia GPU.

NVIDIA Quadro M620

► remove

The 28nm NVIDIA Quadro M620 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a 1st generation Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 architecture with 512 of the 640 shader cores activated. Therefore, the GPU is not similar to any current consumer card. The Geforce GTX 950M, for example, uses the full 640 shader cores. The older Quadro M1000M offers very similar specs (same amount of shader cores and also based on the same chip but more graphics memory), but was intended for the Skylake generation. The M620 is intended for the Kaby Lake generation.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

Due to the smaller amount of memory, the Quadro M620 should be slightly slower than the older Quadro M1000M. However, the exact clock speeds are not known up to now. In early benchmarks we have, the M1000M is about 9 % faster than the M620 in SPECviewperf 12.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M620 can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M620 is rated for a 30 Watt TGP including the board and memory components (21.2 Watt TDP), which is 10 Watt lower than the M1000M (which offers more memory). Therefore, the card is suited for 15-inch notebooks and greater.

NVIDIA Quadro M500MNVIDIA Quadro M620
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 (compare) 2048 @ 1139 - 1140 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M (compare) 1536 @ 962 - 1051 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M (compare) 1280 @ 975 - 1013 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M (compare) 1024 @ 1050 MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 (compare) 1024 @ 694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 (compare) 640 @ 991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M (compare) 640 @ 1038 - 1197 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M (compare) 512 @ 993 - 1072 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1018 MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M (compare) 384 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M (compare) 336 @ 475 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 (compare) 384 @ 756 - 1019 (Boost) MHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M (compare) 384 @ 837 - 876 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1029 - 1124 (Boost) MHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M (compare) 320 @ 405 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M (compare) 240 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M (compare) 192 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M (compare) 96 @ 700 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 (compare) 2048 @ 1139 - 1140 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M (compare) 1536 @ 962 - 1051 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M (compare) 1280 @ 975 - 1013 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M (compare) 1024 @ 1050 MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 (compare) 1024 @ 694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 (compare) 640 @ 991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M (compare) 640 @ 1038 - 1197 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M (compare) 512 @ 993 - 1072 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1018 MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M (compare) 384 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M (compare) 336 @ 475 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 (compare) 384 @ 756 - 1019 (Boost) MHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M (compare) 384 @ 837 - 876 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1029 - 1124 (Boost) MHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M (compare) 320 @ 405 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M (compare) 240 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M (compare) 192 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M (compare) 96 @ 700 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
ArchitectureMaxwellMaxwell
384 - 512 -
Core1029 - 1124 (Boost) MHz1018 MHz
Memory4004 MHz5012 MHz
Bus64 Bit128 Bit
MemoryDDR3GDDR5
Max. Memory2048 MB2048 MB
nono
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), 5.0DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), 5.0
Technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Size
Introduced15.12.2015 13.01.2017
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.de/object/mobile-works...

3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
968 Points (7%)
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
862 Points (6%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
126522 Points (24%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 24523     avg: 33578     median: 33578 (5%)     max: 42633 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 5986     avg: 6299     median: 6359 (10%)     max: 6491 Points
min: 11481     avg: 13620     median: 13620 (20%)     max: 15759 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 8211     avg: 8403     median: 8348 (4%)     max: 8703 Points
min: 20980     avg: 22120     median: 22119.5 (11%)     max: 23259 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 1387     avg: 1401     median: 1391.5 (5%)     max: 1432 Points
min: 2694     avg: 2914     median: 2989 (11%)     max: 3059 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 1585     avg: 1596     median: 1594.5 (4%)     max: 1610 Points
min: 2867     avg: 3067     median: 3130 (8%)     max: 3204 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 26395     avg: 38225     median: 40554 (5%)     max: 45396 Points
163099 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 2350     avg: 2431     median: 2447 (7%)     max: 2478 points
min: 4015     avg: 4118     median: 4140 (12%)     max: 4200 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 2222     avg: 2341     median: 2364.5 (5%)     max: 2412 points
min: 3676     avg: 3761     median: 3801 (7%)     max: 3805 points
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Extreme HD DirectX 1920x1080
min: 6.1     avg: 6.3     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 6.5 fps
min: 15.6     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (10%)     max: 17.4 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - DX 11, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
min: 21     avg: 21.4     median: 21.4 (8%)     max: 21.7 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - OpenGL, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
min: 19.1     avg: 19.6     median: 19.6 (11%)     max: 20 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
min: 28.4     avg: 28.7     median: 28.7 (12%)     max: 28.9 fps
56.6 fps (24%)
SPECviewperf 11
Siemens NX 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Siemens NX 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Tcvis 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Tcvis 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SolidWorks 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
SolidWorks 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Maya 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Maya 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Lightwave 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Lightwave 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Ensight 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Ensight 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Catia 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Catia 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
3ds Max (3dsmax-05) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 Solidworks (sw-04) + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Siemens NX (snx-03) + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Showcase (showcase-02) + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Medical (medical-02) + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Maya (maya-05) + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Energy (energy-02) + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Creo (creo-02) + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Catia (catia-05) + NVIDIA Quadro M620
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Ref. Match 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Ref. Match 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
67.9 fps (12%)
134 fps (24%)
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
28.5 fps (8%)
60 fps (16%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
28.9 fps (7%)
65.2 fps (17%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
12.4 fps (5%)
58.6 fps (22%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
min: 328     avg: 353     median: 354 (7%)     max: 378 Samples/s
min: 482     avg: 658     median: 658 (12%)     max: 834 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 618     avg: 804     median: 850 (8%)     max: 945 Samples/s
min: 718     avg: 1079     median: 1079 (10%)     max: 1440 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
min: 1690     avg: 1741     median: 1741 (6%)     max: 1792 Points
2530 Points (9%)
Power Consumption - FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test - Power Consumption (external Monitor) 1280x720 *
45.2 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra 1920x1080 *
48.8 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
58.8 Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M500M → 100%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M620 → 172%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

low 1280x720
Quadro M620:
127.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
44.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
31.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M620:
15.7  fps
Quadro M620:
»
low 1280x720
Quadro M620:
70.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
18.7  fps
Quadro M620:
»
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M500M:
49.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
28.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M500M:
22.2  fps
Quadro M500M:
»
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro M620:
59.2 60.4 ~ 60 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
25.2 46.3 ~ 36 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
18.7 25.2 ~ 22 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
13.9 19.5 ~ 17 fps
Quadro M620:
»
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
30.3  fps
195%
Quadro M620:
55.1 62.2 ~ 59 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
18.6  fps
183%
Quadro M620:
31.1 36.6 ~ 34 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M500M:
10.4  fps
183%
Quadro M620:
17.8 20.4 ~ 19 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
14.4  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M620:
4.9  fps
Quadro M500M:
»
Quadro M620:
»
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
46.9 65.4 ~ 56 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
32.4 38.2 ~ 35 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M500M:
19.2 20.2 ~ 20 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M500M:
11.9 13.1 ~ 13 fps
Quadro M500M:
»
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
35.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
29.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M500M:
16.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M500M:
14.5  fps
Quadro M500M:
»
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
56.5  fps
196%
Quadro M620:
110.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
33.3  fps
193%
Quadro M620:
64.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M500M:
15.2  fps
190%
Quadro M620:
28.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M500M:
13  fps
187%
Quadro M620:
24.4  fps
Quadro M500M:
»
Quadro M620:
»
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M500M:
27  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
21  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M500M:
10  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M500M:
7  fps
Quadro M500M:
»
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
29 30.5 ~ 30 fps
180%
Quadro M620:
53.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
17.9 18.9 ~ 18 fps
182%
Quadro M620:
32.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M500M:
9.9 10.2 ~ 10 fps
186%
Quadro M620:
18.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
10 fps  fps
Quadro M500M:
»
Quadro M620:
»
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
82.6  fps
301%
Quadro M620:
249  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
32.8  fps
361%
Quadro M620:
118.5  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M500M:
19.5  fps
318%
Quadro M620:
62.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M500M:
12.7  fps
222%
Quadro M620:
28.2  fps
Quadro M500M:
»
Quadro M620:
»
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
33.7 35 ~ 34 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
22.9 23.4 ~ 23 fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
18.6 19.1 ~ 19 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M500M:
9.2 9.6 ~ 9 fps
Quadro M500M:
»
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
62.6  fps
304%
Quadro M620:
190.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
48.1  fps
290%
Quadro M620:
139.6  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
42.3  fps
270%
Quadro M620:
114.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M500M:
10.5  fps
170%
Quadro M620:
17.8  fps
Quadro M500M:
»
Quadro M620:
»
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
51.7  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
44.4  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M620:
27.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
11.7  fps
Quadro M620:
»
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
192.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
147.4  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M620:
126  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
39.1  fps
Quadro M620:
»
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
48.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
38.3  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
22.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M500M:
11.6  fps
Quadro M500M:
»
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M500M:
89.1 89.9 94.9 ~ 91 fps
194%
Quadro M620:
176.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
50.1 50.2 54 ~ 51 fps
207%
Quadro M620:
105.6  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
40.3 40.5 43.8 ~ 42 fps
220%
Quadro M620:
92.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M500M:
13.8 13.8 14.7 ~ 14 fps
254%
Quadro M620:
35.6  fps
Quadro M500M:
»
Quadro M620:
»
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
217.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
93.6  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
48.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M500M:
24.2  fps
Quadro M500M:
»
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
137.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
62.7  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
34.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M500M:
17.3  fps
Quadro M500M:
»
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
100%
Quadro M500M:
78.5  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
57  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro M500M:
45.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M500M:
27.5  fps
Quadro M500M:
»

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M500M → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M620 → 227%

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.9
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)