Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Silver N6000 vs AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

Intel Pentium Silver N6000

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium N6000

The Intel Pentium Silver N6000 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 3.3 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N6000 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process, the same process as Ice Lake.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the four CPU cores, the SoC integrates a 32 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 850 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4x memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N6000 in our database proves to be an OK entry-level processor, as of late 2022, its multi-thread benchmark scores nearly matching those of the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U. Yes, the chip is a whole lot slower than the latest Ryzen 3 and Core i3 processors, but it will at least let you run your day-to-day apps without annoying slowdowns.

The Asus Vivobook 13 Slate is among the fastest systems built around the N6000 that we know of, thanks to the long-term CPU power limit of 10 W. It can be more than 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

Like nearly all other N-class Intel processors, the Pentium N6000 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as the long-term power limit). This is low and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The SoC is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is a powerful Phoenix family APU that saw the light of day in H1 2023. Its 8 cores are powered by the Zen 4 architecture and are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads. 4.0 GHz is the base clock speed and the highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.2 GHz.

The 7940HS introduces Ryzen AI which is AMD's answer to Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies. The Radeon 780M serves as the integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is set to give applications such as DaVinci Resolve and Photoshop quite a bit of generative AI magic.

More importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

The 7940HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600, including ECC-enabled memory). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7940HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-12900HK and also, somewhat disappointingly, the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 80 W, the ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY is among the fastest laptops built around the 7940HS that we know of. It can be about 15% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding most video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1, but more importantly it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 7940HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is a powerful Phoenix family chip that saw the light of day in H1 2023. The processor features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at 3.8 GHz. The highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.1 GHz.

Not only does this APU has full might of the Zen 4 architecture at its disposal, it also comes with the new Ryzen AI technology that's set to make generative AI more ubiquitous than ever before. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is coming after Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies; time will tell if this move by AMD is a good idea.

Perhaps more importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is set to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

Elsewhere, the 7840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7840HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-12700H, Core i7-12850HX, Core i9-12900H, Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The 7840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Pentium Silver N6000AMD Ryzen 9 7940HSAMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
CodenameJasper LakePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 « 1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock1100 - 3300 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache4 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 168 / 16
TDP6 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Technology10 nm4 nm4 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1338FP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3 x 8, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) (350 - 850 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium N6000
21.9 pt (30%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7940HS
46.2 pt (64%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7840HS
45.6 pt (63%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 104     avg: 106     median: 106 (74%)     max: 108 Points
min: 101     avg: 104.5     median: 105 (73%)     max: 107 Points
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 824     avg: 912     median: 937.5 (17%)     max: 972 Points
min: 880     avg: 918     median: 918 (17%)     max: 956 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1610     avg: 1730     median: 1699 (2%)     max: 1911 Points
min: 15556     avg: 16952     median: 16985 (16%)     max: 18131 Points
min: 15515     avg: 16393     median: 16194.5 (15%)     max: 17214 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 653     avg: 669     median: 672.5 (29%)     max: 679 Points
min: 1733     avg: 1787     median: 1791 (76%)     max: 1832 Points
min: 1718     avg: 1770     median: 1775 (75%)     max: 1812 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 237     avg: 253.8     median: 255 (28%)     max: 268 Points
min: 680     avg: 701     median: 702 (78%)     max: 714 Points
min: 668     avg: 687     median: 689 (77%)     max: 705 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 595     avg: 657     median: 650.5 (2%)     max: 730 Points
min: 6277     avg: 6635     median: 6640 (16%)     max: 7111 Points
min: 6061     avg: 6395     median: 6346.5 (15%)     max: 6744 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 266     avg: 292.5     median: 291 (2%)     max: 322 Points
min: 2470     avg: 2687     median: 2663 (17%)     max: 2848 Points
min: 2473     avg: 2592     median: 2573 (16%)     max: 2729 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 109     avg: 114.3     median: 113.7 (34%)     max: 121 Points
min: 277     avg: 283.7     median: 284 (86%)     max: 288 Points
min: 270     avg: 277.7     median: 278.5 (84%)     max: 286 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3.47     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (5%)     max: 3.71 Points
min: 29.8     avg: 30.3     median: 30.3 (39%)     max: 30.88 Points
min: 29.7     avg: 30     median: 30 (39%)     max: 30.25 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.36     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (35%)     max: 1.46 Points
min: 3.34     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (85%)     max: 3.46 Points
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (82%)     max: 3.33 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4057     avg: 4132     median: 4131.5 (25%)     max: 4206 Points
min: 7798     avg: 7881     median: 7880.5 (48%)     max: 7963 Points
min: 7574     avg: 7642     median: 7641.5 (46%)     max: 7709 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 9343     avg: 9643     median: 9642.5 (7%)     max: 9942 Points
min: 47982     avg: 48914     median: 48913.5 (35%)     max: 49845 Points
min: 45602     avg: 47933     median: 47933 (35%)     max: 50264 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 84721     avg: 86625     median: 86625 (60%)     max: 88529 Points
min: 83726     avg: 85395     median: 85395 (59%)     max: 87064 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14300     avg: 14516     median: 14515.5 (18%)     max: 14731 Points
min: 14015     avg: 14096     median: 14096 (17%)     max: 14177 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
727 s (9%)
min: 66.801     avg: 82.5     median: 82.5 (1%)     max: 98.222 s
min: 71.922     avg: 72.4     median: 72.4 (1%)     max: 72.819 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
16.9 s (3%)
min: 2.648     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 2.698 s
min: 2.626     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (1%)     max: 2.658 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1330 Points (2%)
min: 7439     avg: 7465     median: 7464.5 (12%)     max: 7490 Points
min: 6428     avg: 7064     median: 7063.5 (11%)     max: 7699 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 8096     avg: 8953     median: 9212 (5%)     max: 9668 MIPS
min: 66408     avg: 70832     median: 70707 (41%)     max: 73434 MIPS
min: 59538     avg: 69127     median: 70330 (40%)     max: 73035 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2320     avg: 2934     median: 3305 (40%)     max: 3387 MIPS
min: 6417     avg: 6643     median: 6642 (79%)     max: 6776 MIPS
min: 6049     avg: 6561     median: 6618 (79%)     max: 6754 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
18.4 fps (6%)
min: 140.8     avg: 145.8     median: 145.8 (51%)     max: 150.8 fps
min: 144.1     avg: 146.7     median: 146.7 (51%)     max: 149.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
93.4 fps (22%)
min: 292.5     avg: 298.5     median: 298.5 (69%)     max: 304.5 fps
min: 281.5     avg: 289.8     median: 289.8 (67%)     max: 298 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.55     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (3%)     max: 1.76 fps
min: 20.1     avg: 21.1     median: 20.9 (37%)     max: 22.6 fps
min: 11.7     avg: 19.8     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 21.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
min: 1.3     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (0%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
1.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (7%)
2.1 GB/s (36%)
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.8 GB/s (7%)
min: 14.8     avg: 15     median: 15 (39%)     max: 15.1 GB/s
min: 14.7     avg: 14.8     median: 14.8 (39%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
3786 Seconds (48%)
min: 287     avg: 306.9     median: 305 (4%)     max: 331 Seconds
min: 298     avg: 324.4     median: 318.5 (4%)     max: 463 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1738     avg: 2163     median: 1935 (14%)     max: 3157 Seconds
min: 182     avg: 190.4     median: 188.5 (1%)     max: 202 Seconds
min: 185     avg: 198.6     median: 196 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.084     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (26%)     max: 1.278 sec
min: 0.4159     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4467 sec
min: 0.4184     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4739 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3985 Points (8%)
min: 14891     avg: 15553     median: 15689 (33%)     max: 15851 Points
min: 15312     avg: 15685     median: 15663 (33%)     max: 16073 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
17.5 s (4%)
min: 7.058     avg: 7.3     median: 7.3 (2%)     max: 7.442 s
min: 7.112     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (2%)     max: 8.774 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.513     avg: 18     median: 18 (1%)     max: 18.402 s
min: 17.697     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (1%)     max: 21.271 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
895 s (4%)
min: 529.929     avg: 531     median: 531.4 (2%)     max: 532.8 s
min: 655.388     avg: 690     median: 689.9 (3%)     max: 724.411 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 74246     avg: 80834     median: 80476.5 (70%)     max: 86583 Points
min: 76708     avg: 82457     median: 83358.5 (73%)     max: 85884 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3134     avg: 3617     median: 3563 (10%)     max: 4155 Points
min: 16799     avg: 22601     median: 22587.5 (61%)     max: 25006 Points
min: 17320     avg: 22172     median: 22611 (61%)     max: 25584 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 30345     avg: 32921     median: 32921 (27%)     max: 35497 Points
min: 79935     avg: 88670     median: 89772 (73%)     max: 96559 Points
min: 77280     avg: 89035     median: 91414 (74%)     max: 93910 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 30120     avg: 32790     median: 32790 (27%)     max: 35460 Points
min: 79450     avg: 88483     median: 89602 (73%)     max: 96418 Points
min: 84349     avg: 89853     median: 91645 (74%)     max: 93208 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 38897     avg: 43994     median: 43993.5 (37%)     max: 49090 Points
min: 85305     avg: 91108     median: 92030 (78%)     max: 96047 Points
min: 84416     avg: 91454     median: 92596 (78%)     max: 95508 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2524     avg: 2897     median: 2947 (7%)     max: 3220 Points
min: 13400     avg: 19703     median: 21112 (53%)     max: 21353 Points
min: 13602     avg: 19764     median: 20637 (52%)     max: 21602 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3838     avg: 4315     median: 4063 (7%)     max: 5296 Points
min: 24034     avg: 28329     median: 28504 (51%)     max: 30876 Points
min: 24338     avg: 27673     median: 27816 (50%)     max: 29343 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1161     avg: 1301     median: 1259.5 (5%)     max: 1523 Points
min: 10388     avg: 11211     median: 11210 (47%)     max: 12212 Points
min: 8903     avg: 10942     median: 11131 (47%)     max: 12218 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2426     avg: 2618     median: 2630 (71%)     max: 2746 Points
min: 2585     avg: 2661     median: 2670 (72%)     max: 2721 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 9899     avg: 12185     median: 12249 (48%)     max: 13470 Points
min: 12111     avg: 12994     median: 13112 (52%)     max: 13498 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 720     avg: 728     median: 727 (31%)     max: 736 Points
min: 1823     avg: 1982     median: 1994.5 (84%)     max: 2032 Points
min: 1837     avg: 1966     median: 1963.5 (83%)     max: 2017 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1784     avg: 1912     median: 1915 (3%)     max: 2004 Points
min: 11207     avg: 11870     median: 11837.5 (21%)     max: 12500 Points
min: 8446     avg: 11674     median: 11874 (21%)     max: 12339 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 723     avg: 725     median: 724.5 (3%)     max: 726 Points
min: 1764     avg: 1874     median: 1906 (8%)     max: 1918 Points
min: 1834     avg: 1891     median: 1895.5 (8%)     max: 1936 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1881     avg: 1912     median: 1911.5 (6%)     max: 1942 Points
min: 11232     avg: 11567     median: 11454 (36%)     max: 12127 Points
min: 8572     avg: 11483     median: 11905 (38%)     max: 12278 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3188 Points (32%)
min: 7410     avg: 7856     median: 7904 (79%)     max: 8253 Points
min: 7924     avg: 8100     median: 8148 (81%)     max: 8166 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
8341 Points (9%)
min: 45905     avg: 46966     median: 46270 (51%)     max: 48723 Points
min: 47599     avg: 48417     median: 48498 (53%)     max: 48906 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1388     avg: 1412     median: 1405 (2%)     max: 1451 ms
min: 481     avg: 497.2     median: 499 (1%)     max: 515 ms
min: 485     avg: 509     median: 512 (1%)     max: 544 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
293.2 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 25840     avg: 32251     median: 34145.5 (31%)     max: 34874 Points
89067 Points (80%)
min: 91356     avg: 91588     median: 91577 (82%)     max: 91831 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
104.2 Points (30%)
min: 234     avg: 261.2     median: 263 (76%)     max: 271 Points
min: 232     avg: 263.8     median: 263 (76%)     max: 319 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 138.4     avg: 143.8     median: 146 (30%)     max: 147 Points
min: 302     avg: 319.9     median: 317 (66%)     max: 349 Points
min: 288     avg: 317.1     median: 321 (67%)     max: 339 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 440     avg: 469     median: 469 (18%)     max: 498 Points
min: 1674     avg: 1784     median: 1792 (69%)     max: 1861 Points
min: 1566     avg: 1763     median: 1801 (69%)     max: 1891 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 11.3     avg: 12     median: 12 (2%)     max: 12.6 Watt
min: 70     avg: 103.1     median: 105.2 (18%)     max: 130.1 Watt
min: 64.7     avg: 93.2     median: 87.2 (15%)     max: 137.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 10.5     avg: 13.3     median: 12.9 (2%)     max: 16.4 Watt
min: 73     avg: 107.5     median: 110.4 (20%)     max: 134 Watt
min: 74.7     avg: 98.9     median: 88.8 (16%)     max: 135.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.1 Watt (2%)
min: 4.81     avg: 13.3     median: 15.5 (10%)     max: 20.1 Watt
min: 4.73     avg: 13.9     median: 11.6 (8%)     max: 59.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.37     avg: 5.4     median: 4.8 (5%)     max: 8.08 Watt
min: 9.82     avg: 15.9     median: 15.6 (17%)     max: 21.5 Watt
min: 7.09     avg: 13.7     median: 12.6 (14%)     max: 35.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 19.6     avg: 22.3     median: 20.6 (15%)     max: 26.7 Points per Watt
min: 21.9     avg: 26.5     median: 25.5 (19%)     max: 33.8 Points per Watt
min: 20.1     avg: 28.1     median: 29.7 (22%)     max: 33.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver N6000 → 100% n=45

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS → 440% n=45

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS → 435% n=45

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 17. 09:53:16

#0 checking url part for id 13075 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14946 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14948 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.039s ... 0.04s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.04s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13075 +0.019s ... 0.059s

#8 got single benchmarks 13075 +0.023s ... 0.082s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14946 +0.021s ... 0.103s

#10 got single benchmarks 14946 +0.051s ... 0.154s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14948 +0.016s ... 0.17s

#12 got single benchmarks 14948 +0.064s ... 0.234s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.234s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.612s ... 0.847s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.847s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)