Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Intel HD Graphics 500

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

► remove from comparison Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 (GT3e) is an integrated graphics card and the fastest GPU of the Broadwell generation. It is built into several high-end CPUs specified at 47 W TDP. The so-called GT3e GPU offers a fast eDRAM cache as well as 48 EUs (Execution Units) and therefore somewhat more shader power than the previous Iris Pro Graphics 5200. The clock range depends on the model it is built into (up to 1150 MHz with Turbo Boost).

Architecture and Features

Broadwell features a GPU based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which has been optimized in various aspects compared to the previous Gen7.5 (Haswell). Inter alia, the shader arrays called "subslice" have been reorganized and now offer 8 Execution Units (EUs) each. Three subslices form a "slice" for a total of 24 EUs. Combined with other improvements such as larger L1 caches and an optimized frontend, the integrated GPU has become faster and more efficient than its predecessor.

The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 represents the high-end "GT3e" version of the Broadwell GPU family and consists of two slices with 48 EUs in total. In addition, there is also a fast eDRAM cache (128 MB), which can be found only on the Iris Pro.

All Broadwell GPUs support OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 11_1). The video engine can now decode H.265 using both fixed function hardware as well as available GPU shaders. Up to three displays can be connected via DP 1.2/eDP 1.3 (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 60 Hz) or HDMI 1.4a (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 24 Hz). HDMI 2.0, however, is not supported.

Performance

Depending on the benchmark, the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 performs similar to a dedicated GeForce GT 750M or GeForce 940M. Many games of 2014/2015 can be played fluently in WXGA resolution (1366 x 768) and medium detail settings. However, very demanding games such as The Witcher 3 will require lower resolutions and/or details.

Power Consumption

Utilizing a new 14 nm FinFET process, the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is specified at 47 W TDP (entire chip including CPU, GPU and memory controller) and therefore suited for medium-sized notebooks. The TDP is flexible and can be further reduced (37 W), which has a significant impact on performance.

Intel HD Graphics 500

► remove from comparison Intel HD Graphics 500

The Intel HD Graphics 500 is an integrated processor graphics unit from the Apollo Lake generation (e. g. Celeron N3450 and Celeron N3350), which was announced mid 2016. The GPU can convince with low consumption figures, but the performance is only in the low-end segment and is rarely sufficient for modern games. Being a partial configuration of the Apollo Lake GPU, the HD Graphics 505 is equipped with just 12 Execution Units (EUs) (HD Graphics 505: 18 EUs) running at up to 650-700 MHz depending on the model. The technical specifications of the GPU are based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which is also used for the more expensive Skylake series.

Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the HD 505 has to access the main memory via processor (2x 64bit DDR3L-/LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400).

Performance

The HD Graphics 505 should be slightly slower than the older Broadwell GPU HD Graphics (Broadwell), so modern games (as of 2016) will rarely run smoothly even at the lowest settings.

Features

The revised video engine now decodes H.265/HEVC completely in hardware and thereby much more efficiently than before. Up to three displays can be connected via DP/eDP or HDMI (4K probably only at 30 Hz via HDMI 1.4).

Power Consumption

The TDP of the whole Pentium N4200 chip is 6 Watts by default, so the GPU is primarily used for (often passively cooled) netbooks or thin notebooks. The TDP can also be reduced to 4 Watts, but this will obviously affect the performance.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Intel HD Graphics 500
Gen. 9 Series
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 compare 40 @ 0.2 - 1.3 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 6100 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 5100 compare 40 @ 0.2 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics P580 compare 72 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 compare 72 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 compare 24 @ 0.35 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 610 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 compare 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 compare 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
CodenameBroadwell GT3eApollo Lake
ArchitectureGen. 8 BroadwellGen. 9 Apollo Lake
Pipelines48 - unified12 - unified
Core Speed300 - 1150 (Boost) MHz300 - 700 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus WidtheDRAM + 64/128 Bit64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_1), OpenGL 4.3DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4
technology14 nm14 nm
FeaturesQuickSyncQuickSync
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.06.2015 01.09.2016
CPU in Iris Pro Graphics 6200GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-5775C4 x 3300 MHz, 65 W300 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i7-5950HQ4 x 2900 MHz, 47 W300 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i7-5850HQ4 x 2700 MHz, 47 W300 MHz1100 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz1050 - 1150 MHz
CPU in HD Graphics 500GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Celeron J34554 x 1500 MHz, 10 W250 MHz750 MHz
Intel Celeron N34504 x 1100 MHz, 6 W200 MHz700 MHz
Intel Celeron J33552 x 2000 MHz, 10 W250 MHz700 MHz
Intel Celeron N33502 x 1100 MHz, 6 W200 MHz650 MHz
min. - max.200 - 300 MHz650 - 1150 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - HD Graphics 500
0.2 pt (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 19294     avg: 24491     median: 24609 (3%)     max: 29579 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
100535 Points (13%)
min: 12299     avg: 15195     median: 15085 (2%)     max: 18200 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 12893     avg: 13059     median: 13058.5 (14%)     max: 13224 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 15361     avg: 15388     median: 15387.5 (4%)     max: 15414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1662     avg: 1685     median: 1685 (3%)     max: 1708 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1704     avg: 1737     median: 1736.5 (2%)     max: 1769 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 20140     avg: 26074     median: 23761 (3%)     max: 34320 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
3094 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2766 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 500
3DMark 06
min: 3393     avg: 3551     median: 3506 (5%)     max: 3753 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel HD Graphics 500
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2791     avg: 2888     median: 2894 (2%)     max: 3031 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 7.05     avg: 8.2     median: 8.1 (3%)     max: 9.61 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3.6 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
9.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
8.4 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
15 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
20 fps (1%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics 500
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
42 fps (0%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
16.3 fps (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
49 Samples/s (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
79 Samples/s (0%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 296     avg: 320     median: 324 (0%)     max: 336 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.9 Watt (1%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
450 MHz (18%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics 500 → 18% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Valorant

Valorant

2020
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
9.1  fps
low 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
23.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
24  fps
high 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
11.2  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
28.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
20.2  fps
high 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
13.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
12.6  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
2  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
3  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
0 (!)  fps
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
12  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
5.5  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
1  fps
QHD 2560x1440
HD Graphics 500:
1  fps
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
34.4 (!)  fps
med. 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
4.6 (!)  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
5.3 5.5 7.6 ~ 6 fps
med. 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
3.9 4.7 ~ 4 fps
high 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
3.6 4.3 ~ 4 fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
10  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
18.2 21.2 ~ 20 fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
17.2  fps
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
10  fps
med. 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
5.6  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
18.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
6.2  fps
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
4.9  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
8.7  fps
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
15.9  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
15.5  fps
low 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
19.1  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
16.4  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
9.7  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
15.9 22.1 27.6 ~ 22 fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
15.3 15.3 ~ 15 fps
high 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
5.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
5.1  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
28.5  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
12.5  fps
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
22  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
16  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
17.7  fps
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
71.6  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
13.7  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
10  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
6.3  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
43.8  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
19.1  fps
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
29.3  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
14.4  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
16.2 18 18.7 21 21.2 22.5 24.3 ~ 20 fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
8.8 9.6 9.8 11 13 ~ 10 fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
7.9 8.9 9.7 ~ 9 fps
ultra 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
2.7  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
21.5  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
9.3  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
19.3  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
9.1  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
14 16.6 ~ 15 fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
14  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
12.7 22 ~ 17 fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
13.6  fps
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
27.8  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
12.2  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
11.2  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
7.6  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
22.9  fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
11.1  fps
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
HD Graphics 500:
40.1  fps
med. 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
14.7  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
54.5  fps
med. 1360x768
HD Graphics 500:
14.1  fps
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
HD Graphics 500:
119  fps
high 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
27.2  fps
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
HD Graphics 500:
46  fps
Intel HD Graphics 500lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Valorant9.09
Hearthstone23.92411.2
League of Legends28.220.213.912.6
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider3
Strange Brigade
F1 201812
The Crew 25.5
Far Cry 511
World of Tanks enCore34.44.6
X-Plane 11.11644
Middle-earth: Shadow of War10
Team Fortress 22017.2
Dirt 4105.6
Rocket League18.16.2
Prey4.9
For Honor8.7
Overwatch15.9
Rainbow Six Siege15.5
World of Warships19.1
Metal Gear Solid V16.49.7
Dota 2 Reborn22155.65.1
Dirt Rally28.512.5
F1 20142216
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor17.7
Sims 471.613.7
Risen 3: Titan Lords106.3
GRID: Autosport43.819.1
GRID 229.314.4
BioShock Infinite201092.7
Tomb Raider21.59.3
Dead Space 319.39.1
Counter-Strike: GO1514
Diablo III1713.6
Anno 207027.812.2
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim11.27.6
Deus Ex Human Revolution22.911.1
Dirt 340.114.7
StarCraft 254.514.1
Trackmania Nations Forever11927.2
World of Warcraft46
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
33
5
2
24


7


3


1





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 14:31:24

#0 checking url part for id 5947 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7543 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:38:48 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.082s ... 0.083s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.083s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.083s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 5947 +0.029s ... 0.111s

#8 got single benchmarks 5947 +0.009s ... 0.12s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7543 +0.017s ... 0.138s

#10 got single benchmarks 7543 +0.097s ... 0.235s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.235s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.185s ... 0.42s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.42s

#14 Got 98 rows for game benchmarks. +0.019s ... 0.439s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.439s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.027s ... 0.465s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.093s ... 0.559s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.559s

#19 return log +0.042s ... 0.6s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)