Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Xeon W-10855M vs Intel Core i5-10300H vs Intel Xeon W-10885M

Intel Xeon W-10855M

► remove from comparison

The Intel Xeon W-10855M is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.8 and 4.8 GHz (probably 4.4 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. 

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Intel Xeon W-10855M supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP and is the professional version of the Core i7-10850H with slightly higher clock speeds (+100 MHz base speed). 

Performance

The performance of the Xeon W-10855M should be similar to the old top model Core i7-8950H (6 cores, 2.9 - 4.8 GHz). Thanks to the 6 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run fine on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics P630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9750H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i7 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Core i5-10300H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10300H

The Intel Core i5-10300H is a fast processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.5 and 4.5 GHz (up to 4.2 with 4 cores) and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i5-9300H from 2019, the 10300H is clocked slightly higher (+100 MHz Base, +400 MHz Boost) and supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10300H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the faster Core i5-10400H (2.6 - 4.6 GHz) that was released at a later date.

Performance

The average 10300H in our database matches AMD Ryzen 5 3550H in multi-thread performance. While not a poor result per se, it is indicative of an entry-level H-class CPU that is unlikely to meet the needs of hardcore gamers, professional videographers and similar clientele.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i5-9300H. As a low-end solution it will probably only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power consumption

The Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are free to reduce slightly, 35 W being the lower limit, resulting in lower clock speeds and lower performance. The CPU is manufactured on a fairly old (as of early 2023) 14 nm Intel process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

Intel Xeon W-10885M

► remove from comparison Intel W-10885M

The Intel Xeon W-10885M is a high-end processor for workstation laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 5.3 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Intel Xeon W-10885M supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP and is the professional version of the Intel Core i9-10885H

Performance

The performance of the W-10885M should be slightly above the older Core i9-9980HK top model, thanks to the potential higher single core turbo. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration. At the time of announcement, the Intel Xeon W-10885M is the second fastest Comet Lake-H CPU behind the Core i9-10980HK.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics P630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9880H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all. The P-variant uses professional drivers.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelIntel Xeon W-10855MIntel Core i5-10300HIntel Xeon W-10885M
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-HComet Lake-HComet Lake-H
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M « 2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H « 2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M « 2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2800 - 5100 MHz2500 - 4500 MHz2400 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB256 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache12 MB8 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 124 / 88 / 16
TDP45 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1440FCBGA1440
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics P630 (350 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics P630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10300H
38 pt (43%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - W-10885M
47.5 pt (53%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 4621     avg: 4864     median: 4863.5 (8%)     max: 5106 Points
6893 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1095     avg: 1121     median: 1121 (49%)     max: 1147 Points
1300 Points (57%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 312     avg: 443.5     median: 455.5 (52%)     max: 470 Points
min: 488     avg: 495.3     median: 495.5 (57%)     max: 502 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1397     avg: 2037     median: 2113.5 (9%)     max: 2240 Points
min: 2727     avg: 3639     median: 3882.5 (16%)     max: 4065 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 536     avg: 825     median: 892 (9%)     max: 921 Points
min: 1089     avg: 1509     median: 1640 (17%)     max: 1666 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 108     avg: 174     median: 186 (57%)     max: 194 Points
min: 208     avg: 209.8     median: 210 (64%)     max: 211 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 9.87     avg: 10     median: 10.1 (14%)     max: 10.06 Points
18.3 Points (26%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.05     avg: 2.1     median: 2.2 (7%)     max: 2.17 Points
2.4 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6867     avg: 7056     median: 7130 (58%)     max: 7170 Points
7865 Points (64%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 26994     avg: 27496     median: 27692 (31%)     max: 27801 Points
44583 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 35899     avg: 36042     median: 36042 (26%)     max: 36185 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 9326     avg: 9339     median: 9338.5 (51%)     max: 9351 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
215.2 s (3%)
105.8 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.1 s (1%)
3.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4825 Points (28%)
7180 Points (42%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 15146     avg: 23257     median: 24259 (15%)     max: 24841 MIPS
min: 36204     avg: 43315     median: 45696 (28%)     max: 48044 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2945     avg: 4708     median: 4903 (59%)     max: 4956 MIPS
min: 5495     avg: 5568     median: 5507 (66%)     max: 5703 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
53.3 fps (19%)
100.1 fps (37%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
190.2 fps (45%)
236.9 fps (56%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 6.13     avg: 7.1     median: 7.3 (16%)     max: 7.78 fps
min: 8.89     avg: 11.9     median: 13.1 (28%)     max: 13.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.4 GB/s (0%)
1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.7 GB/s (0%)
1.8 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.1 GB/s (0%)
10.3 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 478.9     avg: 515     median: 514 (4%)     max: 555 Seconds
min: 281     avg: 326.3     median: 286 (2%)     max: 412 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.625     avg: 0.7     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 1.088 sec
min: 0.551     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.57 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9731     avg: 9744     median: 9744 (21%)     max: 9757 Points
13490 Points (29%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.7 s (2%)
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.8 s (1%)
17.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
516 s (2%)
429.3 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 8554     avg: 9719     median: 9884.5 (27%)     max: 10909 Points
min: 13072     avg: 16593     median: 18302 (50%)     max: 18404 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 58736     avg: 60992     median: 61113 (39%)     max: 62933 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 58462     avg: 61155     median: 61387 (51%)     max: 62548 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 38284     avg: 60059     median: 63707 (54%)     max: 63995 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8220     avg: 8936     median: 9017.5 (23%)     max: 9305 Points
min: 10772     avg: 13951     median: 14922 (38%)     max: 16159 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 12298     avg: 12919     median: 13016 (24%)     max: 13267 Points
min: 15118     avg: 19215     median: 20247 (37%)     max: 22279 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3772     avg: 4678     median: 4684 (23%)     max: 5600 Points
min: 6457     avg: 8161     median: 8812 (43%)     max: 9214 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1296 Points (56%)
min: 703     avg: 1164     median: 1205 (52%)     max: 1241 Points
min: 1331     avg: 1339     median: 1340 (58%)     max: 1347 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6231 Points (22%)
min: 2783     avg: 4338     median: 4399 (15%)     max: 4728 Points
min: 6948     avg: 7939     median: 8378 (29%)     max: 8491 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1121     avg: 1175     median: 1172.5 (5%)     max: 1234 Points
min: 1310     avg: 1332     median: 1323 (6%)     max: 1362 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3887     avg: 4333     median: 4365 (14%)     max: 4713 Points
min: 7542     avg: 8126     median: 8295 (26%)     max: 8541 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4844     avg: 5198     median: 5199 (54%)     max: 5549 Points
min: 5880     avg: 5899     median: 5892 (61%)     max: 5924 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15448     avg: 17203     median: 17278 (19%)     max: 18807 Points
min: 30737     avg: 32163     median: 32814 (37%)     max: 32939 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 CPU Mark
12111 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 812     avg: 872     median: 824 (1%)     max: 1366 ms
min: 728     avg: 736     median: 733 (1%)     max: 746 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 36854     avg: 47282     median: 48896 (51%)     max: 51952 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 134     avg: 206.2     median: 210.5 (53%)     max: 231 Points
min: 228     avg: 229.3     median: 229 (58%)     max: 231 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 76.8     avg: 95.8     median: 95.3 (16%)     max: 112 Watt
150 Watt (26%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 75.3     avg: 85.7     median: 85.8 (18%)     max: 93 Watt
152.9 Watt (32%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 9.51     avg: 10.4     median: 10.5 (12%)     max: 11.1 Points per Watt
10.8 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon W-10855M → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10300H → 82% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon W-10885M → 119% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.22
log 28. 02:03:32

#0 checking url part for id 12207 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11706 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12205 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:57:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.033s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12207 +0.001s ... 0.034s

#8 got single benchmarks 12207 +0.006s ... 0.04s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11706 +0.011s ... 0.051s

#10 got single benchmarks 11706 +0.07s ... 0.122s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12205 +0.011s ... 0.132s

#12 got single benchmarks 12205 +0.012s ... 0.145s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.145s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.205s ... 0.35s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.35s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)