Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H vs Intel Core i9-13950HX

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 185H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is the top-of-the-line Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 6, are SMT-enabled and run at up to 5.1 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.8 GHz. The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.35 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while the rest of the chip is turned off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes that this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 9 185H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 185H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official Intel performance data, then the 185H is not a whole lot faster than the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.35 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is about as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 9 series processor has a "base" power consumption of 45 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. A powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 185H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

Intel Core i9-13950HX

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13950HX

The Intel Core i9-13950HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake-HX series. Is was announced in early 2023 and is based on the desktop Core i9-13000K with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) clocked from 2.2 to 5.5 GHz (single core, all core boost 4.9 GHz) with HyperThreading and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading clocked from 1.6 to 4 GHz. The 13950HX is very similar to the Core i9-13980HX, but with vPro Enterprise support and a 100 MHz reduced boost of the P-cores.

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX).

Performance

The average 13950HX in our database is in the same league as the i9-13980HX and the i9-13900HX while being noticeably faster than the Ryzen 9 7845HX, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very, very fast chip, as of mid 2023.

Thanks to its powerful cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 145 W, the MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US is among the fastest laptops built around the 13950HX that we know of.

Power consumption

The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption is 45 W while its Turbo power consumption isn't supposed to go over 157 W. Intel suggests the "base" power consumption should be set to 55 W, which laptop makers aren't really obliged to do. Most will go for a higher value to get better performance.

This i9 series processor is manufactured on Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 9 185HIntel Core i9-13950HX
CodenameMeteor Lake-HRaptor Lake-HX
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HIntel Raptor Lake-HX
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H compare3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H compare3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H compare3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H compare3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX « 1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX compare1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz1600 - 5500 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
24 / 32
8 x 5.5 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.0 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP45 Watt55 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm
max. Temp.110 °C100 °C
SocketBGA2049BGA1964
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, TME
iGPUIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1650 MHz)
NPU / AI11 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L2 Cache32 MB
Die Size257 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 185H
39.2 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13950HX
45.1 pt (75%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 103     avg: 108.2     median: 108.1 (61%)     max: 112.2 Points
119 Points (67%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 828     avg: 1003     median: 1021 (19%)     max: 1096 Points
1138 Points (21%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12688     avg: 18030     median: 18338 (17%)     max: 19851 Points
min: 24560     avg: 29352     median: 28681 (27%)     max: 33277 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1620     avg: 1818     median: 1812 (76%)     max: 1912 Points
min: 1952     avg: 2067     median: 2096 (88%)     max: 2113 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 622     avg: 701     median: 702 (76%)     max: 735 Points
min: 742     avg: 788     median: 801 (87%)     max: 816 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4843     avg: 6957     median: 7192 (18%)     max: 7651 Points
min: 8697     avg: 10973     median: 10919 (27%)     max: 12648 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1581.9     avg: 2762     median: 2853 (18%)     max: 3165 Points
min: 3625     avg: 4565     median: 4529 (29%)     max: 5227 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 238     avg: 267.1     median: 268 (74%)     max: 281 Points
min: 274     avg: 292.9     median: 297 (82%)     max: 303 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 33.95     avg: 34.7     median: 34.6 (45%)     max: 35.55 Points
60 Points (78%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.11     avg: 3.2     median: 3.1 (75%)     max: 3.27 Points
3.6 Points (85%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9719     avg: 9994     median: 9977.5 (60%)     max: 10300 Points
11424 Points (69%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 59935     avg: 63422     median: 63273.5 (46%)     max: 67204 Points
80693 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 88902     avg: 90904     median: 91265.5 (58%)     max: 92183 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 13892     avg: 14147     median: 14161 (17%)     max: 14374 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 87.408     avg: 215.6     median: 165.1 (2%)     max: 441.275 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.254     avg: 4.3     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 8.1 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6724     avg: 9769     median: 7940 (13%)     max: 17856 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 52522     avg: 70203     median: 71934 (41%)     max: 76331 MIPS
min: 99351     avg: 115415     median: 116665 (67%)     max: 127295 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4502     avg: 5480     median: 5560 (66%)     max: 5781 MIPS
min: 6445     avg: 6775     median: 6754 (80%)     max: 7064 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 153.6     avg: 159.7     median: 159.9 (4%)     max: 165.6 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 300.5     avg: 322.4     median: 326.3 (8%)     max: 336.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.1     avg: 20.1     median: 20.6 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
min: 26     avg: 30.7     median: 31 (54%)     max: 34.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.96     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (32%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.4     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (31%)     max: 2.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.9     avg: 10.8     median: 11.3 (29%)     max: 12.1 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 280     avg: 331.7     median: 309 (4%)     max: 538 Seconds
min: 175     avg: 203.1     median: 196 (2%)     max: 254 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 163     avg: 188.6     median: 177 (1%)     max: 285 Seconds
min: 100     avg: 112.4     median: 111 (1%)     max: 137 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4313     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.503 sec
min: 0.3823     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4121 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9854     avg: 13153     median: 13074 (28%)     max: 15529 Points
19311 Points (41%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.6     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 7.256 s
6.2 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 14.786     avg: 14.9     median: 14.9 (1%)     max: 15.15 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 304.446     avg: 358     median: 366.9 (2%)     max: 402.742 s
322.8 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 73186     avg: 76512     median: 75742.5 (58%)     max: 80494 Points
79200 Points (61%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12693     avg: 21337     median: 22169.5 (55%)     max: 24629 Points
min: 19337     avg: 23708     median: 23960 (59%)     max: 27078 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 74638     avg: 81658     median: 76996.5 (63%)     max: 100241 Points
81602 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 73618     avg: 82055     median: 75494 (61%)     max: 100192 Points
77857 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78677     avg: 89559     median: 91059 (73%)     max: 102469 Points
81621 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 14341     avg: 18938     median: 18896 (48%)     max: 21425 Points
16332 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21106     avg: 28071     median: 28964.5 (52%)     max: 30623 Points
min: 31279     avg: 37843     median: 39372 (70%)     max: 42199 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6307     avg: 10957     median: 11454.5 (48%)     max: 12209 Points
min: 13744     avg: 15379     median: 14805 (62%)     max: 18867 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2199     avg: 2483     median: 2495 (60%)     max: 2573 Points
min: 2758     avg: 2862     median: 2870.5 (69%)     max: 2949 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 12825     avg: 13823     median: 13974 (54%)     max: 14540 Points
min: 15490     avg: 16445     median: 16156.5 (63%)     max: 17977 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2385     avg: 2398     median: 2397.5 (76%)     max: 2410 Points
2750 Points (87%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12735     avg: 12928     median: 12928 (53%)     max: 13121 Points
15049 Points (62%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1700     avg: 1828     median: 1852 (70%)     max: 1902 Points
min: 1805     avg: 2013     median: 2043 (78%)     max: 2097 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10441     avg: 13368     median: 13566 (24%)     max: 14230 Points
min: 16776     avg: 19501     median: 20036 (36%)     max: 21853 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1695     avg: 1788     median: 1799 (8%)     max: 1830 Points
min: 1856     avg: 1979     median: 2006 (9%)     max: 2048 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13228     avg: 13612     median: 13736 (43%)     max: 13972 Points
min: 16846     avg: 18847     median: 18486.5 (58%)     max: 21567 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7040     avg: 7372     median: 7422 (74%)     max: 7602 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47960     avg: 49362     median: 49781.5 (49%)     max: 49924 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 494     avg: 524     median: 522 (1%)     max: 594 ms
min: 451     avg: 466.6     median: 468 (1%)     max: 478 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 90543     avg: 95362     median: 96090 (70%)     max: 98144 Points
103911 Points (76%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 237     avg: 258.7     median: 260 (71%)     max: 271 Points
min: 279     avg: 290.9     median: 291 (80%)     max: 302 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 237     avg: 279.4     median: 286 (51%)     max: 301 Points
min: 266     avg: 306.3     median: 318.5 (57%)     max: 346 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1589     avg: 1774     median: 1770 (66%)     max: 1971 Points
min: 1592     avg: 1950     median: 1964 (73%)     max: 2139 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 44.4     avg: 113.4     median: 123.8 (21%)     max: 176.1 Watt
min: 134.5     avg: 188.3     median: 205 (35%)     max: 223 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 88     avg: 129.5     median: 124.6 (23%)     max: 171.8 Watt
min: 145     avg: 212.8     median: 204 (37%)     max: 259 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.1     avg: 12.4     median: 11.7 (8%)     max: 21.4 Watt
min: 14.2     avg: 20     median: 15.5 (10%)     max: 35 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.18     avg: 13.7     median: 11.9 (14%)     max: 28.8 Watt
min: 15     avg: 18.5     median: 17 (21%)     max: 27.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 17.8     avg: 27.4     median: 24.2 (18%)     max: 67 Points per Watt
min: 18.8     avg: 21.5     median: 21.4 (16%)     max: 25 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 185H → 100% n=42

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13950HX → 123% n=42

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 15. 00:05:00

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16921 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14671 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760479499s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 Oct 2025 05:18:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16921 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 16921 +0.029s ... 0.04s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14671 +0.005s ... 0.045s

#10 got single benchmarks 14671 +0.013s ... 0.058s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.058s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.065s ... 0.123s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.126s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)