AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs Qualcomm Adreno 642L
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
► remove from comparison
The AMD Radeon RX 5300M is a dedicated mobile mid-range graphics card for laptops. It uses the new Navi 14 chip (RDNA architecture) which is produced in 7nm. Is supports fast and expensive GDDR6 VRAM and when using it, it should be faster than a GeForce GTX 1650 (according to leaked benchmarks from AMD).
The Navi 14 chip uses the new RDNA (Radeon DNA) microarchitecture which is a successor the the GCN instruction set. It features a new processor design, a multi-level cache hierarchy and an improved rendering pipeline with support for GDDR6 memory.
The performance should be around the GeForce GTX 1650 according to AMD. Therefore, it is most suited for medium to high detail settings in full HD for demanding games in 2019.
The RX5300M uses the same amount of compute cores as the faster 5500M but at a lower clock rate that leads to a lower TDP of the chip of 65 Watt (versus 85W of the 5500M).
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 642L is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SoC. The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642L GPU offers a 40% improved performance over the Adreno 620 (compared to the specified +50% of the 642 in the SD 780G), its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.
The Adreno 642L supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 778G and therefore also the 642L is manufactured in the modern 6nm UEV process at TSMC that should provide a good power efficiency.
| AMD Radeon RX 5300M | Qualcomm Adreno 642L | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Adreno 600 Series |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Codename | Navi 14 / E19M-E65 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Architecture | Navi / RDNA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pipelines | 1408 - unified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Core Speed | 1036 - 1445 (Boost) MHz | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Memory Speed | 14000 MHz | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Memory Bus Width | 96 Bit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Max. Amount of Memory | 3 GB | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shared Memory | no | yes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| API | DirectX 12, Shader 6.4, OpenGL 4.6 | OpenGL ES 3.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power Consumption | 65 Watt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| technology | 7 nm | 6 nm | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Features | DisplayPort 1.4 w/DFSC, HDMI 2.0b, Radeon Media Engine (H.264 4K150 decode, 4K90 encode / H.265 4K90 decode, 4K60 encode / VP9 4K90 decode) | OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Notebook Size | medium sized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Date of Announcement | 29.09.2019 | 07.05.2021 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benchmarks
3DM Vant. Perf. total + AMD Radeon RX 5300M
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon RX 5300M → 100% n=12
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 17% n=12
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks
The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
League of Legends: Wild Rift
2020
Gears Tactics
2020
Doom Eternal
2020
Hunt Showdown
2020
Escape from Tarkov
2020
Need for Speed Heat
2019
GRID 2019
2019
FIFA 20
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Control
2019
F1 2019
2019
Rage 2
2019
Anno 1800
2019
The Division 2
2019
Dirt Rally 2.0
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
Apex Legends
2019
Just Cause 4
2018
Darksiders III
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Monster Hunter World
2018
PUBG Mobile
2018
X-Plane 11.11
2018
Fortnite
2018
Dota 2 Reborn
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
GTA V
2015
Dead Trigger 2
2013
Subway Surfers
2012Average Gaming AMD Radeon RX 5300M → 100%
Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 21%
Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 31%
| AMD Radeon RX 5300M | Qualcomm Adreno 642L | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |||
| Diablo Immortal | 59 | 56 | ||||||||||||
| League of Legends: Wild Rift | 61 | |||||||||||||
| Armajet | 89 | |||||||||||||
| PUBG Mobile | 58 | 40 | 38 | |||||||||||
| Dota 2 Reborn | 113 | 108 | 97.9 | 94.7 | 35 | 26 | 15 | 13 | ||||||
| Dead Trigger 2 | 60 | |||||||||||||
| Asphalt 9: Legends | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||
| Subway Surfers | 90 | |||||||||||||
| AMD Radeon RX 5300M | Qualcomm Adreno 642L | |||||||||||||
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | | < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps | 4 | 1 1 | 1 2 3 | 1 1 1 | | |
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
