Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Intel Core i9-9980HK vs AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is a powerful processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new laptop chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 7 7840U with a slightly higher wattage as well as higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8840HS has eight Zen 4 cores running at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz that are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads, while the great Radeon 780M is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties. Compared to the consumer 8840HS, the PRO variant supports AMD PRO technologies with management features and usually longer availability and support.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs, making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more useful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the R7 PRO 8840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and therefore with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving NVMe SSDs up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around this Ryzen 7 series APU are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since this is a 7840U in disguise that we are dealing with here, it is safe to expect the 8840HS to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to tune to their liking, with values between 20 W and 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-9980HK

► remove from comparison Intel i9-9980HK

The Intel Core i9-9980HK is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.4 - 5 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5 GHz can only be reached using the "Thermal Velocity Boost" which allows one core to boost to 5 GHz (+100 MHz) as long as the CPU temperature is below 50°C. Multiple cores can be boosted +100 MHz? below 50°C (not verified). Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-8950HK, the 9980H is based on the same architecture but offers 2 more cores and higher clock speeds (boost).

According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The i9-9980HK is the fastest model of the Coffee-Lake-H (refresh) series at the time of announcement and offers an unlocked multiplier for overclocking of the CPU.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now max. eight cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 33% compared to a similar clocked 6-core processor. According to first benchmarks, the mobile variant can reach the performance of the Core i9-9900K if the cooling is sufficient.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS

► remove from comparison AMD R5 8645HS

The Ryzen 5 8645HS is an upper mid-range processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new chip; instead, the 8645HS is a rebadged Ryzen 5 7640HS with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8645HS was brought to life in Q4 2023 and it has 6 SMT-enabled Zen 4 cores (12 threads) running at 4.3 GHz to 5.0 GHz. The Radeon 760M iGPU is responsible for carrying out 3D calculations and similar duties.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are promised to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8645HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a super-fast DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 RAM controller. USB 4 (and thus Thunderbolt) is supported natively and so is PCIe 4. In fact, 20 PCIe 4 lanes are on offer; data transfer speeds of up to 7.8 GB/s will be possible provided a sufficiently fast NVMe SSD is used.

Systems powered by this Ryzen 5 series chip are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that the APU is not overclockable and neither will you be able to replace it with a faster one as it gets soldered to the motherboard permanently (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8645HX is an 7640HS in disguise, it is safe to expect the APU to be about as fast as the Ryzen 9 5900HX, Ryzen 7 6800H, Ryzen 7 7736U and also the Core i5-12500H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. While this is not the best graphics adapter for gaming as it's only just fast enough for low quality settings and resolutions such as 1600 x 900, it will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it also HW-encodes and HW-decodes the most widely used video codecs such as AV1, HEVC and AVC without breaking a sweat.

Power consumption

The 8645HS has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between improving battery life and giving the system they are working on more oomph. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

This Ryzen 5 series APU is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HSIntel Core i9-9980HKAMD Ryzen 5 8645HS
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Coffee Lake-HHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)Intel Coffee LakeAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK « 2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS « 4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3300 - 5100 MHz2400 - 5000 MHz4300 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache8 MB2 MB6 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 166 / 12
6 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP28 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology4 nm14 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FCBGA1440FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1250 MHz)AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 8840HS
39.3 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9980HK
32.2 pt (53%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 8645HS
38.6 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
103.7 Points (58%)
99.7 Points (56%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
869 Points (16%)
727 Points (14%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14621     avg: 14784     median: 14784 (14%)     max: 14947 Points
13220 Points (12%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1712     avg: 1724     median: 1724 (73%)     max: 1736 Points
1714 Points (72%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 671     avg: 673     median: 673 (74%)     max: 675 Points
min: 431     avg: 471.3     median: 478.5 (52%)     max: 505 Points
668 Points (73%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5760     avg: 5820     median: 5819.5 (14%)     max: 5879 Points
min: 2974     avg: 3530     median: 3475 (8%)     max: 4150 Points
5121 Points (12%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2427     avg: 2458     median: 2458 (16%)     max: 2489 Points
min: 1327     avg: 1656     median: 1624 (10%)     max: 1930 Points
2094 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 271     avg: 271.5     median: 271.5 (76%)     max: 272 Points
min: 181     avg: 198.8     median: 201 (56%)     max: 215 Points
270 Points (75%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
26.4 Points (34%)
min: 14.81     avg: 16.7     median: 17.2 (22%)     max: 18.04 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.6 Points (61%)
min: 2.25     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (54%)     max: 2.4 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5809 Points (35%)
min: 7709     avg: 8346     median: 7969.5 (48%)     max: 9734 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
39747 Points (29%)
min: 39440     avg: 44697     median: 44455 (32%)     max: 50439 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
55742 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
10359 Points (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
362.5 s (4%)
min: 110.4     avg: 115.3     median: 115.3 (1%)     max: 120.2 s
89.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.9 s (2%)
min: 3.788     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (1%)     max: 4.941 s
3.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
21172 Points (34%)
min: 7266     avg: 7351     median: 7351 (12%)     max: 7436 Points
6695 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 63624     avg: 63845     median: 63845 (37%)     max: 64066 MIPS
min: 39566     avg: 41756     median: 41688 (24%)     max: 44081 MIPS
55608 MIPS (32%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6261     avg: 6289     median: 6289 (74%)     max: 6317 MIPS
min: 5283     avg: 5426     median: 5389.5 (64%)     max: 5642 MIPS
6190 MIPS (73%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 92.8     avg: 93.8     median: 93.8 (31%)     max: 94.8 fps
121.8 fps (41%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 237.5     avg: 238.1     median: 238.1 (55%)     max: 238.7 fps
281.5 fps (65%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 17.8     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (31%)     max: 18 fps
min: 10.8     avg: 11.5     median: 11.4 (20%)     max: 12.35 fps
17.2 fps (30%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
1 GB/s (29%)
1 GB/s (28%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
1.7 GB/s (29%)
1.5 GB/s (26%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.2 GB/s (37%)
min: 10.1     avg: 10.2     median: 10.2 (27%)     max: 10.3 GB/s
11 GB/s (29%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 345     avg: 354.5     median: 354.5 (5%)     max: 364 Seconds
389 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 212     avg: 217     median: 217 (2%)     max: 222 Seconds
min: 317.4     avg: 397.6     median: 348.4 (2%)     max: 527 Seconds
241 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4568     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4747 sec
0.5 sec (12%)
0.4 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 11256     avg: 12585     median: 13208 (28%)     max: 13290 Points
14055 Points (30%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.7 s (2%)
min: 7.639     avg: 7.7     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 7.856 s
8.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.7 s (1%)
min: 16.84     avg: 17.1     median: 17.1 (1%)     max: 17.26 s
20.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
571 s (3%)
min: 424.4     avg: 432.3     median: 432.3 (2%)     max: 440.1 s
718 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
49107 Points (38%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20839     avg: 20940     median: 20940 (52%)     max: 21041 Points
min: 9056     avg: 15688     median: 16079.5 (40%)     max: 18260 Points
18811 Points (46%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 64033     avg: 64733     median: 65047 (53%)     max: 65119 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 64156     avg: 64682     median: 64841 (53%)     max: 65049 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 60812     avg: 63911     median: 64615.5 (54%)     max: 65599 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13173     avg: 15303     median: 15694.5 (40%)     max: 16935 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 23922     avg: 24665     median: 24664.5 (44%)     max: 25407 Points
min: 11758     avg: 19893     median: 20357 (36%)     max: 22463 Points
21505 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8914     avg: 9434     median: 9433.5 (40%)     max: 9953 Points
min: 5540     avg: 8487     median: 8884.5 (37%)     max: 10162 Points
8081 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
7968 Points (75%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2594     avg: 2607     median: 2607 (65%)     max: 2620 Points
2570 Points (64%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 12118     avg: 12481     median: 12480.5 (48%)     max: 12843 Points
10882 Points (42%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1925 Points (75%)
min: 1314     avg: 1346     median: 1346 (53%)     max: 1378 Points
1915 Points (75%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11318     avg: 11430     median: 11430 (20%)     max: 11542 Points
min: 6945     avg: 7405     median: 7568 (14%)     max: 7703 Points
9420 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1171     avg: 1273     median: 1282 (6%)     max: 1355 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7072     avg: 7421     median: 7403.5 (23%)     max: 7805 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5617     avg: 5853     median: 5969 (60%)     max: 5972 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 28625     avg: 29620     median: 29385 (29%)     max: 30849 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
6002 Points (66%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
30099 Points (43%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
31724 Points (56%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4871 Points (95%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 537     avg: 538     median: 537.5 (1%)     max: 538 ms
min: 705     avg: 878     median: 941 (1%)     max: 999 ms
547 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
86267 Points (65%)
min: 40364     avg: 42641     median: 42219.5 (32%)     max: 46473 Points
93292 Points (71%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 226     avg: 238.5     median: 238.5 (66%)     max: 251 Points
248 Points (68%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 298     avg: 304.9     median: 304.9 (55%)     max: 311.8 Points
233 Points (42%)
295 Points (53%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1648     avg: 1701     median: 1701 (64%)     max: 1754 Points
1765 Points (66%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 59.1     avg: 61     median: 61 (11%)     max: 62.8 Watt
min: 97.2     avg: 103.3     median: 103.3 (18%)     max: 109.4 Watt
114.2 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
61.6 Watt (11%)
min: 127.1     avg: 132.7     median: 132.7 (24%)     max: 138.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 6.65     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (5%)     max: 7.55 Watt
19.5 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.31     avg: 6.5     median: 6.5 (7%)     max: 6.62 Watt
11 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
39.4 Points per Watt (29%)
13.2 Points per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9980HK → 90% n=26

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS → 107% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 30. 16:31:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18727 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11341 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 16403 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751293882s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 Jun 2025 05:20:10 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18727 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#9 got single benchmarks 18727 +0.005s ... 0.019s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11341 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#11 got single benchmarks 11341 +0.015s ... 0.038s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 16403 +0.004s ... 0.042s

#13 got single benchmarks 16403 +0.006s ... 0.048s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.067s ... 0.115s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.115s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)