Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700 vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3750H

The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 3700U, the 3750H offers a 20 Watt higher TDP and therefore a better performance under long periods of load. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements.

Performance

The average 3750H in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-10610U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a fairly good result, as of early 2022.

The ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU is among the fastest laptops built around the 3750H that we know of. It can be about 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP of 35 W (also known as the long-term power limit). Laptop manufacturers are free to change that value to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly. These values are comparatively high, making an active cooling solution pretty much a necessity.

Last but not the least, this AMD APU is built with a rather old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

► remove from comparison AMD R7 2700

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700 is an eight-core desktop processor that can handle sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT). This technology is equivalent to Intel's Hyper-Threading. Launched in April 2018, the Ryzen 7 2700 is the second fastest Ryzen 7 processor and is much more economical than its flagship sibling. The Ryzen 7 2700 has a 65 W TDP, which is nearly 50% more efficient than the 105 W TDP Ryzen 7 2700 X. This energy efficiency comes at a cost to performance though.

The Ryzen 7 2700 has a base clock speed of 3.2 GHz, which can be boosted by Extended Frequency Range (XFR) up to 4.1 GHz. The power gain is still high in multi-threaded applications, although this is some way off the Ryzen 7 2700X. The Ryzen 7 2700 benefits from AMD's new Zen+ architecture, with a greater number of instructions per cycle (IPC) and higher clock speeds than last year's Zen chips. The Ryzen 7 2700's eight cores are divided into two clusters that are connected by Infinity Fabric, a subset of HyperTransport. Each cluster has its own L3 cache.

The Ryzen 7 2700 has good performance in games. However, if it is operating at a lower base clock because of low TDP, then the Ryzen 7 2700 falls behind the Ryzen 5 2600 in gaming benchmarks. This behaviour could be because many games currently lack multi-core support. Hence, games rely more on clock speed more than core count.

Detailed information, benchmarks and values can be found in our review of the Ryzen 7 2700.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

► remove from comparison AMD R7 2700X

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is a high-end desktop processor with 8 cores (16 threads) that was announced early 2018. It is based on the revised Zen+ cores and at launch the fastest Ryzen CPU. The CPU cores clock at 3.7 GHz base and using Precision Boost 2 up to 4.3 GHz. All 8 cores and 16 threads can clock up to 4 GHz. The 8 cores are divided in two cluster (4 cores each with own L3 cache) connected via Infinity Fabric.

Compared to the older first Ryzen generation (e.g., Ryzen 5 1700X), the second generation is manufactured in an improved process (12nm called), offers and improved Precision Boost 2 (especially in partial load of the cores) and faster cache and memory speeds.

See our second generation Ryzen review for detailed benchmarks and information.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 3750HAMD Ryzen 7 2700AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Ryzen 7AMD Ryzen 7
CodenamePicasso (Zen+)Zen+Zen+
Clock2300 - 4000 MHz3200 - 4100 MHz3700 - 4300 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB4 MB
L3 Cache4 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 88 / 168 / 16
TDP35 Watt65 Watt105 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4940 Million4940 Million
Technology12 nm12 nm12 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketFP5AM4 (1331)AM4 (1331)
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHASSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHASSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com
Series: Ryzen 7 Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X3.7 - 4.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 « 3.2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X « 3.7 - 4.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 27003.2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Die Size213 mm2213 mm2
$299 U.S.$329 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 3750H
27 pt (37%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3897 Points (4%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
971 Points (41%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 340     avg: 363.8     median: 364.5 (41%)     max: 386 Points
430 Points (48%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1514     avg: 1691     median: 1713 (4%)     max: 1825 Points
3944 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 672     avg: 743     median: 734 (5%)     max: 805 Points
1551 Points (10%)
min: 1740     avg: 1768     median: 1762 (11%)     max: 1801 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 135     avg: 143.9     median: 144 (43%)     max: 157 Points
161 Points (48%)
min: 175.5     avg: 175.7     median: 175.7 (53%)     max: 176 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.2 Points (12%)
16.7 Points (22%)
18.7 Points (24%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.6 Points (41%)
1.8 Points (44%)
2 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4527     avg: 4732     median: 4770 (29%)     max: 4898 Points
4505 Points (27%)
5256 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 19290     avg: 20242     median: 20687 (15%)     max: 20750 Points
31385 Points (23%)
34763 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 R7 2700 +
49441 Points (34%)
57811 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 R7 2700 +
7756 Points (9%)
8673 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
197.1 s (2%)
130.5 s (2%)
96.6 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.4 s (1%)
5.1 s (1%)
3.5 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2866 Points (5%)
4440 Points (7%)
4779 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 17077     avg: 18318     median: 18689 (11%)     max: 19187 MIPS
45814 MIPS (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3511     avg: 3641     median: 3659 (44%)     max: 3752 MIPS
4647 MIPS (56%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
48.6 fps (17%)
89.7 fps (31%)
104.5 fps (36%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
139.4 fps (32%)
195.7 fps (45%)
226.7 fps (52%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.14     avg: 4.3     median: 4.4 (8%)     max: 4.4 fps
219%
1 R7 2700 +
9.5 fps (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
0.9 GB/s (0%)
1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.7 GB/s (12%)
1.4 GB/s (24%)
1.6 GB/s (28%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5 GB/s (13%)
9 GB/s (23%)
10.6 GB/s (28%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 584     avg: 630     median: 633 (4%)     max: 672 Seconds
308.3 Seconds (2%)
min: 264     avg: 266.8     median: 266.8 (2%)     max: 269.6 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.6902     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.723 sec
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7187     avg: 7715     median: 7431 (16%)     max: 8812 Points
9475 Points (20%)
min: 10429     avg: 10651     median: 10643 (23%)     max: 10823 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11 s (2%)
11.1 s (2%)
10.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
25.7 s (1%)
24.1 s (1%)
23.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
650 s (3%)
597 s (3%)
578 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
25143 Points (22%)
51796 Points (45%)
min: 55102     avg: 57950     median: 58836.5 (52%)     max: 59792 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6360     avg: 7609     median: 7878 (21%)     max: 8648 Points
13959 Points (38%)
min: 12874     avg: 14926     median: 15098 (41%)     max: 15552 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 39182     avg: 48304     median: 48251 (39%)     max: 57479 Points
64158 Points (52%)
min: 71788     avg: 75803     median: 76251 (62%)     max: 77677 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 44524     avg: 50874     median: 51438 (42%)     max: 56661 Points
64932 Points (53%)
min: 73539     avg: 76030     median: 76288 (62%)     max: 77262 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 55479     avg: 58242     median: 55515 (47%)     max: 63731 Points
66419 Points (56%)
min: 74344     avg: 76804     median: 76312 (64%)     max: 79006 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5698     avg: 7447     median: 7716 (20%)     max: 8117 Points
12224 Points (31%)
min: 13090     avg: 14891     median: 15060.5 (38%)     max: 15851 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 10095     avg: 11205     median: 11316 (20%)     max: 11900 Points
17915 Points (32%)
min: 20189     avg: 21001     median: 20923.5 (37%)     max: 21975 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2861     avg: 3318     median: 3344 (14%)     max: 3574 Points
8049 Points (34%)
min: 8241     avg: 8676     median: 8747 (37%)     max: 8954 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
874 Points (37%)
1000 Points (42%)
min: 1131     avg: 1177     median: 1177 (50%)     max: 1223 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3537 Points (6%)
6560 Points (12%)
min: 6372     avg: 7022     median: 7021.5 (13%)     max: 7671 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 853     avg: 895     median: 884 (4%)     max: 959 Points
1126 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3007     avg: 3467     median: 3571.5 (11%)     max: 3718 Points
7878 Points (25%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3898     avg: 4104     median: 4166 (42%)     max: 4186 Points
4681 Points (47%)
min: 4999     avg: 5050     median: 5049.5 (50%)     max: 5100 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11396     avg: 12985     median: 13403.5 (15%)     max: 13738 Points
22776 Points (25%)
min: 25919     avg: 27790     median: 27789.5 (31%)     max: 29660 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14478     avg: 14749     median: 14748.5 (26%)     max: 15019 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3717     avg: 3768     median: 3768 (74%)     max: 3819 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1132     avg: 1170     median: 1160 (1%)     max: 1228 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 29949     avg: 30479     median: 30626 (28%)     max: 30714 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
153 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 43.3     avg: 106.8     median: 95 (16%)     max: 182 Watt
140.9 Watt (24%)
211.2 Watt (36%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 40.7     avg: 68.1     median: 66.4 (12%)     max: 97.1 Watt
143.2 Watt (26%)
219.2 Watt (40%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 8.29     avg: 12     median: 11 (8%)     max: 16.7 Points per Watt
10.8 Points per Watt (8%)
8.2 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3750H → 100% n=31

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 2700 → 147% n=31

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 2700X → 164% n=31

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 02. 02:08:59

#0 checking url part for id 11131 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10030 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9978 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:34:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.034s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11131 +0.02s ... 0.054s

#8 got single benchmarks 11131 +0.06s ... 0.114s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10030 +0.003s ... 0.117s

#10 got single benchmarks 10030 +0.012s ... 0.129s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9978 +0.005s ... 0.134s

#12 got single benchmarks 9978 +0.067s ... 0.2s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.2s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.543s ... 0.743s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.743s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)