Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 7520U vs Intel Core i7-1068G7 vs Intel Core i7-1065G7

AMD Ryzen 5 7520U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 7520U

The AMD Ryzen 5 7520U is a mobile processor for cheap laptops of the Mendocino series. It integrates four older Zen 2 cores (similar to the Ryzen 4000 series like the Ryzen 3 4300U). The CPU cores clock from 2.8 GHz (base) to 4.3 GHz (single core Turbo) and can use 4 MB L3 cache. Thanks to SMT/Hyperthreading, the CPU can work on 8 threads simultaneously. The integrated memory controller only supports fast LPDDR5 memory (5500 MHz max.).

The integrated graphics adapter (Radeon 610M iGPU) uses the modern RDNA 2 architecture, but only 2 CUs (128 shaders) and clocks with up to 1.9 GHz.

Performance

The average 7520U in our extensive database is in the same league as the Core i7-1185G7, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a so-so result and indicative of a lower mid-range chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Mendocino series chips are produced on a relatively modern 6nm FinFET process at TSMC and should offer a good power efficiency. The R5 7520U is rated at 8-15 W TDP and therefore well suited for thin and light laptops.

Intel Core i7-1068G7

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1068G7

The Intel Core i7-1068G7 is a quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Ice-Lake-U generation that was announced in Mai 2019 (Computex). It integrates four Sunnycove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading) clocked at 2.3 (base) - 4.1 (single core Turbo) GHz. All four cores can run at up to 3.6 GHz using Turbo Boost. According to Intel the Sunnycove cores achieve 18% more IPCs (Instructions per Clock) and therefore the CPU performance should be similar to the higher clocked Whiskey-Lake and Coffee-Lake predecessors (e.g. Core i7-8559U, 2.7 - 4.5 GHz). The Core i7-1068G7 is the fastest and only 28 Watt Ice Lake-U chip at the time of announcement in 2019.

The biggest improvement for Ice-Lake is the integrated Gen 11 graphics card called Iris Plus Graphics. The Core i7-1065G7 integrates the biggest G7 variant with 64 CUs clocked at 300 - 1100 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 should be twice as fast as the predecessors and best the AMD Vega 10 GPU in current Ryzen APUs.

Other improvements for Ice Lake are the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wifi 6 in the chip. The integrated DDR4 memory controller supports modules with up to 3200 MHz (and LPDDDR4 3733).

The Core i7-1068G7 is produced in the new  10nm process at Intel that should offer a comparable performance to the 7nm process at TSMC. The TDP is specified at 28 Watts and therefore the CPU is best used in small multimedia laptops from 13-inch upwards (e.g. like a MacBook Pro 13).

Intel Core i7-1065G7

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1065G7

The Intel Core i7-1065G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC of the Ice Lake U product family designed for thin laptops and Ultrabooks. It was announced in May 2019 (Computex). The CPU has four Sunnycove processor cores (8 threads thanks to Hyper-Threading) clocked at 1.3 (base) - 3.9 (single core Turbo) GHz. 2 cores can reach 3.8 GHz and all four 3.5 GHz using Turbo Boost. According to Intel the Sunnycove cores achieve 18% more IPCs (Instructions per Clock).

Other improvements for Ice Lake are the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wi-Fi 6 in the chip. The integrated DDR4 memory controller supports modules with up to 3200 MHz (and LPDDDR4 3733).

The biggest improvement of Ice Lake is the integrated Gen 11 graphics adapter called Iris Plus Graphics. The Core i7-1065G7 integrates the biggest G7 variant with 64 EUs clocked at 300 - 1100 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 should be twice as fast as the predecessors and best the AMD Vega 10 GPU from current Ryzen APUs.

Performance

The average 1065G7 in our database is most comparable to the AMD Ryzen 7 2700U and the Intel Core i5-8259U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a so-so result and a direct consequence of Intel's inability to make the best of its brand-new 10 nm node. The Core i7-10710U, a 10th generation processor built with an older 14 nm process, will easily rip a 1065G7 to pieces. That said, the 1065G7 will surely beat a 10710U in terms of energy efficiency.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and sufficiently high CPU power limits, the Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 is among the fastest laptops powered by the 1065G7 that we know of. It can be around 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i7 has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to change that value to anything between 12 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, that's a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The quad-core Intel CPU is built with Intel's second-gen 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 7520UIntel Core i7-1068G7Intel Core i7-1065G7
CodenameMendocino-U (Zen 2)Ice Lake UIce Lake-U
SeriesAMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)Intel Ice LakeIntel Ice Lake
Series: Ice Lake Ice Lake-U
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U « 2.8 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1068G7 « 2.3 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1034G10.8 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1038NG72 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1065G7 « 1.3 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G71.2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G41.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G11 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1005G11.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2800 - 4300 MHz2300 - 4100 MHz1300 - 3900 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB192 KB192 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 84 / 8
TDP15 Watt28 Watt15 Watt
Technology6 nm10 nm10 nm
FeaturesLPDDR5-5500 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAAVX512, DL Boost, Turbo Boost 2.0DDR4-3200/LPDDR4-3733 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1100 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1526

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 7520U
26.7 pt (44%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1065G7
28.2 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5149 Points (5%)
min: 3127     avg: 3615     median: 3437 (3%)     max: 4281 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1171 Points (49%)
min: 1050     avg: 1131     median: 1131 (48%)     max: 1212 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 250     avg: 350.5     median: 350.5 (38%)     max: 451 Points
min: 358     avg: 438.1     median: 449 (49%)     max: 474 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1281     avg: 1633     median: 1632.5 (4%)     max: 1984 Points
min: 1081     avg: 1510     median: 1543 (4%)     max: 2024 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
834 Points (5%)
min: 288     avg: 648     median: 662.5 (4%)     max: 836 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
168.8 Points (47%)
min: 141     avg: 174.2     median: 178.1 (49%)     max: 190 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5.69     avg: 7.4     median: 7.2 (9%)     max: 9.37 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.09     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (50%)     max: 2.17 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7083     avg: 7254     median: 7270.5 (44%)     max: 7390 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 16551     avg: 21959     median: 22401.5 (16%)     max: 26481 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 232.9     avg: 281     median: 255.6 (3%)     max: 354.4 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.969     avg: 8     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 9.186 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4908     avg: 4953     median: 4956 (8%)     max: 4995 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
24219 MIPS (14%)
min: 10406     avg: 17024     median: 17254.5 (10%)     max: 22898 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4167 MIPS (49%)
min: 3289     avg: 4284     median: 4393 (52%)     max: 4589 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 40.6     avg: 45.1     median: 45.1 (15%)     max: 49.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 175.5     avg: 184.9     median: 184.9 (43%)     max: 194.3 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.3 fps (11%)
min: 2.2     avg: 4.6     median: 4.5 (8%)     max: 6.38 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.449     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (13%)     max: 0.459 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.76     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (13%)     max: 0.79 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 4.9     avg: 5     median: 5 (13%)     max: 5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1044 Seconds (13%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
588 Seconds (4%)
min: 675     avg: 882     median: 836 (6%)     max: 1650 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
min: 0.661     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.798 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9122     avg: 9209     median: 9208.5 (20%)     max: 9295 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.64     avg: 11.7     median: 11.7 (3%)     max: 14.72 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.92     avg: 23.2     median: 23.2 (1%)     max: 27.42 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 431     avg: 481     median: 481 (2%)     max: 531 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
26223 Points (20%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
7743 Points (19%)
min: 3401     avg: 8138     median: 8479.5 (21%)     max: 10494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
58709 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
58852 Points (48%)
min: 29190     avg: 46812     median: 48876 (40%)     max: 54424 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 52974     avg: 57448     median: 57798 (48%)     max: 60169 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
5521 Points (14%)
min: 5065     avg: 7011     median: 7365 (19%)     max: 8472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
11558 Points (21%)
min: 2752     avg: 9928     median: 10445 (19%)     max: 12021 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
3442 Points (15%)
min: 2273     avg: 3365     median: 3523 (15%)     max: 4435 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
1374 Points (34%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
4434 Points (17%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
1338 Points (42%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
4253 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1066 Points (42%)
1173 Points (46%)
min: 948     avg: 1274     median: 1316 (51%)     max: 1348 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
3821 Points (7%)
4449 Points (8%)
min: 2464     avg: 4215     median: 4406.5 (8%)     max: 4855 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1184     avg: 1295     median: 1310 (6%)     max: 1334 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3375     avg: 4436     median: 4648 (15%)     max: 4839 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5239     avg: 5587     median: 5637.5 (56%)     max: 5771 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14557     avg: 17869     median: 18459.5 (18%)     max: 18849 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5752 Points (64%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
18772 Points (27%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
14396 Points (26%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3863 Points (75%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
849 ms (1%)
min: 788     avg: 912     median: 861.5 (1%)     max: 1249 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
88.9 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 25166     avg: 37201     median: 36670 (28%)     max: 53081 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
155.3 Points (43%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
191.3 Points (34%)
min: 130     avg: 199.4     median: 201.5 (36%)     max: 216 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
960 Points (36%)
1025 Points (38%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
35.5 Watt (6%)
min: 23.4     avg: 30.5     median: 26 (4%)     max: 48.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
37 Watt (7%)
min: 24.1     avg: 34.8     median: 34.5 (6%)     max: 48.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.8 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.3 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
22.5 Points per Watt (17%)
min: 15.5     avg: 19.1     median: 19.3 (14%)     max: 25.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 7520U → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1068G7 → 113% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1065G7 → 119% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 29. 03:15:45

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14609 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11444 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11399 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753751745s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:17:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14609 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 14609 +0.007s ... 0.02s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11444 +0.001s ... 0.02s

#11 got single benchmarks 11444 +0.003s ... 0.024s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11399 +0.005s ... 0.029s

#13 got single benchmarks 11399 +0.042s ... 0.071s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.071s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.047s ... 0.117s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.117s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)