Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 6600H vs AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS

AMD Ryzen 5 6600H

► remove from comparison AMD R5 6600H

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600H is a processor for big (gaming) laptops based of the Rembrandt generation. The R5 6600H integrates six of the eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.5 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (12 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process. 

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

In the 6000 series, AMD finally switched to the current RDNA 2 graphics architecture for the iGPU. The 6600H only offers the slower Radeon 660M with 6 of the 12 CUs enabled and 1.9 GHz max. clock speed.

Performance

The average 6600H in our database is in the same league as the R7 5825U, the R7 6800U and also the Core i5-1340P, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very decent result, as of late 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 series APU has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 45 W. A high-performance cooling solution is a must for a system built around such a chip.

The R5 6600H is built with TSMC's 6 nm process for great, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is a powerful Hawk Point family chip that we believe to be a Ryzen 7 7840HS in disguise but with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The R7 8845HS was brought to life in H2 2023; it features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say that there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD uncorks its 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology meaning the new processors are expected to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs. Dozens of popular apps such as DaVinci Resolve support this technology, as of late 2023.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8845HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8845HS is a 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The R7 8845HS is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 6900HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS is a processor for big (gaming) laptops based on the Rembrandt generation. The R9 6900HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.9 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process. The HS variant offers a 10 W lower TDP and therefore a lower sustained performance than the HX version.

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

Performance

The average 6900HS in our database matches the Intel Core i7-12800H in multi-thread performance while managing to keep up with the more power-hungry 6900HX. "Top of the crop" is precisely the right phrase to describe this Ryzen 9 series chip, as of Q4 2022, and it will have no difficulty ripping through any task imaginable for years to come.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

A big novelty is the integrated GPU Radeon 680M, that is now based on the RDNA2 architecture and offers 12 CUs at up to 2.4 GHz. It should be the fastest iGPU of all at the time of announcement.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 35 Watts and therefore better suited for thin and light laptops. The power efficiency should be very good, thanks to the improved 6 nm process  and additional power saving features in the 6000 series.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 6600HAMD Ryzen 7 8845HSAMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
CodenameRembrandt-H (Zen 3+)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+)
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Series: Rembrandt (Zen 3+) Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+)
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX3.3 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H « 3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX3.3 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3300 - 4500 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz3300 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache3 MB8 MB4 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 128 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
TDP45 Watt45 Watt35 Watt
Technology6 nm4 nm6 nm
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C95 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2FP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2
FeaturesDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Die Size178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 6600H
34.9 pt (58%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8845HS
39.9 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 6900HS
36.6 pt (61%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 102     avg: 104.4     median: 103.8 (58%)     max: 107.8 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 567     avg: 869     median: 902 (17%)     max: 956 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10226     avg: 10454     median: 10418 (10%)     max: 10717 Points
min: 14895     avg: 16165     median: 16192 (15%)     max: 18037 Points
min: 12606     avg: 13439     median: 13445 (12%)     max: 14403 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1458     avg: 1467     median: 1458 (61%)     max: 1486 Points
min: 1623     avg: 1751     median: 1769 (74%)     max: 1783 Points
min: 1526     avg: 1553     median: 1554 (65%)     max: 1570 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 564     avg: 574     median: 575 (63%)     max: 584 Points
min: 673     avg: 686     median: 685 (75%)     max: 698 Points
min: 596     avg: 608     median: 612 (67%)     max: 620 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3965     avg: 4071     median: 4106 (10%)     max: 4141 Points
min: 5808     avg: 6317     median: 6346 (15%)     max: 7026 Points
min: 4829     avg: 5167     median: 5152 (13%)     max: 5552 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1626     avg: 1701     median: 1737 (11%)     max: 1740 Points
min: 2342     avg: 2563     median: 2575 (16%)     max: 2908 Points
min: 2054     avg: 2191     median: 2161 (14%)     max: 2342 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 231     avg: 236.7     median: 236 (65%)     max: 243 Points
min: 269     avg: 276     median: 276 (76%)     max: 283 Points
min: 218     avg: 242     median: 245 (68%)     max: 254 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.28     avg: 29.8     median: 29.8 (39%)     max: 30.3 Points
min: 24.2     avg: 24.8     median: 24.7 (32%)     max: 25.29 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (79%)     max: 3.34 Points
min: 2.92     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (70%)     max: 2.97 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7426     avg: 7545     median: 7523 (45%)     max: 7685 Points
min: 6403     avg: 6405     median: 6404.5 (39%)     max: 6406 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 47332     avg: 47532     median: 47500 (34%)     max: 47764 Points
min: 38071     avg: 39960     median: 39960 (29%)     max: 41849 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 85872     avg: 86827     median: 86827 (55%)     max: 87782 Points
73218 Points (47%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14163     avg: 14360     median: 14360 (17%)     max: 14557 Points
12340 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 70.718     avg: 113.2     median: 98.9 (1%)     max: 170 s
116.8 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.703     avg: 3.6     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 5.3 s
5.5 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7275     avg: 11203     median: 7327 (12%)     max: 19008 Points
min: 5835     avg: 6488     median: 6488 (10%)     max: 7141 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 39886     avg: 45692     median: 47836 (27%)     max: 49353 MIPS
min: 62669     avg: 68390     median: 68354 (39%)     max: 74664 MIPS
min: 52948     avg: 60092     median: 62006 (36%)     max: 63591 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5466     avg: 5580     median: 5553 (65%)     max: 5720 MIPS
min: 5197     avg: 6319     median: 6393 (75%)     max: 6714 MIPS
min: 5538     avg: 5766     median: 5805 (68%)     max: 5958 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 143.7     avg: 146.8     median: 146.8 (49%)     max: 149.8 fps
min: 122.5     avg: 123.6     median: 123.6 (41%)     max: 124.7 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 286.5     avg: 287.8     median: 287.8 (66%)     max: 289 fps
min: 259     avg: 265.5     median: 265.5 (61%)     max: 272 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.5     avg: 13.2     median: 13.9 (24%)     max: 14.2 fps
min: 18.6     avg: 20.1     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
min: 14.2     avg: 16.2     median: 16.2 (28%)     max: 17.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
min: 0.962     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (32%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2     avg: 2     median: 2 (34%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
min: 1.4     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (28%)     max: 1.9 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14     avg: 14.4     median: 14.4 (38%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
min: 10.3     avg: 11.1     median: 11.1 (29%)     max: 11.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 497     avg: 512     median: 508 (6%)     max: 532 Seconds
min: 288     avg: 326.8     median: 318 (4%)     max: 367 Seconds
min: 378     avg: 409.7     median: 382 (5%)     max: 469 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 291     avg: 296.7     median: 293 (2%)     max: 306 Seconds
min: 179     avg: 200.9     median: 198 (1%)     max: 216 Seconds
min: 220     avg: 239     median: 227 (2%)     max: 277 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4995     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.532 sec
min: 0.4304     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4935 sec
min: 0.4672     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.502 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15091     avg: 15422     median: 15313 (33%)     max: 15969 Points
min: 13658     avg: 14206     median: 14208 (30%)     max: 14752 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.1     avg: 7.2     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.331 s
min: 7.4     avg: 9     median: 9 (2%)     max: 10.58 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.6     avg: 17.8     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 18.138 s
min: 18.1     avg: 21.9     median: 21.9 (1%)     max: 25.703 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 659.5     avg: 662     median: 662.4 (3%)     max: 665.289 s
min: 643     avg: 758     median: 758.3 (3%)     max: 873.522 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 82048     avg: 82541     median: 82586.5 (63%)     max: 82943 Points
min: 68571     avg: 71157     median: 71601 (55%)     max: 73298 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12022     avg: 14220     median: 14220 (35%)     max: 16418 Points
min: 19492     avg: 22379     median: 22207 (55%)     max: 26212 Points
min: 14568     avg: 18023     median: 18587 (46%)     max: 20560 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 81620     avg: 84501     median: 84429 (69%)     max: 88462 Points
min: 69103     avg: 75800     median: 75280 (61%)     max: 83016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 81607     avg: 85179     median: 85402 (69%)     max: 88305 Points
75258 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 83958     avg: 87188     median: 85870 (71%)     max: 93052 Points
min: 81152     avg: 81465     median: 81465 (68%)     max: 81778 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12692     avg: 13364     median: 13363.5 (34%)     max: 14035 Points
min: 18507     avg: 20158     median: 20268.5 (51%)     max: 22215 Points
min: 11880     avg: 17085     median: 17986 (45%)     max: 19624 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 20214     avg: 21091     median: 21252 (38%)     max: 21808 Points
min: 25099     avg: 27322     median: 27428 (49%)     max: 30715 Points
min: 21071     avg: 24638     median: 25048 (45%)     max: 26334 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6569     avg: 6979     median: 7023 (30%)     max: 7345 Points
min: 8550     avg: 11247     median: 10853 (46%)     max: 19164 Points
min: 8979     avg: 9711     median: 10072 (42%)     max: 10221 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2042 Points (51%)
min: 2510     avg: 2624     median: 2630 (66%)     max: 2698 Points
2175 Points (54%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
9240 Points (36%)
min: 11073     avg: 12854     median: 12998 (50%)     max: 14014 Points
10317 Points (40%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2577     avg: 2844     median: 2846 (90%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12719     avg: 16862     median: 16862.5 (69%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1446     avg: 1478     median: 1474 (58%)     max: 1513 Points
min: 1765     avg: 1931     median: 1949 (76%)     max: 2004 Points
min: 1480     avg: 1541     median: 1537 (60%)     max: 1614 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6403     avg: 7442     median: 7729 (14%)     max: 8195 Points
min: 11256     avg: 11906     median: 11864 (21%)     max: 12726 Points
min: 8381     avg: 9358     median: 9224 (17%)     max: 10040 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1417     avg: 1447     median: 1447 (6%)     max: 1477 Points
min: 1869     avg: 1895     median: 1898 (8%)     max: 1914 Points
min: 1428     avg: 1490     median: 1502 (7%)     max: 1541 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6219     avg: 7173     median: 7172.5 (23%)     max: 8126 Points
min: 11742     avg: 12016     median: 12086 (38%)     max: 12109 Points
min: 9226     avg: 9501     median: 9261 (29%)     max: 10015 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8034     avg: 8109     median: 8077.5 (81%)     max: 8245 Points
min: 5986     avg: 6400     median: 6476 (65%)     max: 6739 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47602     avg: 48576     median: 48614.5 (48%)     max: 49473 Points
min: 35811     avg: 38242     median: 39091 (39%)     max: 39825 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 604     avg: 637     median: 637 (1%)     max: 670 ms
min: 496     avg: 534     median: 527 (1%)     max: 664 ms
min: 566     avg: 599     median: 591 (1%)     max: 644 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 94     avg: 106.6     median: 106.6 (1%)     max: 119.2 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85632     avg: 90739     median: 90496 (68%)     max: 96330 Points
73797 Points (56%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 193.4     avg: 201.2     median: 201.2 (55%)     max: 209 Points
min: 176.4     avg: 255.2     median: 256.5 (70%)     max: 314 Points
min: 184.4     avg: 202.3     median: 197.4 (54%)     max: 225 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 233     avg: 245.7     median: 244 (44%)     max: 260 Points
min: 275     avg: 304.2     median: 305 (55%)     max: 334 Points
min: 239     avg: 273.6     median: 281 (50%)     max: 304 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1399     avg: 1460     median: 1460 (55%)     max: 1521 Points
min: 1531     avg: 1772     median: 1795.5 (67%)     max: 1939 Points
min: 1415     avg: 1534     median: 1527 (57%)     max: 1661 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 78.3     avg: 78.6     median: 78.6 (14%)     max: 78.8 Watt
min: 42.5     avg: 82.2     median: 81.1 (14%)     max: 147.2 Watt
min: 78.2     avg: 101.9     median: 104.3 (18%)     max: 118.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 75.1     avg: 82.8     median: 82.8 (15%)     max: 90.4 Watt
min: 39     avg: 79.3     median: 78.1 (14%)     max: 145.6 Watt
min: 84.8     avg: 107     median: 105.5 (19%)     max: 129 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.1 Watt (5%)
min: 3.78     avg: 9     median: 7.1 (5%)     max: 16.5 Watt
min: 7.74     avg: 16.3     median: 16.3 (11%)     max: 24.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.42     avg: 8.9     median: 7.8 (9%)     max: 16.4 Watt
min: 8.53     avg: 15.6     median: 18.1 (20%)     max: 20.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 18     avg: 20.6     median: 20.6 (15%)     max: 23.1 Points per Watt
min: 20     avg: 35.5     median: 33.7 (25%)     max: 66.2 Points per Watt
min: 18.2     avg: 21.6     median: 22.3 (17%)     max: 24.4 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 6600H → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS → 138% n=26

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS → 117% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 02. 05:02:39

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14086 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16399 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14118 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754103759s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 01 Aug 2025 05:18:38 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14086 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 14086 +0.006s ... 0.018s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 16399 +0.005s ... 0.023s

#11 got single benchmarks 16399 +0.022s ... 0.044s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14118 +0.005s ... 0.049s

#13 got single benchmarks 14118 +0.012s ... 0.061s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.081s ... 0.143s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.143s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)