Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 610 vs ARM Mali-G52 MP6 vs Qualcomm Adreno 650

Qualcomm Adreno 610

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 610 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

In synthetic benchmarks, the Adreno 610 positions itself between the old Adreno 510 and Adreno 512 / 612

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

ARM Mali-G52 MP6

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G52 MP6

The ARM Mali-G52 MP6 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2019 in the HiSilicon Kirin 810 and uses 6 clusters (hence the MP6 name). 

The G52 is based on the Bifrost architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. ARM claims that the G52 series offers 30% more performance density and 15% better energy efficiency compared to the ARM Mali G51 series.

The performance of the G52MP6 in our benchmarks (in the Kirin 810) is comparable to the Adreno 618 in the Snapdragon 730 and G76MP4 in the Helio G90T.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

Qualcomm Adreno 650

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 650

The Qualcomm Adreno 650 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 865+ and 870 SoCs. The chip will be available from early 2020 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices. The base clock speed of the GPU is 250 MHz and the boost depends on the used SoC. For the 865 it is 587 MHz, the 865 Plus increased to 846 MHz and the 2021 870 reached 670 MHz.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 650 GPU offers a 25% improved performance over the Adreno 640, its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 855 SoC. The enhanced performance is achieved by the Adreno 650 having 50% more compute units (ALUs) than the Adreno 640. Furthermore, the clock speed of the pixel shaders was also increased by 50%.

The performance in our first benchmarks of a reference system positions itself above the ARM Mali-G76 MP16 and e.g. in 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme even on the top spot. In GFXBench only the Apple A13 GPU is able to best the Adreno 650 (regarding smartphone GPUs).

As a novelty, the GPU driver can be updated in the Android Play Store. Furthermore, some features are running under the Elite Gaming brand (e.g., 144 Hz display support, desktop forward rendering). 

The Adreno 650 supports Vulkan 1.1, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. Furthermore, games and videos can use HDR10+ and Dolby Vision (with a supported display). The 650 supports 2 displays with up to 4K 60 Hz / QHD+ 144 Hz.

Qualcomm Adreno 610ARM Mali-G52 MP6Qualcomm Adreno 650
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
ArchitectureAdreno 600BifrostAdreno 600
Shared Memoryyesnoyes
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
technology11 nm12 nm7 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement09.04.2019 06.03.2018 04.12.2019
Pipelines6 - unified
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.com
Core Speed250 - 670 (Boost) MHz
CPU in Adreno 610GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6658 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? - 1050 MHz
CPU in Mali-G52 MP6GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 8108 x 1880 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 650GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G8 x 2420 MHz, 5 W? MHz670 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)8 x 2420 MHz, 5 W250 MHz646 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8658 x 2420 MHz, 5 W250 MHz587 MHz
min. - max.250 MHz587 - 670 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 205     avg: 414.2     median: 433 (0%)     max: 634 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
0 Points (0%)
min: 45182     avg: 46563     median: 46944 (5%)     max: 47563 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 975     avg: 1855     median: 1827.5 (8%)     max: 2254 Points
min: 3314     avg: 3463     median: 3483 (15%)     max: 3591 Points
min: 7970     avg: 9563     median: 9684 (42%)     max: 11492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1295     avg: 1759     median: 1746.5 (4%)     max: 2187 Points
min: 3274     avg: 3389     median: 3406 (7%)     max: 3488 Points
min: 11617     avg: 13051     median: 12858 (28%)     max: 16809 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 267     avg: 1178     median: 1175.5 (5%)     max: 1597 Points
min: 2515     avg: 2810     median: 2954 (12%)     max: 2961 Points
min: 6960     avg: 8089     median: 8085 (34%)     max: 8975 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 240     avg: 1040     median: 1033 (3%)     max: 1436 Points
min: 2328     avg: 2626     median: 2752 (7%)     max: 2798 Points
min: 8593     avg: 9728     median: 9498 (24%)     max: 11999 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 1400     avg: 1836     median: 1797 (16%)     max: 2222 Points
min: 3252     avg: 3342     median: 3338 (30%)     max: 3437 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 1270     avg: 1713     median: 1691 (10%)     max: 2095 Points
min: 3243     avg: 3318     median: 3327 (20%)     max: 3384 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 854     avg: 1210     median: 1164 (6%)     max: 1905 Points
min: 2502     avg: 2748     median: 2837 (14%)     max: 2904 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 726     avg: 1040     median: 1021 (3%)     max: 1394 Points
min: 2347     avg: 2599     median: 2710 (9%)     max: 2740 Points
min: 9.7     avg: 9.9     median: 10 (4%)     max: 10 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 1.4     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 3.6 fps
min: 7.7     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (1%)     max: 7.9 fps
min: 18     avg: 21.1     median: 21 (4%)     max: 27 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 5.1     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (1%)     max: 10.1 fps
min: 20     avg: 21     median: 21 (2%)     max: 22 fps
min: 27     avg: 55     median: 55 (4%)     max: 67 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 5.2     avg: 7.3     median: 7.2 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
min: 19     avg: 20     median: 20 (2%)     max: 21 fps
min: 39     avg: 52.6     median: 51 (5%)     max: 62 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 9.3     avg: 13.3     median: 13 (0%)     max: 16 fps
min: 33     avg: 34     median: 34 (1%)     max: 35 fps
min: 67     avg: 87.2     median: 88 (2%)     max: 103 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 14     avg: 19.5     median: 19 (1%)     max: 24 fps
min: 47     avg: 49.3     median: 48 (2%)     max: 53 fps
min: 96     avg: 125.1     median: 125 (5%)     max: 151 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 610
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 24     avg: 36.1     median: 36 (0%)     max: 45 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G52 MP6
min: 85     avg: 87     median: 87 (1%)     max: 89 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 650
min: 168     avg: 209.5     median: 206 (2%)     max: 266 fps
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 40315     avg: 41445     median: 40525 (3%)     max: 44415 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 8.79     avg: 11.7     median: 11.4 (0%)     max: 14.76 fps
21.1 fps (1%)
min: 72.6     avg: 75.5     median: 75 (2%)     max: 78.57 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
8.6 fps (2%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 343     avg: 347.7     median: 349 (0%)     max: 351 Points
2688 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
577 Points (0%)
2532 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 7370     avg: 16213     median: 17873 (6%)     max: 21734 Points
11576 Points (4%)
54110 Points (19%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1595     avg: 12281     median: 13408 (18%)     max: 20711 Points
3831 Points (5%)
42627 Points (56%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.25     avg: 3.5     median: 3 (1%)     max: 6.42 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 610 → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G52 MP6 → 213% n=18

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 650 → 633% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 610:
25.6  fps
234%
Adreno 650:
60  fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Adreno 610:
26.5  fps
226%
Adreno 650:
60  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
Adreno 610:
60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
150%
Adreno 650:
60 119 ~ 90 fps
high
100%
Adreno 610:
56 59 60 60 ~ 59 fps
151%
Adreno 650:
60 117 ~ 89 fps
ultra
Adreno 650:
60 118 ~ 89 fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
Adreno 610:
42 59 ~ 51 fps
high
100%
Adreno 610:
40  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 610:
29  fps
207%
Adreno 650:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 610:
26.3 27.7 29.2 37 37 ~ 31 fps
194%
Adreno 650:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 610:
15  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 610:
11 13 13.1 14 15 ~ 13 fps
462%
Adreno 650:
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 38 44 50 53 54 57 57 59 59 60 60 60 87 ~ 52 fps
137%
Adreno 650:
30 30 30 52 59 60 60 60 60 62 64 85 91 114 117 119 120 ~ 71 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 38.8 39.8 ~ 31 fps
129%
Mali-G52 MP6:
40  fps
197%
Adreno 650:
40 40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 90 90 ~ 61 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 610:
25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 29.5 29.9 ~ 25 fps
160%
Mali-G52 MP6:
40  fps
232%
Adreno 650:
40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
high
100%
Adreno 610:
25  fps
120%
Mali-G52 MP6:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
212%
Adreno 650:
30 30 30 30 30 39 40 40 40 40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 53 fps
ultra
Adreno 650:
40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
low
Mali-G52 MP6:
60  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 60 ~ 38 fps
161%
Adreno 650:
60 60 62 ~ 61 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 60 ~ 38 fps
158%
Adreno 650:
60 60 61 ~ 60 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 610:
60 60 66 ~ 62 fps
161%
Adreno 650:
60 60 90 105 142 144 ~ 100 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 610:
20 20 24 26 30 59 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G52 MP6:
30  fps
150%
Adreno 650:
30 30 60 60 ~ 45 fps
high
100%
Adreno 610:
11 12 15 17 22 23 41.5 ~ 20 fps
150%
Mali-G52 MP6:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
205%
Adreno 650:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 58 60 60 60 ~ 41 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Adreno 650:
60 144 ~ 102 fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 610:
60  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 610 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G52 MP6 → 132%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 145%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 650 → 202%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 220%

Qualcomm Adreno 610ARM Mali-G52 MP6Qualcomm Adreno 650
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal25.626.56060
League of Legends: Wild Rift6059908989
Call of Duty Mobile51402960
Genshin Impact3115136060
Armajet5271
PUBG Mobile31252540403061585340
Arena of Valor38386160
Dead Trigger 262100
Asphalt 9: Legends302030304541
Temple Run 260
Qualcomm Adreno 610ARM Mali-G52 MP6Qualcomm Adreno 650
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
5
1
2


2
3
2
3
1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2


1


2










< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
5

1


2
3

1
5






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.35
log 01. 23:08:34

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9921 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10362 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9971 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1767305314s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 01 Jan 2026 05:18:57 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.006s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9921 +0.01s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 9921 +0.055s ... 0.071s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10362 +0s ... 0.071s

#12 got single benchmarks 10362 +0.001s ... 0.072s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9971 +0s ... 0.072s

#14 got single benchmarks 9971 +0.005s ... 0.077s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.077s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.078s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.082s

#18 min, max, avg, median took s +0.027s ... 0.109s

#19 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.109s

#20 Got 282 rows for game benchmarks. +0.029s ... 0.138s

#21 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.138s

#22 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.139s

#23 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.144s

#24 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.144s

#25 return log +0.001s ... 0.145s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)