Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-13905H vs Intel Core i9-13900H

Intel Core i9-13905H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13905H

The Intel Core i9-13905H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Raptor Lake-H series (Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.6 to 5.4 GHz (single core turbo, all-core 4.9 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.9 to 4.1 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Similar to the i9-13900H but without vPro support and the 13905H uses a different package and socket.

Performance

Thanks to the high core count and high clock speed, the Core i9-13905H is (together with the 13900HK) the fastest 45W CPU for laptops and only bested by Raptor Lake-HX based models with more cores and improved P-cores (e.g., the i9-13980HX). Still, the CPU is very well suited for all demanding use cases like gaming, content creation, and scientific calculations.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from 4800 MHz for the 12th gen). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) .

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (115 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7 (improved over the 12th Gen).

Intel Core i9-13900H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900H

The Intel Core i9-13900H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Raptor Lake-H series (Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.6 to 5.4 GHz (single core turbo, all-core 4.9 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.9 to 4.1 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the similar Core i9-13900HK, the 13900H supports no open multiplicator for overclocking, but on the other hand the full set of vPro management features.

Performance

The average 13900H in our database is in the same league as the Core i5-13500HX, Core i7-13705H, Core i9-12900HK, Core i9-13905H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 115 W, the Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 is among the fastest laptops built around the 13900H that we know of. It can be about 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from 4800 MHz for the 12th gen). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) .

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (115 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7 (improved over the 12th Gen).

ModelIntel Core i9-13905HIntel Core i9-13900H
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HIntel Raptor Lake-H
CodenameRaptor Lake-HRaptor Lake-H
Series: Raptor Lake-H Raptor Lake-H
Intel Core i9-13900HK compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H « 1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H compare1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H compare2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H compare1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HK compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H « 1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H compare1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H compare2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H compare1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock1900 - 5400 MHz1900 - 5400 MHz
L1 Cache1.2 MB1.2 MB
L2 Cache11.5 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache24 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 2014 / 20
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA1792BGA1744
FeaturesThread DirectorDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-5200/LPDDR5-6400/LPDDR5x-6400 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, vPro Ent., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13905H
42.9 pt (60%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900H
46.5 pt (64%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 17880     avg: 19384     median: 20034 (19%)     max: 20237 Points
min: 13177     avg: 17182     median: 17754 (16%)     max: 20385 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1652     avg: 1901     median: 2020 (86%)     max: 2030 Points
min: 1297     avg: 1906     median: 1970 (84%)     max: 2054 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 622     avg: 679     median: 639 (71%)     max: 775 Points
min: 428     avg: 727     median: 757 (84%)     max: 792 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6462     avg: 7028     median: 7152 (17%)     max: 7469 Points
min: 4960     avg: 6689     median: 6937.5 (17%)     max: 7716 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2676     avg: 2821     median: 2857 (18%)     max: 2931 Points
min: 2061     avg: 2713     median: 2739 (17%)     max: 3100 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 235     avg: 255.3     median: 246 (74%)     max: 285 Points
min: 211     avg: 271.7     median: 285 (86%)     max: 297 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 68880     avg: 71701     median: 69892 (40%)     max: 76332 MIPS
min: 45045     avg: 67692     median: 70425 (40%)     max: 79032 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4871     avg: 5487     median: 5520 (66%)     max: 6069 MIPS
min: 3665     avg: 6079     median: 6277.5 (75%)     max: 6600 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.5     avg: 21.5     median: 21.2 (37%)     max: 22.9 fps
min: 14.7     avg: 18.9     median: 19.3 (34%)     max: 22.3 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 280     avg: 296     median: 302 (4%)     max: 306 Seconds
min: 279     avg: 342.9     median: 329 (4%)     max: 428 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 163     avg: 171.3     median: 173 (1%)     max: 178 Seconds
min: 166     avg: 200.3     median: 193 (1%)     max: 268 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4178     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4974 sec
min: 0.4052     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.723 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15222     avg: 15362     median: 15361.5 (33%)     max: 15501 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
75108 Points (66%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 22494     avg: 23911     median: 23894 (65%)     max: 25346 Points
min: 15540     avg: 22251     median: 23010 (62%)     max: 25420 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 88687     avg: 98764     median: 102969 (84%)     max: 103874 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
93890 Points (76%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 94133     avg: 95308     median: 95308 (80%)     max: 96483 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
21588 Points (55%)
min: 12004     avg: 18147     median: 19708 (50%)     max: 22184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 27625     avg: 29475     median: 29193 (52%)     max: 31606 Points
min: 17733     avg: 27162     median: 28865.5 (51%)     max: 32664 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 12800     avg: 13567     median: 13653 (58%)     max: 14249 Points
min: 7863     avg: 11807     median: 12285 (52%)     max: 13726 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2404 Points (73%)
min: 2437     avg: 2670     median: 2696 (82%)     max: 2807 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
14212 Points (56%)
min: 11118     avg: 13174     median: 13225 (52%)     max: 14404 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1672     avg: 1774     median: 1685 (71%)     max: 1966 Points
min: 1140     avg: 1909     median: 1974 (83%)     max: 2043 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13661     avg: 14122     median: 13707 (25%)     max: 14999 Points
min: 9094     avg: 12803     median: 13216 (24%)     max: 15410 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1898 Points (8%)
min: 1654     avg: 1804     median: 1802.5 (8%)     max: 1958 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
14690 Points (46%)
min: 11743     avg: 13078     median: 13197.5 (42%)     max: 14172 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7253     avg: 7977     median: 8409 (84%)     max: 8498 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 45069     avg: 49976     median: 50450 (56%)     max: 54848 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 465     avg: 522     median: 545 (1%)     max: 557 ms
min: 456     avg: 505     median: 472 (1%)     max: 828 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85435     avg: 97010     median: 100627 (90%)     max: 102947 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 243     avg: 265.5     median: 265.5 (76%)     max: 288 Points
min: 133.5     avg: 274.9     median: 286 (82%)     max: 348 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 267     avg: 301.5     median: 301.5 (63%)     max: 336 Points
min: 171.4     avg: 302.4     median: 317 (66%)     max: 340 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1774     avg: 1884     median: 1883.5 (72%)     max: 1993 Points
min: 1104     avg: 1881     median: 1927.5 (74%)     max: 2146 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 139.4     avg: 140     median: 140 (24%)     max: 140.6 Watt
min: 38.1     avg: 102.7     median: 105.8 (18%)     max: 154 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
168.6 Watt (31%)
min: 66.1     avg: 128.6     median: 124.6 (23%)     max: 196.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 16     avg: 16.6     median: 16.6 (11%)     max: 17.2 Watt
min: 2.9     avg: 13.7     median: 13.3 (9%)     max: 28.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 11.7     avg: 15.8     median: 15.8 (17%)     max: 19.9 Watt
min: 4.85     avg: 13.3     median: 12.3 (14%)     max: 24 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
16.9 Points per Watt (13%)
min: 13.6     avg: 28.5     median: 21.1 (16%)     max: 97.6 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13905H → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900H → 101% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 26. 13:03:54

#0 checking url part for id 14983 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14717 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14983 +0.016s ... 0.046s

#7 got single benchmarks 14983 +0.016s ... 0.063s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14717 +0.015s ... 0.078s

#9 got single benchmarks 14717 +0.079s ... 0.157s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.157s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.207s ... 0.363s

#12 return log +0.021s ... 0.385s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)