Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-12900H vs AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS vs Intel Core i7-12800H

Intel Core i9-12900H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900H

The Intel Core i9-12900H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.5 to 5 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.8 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12900HK, the 12900H does not offer the open multiplicator (for overclocking) but the full "Enterprise" set of vPro features (for remote management).

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.45 GHz.

Performance

The average 12900H in our database proves to be an outrageously fast CPU, ripping the Ryzen 9 6900HX to pieces as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Perhaps surprisingly, the i9's multi-thread performance is not much higher than that of the Core i7-12700H, suggesting the latter might be a better bang for the buck.

With its decent cooling solution and a long-term Power Limit of 110 W, the Asus StudioBook 16 H7600ZW is one of the fastest laptops built around the i9-12900H that we know of. It can be more than 80% faster than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, depending on the circumstances.

Power consumption

The Core i9 has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W, with 45 W being its Base power consumption. The CPU's maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sits at 115 W.

The i9-12900H is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower than average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 6900HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS is a processor for big (gaming) laptops based on the Rembrandt generation. The R9 6900HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.9 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process. The HS variant offers a 10 W lower TDP and therefore a lower sustained performance than the HX version.

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

Performance

The average 6900HS in our database matches the Intel Core i7-12800H in multi-thread performance while managing to keep up with the more power-hungry 6900HX. "Top of the crop" is precisely the right phrase to describe this Ryzen 9 series chip, as of Q4 2022, and it will have no difficulty ripping through any task imaginable for years to come.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

A big novelty is the integrated GPU Radeon 680M, that is now based on the RDNA2 architecture and offers 12 CUs at up to 2.4 GHz. It should be the fastest iGPU of all at the time of announcement.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 35 Watts and therefore better suited for thin and light laptops. The power efficiency should be very good, thanks to the improved 6 nm process  and additional power saving features in the 6000 series.

Intel Core i7-12800H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12800H

The Intel Core i7-12800H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.4 to 4.8 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.8 to3.7 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12900H, the 12800H is lower clocked and also features  the full "Enterprise" set of vPro features (for remote management).

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.4 GHz.

Performance

The average 12800H in our database matches the Ryzen 9 6900HS and the Core i9-11900H in multi-thread performance. Which is fairly impressive, as of mid 2022.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 70 W, the ZBook Studio 16 G9 is among the fastest laptops built around the 12800H that we know of. It can be about 70% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W, with 45 W being its Base power consumption. The maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sits at 115 W.

The i7-12800H is built with Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i9-12900HAMD Ryzen 9 6900HSIntel Core i7-12800H
CodenameAlder Lake-HRembrandt-H (Zen 3+)Alder Lake-H
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-PAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)Intel Alder Lake-P
Series: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-H
Intel Core i9-12900HK1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H « 1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX3.3 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900HK1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H « 1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock1800 - 5000 MHz3300 - 4900 MHz1800 - 4800 MHz
L1 Cache1.2 MB512 KB1.2 MB
L2 Cache11.5 MB4 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache24 MB16 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 208 / 1614 / 20
TDP45 Watt35 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm6 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C95 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1744FP7/FP7r2BGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thread Director, DL Boost, GNA, Remote Platform Erase, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2400 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900H
39.2 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 6900HS
36.6 pt (61%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12800H
38.6 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 96     avg: 104.9     median: 106 (60%)     max: 112 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 371     avg: 636     median: 578 (11%)     max: 920 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7359     avg: 15133     median: 15946.5 (15%)     max: 19648 Points
min: 12606     avg: 13439     median: 13445 (12%)     max: 14403 Points
min: 9777     avg: 14387     median: 15283 (14%)     max: 16597 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1634     avg: 1829     median: 1863.5 (78%)     max: 1930 Points
min: 1526     avg: 1553     median: 1554 (65%)     max: 1570 Points
min: 1796     avg: 1824     median: 1828 (77%)     max: 1859 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 624     avg: 706     median: 714.5 (78%)     max: 738 Points
min: 596     avg: 608     median: 612 (67%)     max: 620 Points
min: 690     avg: 703     median: 706 (77%)     max: 714 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2681     avg: 5717     median: 6056.5 (15%)     max: 7471 Points
min: 4829     avg: 5167     median: 5152 (13%)     max: 5552 Points
min: 3741     avg: 5443     median: 5731 (14%)     max: 6433 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1395     avg: 2454     median: 2576.5 (16%)     max: 3077 Points
min: 2054     avg: 2191     median: 2161 (14%)     max: 2342 Points
min: 1566     avg: 2236     median: 2222 (14%)     max: 2697 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 235     avg: 262.3     median: 266 (74%)     max: 277 Points
min: 218     avg: 242     median: 245 (68%)     max: 254 Points
min: 242     avg: 260     median: 265 (73%)     max: 269 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 12.08     avg: 23.6     median: 25.3 (33%)     max: 32.77 Points
min: 24.2     avg: 24.8     median: 24.7 (32%)     max: 25.29 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.83     avg: 3     median: 3 (71%)     max: 3.3 Points
min: 2.92     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (70%)     max: 2.97 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7952     avg: 8475     median: 8235 (50%)     max: 9498 Points
min: 6403     avg: 6405     median: 6404.5 (39%)     max: 6406 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 24313     avg: 43425     median: 47767 (35%)     max: 60567 Points
min: 38071     avg: 39960     median: 39960 (29%)     max: 41849 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 48178     avg: 66910     median: 70976.5 (45%)     max: 77409 Points
73218 Points (47%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12846     avg: 13385     median: 13227.5 (16%)     max: 14567 Points
12340 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 187.176     avg: 206.8     median: 197.8 (2%)     max: 265.116 s
116.8 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.421     avg: 4.1     median: 4 (1%)     max: 5.062 s
5.5 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7620     avg: 8202     median: 7937 (13%)     max: 9328 Points
min: 5835     avg: 6488     median: 6488 (10%)     max: 7141 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 34684     avg: 60849     median: 64908.5 (37%)     max: 76677 MIPS
min: 52948     avg: 60092     median: 62006 (36%)     max: 63591 MIPS
min: 44553     avg: 59950     median: 62100 (36%)     max: 68930 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5302     avg: 5843     median: 5881 (69%)     max: 6289 MIPS
min: 5538     avg: 5766     median: 5805 (68%)     max: 5958 MIPS
min: 5726     avg: 5835     median: 5820 (69%)     max: 5976 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 67.5     avg: 105.8     median: 111.4 (3%)     max: 126.7 fps
min: 122.5     avg: 123.6     median: 123.6 (3%)     max: 124.7 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 225     avg: 266.6     median: 263.3 (7%)     max: 317 fps
min: 259     avg: 265.5     median: 265.5 (7%)     max: 272 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.05     avg: 17.1     median: 17.8 (31%)     max: 22.5 fps
min: 14.2     avg: 16.2     median: 16.2 (28%)     max: 17.9 fps
min: 11.7     avg: 16.3     median: 16.8 (30%)     max: 19.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.864     avg: 1.1     median: 1 (29%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
min: 0.962     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (32%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.5     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (33%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
min: 1.4     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (28%)     max: 1.9 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 8.6     avg: 10.5     median: 10.3 (27%)     max: 12.8 GB/s
min: 10.3     avg: 11.1     median: 11.1 (29%)     max: 11.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 273     avg: 420.7     median: 376 (5%)     max: 850 Seconds
min: 378     avg: 409.7     median: 382 (5%)     max: 469 Seconds
337 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 160     avg: 231.3     median: 205.5 (1%)     max: 451 Seconds
min: 220     avg: 239     median: 227 (2%)     max: 277 Seconds
min: 192     avg: 233.2     median: 222 (2%)     max: 306 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4218     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.506 sec
min: 0.4672     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.502 sec
min: 0.4442     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4715 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 10122     avg: 13153     median: 13453 (29%)     max: 14655 Points
min: 13658     avg: 14206     median: 14208 (30%)     max: 14752 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.3     avg: 7.7     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 8.329 s
min: 7.4     avg: 9     median: 9 (2%)     max: 10.58 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.373     avg: 17.3     median: 17.2 (1%)     max: 18.439 s
min: 18.1     avg: 21.9     median: 21.9 (1%)     max: 25.703 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 385.4     avg: 410.8     median: 398.6 (2%)     max: 474.148 s
min: 643     avg: 758     median: 758.3 (3%)     max: 873.522 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 33640     avg: 52620     median: 53621 (41%)     max: 62706 Points
min: 68571     avg: 71157     median: 71601 (55%)     max: 73298 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10552     avg: 21276     median: 22264 (55%)     max: 26126 Points
min: 14568     avg: 18023     median: 18587 (46%)     max: 20560 Points
min: 15130     avg: 21336     median: 22022 (54%)     max: 24746 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 70655     avg: 87893     median: 91477 (74%)     max: 103016 Points
min: 69103     avg: 75800     median: 75280 (61%)     max: 83016 Points
79353 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 71651     avg: 89380     median: 91745 (74%)     max: 103757 Points
75258 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 81857     avg: 89973     median: 89999 (72%)     max: 100472 Points
min: 81152     avg: 81465     median: 81465 (65%)     max: 81778 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9262     avg: 17875     median: 18691.5 (47%)     max: 22123 Points
min: 11880     avg: 17085     median: 17986 (45%)     max: 19624 Points
min: 12719     avg: 17648     median: 18989 (48%)     max: 19895 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 9703     avg: 25492     median: 26678.5 (48%)     max: 31176 Points
min: 21071     avg: 24638     median: 25048 (45%)     max: 26334 Points
min: 21866     avg: 27059     median: 27907 (50%)     max: 29584 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5062     avg: 11544     median: 12039 (51%)     max: 14424 Points
min: 8979     avg: 9711     median: 10072 (42%)     max: 10221 Points
min: 9325     avg: 11508     median: 11786 (50%)     max: 13353 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 1893     avg: 2368     median: 2384 (58%)     max: 2652 Points
2175 Points (53%)
2209 Points (53%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 9258     avg: 10829     median: 10337.5 (40%)     max: 12856 Points
10317 Points (40%)
12290 Points (48%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2093     avg: 2248     median: 2203 (70%)     max: 2440 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 8918     avg: 10207     median: 9930 (41%)     max: 11663 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1631     avg: 1800     median: 1820 (69%)     max: 1897 Points
min: 1480     avg: 1541     median: 1537 (58%)     max: 1614 Points
min: 1739     avg: 1790     median: 1771 (67%)     max: 1842 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8519     avg: 11913     median: 12237 (22%)     max: 14376 Points
min: 8381     avg: 9358     median: 9224 (17%)     max: 10040 Points
min: 9607     avg: 11957     median: 12434 (22%)     max: 12940 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1553     avg: 1695     median: 1710 (7%)     max: 1838 Points
min: 1428     avg: 1490     median: 1502 (7%)     max: 1541 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8374     avg: 10525     median: 9892 (31%)     max: 12717 Points
min: 9226     avg: 9501     median: 9261 (29%)     max: 10015 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7191     avg: 7533     median: 7650 (76%)     max: 8015 Points
min: 5986     avg: 6400     median: 6476 (65%)     max: 6739 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 30682     avg: 36787     median: 36900 (36%)     max: 41134 Points
min: 35811     avg: 38242     median: 39091 (38%)     max: 39825 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
7309 Points (81%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
46641 Points (61%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 490     avg: 520     median: 508 (1%)     max: 608 ms
min: 566     avg: 599     median: 591 (1%)     max: 644 ms
min: 510     avg: 520     median: 513 (1%)     max: 542 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 94     avg: 106.6     median: 106.6 (1%)     max: 119.2 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 84027     avg: 87439     median: 86645 (63%)     max: 92438 Points
73797 Points (54%)
91965 Points (67%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 239     avg: 262     median: 264 (73%)     max: 279 Points
min: 184.4     avg: 202.3     median: 197.4 (54%)     max: 225 Points
265 Points (73%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 263     avg: 297.3     median: 296 (53%)     max: 332 Points
min: 239     avg: 273.6     median: 281 (50%)     max: 304 Points
min: 284     avg: 294.8     median: 294.5 (53%)     max: 306 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1515     avg: 1846     median: 1872 (70%)     max: 2108 Points
min: 1415     avg: 1534     median: 1527 (57%)     max: 1661 Points
min: 1768     avg: 1800     median: 1790 (67%)     max: 1843 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 52     avg: 109.2     median: 101.2 (17%)     max: 180 Watt
min: 78.2     avg: 101.9     median: 104.3 (18%)     max: 118.9 Watt
min: 67.7     avg: 108.7     median: 118 (20%)     max: 126 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 74.6     avg: 126.3     median: 124 (23%)     max: 222 Watt
min: 84.8     avg: 107     median: 105.5 (19%)     max: 129 Watt
min: 84.3     avg: 135.4     median: 143 (26%)     max: 158 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.05     avg: 29.1     median: 27 (18%)     max: 96.8 Watt
min: 7.74     avg: 16.3     median: 16.3 (11%)     max: 24.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.99     avg: 18.1     median: 14.8 (18%)     max: 34.3 Watt
min: 8.53     avg: 15.6     median: 18.1 (22%)     max: 20.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 13.6     avg: 19.9     median: 19.1 (14%)     max: 27.5 Points per Watt
min: 18.2     avg: 21.6     median: 22.3 (17%)     max: 24.4 Points per Watt
min: 14.1     avg: 16.4     median: 16.5 (12%)     max: 18.6 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900H → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS → 88% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12800H → 99% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 08. 18:10:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14043 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14118 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14045 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759939822s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14043 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 14043 +0.038s ... 0.051s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14118 +0.005s ... 0.055s

#11 got single benchmarks 14118 +0.01s ... 0.066s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14045 +0.003s ... 0.069s

#13 got single benchmarks 14045 +0.007s ... 0.076s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.076s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.097s ... 0.173s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.173s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)