Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-10500H vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

Intel Core i5-10500H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10500H

The Intel Core i5-10500H is a fast processor for laptops with six cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.5 and 4.5 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured on a 14nm (14nm++) process. 

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced on the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The average 10500H in our database matches the AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, a noticeably less power-hungry processor, in multi-thread performance making the i5 a somewhat underwhelming option as far as H-class processors go.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your system is, and how high the CPU power limits are.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i5-9300H. As a  low-end solution it will probably only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 45 W. Laptop makers are free to reduce that value slightly, 35 W being the minimum Intel-recommended value, resulting in lower clock speed and lower performance. Either way, an active cooling solution will still be needed to dissipate the heat.

The i5-10500H is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 5800H

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800H is a high-performance octa-core processor of the Cezanne product family. It was released in Q1 2021; it is designed for use in larger laptops, primarily gaming laptops and DTRs. The Ryzen features eight SMT-enabled Zen 3 cores running at 3.2 GHz (base clock speed) to 4.4 GHz (highest Boost frequency possible) along with the Vega 8 iGPU. The chip has 16 MB of L3 cache.

Architecture

The Ryzen 7 5800H is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process, just like the outgoing Ryzen 7 4800H was; both CPUs have 8 cores and 16 threads, too. The underlying microarchitecture is what makes the two vastly different as the newer Zen 3 microarchitecture brings a massive IPC improvement over Zen 2. To be specific, AMD promises an increase of up to 19%, with independent reviews pointing to a lower (but sizeable nonetheless) 12% increase.

Ryzen 5 5800H supports dual-channel DDR4-3200 and quad-channel LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Unlike the desktop-grade Ryzen 5000-series processors, Ryzen 5 5800H does not support PCI-Express 4.0, meaning NVMe SSDs will be limited to read/write rates of 3.9 GB/s.

The CPU gets soldered straight on to the motherboard (FP6 socket interface) and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

The Ryzen is a marvel of a processor. As far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, the average 5800H in our database trades blows with the Intel Core i5-12500H, Core i7-11800H, Core i7-12650H, Core i9-11950H and also the AMD Ryzen 9 4900H. Needless to say, a system built around this CPU will have little difficulty chewing through pretty much any workload imaginable for years to come.

With the long-term CPU power limit of 75 W, the Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH is among the fastest 5800H-toting laptops that we have tested; it can be at least 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest laptops built around the 5800H in our database such as the HP Victus 16 or the Asus ZenBook 14X OLED.

Graphics

In addition to its eight CPU cores, the APU has the Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics adapter. Just like the name suggests, Vega 8 features 8 Compute Units (8 x 64 = 512 unified shaders); in the case of Ryzen 7 5800H, the Vega runs at up to 2,000 MHz.

On paper, this iGPU is inferior to the 96 EU Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7. However, as is usually the case, synthetic benchmarks do not tell the entire story, as AMD's drivers are superior to those of Intel. As a result, the Vega will let you play a lot of games released in 2020 and 2021 at reasonable resolutions (up to Full HD 1080p) and Low to Medium presets. Mass Effect Legendary Edition is playable at 1080p (High), to give you an example. As the iGPU has no VRAM of its own, it is paramount that fast system RAM is used.

The graphics adapter definitely supports 2160p UHD monitors at 60 Hz. AVC, HEVC, MPEG-2, VP9-encoded videos can be hardware-decoded with the Vega but there is no AV1 support here; such a video will be software-decoded for much lower energy efficiency.

Power consumption

This AMD APU has a default TDP (also known as the long-term Power Limit) of 45 W that can be changed to anything between 35 W and 54 W by laptop makers, with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. No matter the exact value, an active cooling solution is a must.

The Ryzen 7 5800H is built with TSMC's 7 nm process for very decent, as of early 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-10500HAMD Ryzen 7 5800H
SeriesIntel Comet LakeAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
CodenameComet Lake-HCezanne-H (Zen 3)
Series: Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) Cezanne-H (Zen 3)
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H « 2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX compare3.3 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H « 3.2 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H compare3.3 - 4.2 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4500 MHz3200 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB
L3 Cache12 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 128 / 16
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm7 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1440FP6
FeaturesDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
L2 Cache4 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10500H
32.9 pt (46%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 5800H
38.9 pt (54%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
86 Points (60%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
618 Points (12%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 6820     avg: 7104     median: 7103.5 (7%)     max: 7387 Points
min: 8812     avg: 11822     median: 12091.5 (11%)     max: 13214 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1158     avg: 1160     median: 1159.5 (49%)     max: 1161 Points
min: 1294     avg: 1410     median: 1416 (60%)     max: 1441 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 446     avg: 448     median: 448 (50%)     max: 450 Points
min: 502     avg: 550     median: 554 (62%)     max: 560 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2842     avg: 2919     median: 2919 (7%)     max: 2996 Points
min: 3430     avg: 4578     median: 4662 (11%)     max: 5020 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1209     avg: 1249     median: 1249 (8%)     max: 1289 Points
min: 1487     avg: 1968     median: 2005 (13%)     max: 2119 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 184.5     avg: 186.3     median: 186.3 (56%)     max: 188 Points
min: 209     avg: 228.2     median: 229 (69%)     max: 234 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
13.8 Points (18%)
min: 21.25     avg: 22.5     median: 22.5 (29%)     max: 23.68 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (52%)
min: 2.69     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (68%)     max: 2.75 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7109 Points (43%)
min: 5981     avg: 6017     median: 6017 (36%)     max: 6053 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
37125 Points (27%)
min: 35208     avg: 36735     median: 36734.5 (27%)     max: 38261 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 62312     avg: 65382     median: 65382 (45%)     max: 68452 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 11378     avg: 11508     median: 11507.5 (14%)     max: 11637 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
281 s (3%)
min: 111.714     avg: 188.4     median: 188.4 (2%)     max: 265 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
9.1 s (2%)
min: 3.93     avg: 6.1     median: 6.1 (1%)     max: 8.3 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
265 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
8.2 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6194 Points (10%)
min: 6660     avg: 6851     median: 6851 (11%)     max: 7042 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 33075     avg: 33445     median: 33445 (19%)     max: 33815 MIPS
min: 45773     avg: 54229     median: 54052 (31%)     max: 59986 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4874     avg: 4886     median: 4885.5 (58%)     max: 4897 MIPS
min: 5038     avg: 5478     median: 5499.5 (66%)     max: 5632 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
77.8 fps (27%)
104.7 fps (37%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
227.5 fps (52%)
244 fps (56%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.31     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (17%)     max: 9.73 fps
min: 11.6     avg: 14.6     median: 14.8 (26%)     max: 16.1 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.6 GB/s (0%)
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (0%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (16%)
min: 1.6     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (28%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.1 GB/s (11%)
min: 8.5     avg: 10     median: 10 (26%)     max: 11.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 486     avg: 499.5     median: 499.5 (6%)     max: 513 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 382     avg: 385.5     median: 385.5 (3%)     max: 389 Seconds
min: 237     avg: 259.8     median: 255.5 (2%)     max: 339.8 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.634     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.645 sec
min: 0.511     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.559 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
11157 Points (24%)
min: 12300     avg: 12790     median: 12790 (27%)     max: 13280 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.6 s (2%)
min: 7.2     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (2%)     max: 9.415 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.1 s (1%)
min: 15.7     avg: 18     median: 18 (1%)     max: 20.257 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
485.6 s (2%)
min: 366     avg: 419.5     median: 419.5 (2%)     max: 472.992 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
60691 Points (53%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11219     avg: 12299     median: 12299 (33%)     max: 13379 Points
min: 13192     avg: 15511     median: 15120 (41%)     max: 17779 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 77323     avg: 79661     median: 80007.5 (65%)     max: 81129 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 77630     avg: 79055     median: 79316 (64%)     max: 79957 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78495     avg: 82477     median: 82134 (69%)     max: 85865 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10881     avg: 11086     median: 11085.5 (28%)     max: 11290 Points
min: 16269     avg: 17332     median: 17425 (44%)     max: 18539 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 16551     avg: 17052     median: 17051.5 (30%)     max: 17552 Points
min: 22433     avg: 23961     median: 23886 (43%)     max: 25300 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6016     avg: 6390     median: 6389.5 (27%)     max: 6763 Points
min: 7021     avg: 8827     median: 8891 (37%)     max: 9835 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1991 Points (54%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
9411 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1181     avg: 1202     median: 1205.5 (51%)     max: 1214 Points
min: 1336     avg: 1452     median: 1462 (62%)     max: 1505 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5550     avg: 6139     median: 6332 (11%)     max: 6340 Points
min: 6551     avg: 7801     median: 7641 (14%)     max: 9062 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1200 Points (5%)
min: 1416     avg: 1419     median: 1418.5 (6%)     max: 1421 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6233 Points (20%)
min: 7408     avg: 7988     median: 7988 (25%)     max: 8568 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5501 Points (55%)
min: 5970     avg: 6133     median: 6132.5 (61%)     max: 6295 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
25696 Points (28%)
min: 29073     avg: 31637     median: 31636.5 (35%)     max: 34200 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 813     avg: 819     median: 818.5 (1%)     max: 824 ms
min: 623     avg: 643     median: 637.5 (1%)     max: 765 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
134.1 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 65332     avg: 67146     median: 67411 (61%)     max: 68649 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
190.5 Points (55%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 218     avg: 223.5     median: 223.5 (47%)     max: 229 Points
min: 202     avg: 262.7     median: 269 (56%)     max: 280 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1302     avg: 1344     median: 1330.5 (51%)     max: 1429 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 93.3     avg: 99.2     median: 99.2 (17%)     max: 105 Watt
min: 49.1     avg: 84     median: 82.6 (14%)     max: 109 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 105.9     avg: 115.5     median: 115.5 (21%)     max: 125 Watt
min: 53.9     avg: 89.8     median: 89 (16%)     max: 123 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.79     avg: 6.3     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 7.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
7.8 Watt (9%)
min: 7.92     avg: 11.6     median: 11.4 (13%)     max: 15.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 10.3     avg: 10.9     median: 10.9 (8%)     max: 11.4 Points per Watt
min: 17     avg: 22.9     median: 22.2 (17%)     max: 36.6 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10500H → 100% n=39

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 5800H → 129% n=39

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 03. 13:12:39

#0 checking url part for id 13217 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13005 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.077s ... 0.078s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.078s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13217 +0.018s ... 0.095s

#7 got single benchmarks 13217 +0.015s ... 0.11s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13005 +0.018s ... 0.128s

#9 got single benchmarks 13005 +0.162s ... 0.29s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.29s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.426s ... 0.716s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.741s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)