Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-10400F vs Intel Core i9-13900H

Intel Core i5-10400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400F

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a mid-range processor for desktops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.9 and 4.3 GHz and can execute up to 12 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading.

The processor is still manufactured on the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is made with the same 14 nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2666 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The average 10400F in our database matches the Ryzen 7 4800U and also the Core i7-9700K in multi-thread performance to be a more than decent mid-range option for your gaming rig, as of early 2022.

Graphics

The CPUs with an "F" suffix do not feature an integrated graphics adapter. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is deactivated.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 65 W which is in line with most desktop chips.

The i5-10400F is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-13900H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900H

The Intel Core i9-13900H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Raptor Lake-H series (Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.6 to 5.4 GHz (single core turbo, all-core 4.9 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.9 to 4.1 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the similar Core i9-13900HK, the 13900H supports no open multiplicator for overclocking, but on the other hand the full set of vPro management features.

Performance

The average 13900H in our database is in the same league as the Core i5-13500HX, Core i7-13705H, Core i9-12900HK, Core i9-13905H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 115 W, the Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 is among the fastest laptops built around the 13900H that we know of. It can be about 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from 4800 MHz for the 12th gen). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) .

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (115 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7 (improved over the 12th Gen).

ModelIntel Core i5-10400FIntel Core i9-13900H
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Raptor Lake-H
CodenameComet LakeRaptor Lake-H
Series: Raptor Lake-H Raptor Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F « 2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HK compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H « 1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H compare1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H compare2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H compare1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock2900 - 4300 MHz1900 - 5400 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB1.2 MB
L2 Cache1.5 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 1214 / 20
TDP65 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1200BGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-5200/LPDDR5-6400/LPDDR5x-6400 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, vPro Ent., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
Architecturex86x86
$155 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400F
33.2 pt (46%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900H
46.3 pt (64%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 101     avg: 102.5     median: 102.5 (71%)     max: 104 Points
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 703     avg: 761     median: 760.5 (14%)     max: 818 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13015     avg: 16992     median: 17706 (16%)     max: 20385 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1297     avg: 1894     median: 1966 (84%)     max: 2054 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
438 Points (49%)
min: 428     avg: 723     median: 754 (84%)     max: 792 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3201 Points (8%)
min: 4960     avg: 6599     median: 6864.5 (17%)     max: 7716 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1332 Points (8%)
min: 2061     avg: 2685     median: 2706 (17%)     max: 3100 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
180 Points (54%)
min: 211     avg: 269.8     median: 280 (84%)     max: 297 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
14.4 Points (19%)
min: 27.48     avg: 28.6     median: 28.6 (37%)     max: 29.65 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (50%)
min: 2.98     avg: 3     median: 3 (74%)     max: 3 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6719 Points (41%)
min: 9550     avg: 9590     median: 9590 (58%)     max: 9630 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
36564 Points (26%)
min: 53438     avg: 54921     median: 54920.5 (40%)     max: 56403 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
47901 Points (33%)
min: 79014     avg: 79435     median: 79435 (55%)     max: 79856 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8849 Points (11%)
min: 13752     avg: 13786     median: 13786 (17%)     max: 13820 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
134.7 s (2%)
min: 179.496     avg: 296.1     median: 296.1 (4%)     max: 412.775 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.3 s (1%)
min: 3.141     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (1%)     max: 3.518 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6800     avg: 8052     median: 8051.5 (13%)     max: 9303 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
36731 MIPS (21%)
min: 45045     avg: 66867     median: 70217.5 (40%)     max: 79032 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5064 MIPS (61%)
min: 3665     avg: 6064     median: 6277.5 (75%)     max: 6600 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
81.2 fps (28%)
min: 113.95     avg: 126.3     median: 126.3 (44%)     max: 138.55 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
228.5 fps (53%)
min: 284     avg: 292.3     median: 292.3 (67%)     max: 300.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
11.2 fps (20%)
min: 14.1     avg: 18.7     median: 19 (33%)     max: 22.3 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (0%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.4     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (42%)     max: 2.5 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 13.2     avg: 14     median: 14 (36%)     max: 14.8 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 279     avg: 348.7     median: 336 (4%)     max: 467 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
332.4 Seconds (2%)
min: 166     avg: 203     median: 193 (1%)     max: 268 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
min: 0.4052     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.723 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13869     avg: 14799     median: 14893 (32%)     max: 15501 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.7 s (2%)
min: 6.156     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 7.445 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.2 s (1%)
min: 13.784     avg: 15     median: 15 (1%)     max: 16.234 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
470.4 s (2%)
min: 350.453     avg: 383.8     median: 383.8 (2%)     max: 417.103 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 55574     avg: 65893     median: 67507 (59%)     max: 75108 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
14539 Points (39%)
min: 15540     avg: 21972     median: 22680.5 (61%)     max: 25420 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
62086 Points (50%)
min: 83732     avg: 95381     median: 93901 (76%)     max: 103874 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
61795 Points (50%)
min: 85594     avg: 91514     median: 93285 (76%)     max: 93890 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
62883 Points (53%)
min: 89952     avg: 94996     median: 96373 (81%)     max: 98040 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
11914 Points (30%)
min: 12004     avg: 17896     median: 18588.5 (47%)     max: 22184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17733     avg: 26770     median: 27939 (50%)     max: 32664 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
7548 Points (32%)
min: 7863     avg: 11616     median: 11827.5 (50%)     max: 13726 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2437     avg: 2658     median: 2653.5 (71%)     max: 2807 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 11118     avg: 12850     median: 12644 (50%)     max: 14404 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1217     avg: 1220     median: 1220 (51%)     max: 1223 Points
min: 1140     avg: 1903     median: 1960 (83%)     max: 2043 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6358     avg: 6365     median: 6365 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
min: 9094     avg: 12693     median: 13014 (23%)     max: 15410 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1217 Points (5%)
min: 1654     avg: 1819     median: 1847 (8%)     max: 1958 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6349 Points (20%)
min: 11168     avg: 12512     median: 12681 (40%)     max: 14172 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5587 Points (56%)
min: 7253     avg: 8025     median: 8266 (83%)     max: 8498 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
25403 Points (28%)
min: 41851     avg: 47697     median: 46327 (51%)     max: 54848 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
849 ms (1%)
min: 456     avg: 505     median: 478 (1%)     max: 828 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85435     avg: 97010     median: 100627 (90%)     max: 102947 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 133.5     avg: 275.6     median: 284 (82%)     max: 348 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
215 Points (45%)
min: 171.4     avg: 303.2     median: 317 (66%)     max: 340 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1104     avg: 1872     median: 1915 (73%)     max: 2146 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
135.8 Watt (23%)
min: 38.1     avg: 100.5     median: 102.4 (18%)     max: 154 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
125.5 Watt (23%)
min: 66.1     avg: 125.6     median: 115.9 (21%)     max: 196.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.9     avg: 14     median: 15.6 (10%)     max: 28.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.85     avg: 13.3     median: 12.3 (14%)     max: 24 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)
min: 13.6     avg: 28.3     median: 21.5 (16%)     max: 97.6 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400F → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900H → 150% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 17. 13:35:34

#0 checking url part for id 12714 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14717 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.041s ... 0.042s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.042s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12714 +0.018s ... 0.06s

#7 got single benchmarks 12714 +0.008s ... 0.068s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14717 +0.019s ... 0.088s

#9 got single benchmarks 14717 +0.099s ... 0.187s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.187s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.374s ... 0.561s

#12 return log +0.06s ... 0.621s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)