Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 285H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is a mobile high-end CPU for larger notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 16 cores consisting of 6 fast performance cores (Lion Cove) with up to 5.4 GHz and 8 smaller efficiency cores (Skymont) with up to 4.5 GHz clock speed and two additional low power cores with up to 2.5 GHz (Skymont). The CPU has access to 24 MB of cache and is specified with a TDP of 45 watts.

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Enterprise. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 or DDR5-6400 (dual channel). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is an Intel Arc 140T graphics card that offers eight Xe cores with up to 2.35 GHz.

Performance - High End

The top model offers all the cores that are built into the chip and clocks relatively high at up to 5.4 GHz. Thanks to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should reach the level of the old Raptor Lake Core Core 9 270H (6 + 8 cores, max 5.8 / 4.1 GHz). This makes the CPU ideal for very demanding tasks such as high-end gaming and content creation.

Chiplet Design

Like the desktop and HX chips, the Arrow Lake-H chips are based on individual chiplets that are placed on a 22nm base tile from Intel using Foveros 3D packaging. The CPU part comes from TSMC using the modern N3B (3nm) process. As with HX, the GPU also is produced at TSMC and is manufactured using the N5P process. SoC and I/O Tile are also from TSMC but in the older N6 process.

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 185H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is the top-of-the-line Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 6, are SMT-enabled and run at up to 5.1 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.8 GHz. The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.35 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while the rest of the chip is turned off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes that this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 9 185H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 185H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official Intel performance data, then the 185H is not a whole lot faster than the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.35 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is about as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 9 series processor has a "base" power consumption of 45 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. A powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 185H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 9 285HIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
CodenameArrow Lake-HMeteor Lake-H
SeriesIntel Arrow LakeIntel Meteor Lake-H
Series: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H « 4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H compare4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H compare4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H compare4.3 - 4.9 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H compare4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H compare3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H compare3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H compare3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H compare3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock4500 - 5400 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 16
6 x 5.4 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
8 x 4.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2115 Watt
Technology5 nm7 nm
max. Temp.110 °C110 °C
iGPUIntel Arc Graphics 140T ( - 2350 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$651 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
SocketBGA2049
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 285H
43.1 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 185H
39.2 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 126     avg: 127.6     median: 127 (71%)     max: 130 Points
min: 103     avg: 108.2     median: 108.1 (61%)     max: 112.2 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 740     avg: 986     median: 991 (18%)     max: 1194 Points
min: 828     avg: 1003     median: 1021 (19%)     max: 1096 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16632     avg: 19618     median: 20442 (19%)     max: 22080 Points
min: 12688     avg: 18030     median: 18338 (17%)     max: 19851 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2105     avg: 2137     median: 2133 (90%)     max: 2163 Points
min: 1620     avg: 1818     median: 1812 (76%)     max: 1912 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 809     avg: 819     median: 817 (89%)     max: 830 Points
min: 622     avg: 701     median: 702 (76%)     max: 735 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6517     avg: 7633     median: 7920 (19%)     max: 8251 Points
min: 4843     avg: 6957     median: 7192 (18%)     max: 7651 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2797     avg: 3085     median: 3137 (20%)     max: 3333 Points
min: 1581.9     avg: 2762     median: 2853 (18%)     max: 3165 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 309     avg: 313     median: 313 (87%)     max: 318 Points
min: 238     avg: 267.1     median: 268 (74%)     max: 281 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 35.99     avg: 38.3     median: 38.7 (50%)     max: 40.33 Points
min: 33.95     avg: 34.7     median: 34.6 (45%)     max: 35.55 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.7     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.82 Points
min: 3.11     avg: 3.2     median: 3.1 (75%)     max: 3.27 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 11334     avg: 11456     median: 11459 (69%)     max: 11576 Points
min: 9719     avg: 9994     median: 9977.5 (60%)     max: 10300 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 72114     avg: 77213     median: 74797 (54%)     max: 84729 Points
min: 59935     avg: 63422     median: 63273.5 (46%)     max: 67204 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 111175     avg: 113680     median: 113680 (73%)     max: 116185 Points
min: 88902     avg: 90904     median: 91265.5 (58%)     max: 92183 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 17328     avg: 17422     median: 17421.5 (21%)     max: 17515 Points
min: 13892     avg: 14147     median: 14161 (17%)     max: 14374 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 104.802     avg: 206.2     median: 238.3 (3%)     max: 275.558 s
min: 87.408     avg: 215.6     median: 165.1 (2%)     max: 441.275 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.3     avg: 4.6     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 7.1 s
min: 3.254     avg: 4.3     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 8.1 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6751     avg: 10391     median: 7690 (12%)     max: 16732 Points
min: 6724     avg: 9769     median: 7940 (13%)     max: 17856 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 53335     avg: 61495     median: 60639 (35%)     max: 69676 MIPS
min: 52522     avg: 70203     median: 71934 (41%)     max: 76331 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5999     avg: 6146     median: 6136 (72%)     max: 6419 MIPS
min: 4502     avg: 5480     median: 5560 (66%)     max: 5781 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 176.05     avg: 180.6     median: 180.6 (60%)     max: 185.15 fps
min: 153.6     avg: 159.7     median: 159.9 (53%)     max: 165.6 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 356.5     avg: 359.8     median: 359.8 (83%)     max: 363 fps
min: 300.5     avg: 322.4     median: 326.3 (75%)     max: 336.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 18.8     avg: 22.6     median: 23.6 (41%)     max: 25.9 fps
min: 14.1     avg: 20.1     median: 20.6 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (32%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
min: 0.96     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (32%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
min: 1.4     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (31%)     max: 2.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 8.9     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (25%)     max: 10 GB/s
min: 7.9     avg: 10.8     median: 11.3 (29%)     max: 12.1 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 259     avg: 328.8     median: 341 (4%)     max: 417 Seconds
min: 280     avg: 331.7     median: 309 (4%)     max: 538 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 159     avg: 193.2     median: 197 (1%)     max: 235 Seconds
min: 163     avg: 188.6     median: 177 (1%)     max: 285 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4111     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4428 sec
min: 0.4313     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.503 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15781     avg: 16231     median: 16206.5 (34%)     max: 16728 Points
min: 9854     avg: 13153     median: 13074 (28%)     max: 15529 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.084     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 7.338 s
min: 6.6     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 7.256 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.516     avg: 15.8     median: 15.7 (1%)     max: 16.138 s
min: 14.786     avg: 14.9     median: 14.9 (1%)     max: 15.15 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
389.3 s (2%)
min: 304.446     avg: 358     median: 366.9 (2%)     max: 402.742 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 81047     avg: 90659     median: 91977.5 (71%)     max: 97633 Points
min: 73186     avg: 76512     median: 75742.5 (58%)     max: 80494 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 19102     avg: 22397     median: 22766 (56%)     max: 24334 Points
min: 12693     avg: 21337     median: 22169.5 (55%)     max: 24629 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 96324     avg: 109770     median: 112526 (91%)     max: 117704 Points
min: 74638     avg: 81658     median: 76996.5 (63%)     max: 100241 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 97320     avg: 107393     median: 109206 (89%)     max: 113839 Points
min: 73618     avg: 82055     median: 75494 (61%)     max: 100192 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 103278     avg: 114769     median: 116506 (94%)     max: 124524 Points
min: 78677     avg: 89559     median: 91059 (73%)     max: 102469 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 20952     avg: 21910     median: 21599 (55%)     max: 23640 Points
min: 14341     avg: 18938     median: 18896 (48%)     max: 21425 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 27803     avg: 33382     median: 34056 (61%)     max: 35532 Points
min: 21106     avg: 28071     median: 28964.5 (52%)     max: 30623 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6727     avg: 11394     median: 11650 (49%)     max: 13154 Points
min: 6307     avg: 10957     median: 11454.5 (48%)     max: 12209 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2665     avg: 2902     median: 2895 (72%)     max: 3110 Points
min: 2199     avg: 2483     median: 2495 (62%)     max: 2573 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 15330     avg: 16238     median: 15647.5 (61%)     max: 17992 Points
min: 12825     avg: 13823     median: 13974 (54%)     max: 14540 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
min: 2410     avg: 2931     median: 3105 (99%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
min: 12735     avg: 18936     median: 21003 (86%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1973     avg: 2073     median: 2060 (81%)     max: 2256 Points
min: 1700     avg: 1828     median: 1852 (72%)     max: 1902 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14243     avg: 15350     median: 15207 (27%)     max: 16626 Points
min: 10441     avg: 13368     median: 13566 (24%)     max: 14230 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1945     avg: 2056     median: 2027 (9%)     max: 2196 Points
min: 1695     avg: 1788     median: 1799 (8%)     max: 1830 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14890     avg: 15084     median: 15136 (48%)     max: 15225 Points
min: 13228     avg: 13612     median: 13736 (43%)     max: 13972 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8471     avg: 8740     median: 8530 (85%)     max: 9220 Points
min: 7040     avg: 7372     median: 7422 (74%)     max: 7602 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 54076     avg: 55531     median: 55924 (56%)     max: 56593 Points
min: 47960     avg: 49362     median: 49781.5 (50%)     max: 49924 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 418     avg: 443.8     median: 450 (1%)     max: 465 ms
min: 494     avg: 524     median: 522 (1%)     max: 594 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 109360     avg: 115546     median: 115823 (85%)     max: 121454 Points
min: 90543     avg: 95362     median: 96090 (70%)     max: 98144 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 254     avg: 298.5     median: 311 (85%)     max: 323.6 Points
min: 237     avg: 258.7     median: 260 (71%)     max: 271 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 280     avg: 323.4     median: 324 (58%)     max: 358 Points
min: 237     avg: 279.4     median: 286 (51%)     max: 301 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1812     avg: 2055     median: 2064 (77%)     max: 2227 Points
min: 1589     avg: 1774     median: 1770 (66%)     max: 1971 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 53.2     avg: 82.3     median: 69.5 (12%)     max: 131.6 Watt
min: 44.4     avg: 113.4     median: 123.8 (21%)     max: 176.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 65.4     avg: 97.7     median: 102.8 (19%)     max: 130.5 Watt
min: 88     avg: 129.5     median: 124.6 (23%)     max: 171.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.27     avg: 10.9     median: 6.5 (4%)     max: 29.2 Watt
min: 5.1     avg: 12.4     median: 11.7 (8%)     max: 21.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.65     avg: 7.4     median: 6.4 (7%)     max: 10.3 Watt
min: 5.18     avg: 13.7     median: 11.9 (13%)     max: 28.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 25.5     avg: 32.8     median: 31.9 (24%)     max: 42.8 Points per Watt
min: 17.8     avg: 27.4     median: 24.2 (18%)     max: 67 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 285H → 100% n=55

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 185H → 92% n=55

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 24. 01:33:52

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18542 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16921 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755992032s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Aug 2025 05:18:47 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18542 +0.005s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 18542 +0.012s ... 0.024s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16921 +0.005s ... 0.028s

#10 got single benchmarks 16921 +0.032s ... 0.061s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.068s ... 0.129s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.131s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)