Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The APU comes with 12 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.1 GHz, the 16 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 890M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support.

Of the 12 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores and 8 are smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter run at significantly lower clock speeds than the former.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the HX 370 supports LPDDR5x-8000 and DDR5-5600 RAM, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

Given the IPC improvement, we expect 4 Zen 5 cores combined with 8 Zen 5c cores to perform about as well as 16 Zen 4 cores meaning there is a real chance of the HX 370 dethroning the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a laptop powered by the HX 370.

Graphics

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer right now. It features 16 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) running at up to 2,900 MHz. We expect the graphics adapter to deliver gaming performance good enough for playing 2023 and 2024 games in 1080p (Low detail settings).

Naturally, the 890M is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The HX 370 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of mid 2024, energy efficiency.

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 255H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H is a mobile high-end CPU for larger notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 16 cores consisting of 6 fast performance cores (Lion Cove) with up to 5.1 GHz and 8 smaller efficiency cores (Skymont) with up to 4.4 GHz clock speed and two additional "low power" efficiency cores with up to 2.5 GHz (Skymont). The CPU has access to 24 MB of cache and is specified with a TDP of 28 watt (PL1, 115W PL2).

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Essentials. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 or DDR5-6400 (dual channel). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is an Intel Arc 140T graphics card which offers eight Xe cores with up to 2.25 GHz.

Performance - High End

The Core Ultra 7 is superior to the top model Core Ultra 9 285H as only the maximum Turbo frequency is 200 MHz lower. Due to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should perform slightly below the level of the old Raptor Lake Core Core 9 270H (6 + 8 cores, max 5.8 / 4.1 GHz). This makes the CPU very suitable for demanding tasks such as high-end gaming and content creation.

Chiplet design

Like the desktop and HX chips, the Arrow Lake-H chips are based on individual chiplets that are placed on a 22nm base tile from Intel using Foveros 3D packaging. The CPU part comes from TSMC using the modern N3B (3nm) process. As with HX, the GPU also is produced at TSMC and is manufactured using the N5P process. SoC and I/O Tile are also from TSMC but in the older N6 process.

ModelAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
CodenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)Arrow Lake-H
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)Intel Arrow Lake
Clock2000 - 5100 MHz4400 - 5100 MHz
L2 Cache12 MB
L3 Cache24 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
16 / 16
6 x 5.1 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
8 x 4.4 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt115 Watt
Technology4 nm5 nm
max. Temp.100 °C110 °C
SocketFP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics 140T ( - 2250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-H
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H compare4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H « 4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H compare4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H compare4.3 - 4.9 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
$514 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.1 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 255H
42.4 pt (71%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 113.6     avg: 116.6     median: 116 (65%)     max: 121 Points
min: 123.5     avg: 126.2     median: 126.5 (71%)     max: 128.1 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 621     avg: 1060     median: 1135 (21%)     max: 1284 Points
min: 750     avg: 942     median: 856 (16%)     max: 1197 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10435     avg: 20440     median: 21761 (20%)     max: 23902 Points
min: 16435     avg: 18134     median: 17652.5 (16%)     max: 22578 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1921     avg: 2010     median: 2018 (85%)     max: 2049 Points
min: 2047     avg: 2095     median: 2098.5 (88%)     max: 2152 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 753     avg: 789     median: 791 (86%)     max: 804 Points
min: 786     avg: 805     median: 807 (88%)     max: 826 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6449     avg: 8372     median: 8830 (22%)     max: 9280 Points
min: 6414     avg: 7150     median: 7015 (17%)     max: 8860 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2498.13     avg: 3220     median: 3409.5 (22%)     max: 3551 Points
min: 2414     avg: 2829     median: 2835 (18%)     max: 3444 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 192.1     avg: 299.8     median: 307 (85%)     max: 315 Points
min: 258     avg: 306.9     median: 312 (86%)     max: 322 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 38.84     avg: 40.2     median: 40.7 (53%)     max: 41.17 Points
31.3 Points (41%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.68     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.7 Points
3.8 Points (90%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8639     avg: 8701     median: 8668 (52%)     max: 8797 Points
11500 Points (69%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 53766     avg: 55510     median: 56074 (41%)     max: 56689 Points
65269 Points (47%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 96857     avg: 100361     median: 100569 (64%)     max: 103657 Points
96508 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 15698     avg: 15853     median: 15927 (19%)     max: 15935 Points
17883 Points (22%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 50.536     avg: 69.8     median: 79.4 (1%)     max: 79.442 s
319.3 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.701     avg: 3.1     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.743 s
3.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4008     avg: 4286     median: 4090 (6%)     max: 4759 Points
7777 Points (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 66154     avg: 78114     median: 80572.5 (46%)     max: 83714 MIPS
min: 47514     avg: 57327     median: 56801 (33%)     max: 68627 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5859     avg: 6144     median: 6135 (72%)     max: 6497 MIPS
min: 4589     avg: 5906     median: 6015.5 (71%)     max: 6385 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 169.8     avg: 175.5     median: 171.5 (57%)     max: 185.1 fps
154.7 fps (52%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 304.5     avg: 313.5     median: 306 (71%)     max: 330 fps
354.5 fps (82%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.3     avg: 25.1     median: 26.1 (46%)     max: 28.7 fps
min: 16.2     avg: 20.5     median: 20.5 (36%)     max: 25.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.6     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (47%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
1.1 GB/s (32%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.5     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (45%)     max: 2.7 GB/s
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 15.3     avg: 15.7     median: 15.3 (40%)     max: 16.6 GB/s
8.3 GB/s (22%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 208     avg: 239.2     median: 221 (3%)     max: 306 Seconds
min: 256     avg: 340     median: 341 (4%)     max: 429 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 139     avg: 156.5     median: 148 (1%)     max: 192 Seconds
min: 157     avg: 207.7     median: 211 (1%)     max: 251 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3892     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.529 sec
min: 0.4233     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.515 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13761     avg: 16184     median: 16571.5 (35%)     max: 17466 Points
min: 14666     avg: 14844     median: 14843.5 (32%)     max: 15021 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.224     avg: 8.3     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.43 s
7.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.504     avg: 17.6     median: 17.6 (1%)     max: 17.767 s
16.5 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 66119     avg: 73944     median: 75793 (58%)     max: 77565 Points
min: 79410     avg: 80381     median: 80381 (62%)     max: 81352 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17129     avg: 20239     median: 20686 (51%)     max: 23282 Points
min: 18204     avg: 21223     median: 20949 (52%)     max: 24715 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 50952     avg: 59510     median: 61220 (50%)     max: 67655 Points
min: 106965     avg: 111352     median: 111352 (90%)     max: 115738 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 50955     avg: 60322     median: 61072 (50%)     max: 67802 Points
min: 106511     avg: 111384     median: 111384 (90%)     max: 116256 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 48351     avg: 58447     median: 59313.5 (49%)     max: 66810 Points
min: 108898     avg: 112983     median: 112983 (94%)     max: 117068 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16960     avg: 19395     median: 19571 (50%)     max: 21349 Points
min: 19528     avg: 19733     median: 19769 (50%)     max: 19902 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24918     avg: 29844     median: 30184.5 (54%)     max: 33844 Points
min: 27621     avg: 30658     median: 29128 (52%)     max: 37837 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8866     avg: 10400     median: 10519 (44%)     max: 12293 Points
min: 9186     avg: 11565     median: 11334.5 (48%)     max: 13757 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2780     avg: 2881     median: 2876 (72%)     max: 2965 Points
min: 2858     avg: 2892     median: 2894 (72%)     max: 2925 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 11973     avg: 14488     median: 14896 (58%)     max: 15994 Points
min: 11979     avg: 14969     median: 15223 (59%)     max: 17489 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2645     avg: 2952     median: 3105 (99%)     max: 3105 Points
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12664     avg: 18473     median: 21003 (86%)     max: 21003 Points
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1957     avg: 2083     median: 2098 (82%)     max: 2160 Points
min: 1980     avg: 2081     median: 2103 (82%)     max: 2121 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11394     avg: 14057     median: 14301 (26%)     max: 15759 Points
min: 11348     avg: 14420     median: 14322 (26%)     max: 17218 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1827     avg: 1941     median: 1947 (8%)     max: 2041 Points
2094 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12962     avg: 14070     median: 14244 (45%)     max: 14828 Points
13465 Points (42%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7480     avg: 8044     median: 8033.5 (80%)     max: 8628 Points
8697 Points (87%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 42842     avg: 52269     median: 54586.5 (54%)     max: 57060 Points
50379 Points (50%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 419     avg: 441.1     median: 438 (1%)     max: 503 ms
min: 427     avg: 441.3     median: 443 (1%)     max: 455 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 64079     avg: 107304     median: 107598 (81%)     max: 124105 Points
min: 116699     avg: 119142     median: 118679 (90%)     max: 122048 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 210     avg: 256.3     median: 262 (72%)     max: 277 Points
min: 291     avg: 303.9     median: 303.5 (83%)     max: 317 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 252     avg: 307     median: 319 (57%)     max: 347 Points
min: 302     avg: 315.1     median: 315 (57%)     max: 327 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1402     avg: 1766     median: 1778 (66%)     max: 1981 Points
min: 1665     avg: 1905     median: 1920 (72%)     max: 2058 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.6     avg: 90.8     median: 90.8 (16%)     max: 133.7 Watt
min: 49     avg: 72.1     median: 57.6 (10%)     max: 131.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.3     avg: 94.2     median: 104 (19%)     max: 130.3 Watt
min: 61.6     avg: 93.1     median: 69.9 (13%)     max: 168 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.89     avg: 9.1     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 19.6 Watt
min: 4.84     avg: 7.7     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 11.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.31     avg: 9.5     median: 9.2 (10%)     max: 12.8 Watt
min: 7.39     avg: 8.8     median: 9 (10%)     max: 9.56 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 26.9     avg: 36.1     median: 31.4 (23%)     max: 54.9 Points per Watt
min: 20.5     avg: 34.6     median: 39.5 (29%)     max: 40.6 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 → 100% n=54

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 255H → 101% n=54

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 03. 03:14:05

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17543 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18903 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754183645s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 01 Aug 2025 05:18:38 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17543 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 17543 +0.025s ... 0.035s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18903 +0.003s ... 0.038s

#10 got single benchmarks 18903 +0.011s ... 0.049s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.049s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.067s ... 0.116s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.117s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)