Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is a powerful Hawk Point family chip that we believe to be a Ryzen 7 7840HS in disguise but with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The R7 8845HS was brought to life in H2 2023; it features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say that there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD uncorks its 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology meaning the new processors are expected to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs. Dozens of popular apps such as DaVinci Resolve support this technology, as of late 2023.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8845HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8845HS is a 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The R7 8845HS is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7735HS

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS is a processor for (gaming) laptops based of the Rembrandt Refresh generation. The R7 7735HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.2 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.75 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in 6 nm at TSMC. The 7735HS is the refresh of the Ryzen 7 6800HS with 50 MHz higher boost speed and a potential higher TDP up to 54W.

The Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip offers modern features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4 and DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s.

Performance

The average 7735HS in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 5 7645HX, Ryzen 9 6900HS, Ryzen 9 6900HX, Core i5-12500H, Core i5-13500H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 75 W, the Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 is among the fastest laptops built around the 7735HS that we know of. It can be about 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

The integrated GPU Radeon 680M is still one of the fastest iGPUs (only bested by the new Radeon 780M). It is based on the RDNA2 architecture and offers 12 CUs at up to 2.2 GHz.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 CPU has a specified TDP of 35 W to 54 W (also known as the long-term power limit).

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 8845HSAMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Rembrandt-HS Refresh
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz3200 - 4750 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB4 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
TDP45 Watt35 Watt
Technology4 nm6 nm
Die Size178 mm2210 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C95 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8845HS
39.9 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7735HS
36.6 pt (61%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 102     avg: 104.4     median: 103.8 (58%)     max: 107.8 Points
min: 88.1     avg: 90.3     median: 90.5 (51%)     max: 92 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 567     avg: 869     median: 902 (17%)     max: 956 Points
min: 620     avg: 684     median: 666.5 (12%)     max: 781 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14895     avg: 16165     median: 16192 (15%)     max: 18037 Points
min: 10283     avg: 12760     median: 13240 (12%)     max: 14131 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1623     avg: 1751     median: 1769 (74%)     max: 1783 Points
min: 1288     avg: 1527     median: 1546 (65%)     max: 1570 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 673     avg: 686     median: 685 (75%)     max: 698 Points
min: 502     avg: 596     median: 602 (66%)     max: 613 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5808     avg: 6317     median: 6346 (15%)     max: 7026 Points
min: 3968     avg: 4946     median: 5151 (13%)     max: 5502 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2342     avg: 2563     median: 2575 (16%)     max: 2908 Points
min: 1758     avg: 2121     median: 2163.6 (14%)     max: 2355 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 269     avg: 276     median: 276 (76%)     max: 283 Points
min: 206     avg: 245.7     median: 248 (69%)     max: 255 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.28     avg: 29.8     median: 29.8 (39%)     max: 30.3 Points
min: 21.27     avg: 24.7     median: 25.5 (33%)     max: 26.63 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (79%)     max: 3.34 Points
min: 2.92     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (70%)     max: 2.98 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7426     avg: 7545     median: 7523 (45%)     max: 7685 Points
min: 6340     avg: 6566     median: 6624.5 (40%)     max: 6676 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 47332     avg: 47532     median: 47500 (34%)     max: 47764 Points
min: 36073     avg: 40315     median: 40976.5 (30%)     max: 43232 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 85872     avg: 86827     median: 86827 (55%)     max: 87782 Points
min: 61781     avg: 69551     median: 71042 (45%)     max: 75830 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14163     avg: 14360     median: 14360 (17%)     max: 14557 Points
min: 12156     avg: 12431     median: 12494 (15%)     max: 12642 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 70.718     avg: 113.2     median: 98.9 (1%)     max: 170 s
min: 92.763     avg: 98.4     median: 97.8 (1%)     max: 104.757 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.703     avg: 3.6     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 5.3 s
min: 3.429     avg: 3.6     median: 3.5 (1%)     max: 3.934 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7275     avg: 11203     median: 7327 (12%)     max: 19008 Points
min: 6378     avg: 6627     median: 6477.5 (10%)     max: 7174 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 62669     avg: 68390     median: 68354 (39%)     max: 74664 MIPS
min: 43455     avg: 57351     median: 58787 (34%)     max: 63698 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5197     avg: 6319     median: 6393 (75%)     max: 6714 MIPS
min: 4779     avg: 5663     median: 5788 (68%)     max: 5849 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 143.7     avg: 146.8     median: 146.8 (49%)     max: 149.8 fps
min: 105.3     avg: 122.2     median: 125.1 (42%)     max: 133.25 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 286.5     avg: 287.8     median: 287.8 (66%)     max: 289 fps
min: 234.5     avg: 263     median: 270.2 (62%)     max: 277 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 18.6     avg: 20.1     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
min: 10.8     avg: 15.7     median: 16.2 (28%)     max: 17.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
min: 1     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (35%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2     avg: 2     median: 2 (34%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
min: 1.5     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (30%)     max: 1.9 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14     avg: 14.4     median: 14.4 (38%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
min: 10.3     avg: 12.3     median: 12.8 (33%)     max: 13.2 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 288     avg: 326.8     median: 318 (4%)     max: 367 Seconds
min: 355     avg: 416.6     median: 389 (5%)     max: 601 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 179     avg: 200.9     median: 198 (1%)     max: 216 Seconds
min: 214     avg: 249.9     median: 236 (2%)     max: 351 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4304     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4935 sec
min: 0.4822     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.585 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15091     avg: 15422     median: 15313 (33%)     max: 15969 Points
min: 12732     avg: 13443     median: 13372 (28%)     max: 14403 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.1     avg: 7.2     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.331 s
min: 7.776     avg: 8.3     median: 8.2 (2%)     max: 9.048 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.6     avg: 17.8     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 18.138 s
min: 18.935     avg: 19.7     median: 19.1 (1%)     max: 21.596 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 659.5     avg: 662     median: 662.4 (3%)     max: 665.289 s
min: 657.983     avg: 679     median: 668.7 (3%)     max: 719.005 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 82048     avg: 82541     median: 82586.5 (63%)     max: 82943 Points
min: 61919     avg: 68319     median: 68510.5 (53%)     max: 74562 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 19492     avg: 22379     median: 22207 (55%)     max: 26212 Points
min: 11868     avg: 17212     median: 17656 (43%)     max: 20709 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 81620     avg: 84501     median: 84429 (69%)     max: 88462 Points
min: 74994     avg: 79858     median: 80354 (65%)     max: 84074 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 81607     avg: 85179     median: 85402 (69%)     max: 88305 Points
min: 75023     avg: 78536     median: 78020 (63%)     max: 83079 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 83958     avg: 87188     median: 85870 (71%)     max: 93052 Points
min: 78135     avg: 82249     median: 82390 (68%)     max: 86082 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 18507     avg: 20158     median: 20268.5 (51%)     max: 22215 Points
min: 10323     avg: 17657     median: 18460 (47%)     max: 19958 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 25099     avg: 27322     median: 27428 (49%)     max: 30715 Points
min: 20430     avg: 24352     median: 24955 (44%)     max: 27690 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8550     avg: 11247     median: 10853 (46%)     max: 19164 Points
min: 7275     avg: 9282     median: 9182.5 (39%)     max: 11073 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2510     avg: 2624     median: 2630 (66%)     max: 2698 Points
min: 2058     avg: 2102     median: 2106.5 (53%)     max: 2153 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 11073     avg: 12854     median: 12998 (50%)     max: 14014 Points
min: 7854     avg: 9724     median: 10105.5 (39%)     max: 11035 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2577     avg: 2844     median: 2846 (90%)     max: 3105 Points
min: 1892     avg: 2009     median: 2009 (64%)     max: 2090 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12719     avg: 16862     median: 16862.5 (69%)     max: 21003 Points
min: 7540     avg: 9312     median: 9522.5 (39%)     max: 10322 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1765     avg: 1931     median: 1949 (76%)     max: 2004 Points
min: 1327     avg: 1545     median: 1559.5 (61%)     max: 1615 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11256     avg: 11906     median: 11864 (21%)     max: 12726 Points
min: 7368     avg: 9243     median: 9360 (17%)     max: 10258 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1869     avg: 1895     median: 1898 (8%)     max: 1914 Points
min: 1279     avg: 1485     median: 1528 (7%)     max: 1563 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11742     avg: 12016     median: 12086 (38%)     max: 12109 Points
min: 7319     avg: 9018     median: 9253 (29%)     max: 10300 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8034     avg: 8109     median: 8077.5 (81%)     max: 8245 Points
min: 6412     avg: 6583     median: 6618 (66%)     max: 6720 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47602     avg: 48576     median: 48614.5 (48%)     max: 49473 Points
min: 29047     avg: 35544     median: 37422 (37%)     max: 40164 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
6453 Points (71%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
38127 Points (55%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 496     avg: 534     median: 527 (1%)     max: 664 ms
min: 576     avg: 599     median: 591 (1%)     max: 701 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85632     avg: 90739     median: 90496 (68%)     max: 96330 Points
min: 75867     avg: 76530     median: 76491 (58%)     max: 77270 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 176.4     avg: 255.2     median: 256.5 (70%)     max: 314 Points
min: 189.3     avg: 217.9     median: 224.5 (62%)     max: 231 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 275     avg: 304.2     median: 305 (55%)     max: 334 Points
min: 242     avg: 277.9     median: 279 (50%)     max: 307 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1531     avg: 1772     median: 1795.5 (67%)     max: 1939 Points
min: 1361     avg: 1566     median: 1535 (57%)     max: 1736 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 42.5     avg: 82.2     median: 81.1 (14%)     max: 147.2 Watt
min: 8.13     avg: 71.9     median: 73.9 (13%)     max: 108.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39     avg: 79.3     median: 78.1 (14%)     max: 145.6 Watt
min: 45.7     avg: 80.8     median: 77.3 (14%)     max: 110.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.78     avg: 9     median: 7.1 (5%)     max: 16.5 Watt
min: 3.94     avg: 11.3     median: 9.9 (7%)     max: 21.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.42     avg: 8.9     median: 7.8 (9%)     max: 16.4 Watt
min: 5.09     avg: 10.1     median: 9.5 (11%)     max: 17.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20     avg: 35.5     median: 33.7 (25%)     max: 66.2 Points per Watt
min: 21.1     avg: 28.1     median: 27.6 (21%)     max: 40.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS → 100% n=55

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS → 85% n=55

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 04. 02:51:28

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16399 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14952 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751590288s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 03 Jul 2025 17:00:01 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16399 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 16399 +0.022s ... 0.034s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14952 +0.005s ... 0.039s

#10 got single benchmarks 14952 +0.023s ... 0.062s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.062s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.081s ... 0.142s

#13 return log +0.006s ... 0.148s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)