Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H vs Intel Core i5-12450H

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 4800H

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800H is a Renoir APU designed for larger, more powerful laptops with room for better termals. The Ryzen features eight Zen 2 cores running at 2.9 GHz (base clock speed) to 4.2 GHz (Boost). The CPU also has 8 MB of L3 cache and a Vega series integrated GPU. Thread-doubling SMT tech is enabled in this processor, allowing for up to 16 concurrent processing threads.

Architecture

Ryzen 7 4800H is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and in part thanks to this fact AMD promises an up to 2x higher performance-per-watt figure compared to Ryzen 3000 series mobile APUs. This isn't the only noteworthy change however as Zen 2 architecture is leagues ahead of the outgoing Zen+ when it comes to single-core performance. Renoir family processors feature up to 8 CPU cores compared to 4 cores of the previous generation mobile AMD CPUs.

A 4800H will work with dual-channel DDR4-3200 or quad-channel LPDDR4-4266 RAM. The important difference between desktop Ryzen 4000 and mobile Ryzen 4000 processors is that the latter do not have PCI-Express 4.0 support, meaning those blazing-fast NVMe SSDs will be limited to a throughput of 3.9 GB/s.

The Ryzen 7 gets soldered straight to the motherboard (FP6 socket) and is thus not user-replaceable. Please go to our Renoir processor family hub for more information on these CPUs.

Performance

The average 4800H in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-11850H, the Core i7-1360P and also the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This highlights just how great of a job Renoir designers did, back in the day.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term power limit of 45 W, the MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK is among the fastest laptops built around the 4800H that we know of. It can be more than 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

Ryzen 7 4800H features the Radeon RX Vega 7, a 7 CU integrated graphics adapter running at up to 1,600 MHz. The iGPU's underlying architecture is fairly old as of 2021, yet its 448 shaders will let you play many games of 2020 and 2021 as long as you stick to reasonable resolutions and presets. F1 2021 runs well at medium quality, 1080p resolution, to give you an example. A Vega 7 can be as fast as a GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, or as slow as an 80 EU Iris Xe; this depends on the benchmark as well as on cooling system performance and TDP settings of a laptop as mentioned above. As the iGPU has no VRAM of its own, it is paramount that fast system RAM is used.

The Vega definitely supports UHD 2160p monitors at 60 Hz. This iGPU is capable of hardware decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9-encoded videos. There is no AV1 support to be found here though. Such a video will have to be SW-decoded leading to much lower energy efficiency.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W. Laptop makers are allowed to change that to anything between 35 W and 54 W, with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. The Ryzen 7 4800HS is a 35 W edition of the Ryzen 7 4800H that trades away a bit of performance for lower power consumption. In both cases, an active cooling solution is a must.

Both the 4800H and the 4800HS are built with TSMC's 7 nm process for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-12450H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-12450H

The Intel Core i5-12450H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 4 of the 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture) leading to 8 cores in total (octa core CPU). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2 to 4.4 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.5 to 3.3 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12500H, the 12450H offers less E-cores, lower clock rates, a slower iGPU and no vPro support.

Performance

The average 12450H in our extensive database is a bit of a disappointment, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Ryzen 7 5700U and the Core i7-10750H, both fairly old chips as of Q2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 48 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.2 GHz.

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (95 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 4800HIntel Core i5-12450H
CodenameRenoir-H (Zen 2)Alder Lake-H
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Alder Lake-P
Series: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H compare3.3 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H « 2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H compare3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900HK compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H compare1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H compare1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H compare2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H compare1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H « 1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock2900 - 4200 MHz1500 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB704 KB
L2 Cache4 MB8 MB
L3 Cache8 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 12
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketFP6BGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 4800H
31.4 pt (52%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-12450H
34.5 pt (57%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 96.5     avg: 98.4     median: 98.5 (55%)     max: 100 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 422     avg: 503     median: 509.5 (9%)     max: 570 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9644     avg: 10889     median: 11135.5 (10%)     max: 11642 Points
min: 7662     avg: 9113     median: 8822.5 (8%)     max: 10633 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1248     avg: 1254     median: 1253.5 (53%)     max: 1259 Points
min: 1601     avg: 1655     median: 1661 (70%)     max: 1688 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 462     avg: 482.1     median: 485 (53%)     max: 491 Points
min: 622     avg: 638     median: 641 (70%)     max: 646 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3692     avg: 4275     median: 4339.5 (11%)     max: 4663 Points
min: 2952     avg: 3517     median: 3390 (8%)     max: 4105 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1652     avg: 1859     median: 1854 (12%)     max: 1995 Points
min: 1150     avg: 1372     median: 1350 (9%)     max: 1591 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 186     avg: 188     median: 188 (52%)     max: 191 Points
min: 225     avg: 234.2     median: 238 (66%)     max: 239 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 19.95     avg: 21     median: 21.1 (27%)     max: 21.92 Points
min: 14.61     avg: 15.7     median: 16.1 (21%)     max: 16.55 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.16     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (52%)     max: 2.19 Points
min: 2.83     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (68%)     max: 2.91 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5643     avg: 5684     median: 5684 (34%)     max: 5725 Points
min: 8166     avg: 8188     median: 8178 (49%)     max: 8221 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 37236     avg: 37276     median: 37276 (27%)     max: 37316 Points
min: 32260     avg: 34923     median: 35790 (26%)     max: 36720 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 61208     avg: 62934     median: 62933.5 (40%)     max: 64659 Points
min: 50207     avg: 55957     median: 55999 (36%)     max: 61665 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 9712     avg: 9782     median: 9781.5 (12%)     max: 9851 Points
min: 13344     avg: 13357     median: 13352 (16%)     max: 13375 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
90.9 s (1%)
min: 431.842     avg: 440.2     median: 436 (5%)     max: 452.626 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.4 s (1%)
min: 6.893     avg: 7.5     median: 7.2 (1%)     max: 8.23 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4601 Points (7%)
min: 5658     avg: 5956     median: 6015 (10%)     max: 6195 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 44827     avg: 49860     median: 50075 (29%)     max: 53883 MIPS
min: 31119     avg: 33971     median: 33549 (19%)     max: 38415 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4575     avg: 4678     median: 4686 (55%)     max: 4743 MIPS
min: 4824     avg: 5109     median: 5011 (59%)     max: 5386 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 101.5     avg: 102.7     median: 102.7 (3%)     max: 103.9 fps
min: 75.9     avg: 79.1     median: 76 (2%)     max: 85.35 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 209     avg: 215.6     median: 215.6 (6%)     max: 222.2 fps
min: 257.5     avg: 269     median: 272.5 (7%)     max: 277 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 10.8     avg: 12.6     median: 12.8 (22%)     max: 14.1 fps
min: 8.78     avg: 10.5     median: 10.6 (19%)     max: 12.3 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
min: 0.703     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (23%)     max: 0.797 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.9 GB/s (33%)
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (22%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.3 GB/s (27%)
min: 7     avg: 7.9     median: 8 (21%)     max: 8.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 565     avg: 658     median: 663 (8%)     max: 767 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 248     avg: 266     median: 262 (2%)     max: 299 Seconds
min: 330     avg: 379     median: 385 (3%)     max: 429 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.562     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.603 sec
min: 0.4949     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.54 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12018     avg: 12683     median: 12683 (27%)     max: 13348 Points
min: 9897     avg: 11192     median: 11439 (24%)     max: 11991 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.8 s (2%)
min: 8.389     avg: 8.4     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.452 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
22.6 s (1%)
min: 18.721     avg: 18.8     median: 18.7 (1%)     max: 18.876 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
564 s (3%)
min: 449.018     avg: 452.7     median: 451.4 (2%)     max: 457.561 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 51446     avg: 57673     median: 57672.5 (44%)     max: 63899 Points
min: 42422     avg: 46421     median: 46182 (35%)     max: 50898 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11401     avg: 14657     median: 15160 (37%)     max: 15838 Points
min: 12896     avg: 14943     median: 15082 (37%)     max: 17594 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 60191     avg: 61331     median: 61331 (50%)     max: 62471 Points
min: 79585     avg: 89333     median: 90156 (73%)     max: 97433 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 59769     avg: 62130     median: 62130 (50%)     max: 64491 Points
min: 79896     avg: 89470     median: 90458.5 (73%)     max: 97065 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 65802     avg: 66827     median: 67127 (54%)     max: 67553 Points
min: 87275     avg: 92212     median: 90815 (73%)     max: 99941 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13135     avg: 15479     median: 15669 (40%)     max: 16818 Points
min: 10809     avg: 12625     median: 13289 (34%)     max: 13617 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 19980     avg: 21647     median: 21847 (39%)     max: 22687 Points
min: 17079     avg: 20000     median: 20088 (36%)     max: 22477 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6255     avg: 8706     median: 8925 (38%)     max: 9631 Points
min: 5938     avg: 6976     median: 6901 (29%)     max: 8287 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1554 Points (38%)
min: 2155     avg: 2226     median: 2237 (54%)     max: 2293 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
7658 Points (30%)
min: 7081     avg: 8200     median: 8123 (32%)     max: 9109 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2069     avg: 2132     median: 2157 (68%)     max: 2174 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 7595     avg: 8075     median: 7881 (32%)     max: 8789 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1154     avg: 1188     median: 1191 (45%)     max: 1207 Points
min: 1527     avg: 1614     median: 1636 (62%)     max: 1665 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5920     avg: 7725     median: 7955 (14%)     max: 8672 Points
min: 6777     avg: 7342     median: 7200 (13%)     max: 8330 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1177     avg: 1184     median: 1184 (5%)     max: 1191 Points
min: 1509     avg: 1563     median: 1575 (7%)     max: 1594 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6027     avg: 7108     median: 7108 (22%)     max: 8189 Points
min: 6675     avg: 7214     median: 7120.5 (22%)     max: 7938 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4808     avg: 4950     median: 4949.5 (49%)     max: 5091 Points
min: 6930     avg: 7118     median: 7169.5 (72%)     max: 7203 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 23108     avg: 26453     median: 26453 (26%)     max: 29798 Points
min: 26009     avg: 28043     median: 28052 (27%)     max: 30058 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 783     avg: 826     median: 791 (1%)     max: 1220 ms
min: 556     avg: 569     median: 564.5 (1%)     max: 590 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 37080     avg: 43309     median: 43309 (32%)     max: 49538 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 228     avg: 233.5     median: 233.5 (64%)     max: 239 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 204     avg: 217.7     median: 218.5 (39%)     max: 229 Points
min: 253     avg: 278.4     median: 285 (51%)     max: 292 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1463     avg: 1537     median: 1540 (58%)     max: 1637 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 62     avg: 76.6     median: 83 (14%)     max: 84.9 Watt
min: 52.5     avg: 67.2     median: 61.5 (11%)     max: 90.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 81     avg: 84     median: 84 (15%)     max: 86.9 Watt
min: 57.3     avg: 72.5     median: 65.9 (12%)     max: 102.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.6     avg: 9.3     median: 10.7 (7%)     max: 11.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
7.2 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.9     avg: 22.1     median: 22.1 (16%)     max: 23.3 Points per Watt
min: 15.4     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (13%)     max: 20.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 4800H → 100% n=47

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-12450H → 104% n=47

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 11. 19:57:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11677 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14057 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760205451s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 Oct 2025 05:18:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11677 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 11677 +0.027s ... 0.038s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14057 +0.005s ... 0.042s

#10 got single benchmarks 14057 +0.019s ... 0.061s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.058s ... 0.119s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.12s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)