Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U vs Intel Core i9-9980HK vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3250U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is an entry-level, dual-core APU that was announced in 2020. The Ryzen features two Zen cores (SMT is enabled for a total of 4 threads) running at 2.6 GHz to 3.5 GHz and a Radeon RX Vega 3 graphics adapter (3 Compute Units = 192 unified shaders) running at up to 1,200 MHz. The specifications are similar to the older Ryzen 3 3200U, with the lower peak operating temperature of Ryzen 3 3250U (95 °C versus the 105 °C) being the only difference between the two.

AMD Ryzen 3 3250C is a special edition of Ryzen 3 3250U designed for use in Chromebooks. The specifications and performance figures appear to be identical between the two.

Architecture

Unlike the costlier Ryzen 5 3500U, Ryzen 3 3250U is not Zen+ based. It makes use of the ageing Zen architecture and is manufactured on the same 14 nm TSMC process as Ryzen 2000-series laptop-grade processors. This has several repercussions; the limited RAM support is one of them. DDR4-3200, DDR4-2933, DDR4-2666 modules are not supported here. It's just the DDR4-2400, DDR4-2133 and lower on.

The CPU has several PCI-Express 3.0 lanes and is thus compatible with NVMe SSDs (read/write rates will be limited to 3.9 GB/s) as well as discrete graphics cards. Ryzen 3 3250U gets soldered permanently on to the motherboard (FP5 socket interface) and is thus not user-replaceable.

Click here for more information on the Raven Ridge product family.

Performance

As far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, this Ryzen series chip directly competes with the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1110G4 and also the Athlon Gold 3150U. While the 3250U is certainly not a powerhouse, mundane tasks such as web browsing and casual gaming pose little problem to it, as of early 2022.

Graphics

The Vega 3 is fairly close to Intel's UHD Graphics 620 as far as performance and capabilities go. The graphics adapter supports UHD 2160p monitors at 60 fps, and it can HW-decode VP9, AVC, HEVC, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs. The latest AV1 codec is not supported, though. Such a video will have to be decoded via software, with the limited CPU horsepower imposing a hard limit on the resolution that can be played back without stuttering.

The Vega will allow for a bit of light gaming; F1 2021 runs well at 720p / Low, to give you an example. Quality RAM will allow for higher frame rates and the opposite is true as well; please keep in mind that Vega 3 has no VRAM of its own.

Power consumption

Energy efficiency isn't great here. The Ryzen is built with a 14 nm manufacturing process leading to low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

The APU has a default TDP, also known as the long-term Power Limit, of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to reduce that value a little, with 12 W being the lower limit, or give it a noticeable bump (up to 25 W are possible). Clock speeds and performance will change accordingly as a result.

While not as power-hungry as the Ryzen 3 3100 or any other desktop chip, the R3 3250U is still not likely to ever feature in a passively cooled laptop, tablet or mini-PC.

Intel Core i9-9980HK

► remove from comparison Intel i9-9980HK

The Intel Core i9-9980HK is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.4 - 5 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5 GHz can only be reached using the "Thermal Velocity Boost" which allows one core to boost to 5 GHz (+100 MHz) as long as the CPU temperature is below 50°C. Multiple cores can be boosted +100 MHz? below 50°C (not verified). Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-8950HK, the 9980H is based on the same architecture but offers 2 more cores and higher clock speeds (boost).

According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The i9-9980HK is the fastest model of the Coffee-Lake-H (refresh) series at the time of announcement and offers an unlocked multiplier for overclocking of the CPU.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now max. eight cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 33% compared to a similar clocked 6-core processor. According to first benchmarks, the mobile variant can reach the performance of the Core i9-9900K if the cooling is sufficient.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3200U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3200U is a dual-core SoC designed for laptops that was announced in January 2019. The Ryzen features two Zen cores with support for the thread-doubling SMT tech, clocked at 2.6 GHz - 3.5 GHz. The built-in Radeon RX Vega 3 iGPU has 3 CUs (192 unified shaders) clocked at up to 1,200 MHz. The default TDP is 15 W which makes the Ryzen a good fit for thin mid-range laptops.

In comparison to the faster Ryzen 3000 CPUs, the 3200U is not using the newer Zen+ microarchitecture and is still manufactured in 14nm. Compared to the old Ryzen 3 2200U, the 3200U therefore only offers a 100 MHz higher clock speed.

The Ryzen 3 is compatible with single-channel or dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM.

Please go to our Raven Ridge launch article for details on the architecture and more.

Performance

The average 3200U in our extensive database is anything but a performance monster, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-8130U and the Pentium N6000. While not as atrociously slow as most N-series and J-series Intel chips, this specific Ryzen is good enough for basic day-to-day activities only.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 3 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to change that to anything between 12 W and 25 W; most will go for a higher value to extract more performance out of it. Either way, an active cooling solution will be needed to dissipate the heat.

The R3 3200U is built with a 14 nm manufacturing process for low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 3 3250UIntel Core i9-9980HKAMD Ryzen 3 3200U
CodenameZenCoffee Lake-HPicasso-U (Zen)
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)Intel Coffee LakeAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Clock2600 - 3500 MHz2400 - 5000 MHz2600 - 3500 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB512 KB192 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB16 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 48 / 162 / 4
TDP15 Watt45 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C105 °C
SocketFP5FCBGA1440FP5
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1250 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
Intel Core i9-9980HK « 2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 3250U
22.3 pt (37%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9980HK
32.2 pt (54%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 3200U
22.5 pt (37%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1876     avg: 1989     median: 2010 (2%)     max: 2080 Points
min: 1767     avg: 1786     median: 1786 (2%)     max: 1804 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 768     avg: 785     median: 776 (33%)     max: 810 Points
min: 208     avg: 584     median: 765 (32%)     max: 780 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 234     avg: 279     median: 300 (33%)     max: 303 Points
min: 431     avg: 471.3     median: 478.5 (52%)     max: 505 Points
min: 274     avg: 298.2     median: 301 (33%)     max: 318 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 415     avg: 668     median: 783 (2%)     max: 805 Points
min: 2974     avg: 3530     median: 3475 (8%)     max: 4150 Points
min: 453     avg: 607     median: 690 (2%)     max: 727 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 351     avg: 352.7     median: 353 (2%)     max: 354 Points
min: 1327     avg: 1656     median: 1624 (10%)     max: 1930 Points
min: 318     avg: 335     median: 334 (2%)     max: 353 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 119     avg: 122.2     median: 121.6 (34%)     max: 126 Points
min: 181     avg: 198.8     median: 201 (56%)     max: 215 Points
min: 126     avg: 128.3     median: 129 (36%)     max: 130 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
4 Points (5%)
min: 14.81     avg: 16.7     median: 17.2 (22%)     max: 18.04 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.5 Points (35%)
min: 2.25     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (54%)     max: 2.4 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4088 Points (25%)
min: 7709     avg: 8346     median: 7969.5 (48%)     max: 9734 Points
4258 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
10251 Points (7%)
min: 39440     avg: 44697     median: 44455 (32%)     max: 50439 Points
9284 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
55742 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
10359 Points (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
457.3 s (5%)
min: 110.4     avg: 115.3     median: 115.3 (1%)     max: 120.2 s
483.5 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
14.5 s (3%)
min: 3.788     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (1%)     max: 4.941 s
14 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1710 Points (3%)
min: 7266     avg: 7351     median: 7351 (12%)     max: 7436 Points
1613 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 8899     avg: 9153     median: 9063 (5%)     max: 9496 MIPS
min: 39566     avg: 41756     median: 41688 (24%)     max: 44081 MIPS
min: 8785     avg: 9083     median: 9081.5 (5%)     max: 9382 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2931     avg: 3225     median: 3291 (39%)     max: 3452 MIPS
min: 5283     avg: 5426     median: 5389.5 (64%)     max: 5642 MIPS
min: 3333     avg: 3371     median: 3372 (40%)     max: 3406 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
21.1 fps (7%)
min: 92.8     avg: 93.8     median: 93.8 (31%)     max: 94.8 fps
19.5 fps (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
101 fps (23%)
min: 237.5     avg: 238.1     median: 238.1 (55%)     max: 238.7 fps
97.8 fps (23%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.83     avg: 2.1     median: 2.2 (4%)     max: 2.17 fps
min: 10.8     avg: 11.5     median: 11.4 (20%)     max: 12.35 fps
min: 1.864     avg: 2     median: 2 (3%)     max: 2.03 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (7%)
1 GB/s (29%)
0.2 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (6%)
1.7 GB/s (29%)
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.9 GB/s (5%)
min: 10.1     avg: 10.2     median: 10.2 (27%)     max: 10.3 GB/s
2.2 GB/s (6%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 2492     avg: 2541     median: 2541 (32%)     max: 2590 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1319     avg: 1372     median: 1399 (10%)     max: 1399 Seconds
min: 317.4     avg: 397.6     median: 348.4 (2%)     max: 527 Seconds
min: 1439     avg: 1484     median: 1485 (10%)     max: 1528 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.773     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.843 sec
0.5 sec (12%)
min: 0.846     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (18%)     max: 0.852 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3966 Points (8%)
min: 11256     avg: 12585     median: 13208 (28%)     max: 13290 Points
3755 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12.7 s (3%)
min: 7.639     avg: 7.7     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 7.856 s
12.5 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
28.8 s (1%)
min: 16.84     avg: 17.1     median: 17.1 (1%)     max: 17.26 s
29 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
668 s (3%)
min: 424.4     avg: 432.3     median: 432.3 (2%)     max: 440.1 s
730 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
49107 Points (38%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3849     avg: 4103     median: 4195 (10%)     max: 4266 Points
min: 9056     avg: 15688     median: 16079.5 (40%)     max: 18260 Points
min: 3653     avg: 3758     median: 3772 (9%)     max: 3835 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
46375 Points (38%)
min: 64033     avg: 64733     median: 65047 (53%)     max: 65119 Points
min: 40774     avg: 42358     median: 41370 (34%)     max: 45919 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
45549 Points (37%)
min: 64156     avg: 64682     median: 64841 (53%)     max: 65049 Points
min: 39108     avg: 41332     median: 41308 (34%)     max: 43602 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
44021 Points (37%)
min: 60812     avg: 63911     median: 64615.5 (54%)     max: 65599 Points
min: 44389     avg: 48213     median: 48111 (40%)     max: 52242 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3689     avg: 3727     median: 3703 (9%)     max: 3789 Points
min: 13173     avg: 15303     median: 15694.5 (40%)     max: 16935 Points
min: 3321     avg: 3335     median: 3329 (8%)     max: 3362 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 5463     avg: 5522     median: 5507 (10%)     max: 5596 Points
min: 11758     avg: 19893     median: 20357 (36%)     max: 22463 Points
min: 4743     avg: 4930     median: 4867 (9%)     max: 5241 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 353     avg: 1254     median: 1692 (7%)     max: 1718 Points
min: 5540     avg: 8487     median: 8884.5 (37%)     max: 10162 Points
min: 1509     avg: 1536     median: 1541 (6%)     max: 1553 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
7968 Points (75%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 687     avg: 796     median: 824 (32%)     max: 848 Points
min: 1314     avg: 1346     median: 1346 (53%)     max: 1378 Points
min: 770     avg: 803     median: 796.5 (31%)     max: 847 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1397     avg: 1634     median: 1662 (3%)     max: 1813 Points
min: 6945     avg: 7405     median: 7568 (14%)     max: 7703 Points
min: 1604     avg: 1661     median: 1651.5 (3%)     max: 1736 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
868 Points (4%)
min: 1171     avg: 1273     median: 1282 (6%)     max: 1355 Points
min: 823     avg: 827     median: 826.5 (4%)     max: 830 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1838 Points (6%)
min: 7072     avg: 7421     median: 7403.5 (23%)     max: 7805 Points
min: 1529     avg: 1649     median: 1649 (5%)     max: 1769 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3829 Points (38%)
min: 5617     avg: 5853     median: 5969 (60%)     max: 5972 Points
min: 3366     avg: 3562     median: 3562 (36%)     max: 3758 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7396 Points (7%)
min: 28625     avg: 29620     median: 29385 (29%)     max: 30849 Points
min: 6553     avg: 7143     median: 7143 (7%)     max: 7733 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
6002 Points (66%)
3626 Points (40%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
30099 Points (43%)
7237 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
31724 Points (56%)
6922 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4871 Points (95%)
3282 Points (64%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
7496 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3673 Points (55%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
7535 Points (61%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5586 Points (51%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
9447 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
7540 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
7816 Points (20%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1187     avg: 1233     median: 1233 (1%)     max: 1279 ms
min: 705     avg: 878     median: 941 (1%)     max: 999 ms
min: 1185     avg: 1243     median: 1205.5 (1%)     max: 1374 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
313.8 ms (3%)
130.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
35541 Points (27%)
min: 40364     avg: 42641     median: 42219.5 (32%)     max: 46473 Points
23991 Points (18%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
105.2 Points (29%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 135.3     avg: 140.2     median: 140.2 (25%)     max: 145 Points
233 Points (42%)
min: 137     avg: 142.3     median: 139 (25%)     max: 154 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 588     avg: 624     median: 623.5 (23%)     max: 659 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 20.5     avg: 24.1     median: 24.1 (4%)     max: 27.7 Watt
min: 97.2     avg: 103.3     median: 103.3 (18%)     max: 109.4 Watt
17.2 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.2     avg: 26.6     median: 26.6 (5%)     max: 28 Watt
min: 127.1     avg: 132.7     median: 132.7 (24%)     max: 138.2 Watt
19.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.5 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.59     avg: 6     median: 6 (7%)     max: 6.43 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
13.9 Points per Watt (10%)
13.2 Points per Watt (10%)
18.2 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3250U → 100% n=39

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9980HK → 308% n=39

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3200U → 96% n=39

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 10. 23:00:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12255 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11341 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11191 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752181213s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 10 Jul 2025 05:20:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12255 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 12255 +0.007s ... 0.02s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11341 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#11 got single benchmarks 11341 +0.014s ... 0.038s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11191 +0.004s ... 0.041s

#13 got single benchmarks 11191 +0.01s ... 0.051s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.076s ... 0.127s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.127s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)