HP 255 G7 in review: Multiple weaknesses, no strengths

With the 255 G7, Hewlett Packard delivers a simple 15.6-inch office laptop that is aimed at professional and consumer users. The device is powered by a Ryzen 3 3200U APU and is one of the few models that still has a DVD drive on board. Competitors include devices like the Lenovo V15-ADA, the Acer Aspire 5 A515-56, and the Dell Latitude 3510.
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- Specialist News Writer
- Magazine Writer
- Translator (DE<->EN)
Details here
Possible contenders in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
74.6 % | 05/2021 | HP 255 G7 159P1EA R3 3200U, Vega 3 | 1.8 kg | 22.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
76.5 % | 03/2021 | Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE Athlon 3150U, Vega 3 | 1.9 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81.4 % | 02/2021 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81 % | 12/2020 | Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC i3-10110U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Join our Support Satisfaction Survey 2023: We want to hear about your experiences!
Participate here
Case and connectivity - The HP laptop doesn't offer USB-C
HP has chosen a silver-gray plastic case that has matte, smooth surfaces. The design of the base unit's top side is meant to simulate a brushed finish. The chassis is well made, but it should provide more rigidity. The battery is firmly built into the device. You can access the internals after removing the bottom cover. HP hasn't made the latter particularly user-friendly.
In terms of ports, you get the standard selection: The laptop has three USB-A ports (2x USB 3.2 Gen 1, 1x USB 2.0), an HDMI output, and an audio combo port. The memory card reader (reference card: Angelbird SD Card AV PRO UHS-II 128 GB V60) is among the slow models. Moreover, the reader accommodates SD cards almost completely. They protrude by about 2 to 3 mm.
The WLAN chip (Realtek RTL8822BE) supports the 802.11a/b/g/n/ac standard and offers Bluetooth 4.2 functionality. The data rates determined under optimal conditions (no other Wi-Fi devices nearby, short distance between laptop and server PC) are good.
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
Size comparison
Port configuration
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Office (8 - 196.8, n=65, last 2 years) | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Office (23.6 - 183.3, n=63, last 2 years) | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE | |
Average Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter (527 - 676, n=24) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE | |
Average Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter (536 - 677, n=24) | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES |




Input devices - The HP laptop lacks keyboard backlighting
The flat, minimally roughened keys of the non-backlit chiclet keyboard have a short travel and a clear pressure point. The keyboard bounces minimally when typing. All in all, HP delivers a keyboard that is suitable for everyday use here.
The smooth surface of the multitouch-capable touchpad (approx. 11.5 x 5.1 cm) allows fingers to easily glide on it. Moreover, it also responds to inputs in the corners. The two separate mouse buttons offer a short travel and a clear pressure point.
Display - Dim with low contrast and unstable viewing angles
The brightness (193.3 cd/m²) and contrast (398:1) of the matte 15.6-inch display (1920x1080 pixels) are poor. We consider values beyond 300 cd/m² and 1,000:1, respectively, to be good.
The display flickers at a frequency of 2,500 Hz at brightness levels of 90% and below. Due to the high frequency, however, even sensitive users should be unaffected by headaches and/or eye problems.
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Contrast: 398:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.14 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 12.93 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
56% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.69
HP 255 G7 159P1EA BOE0687, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE Chi Mei CMN15F5, TN, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A LG Philips LGD065A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC Dell 156CL05, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP 250 G7-15S40ES BOE BOE0687, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | 2% | 9% | 3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 37.4 | 37.13 -1% | 38.32 2% | 40.78 9% | 38.64 3% |
sRGB Coverage | 56.3 | 55.8 -1% | 57.5 2% | 61.3 9% | 58.2 3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 38.64 | 38.36 -1% | 39.6 2% | 42.15 9% | 39.93 3% |
Response Times | 3% | -76% | -82% | 36% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38 ? | 26 ? 32% | 37 ? 3% | 38 ? -0% | 38 ? -0% |
Response Time Black / White * | 11 ? | 14 ? -27% | 28 ? -155% | 28 ? -155% | 10 ? 9% |
PWM Frequency | 2500 ? | 250 -90% | 5000 ? 100% | ||
Screen | 15% | 43% | 37% | -4% | |
Brightness middle | 199 | 232 17% | 285 43% | 262 32% | 178 -11% |
Brightness | 193 | 211 9% | 255 32% | 236 22% | 174 -10% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 82 -10% | 84 -8% | 86 -5% | 82 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.41 18% | 0.325 35% | 0.31 38% | 0.41 18% |
Contrast | 398 | 566 42% | 877 120% | 845 112% | 434 9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 11.14 | 6.83 39% | 4.23 62% | 4.92 56% | 12.66 -14% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.77 | 18.77 5% | 7.94 60% | 15.83 20% | 22.77 -15% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 12.93 | 8.52 34% | 2.51 81% | 3.47 73% | 15.05 -16% |
Gamma | 2.69 82% | 2.45 90% | 2.57 86% | 2.4 92% | 2.63 84% |
CCT | 14674 44% | 9753 67% | 6626 98% | 6680 97% | 20050 32% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36 | 35 -3% | 36 0% | 39 8% | 37 3% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 56 | 56 0% | 57 2% | 61 9% | 58 4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.75 | 4.34 | 4.36 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
10% | -10% /
19% | -12% /
9% | 12% /
5% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise | |
↘ 19 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (35.2 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2500 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 2500 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2500 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18889 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Color reproduction out of the box is not satisfactory. With a color deviation of about 11, the target (Delta E less than 3) is clearly missed. Furthermore, the display suffers from a noticeable blue tint. In addition, the panel can't reproduce the AdobeRGB (36%) and sRGB (56%) color spaces.
Performance - Sufficient for office and Internet use
With the 255 G7, HP has a simple 15.6-inch office laptop in its portfolio that provides enough computing power for office and Internet applications.
Processor
The CPU part of the Ryzen 3 3200U APU (Picasso) consists of a dual-core processor that runs at a base clock speed of 2.6 GHz. An increase to up to 3.5 GHz is possible via Turbo. Simultaneous multithreading (two threads per core) is supported.
The Cinebench R15 benchmark's multithread test is briefly processed at 3.4 to 3.5 GHz, but the clock rate then drops to 2.6 to 3.5 GHz. The single-thread test is run at 1.6 to 3.5 GHz. On battery power, the CPU operates at 1.4 to 3.6 GHz (multithread) and 1.4 to 2.4 GHz (single-thread), respectively.
We check whether the CPU Turbo is also used permanently in mains operation by running the multi-thread test of the Cinebench R15 benchmark in a loop for at least 30 minutes.
Surprisingly, the APU can only run at full CPU Turbo clock speeds for a short time. The Turbo clock rate drops to about 3 GHz under prolonged load. We don't identify a real reason for this. For comparison: The almost identical Athlon Gold 3150U APU that is installed in the Lenovo V15-ADA continuously operates at full power. Hopefully, HP will improve this with a future BIOS update.
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (80.1 - 284, n=129, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Asus M509DA-EJ153T | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (126 - 130, n=3) | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (160.8 - 2492, n=133, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (318 - 353, n=3) | |
Asus M509DA-EJ153T | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA (Dual-Channel) | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (1439 - 1528, n=3) | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
Average of class Office (246 - 3895, n=136, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
Average of class Office (2059 - 6687, n=135, last 2 years) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (3333 - 3406, n=4) | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA (Dual-Channel) | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE | |
7z b 4 | |
Average of class Office (4226 - 55049, n=134, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA (Dual-Channel) | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (8785 - 9382, n=4) | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
Average of class Office (114 - 764, n=134, last 2 years) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA (Dual-Channel) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (274 - 318, n=5) | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
Asus M509DA-EJ153T | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Office (323 - 5079, n=134, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA (Dual-Channel) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (453 - 727, n=5) | |
Asus M509DA-EJ153T | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA |
Geekbench 5.4 | |
Single-Core | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
Average of class Office (531 - 1974, n=128, last 2 years) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (770 - 847, n=4) | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA (Dual-Channel) | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE | |
Multi-Core | |
Average of class Office (1150 - 11744, n=128, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (1604 - 1736, n=4) | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA (Dual-Channel) | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Average of class Office (0.63 - 14.5, n=134, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA (Dual-Channel) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (1.864 - 2.03, n=4) | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
Asus M509DA-EJ153T |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (84.5 - 95.6, n=3) | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA (Dual-Channel) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Average of class Office (23.6 - 210, n=134, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA (Dual-Channel) | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (0.846 - 0.852, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 2.07, n=135, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A |
* ... smaller is better
System performance
The system works fast and smoothly, and we didn't experience any problems. The laptop has enough computing power for office and Internet applications. This is complemented by decent results in the PCMark benchmarks.
HP lets a part of the performance go to waste because RAM only runs in single-channel mode. The installation of a second memory module is recommended (= dual-channel mode active).
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2928 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2723 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4400 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3187 points | |
Help |
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Average of class Office (1275 - 5686, n=15, last 2 years) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 3200U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 (2742 - 3065, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA |
* ... smaller is better
Storage
HP 255 G7 159P1EA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G | Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G | Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD | Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe | HP 250 G7-15S40ES Samsung PM991 MZVLQ256HAJD | Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 5% | 56% | 31% | 11% | 47% | 68% | |
Write 4K | 128.1 | 124.8 -3% | 86.8 -32% | 150 17% | 152.5 19% | 170.1 ? 33% | 159.5 ? 25% |
Read 4K | 44.05 | 43.56 -1% | 66.4 51% | 61.8 40% | 40.59 -8% | 49.4 ? 12% | 56.8 ? 29% |
Write Seq | 1355 | 977 -28% | 1851 37% | 458 -66% | 720 -47% | 1731 ? 28% | 1920 ? 42% |
Read Seq | 1146 | 1685 47% | 1707 49% | 1881 64% | 1131 -1% | 1643 ? 43% | 2147 ? 87% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 208.3 | 185.9 -11% | 542 160% | 338.4 62% | 423.2 103% | 453 ? 117% | 418 ? 101% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 319.6 | 272.7 -15% | 589 84% | 447.3 40% | 276.1 -14% | 488 ? 53% | 492 ? 54% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1467 | 971 -34% | 1960 34% | 1563 7% | 968 -34% | 1791 ? 22% | 2278 ? 55% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1334 | 2424 82% | 2227 67% | 2422 82% | 2223 67% | 2272 ? 70% | 3389 ? 154% |
AS SSD | -9% | 62% | -19% | 8% | 52% | 64% | |
Seq Read | 1119 | 2114 89% | 2023 81% | 1971 76% | 1784 59% | 1862 ? 66% | 2580 ? 131% |
Seq Write | 1378 | 898 -35% | 1781 29% | 1130 -18% | 860 -38% | 1392 ? 1% | 1572 ? 14% |
4K Read | 37.37 | 34.95 -6% | 61.9 66% | 51.3 37% | 35.84 -4% | 42.1 ? 13% | 52.1 ? 39% |
4K Write | 102.9 | 107.7 5% | 128.7 25% | 119.7 16% | 105.1 2% | 163.8 ? 59% | 146.8 ? 43% |
4K-64 Read | 506 | 446.8 -12% | 904 79% | 585 16% | 464.1 -8% | 813 ? 61% | 956 ? 89% |
4K-64 Write | 539 | 194.4 -64% | 976 81% | 495.5 -8% | 773 43% | 876 ? 63% | 1196 ? 122% |
Access Time Read * | 0.117 | 0.125 -7% | 0.107 9% | 0.107 9% | 0.07875 ? 33% | 0.09221 ? 21% | |
Access Time Write * | 0.057 | 0.057 -0% | 0.031 46% | 0.22 -286% | 0.04 30% | 0.08225 ? -44% | 0.09187 ? -61% |
Score Read | 656 | 693 6% | 1168 78% | 833 27% | 678 3% | 1041 ? 59% | 1271 ? 94% |
Score Write | 780 | 392 -50% | 1283 64% | 728 -7% | 964 24% | 1179 ? 51% | 1500 ? 92% |
Score Total | 1795 | 1388 -23% | 3053 70% | 1962 9% | 1953 9% | 2738 ? 53% | 3380 ? 88% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 710 | 273.5 -61% | 771 9% | 1427 ? 101% | 1409 ? 98% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 277.6 | 184.6 -34% | 240.2 -13% | 612 ? 120% | 428 ? 54% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 539 | 281 -48% | 469.2 -13% | 1001 ? 86% | 941 ? 75% | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-3% | 59% /
59% | 6% /
-1% | 10% /
9% | 50% /
50% | 66% /
66% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics card
The Radeon RX Vega 3 GPU supports DirectX 12 and runs at speeds of up to 1,200 MHz. Like the CPU, the GPU can only operate at full power for a short time. Our The Witcher 3 test shows that the GPU clock rate drops to about 1,000 MHz after 1 to 2 minutes. Moreover, the results in the 3DMark benchmarks are at a normal level for the GPU installed here. Activating dual-channel mode (= installing a second memory module) would slightly increase graphics performance.
3DMark 11 Performance | 1996 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 62643 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6946 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1164 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 438 points | |
Help |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
Average of class Office (599 - 11538, n=124, last 2 years) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA (Dual-Channel) | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 (1108 - 2048, n=14) | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Office (712 - 8114, n=123, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA (Dual-Channel) | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 (726 - 1522, n=16) | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
Average of class Office (5681 - 46247, n=114, last 2 years) | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA (Dual-Channel) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 (5005 - 12278, n=16) | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Office (242 - 2886, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA (Dual-Channel) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 (196 - 450, n=11) |
Gaming performance
The built-in APU can handle games with moderate hardware requirements. Smooth frame rates are reached at low resolutions and low quality settings. Furthermore, it would be possible to increase frame rates by activating dual-channel mode (= installation of a second memory module).
Dota 2 Reborn - 1280x720 min (0/3) fastest | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Average of class Office (14.8 - 142.1, n=135, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA (Dual-Channel) | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 (37.5 - 70.8, n=11) | |
Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1280x720 low (fps_test=1) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Average of class Office (9.12 - 109.9, n=133, last 2 years) | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA (Dual-Channel) | |
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 (6.95 - 23.5, n=11) |
Strange Brigade - 1280x720 lowest AF:1 | |
Average of class Office (15.6 - 167, n=114, last 2 years) | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Dual-Channel) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 (24.9 - 44.7, n=5) | |
HP 255 G7 159P1EA (1.47.22.14 D3D12) |
In order to verify whether the frame rates remain largely constant over a prolonged period of time, we let the game The Witcher 3 run for about 60 minutes at Full HD resolution and maximum quality settings. The character is not moved.
The graphics core has to reduce its clock speed to just under 1,000 MHz after about 1 to 2 minutes. Since the frame rates are generally very low, the decrease of the GPU clock rate hardly has an impact on them. In order to visualize this decrease, we repeated our The Witcher 3 test at low performance settings.