Notebookcheck Logo

HP 255 G7: Office laptop with poor display quality

HP 255 G7 in review: Multiple weaknesses, no strengths
HP 255 G7 in review: Multiple weaknesses, no strengths
The HP 255 G7 offers a Ryzen 3 APU, 8 GB of RAM, a DVD drive, and a 512 GB NVMe SSD. Windows 10 Pro serves as the operating system. The built-in display disappoints in every respect.

With the 255 G7, Hewlett Packard delivers a simple 15.6-inch office laptop that is aimed at both professional and private users. The device is one of the increasingly rare laptops that offers an optical drive. More precisely, there is a DVD burner in the laptop. Furthermore, you'll look for high-quality case materials in vain, since HP has opted for a silver-gray plastic chassis. Alternatively, models made of black plastic are available. When it comes to connectivity, you'll find the standard range of ports.

A Ryzen 3 3200U APU, 8 GB of RAM (1x 8 GB, single-channel mode, expandable), and a 512 GB NVMe SSD (M.2-2280) equip the laptop for office and Internet use. It would be possible to squeeze a bit more performance out from the APU by installing a second memory module (= activating dual-channel mode). However, HP didn't make the process of accessing the case particularly user-friendly.

Hewlett Packard made an absolute mistake with the display. It's a viewing-angle unstable model (TN, LED) with poor color reproduction and unsatisfactory color-space coverage. The brightness (193.3 cd/m²) and contrast (398:1) remain far below the target: We consider values beyond 300 cd/m² and 1,000:1, respectively, to be good. Furthermore, the display exhibits flickering at a frequency of 2,500 Hz at brightness levels of 90% and below.

More information and many benchmark results are available in our review of the HP 255 G7 159P1EA.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > HP 255 G7: Office laptop with poor display quality
Sascha Mölck, 2021-05-14 (Update: 2021-05-14)