, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M620

NVIDIA Quadro M600M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M600M

The 28nm NVIDIA Quadro M600M is an entry-level DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a 1st generation Maxwell GPU that is most likely built on the GM107 architecture with 384 of the 640 shader cores activated. Compared to the older Quadro K620M and consumer GeForce 940M, the GPU offers a 128-Bit memory bus that separates it from the GM108-based K620M. The M600M typically comes with 2 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective at 80 GB/s instead of 16 GB/s on the K620M). 

In the Lenovo Thinkpad P70 the M600M is clocked at 837 - 876 MHz (Boost) for the shaders, and 1253 MHz (5012 MHz effektive) for the 2 GB GDDR5 from Samsung (thanks to our reader John for the GPU-Z screenshot).

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The Quadro M600M is about 20% faster than the previous Quadro K620M thanks to the wider 128-bit memory interface and pretty much right between the siblings Quadro M500M & Quadro M1000M. The consumer GPU GeForce 940MX is beaten by ~10-15%, while the GeForce GTX 950M is another 20% faster.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M600M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M600M is rated at the same 30 Watt TGP as the K620M including the board and memory components. Therefore, the card is also suited for thin and light notebooks.

NVIDIA Quadro M620

► remove from comparison

The 28nm NVIDIA Quadro M620 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a 1st generation Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 architecture with 512 of the 640 shader cores activated. Therefore, the GPU is not similar to any current consumer card. The Geforce GTX 950M, for example, uses the full 640 shader cores. The older Quadro M1000M offers very similar specs (same amount of shader cores and also based on the same chip but more graphics memory), but was intended for the Skylake generation. The M620 is intended for the Kaby Lake generation.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

Due to the smaller amount of memory, the Quadro M620 should be slightly slower than the older Quadro M1000M. However, the exact clock speeds are not known up to now. In early benchmarks we have, the M1000M is about 9 % faster than the M620 in SPECviewperf 12.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M620 can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M620 is rated for a 30 Watt TGP including the board and memory components (21.2 Watt TDP), which is 10 Watt lower than the M1000M (which offers more memory). Therefore, the card is suited for 15-inch notebooks and greater.

NVIDIA Quadro M600MNVIDIA Quadro M620
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
ArchitectureMaxwellMaxwell
Pipelines384 - unified512 - unified
Core Speed837 - 876 (Boost) MHz1018 MHz
Memory Speed5012 MHz5012 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB2048 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0
technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement02.10.2015 13.01.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-for-...http://www.nvidia.de/object/mobile-works...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M600M
8.4 pt (9%)
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M620
15.8 pt (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
719 Points (4%)
968 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
631 Points (3%)
862 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
66347 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
13310 Points (18%)
min: 11481     avg: 13620     median: 13620 (18%)     max: 15759 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
18491 Points (9%)
min: 20980     avg: 22120     median: 22119.5 (11%)     max: 23259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
2322 Points (6%)
min: 2694     avg: 2914     median: 2989 (8%)     max: 3059 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2430 Points (5%)
min: 2867     avg: 3067     median: 3130 (6%)     max: 3204 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
73348 Points (10%)
163099 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
3216 Points (8%)
min: 4015     avg: 4118     median: 4140 (10%)     max: 4200 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2911 Points (5%)
min: 3676     avg: 3761     median: 3801 (6%)     max: 3805 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
12734 Points (12%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M620
17237 Points (17%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
10958 Points (10%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M620
15307 Points (14%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
3DMark 06
20563 Points (38%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
24751 Points (46%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 15.6     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (8%)     max: 17.4 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
56.6 fps (11%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
34.2 fps (24%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
37.9 fps (27%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
36.7 fps (61%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
40.4 fps (68%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
47.5 fps (57%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
50.1 fps (61%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
16.4 fps (68%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
20.2 fps (84%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
51.9 fps (39%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
55.4 fps (42%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
52.3 fps (56%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
54.9 fps (59%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
27.6 fps (13%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
32.6 fps (16%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
45.1 fps (55%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
51.5 fps (63%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
52.4 fps (23%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 55.3     avg: 57.6     median: 56.3 (24%)     max: 62.5 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
24.8 fps (9%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 25.96     avg: 27.5     median: 27.8 (10%)     max: 28.2 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
17.2 fps (7%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 15.8     avg: 18.8     median: 20.2 (8%)     max: 20.3 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
7.5 fps (7%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 10.34     avg: 10.9     median: 10.9 (10%)     max: 11.6 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
22 fps (9%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 22.94     avg: 24.9     median: 25.2 (11%)     max: 26.5 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
0.5 fps (2%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 0.22     avg: 0.5     median: 0.6 (2%)     max: 0.67 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
31.7 fps (18%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 33.8     avg: 34.5     median: 34.4 (20%)     max: 35.26 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
27.6 fps (9%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 29.42     avg: 31.7     median: 32.1 (11%)     max: 33.32 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 17.3     avg: 24.9     median: 24.9 (8%)     max: 32.47 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
59.6 fps (27%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
46.8 fps (9%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
16.2 fps (7%)
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
5.2 fps (3%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
39.7 fps (8%)
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
0.6 fps (1%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
35.6 fps (10%)
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
40.7 fps (9%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
16.6 fps (5%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6832 (32%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M620
6851 (32%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
67.1 fps (29%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
72.4 fps (31%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
75.2 fps (21%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 82.74     avg: 95.3     median: 95.3 (27%)     max: 107.84 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
232 fps (2%)
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
60 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
104 fps (11%)
134 fps (15%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
59.4 fps (16%)
60 fps (16%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
49.8 fps (11%)
65.2 fps (15%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
45.9 fps (17%)
58.6 fps (22%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
484 Samples/s (5%)
min: 482     avg: 658     median: 658 (7%)     max: 834 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1016 Samples/s (3%)
min: 718     avg: 1079     median: 1079 (3%)     max: 1440 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1754 (4%)
2530 (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
59.5 Watt (11%)
45.2 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
48.6 Watt (8%)
48.8 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
58.8 Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M600M → 100% n=39

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M620 → 122% n=39

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
Quadro M620:
127.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
44.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
31.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M620:
15.7  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M620:
70.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
18.7  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M600M:
36.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
24.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
23.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
16  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M600M:
73.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
42.7  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
18.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
16.3  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M600M:
29  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
21.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
11.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
5.8  fps
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro M620:
59.2 60.4 ~ 60 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
25.2 46.3 ~ 36 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
18.7 25.2 ~ 22 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
13.9 19.5 ~ 17 fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
46.2  fps
128%
Quadro M620:
55.1 62.2 ~ 59 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
28.6  fps
119%
Quadro M620:
31.1 36.6 ~ 34 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
15.3  fps
124%
Quadro M620:
17.8 20.4 ~ 19 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
12.7  fps
113%
Quadro M620:
14.4  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M620:
4.9  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
83  fps
133%
Quadro M620:
110.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
47.9  fps
134%
Quadro M620:
64.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
21.4  fps
135%
Quadro M620:
28.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
18.5  fps
132%
Quadro M620:
24.4  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
43  fps
125%
Quadro M620:
53.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
26.2  fps
125%
Quadro M620:
32.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
14.2  fps
131%
Quadro M620:
18.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
7.6  fps
132%
Quadro M620:
10 fps  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
249  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
118.5  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
62.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
28.2  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
103.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
65.2  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
47.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
20.6  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
190.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
139.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M620:
114.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
17.8  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
51.7  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
44.4  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M620:
27.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
11.7  fps
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
192.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
147.4  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M620:
126  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
39.1  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M600M:
127.6  fps
138%
Quadro M620:
176.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
80.2  fps
132%
Quadro M620:
105.6  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
71.7  fps
129%
Quadro M620:
92.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
26.9  fps
132%
Quadro M620:
35.6  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M600M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M620 → 129%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 127%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 20. 00:47:47

#0 checking url part for id 6510 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7708 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 19 Jun 2021 17:20:53 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.046s ... 0.046s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.046s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.046s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6510 +0.028s ... 0.074s

#8 got single benchmarks 6510 +0.007s ... 0.081s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7708 +0.005s ... 0.086s

#10 got single benchmarks 7708 +0.01s ... 0.095s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.095s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.033s ... 0.129s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.129s

#14 Got 82 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.135s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.135s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.137s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.01s ... 0.147s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.147s

#19 return log +0.045s ... 0.192s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)