Notebookcheck Logo

Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs Intel UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) vs Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, not to be confused with the A1000, P1000 or T1000, is a lower-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 2,560 CUDA cores and 6 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. It would be fair to say that this is a GeForce RTX 4050 (Laptop) in disguise; consequently, both are powered by the AD107 chip and are fast enough to handle most games at 1080p with quality set to High. The product was launched in February 2024; it leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and the Ada Lovelace architecture. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 35 W to 140 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gamers. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here; under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different way to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of proprietary Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI applications.

The RTX 1000 Ada features 20 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 80 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 2,560 CUDA cores. Increase those numbers by 20%, and you get the RTX 2000 Ada - as long as we pay no attention to clock speed differences, of course. Unlike costlier Ada Generation professional laptop graphics cards, the RTX 1000 comes with just 6 GB of non-ECC VRAM; the lack of error correction makes this card less suitable for super-important tasks and round-the-clock operation. The VRAM is just 96-bit wide, delivering a not-so-impressive bandwidth of ~192 GB/s.

The RTX 1000 Ada Generation makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol, just like Ampere-based cards did. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs may prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

While we are yet to test a single laptop powered by an RTX 1000 Ada as of late February, we have plenty of performance data for the RTX 4050 Laptop. Based on that, we expect a run-of-the-mill RTX 2000 Ada to deliver:

  • a Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA score of around 54 seconds
  • a 3DMark 11 GPU score of around 27,000 points
  • around 50 fps in GTA V (1440p - Highest settings possible, 16x AF, 4x MSAA, FXAA)
  • upwards of 30 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 (1440p - High settings, Ultra RT, "Quality" DLSS)

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 12.1 TFLOPS" of performance, a downgrade compared to 14.5 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 2000 Ada.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 1000 Ada is.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is exactly the case with the RTX 1000, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 35 W while the highest is 300% higher at 140 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). The slowest system built around an RTX 1000 Ada can easily be half as fast as the fastest one.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 1000 is built with makes for decent energy efficiency, as of early 2024.

Intel UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU)

► remove from comparison Intel UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU)

The Intel UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 with 48 EUs) is an integrated graphics card in the Lakefield SoCs (e.g. Core i3-L13G4) for laptops. It offers no dedicated graphics memory (no eDRAM cache like the Intel Iris Graphics 655 predecessor of the Coffee Lake SoCs). The clock rate ranges between 200 MHz (guaranteed base clock) up to 500 MHz (boost). The TDP of the whole SoC is specified at 7 Watt.

Intel Gen.11 Graphics CardsCoresBaseBoost
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice-Lake64 EUs300 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice-Lake48 EUs300 MHz1050 MHz
Intel UHD Graphics G1 Ice-Lake32 EUs300 MHz1050 MHz
Intel UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield 64 EUs200 MHz500 MHz
Intel UHD Graphics G4 Lakefield 48 EUs200 MHz500 MHz

The GPU performance should be a bit slower than the old Intel HD Graphics 620 and therefore only some low demanding games like League of Legends should run with the UHD Graphics.

A special new feature of the Gen11 graphics card is the new Variable Rate Shading (VRS) support. With it game designers can decide where to spend shading time and e.g. shade object in the background or behind fog with less resolution (up to using only one source for a 4x4 block). With this technique early results show up to 1.3x performance in Unreal Engine POC and 1.2x speedup in Civ 6. Up to now VRS is only supported by the new Nvidia Turing architecture (GTX 1650 and up).

The Lakefield SoCs and therefore the integrated GPU are manufactured in the modern 10nm process at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process of TSMC.

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

► remove from comparison Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

The Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Jasper Lake, Gen. 11) is an integrated graphics card in the Jasper Lake Celeron SoCs for laptops and small desktops. It is the low end GPU version in the Jasper Lake series (Celeron Dual-Cores) and offers only 16 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units / Shader Blocks). It offers no dedicated graphics memory and the clock rate depends on the processor model. At launch there are two Celeron models (N4500 with 6W and N4505 with 10W) clocked at 350 - 750 MHz.

Thanks to the improved architecture and more EUs, the UHD Graphics is clearly faster than the old Gemini Lake SoCs (e.g. UHD Graphics 600).

A special new feature of the Gen11 graphics card is the new Variable Rate Shading (VRS) support. With it game designers can decide where to spend shading time and e.g. shade object in the background or behind fog with less resolution (up to using only one source for a 4x4 block). With this technique early results show up to 1.3x performance in Unreal Engine POC and 1.2x speedup in Civ 6. Up to now VRS is only supported by the new Nvidia Turing architecture (GTX 1650 and up).

Another improved hardware piece is the integrated video de- and encoder that was improved significantly according to Intel. They did not specify any more details, but the previous generation was able to decode VP9 and H.265/HEVC in Main10 profile with 10 bit color depth using the dedicated hardware.

The Jasper Lake SoCs and therefore the integrated GPU are manufactured in the 10nm process (like Ice Lake probably) at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process of TSMC.

Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPUIntel UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Gen. 11 Series
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 64 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 32 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 64 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) 48 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 32 @ 0.35 - 0.9 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) 32 @ 0.4 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) 16 @ 0.25 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 64 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 32 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 64 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) 48 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 32 @ 0.35 - 0.9 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) 32 @ 0.4 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) 16 @ 0.25 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
CodenameGN21-X2Lakefield GT1Gen. 11
ArchitectureAda LovelaceGen. 11 Ice LakeGen. 11
Pipelines2560 - unified48 - unified24 - unified
TMUs80
ROPs32
Raytracing Cores20
Tensor / AI Cores80
CacheL2: 12 MB
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width96 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6DDR4
Max. Amount of Memory6 GB
Shared Memorynoyesyes
Memory Bandwidth192 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5, OpenCL 1.2
Power Consumption115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)7 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
technology5 nm10 nm10 nm
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a3 Displays (max.)
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement27.02.2024 28.05.2020 11.01.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.com
Core Speed200 - 500 (Boost) MHz350 - 800 (Boost) MHz
FeaturesQuickSyncQuickSync
PredecessorUHD Graphics 600
CPU in UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i3-L13G45 x 800 MHz, 10 W200 MHz500 MHz
CPU in UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Celeron N50954 x 2000 MHz, 15 W450 MHz750 MHz
Intel Celeron N62112 x 1200 MHz, 6.5 W250 MHz750 MHz
Intel Celeron N45052 x 2000 MHz, 10 W450 MHz750 MHz
Intel Celeron N45002 x 1100 MHz, 6 W350 MHz750 MHz
min. - max.200 - 450 MHz500 - 750 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
0.3 pt (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 145     avg: 192.4     median: 203 (1%)     max: 210 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 129     avg: 168.2     median: 178 (0%)     max: 182 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 43067     avg: 44131     median: 43609.5 (5%)     max: 46236 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 15477     avg: 18377     median: 17921 (2%)     max: 22189 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 3022     avg: 4251     median: 4596.5 (5%)     max: 4845 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 4210     avg: 4863     median: 4910.5 (1%)     max: 5217 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 378     avg: 595     median: 626 (1%)     max: 658 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 392     avg: 613     median: 645 (1%)     max: 679 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 23782     avg: 32522     median: 35101 (4%)     max: 38682 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 591     avg: 935     median: 975.5 (1%)     max: 1028 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 554     avg: 819     median: 854 (1%)     max: 894 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
3411 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
2969 Points (2%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
12573 Points (14%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
3DMark 06
min: 5796     avg: 6344     median: 6438 (8%)     max: 6704 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
3.5 fps (1%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4674     avg: 5514     median: 5649.5 (4%)     max: 6082 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 19.02     avg: 19.5     median: 19.3 (7%)     max: 20.53 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 11.8     avg: 24.5     median: 26.2 (2%)     max: 28.9 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
1.4 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3.2     avg: 4.9     median: 4.9 (1%)     max: 6.5 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 7.8     avg: 12.7     median: 12.7 (1%)     max: 17.5 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 10     avg: 14.2     median: 14.2 (2%)     max: 18.3 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 8.2     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (0%)     max: 24.7 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 18     avg: 30.7     median: 30.7 (2%)     max: 43.4 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 38     avg: 56.3     median: 56.3 (0%)     max: 74.5 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
1452 Points (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 96     avg: 106.3     median: 111 (1%)     max: 112 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 206     avg: 220     median: 226 (0%)     max: 228 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 536     avg: 549     median: 548 (1%)     max: 564 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 11.1     avg: 14.4     median: 15.2 (2%)     max: 16 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
0 Watt (0%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
13.1 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
12.7 Watt (5%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
30.4 dB(A) (49%)

Average Benchmarks Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
0 (!)  fps
low 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
5.2  fps
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
19  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
15.2  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
7  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
16.2 16.2 ~ 16 fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
6.5 6.6 ~ 7 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
6 6.5 ~ 6 fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
7  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
10.1 10.8 11 13.2 13.3 15.1 ~ 12 fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
7.5 8.4 9 9.2 9.2 ~ 9 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
7.1 7.9 8.3 8.6 8.6 ~ 8 fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
2.2 6.9 6.9 6.9 7.1 7.2 ~ 6 fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
3.2 3.3 3.3 ~ 3 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
2.3 2.3 ~ 2 fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
18.9 36.2 47.7 57.3 58.3 58.6 61.2 ~ 48 fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
20.7 22 22.8 26.6 26.9 26.9 ~ 24 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
11.6 11.8 11.8 11.8 12 12 ~ 12 fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
10.8 10.8 10.9 10.9 11.2 11.2 ~ 11 fps
low 1024x768
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
4 13.5 14 ~ 11 fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
0 (!) 25.1 ~ 13 fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
25  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
5.6  fps
low 1024x768
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
57.6  fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
48.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
17.8  fps
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 22
Elden Ring5.18
F1 202119
Total War: Three Kingdoms15.2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider7
Strange Brigade1676
Far Cry 57
X-Plane 11.111298
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark632
Dota 2 Reborn48241211
The Witcher 311
GTA V13255.59
Counter-Strike: GO57.648.117.8
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
10
2

5
1

5


2








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.27
log 10. 23:01:25

#0 checking url part for id 12424 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10408 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10644 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 05:39:56 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.139s ... 0.14s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.14s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.14s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12424 +0.054s ... 0.194s

#9 got single benchmarks 12424 +0s ... 0.195s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10408 +0.002s ... 0.196s

#11 got single benchmarks 10408 +0.006s ... 0.202s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10644 +0.019s ... 0.221s

#13 got single benchmarks 10644 +0.034s ... 0.255s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.255s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.165s ... 0.42s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.427s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.427s

#18 Got 74 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.439s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.439s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.01s ... 0.449s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.03s ... 0.479s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.479s

#23 return log +0.002s ... 0.481s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)