Notebookcheck Logo

Intel UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) vs Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Intel UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU)

► remove from comparison Intel UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU)

The Intel UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 with 48 EUs) is an integrated graphics card in the Lakefield SoCs (e.g. Core i3-L13G4) for laptops. It offers no dedicated graphics memory (no eDRAM cache like the Intel Iris Graphics 655 predecessor of the Coffee Lake SoCs). The clock rate ranges between 200 MHz (guaranteed base clock) up to 500 MHz (boost). The TDP of the whole SoC is specified at 7 Watt.

Intel Gen.11 Graphics CardsCoresBaseBoost
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice-Lake64 EUs300 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice-Lake48 EUs300 MHz1050 MHz
Intel UHD Graphics G1 Ice-Lake32 EUs300 MHz1050 MHz
Intel UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield 64 EUs200 MHz500 MHz
Intel UHD Graphics G4 Lakefield 48 EUs200 MHz500 MHz

The GPU performance should be a bit slower than the old Intel HD Graphics 620 and therefore only some low demanding games like League of Legends should run with the UHD Graphics.

A special new feature of the Gen11 graphics card is the new Variable Rate Shading (VRS) support. With it game designers can decide where to spend shading time and e.g. shade object in the background or behind fog with less resolution (up to using only one source for a 4x4 block). With this technique early results show up to 1.3x performance in Unreal Engine POC and 1.2x speedup in Civ 6. Up to now VRS is only supported by the new Nvidia Turing architecture (GTX 1650 and up).

The Lakefield SoCs and therefore the integrated GPU are manufactured in the modern 10nm process at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process of TSMC.

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

► remove from comparison Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

The Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Jasper Lake, Gen. 11) is an integrated graphics card in the Jasper Lake Celeron SoCs for laptops and small desktops. It is the low end GPU version in the Jasper Lake series (Celeron Dual-Cores) and offers only 16 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units / Shader Blocks). It offers no dedicated graphics memory and the clock rate depends on the processor model. At launch there are two Celeron models (N4500 with 6W and N4505 with 10W) clocked at 350 - 750 MHz.

Thanks to the improved architecture and more EUs, the UHD Graphics is clearly faster than the old Gemini Lake SoCs (e.g. UHD Graphics 600).

A special new feature of the Gen11 graphics card is the new Variable Rate Shading (VRS) support. With it game designers can decide where to spend shading time and e.g. shade object in the background or behind fog with less resolution (up to using only one source for a 4x4 block). With this technique early results show up to 1.3x performance in Unreal Engine POC and 1.2x speedup in Civ 6. Up to now VRS is only supported by the new Nvidia Turing architecture (GTX 1650 and up).

Another improved hardware piece is the integrated video de- and encoder that was improved significantly according to Intel. They did not specify any more details, but the previous generation was able to decode VP9 and H.265/HEVC in Main10 profile with 10 bit color depth using the dedicated hardware.

The Jasper Lake SoCs and therefore the integrated GPU are manufactured in the 10nm process (like Ice Lake probably) at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process of TSMC.

Intel UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Gen. 11 Series
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) 48 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.35 - 0.9 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.4 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compare 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) compare 16 @ 0.25 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) 48 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.35 - 0.9 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.4 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compare 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) compare 16 @ 0.25 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
CodenameLakefield GT1Gen. 11
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice LakeGen. 11
Pipelines48 - unified24 - unified
Core Speed200 - 500 (Boost) MHz350 - 800 (Boost) MHz
Memory TypeDDR4
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5, OpenCL 1.2
Power Consumption7 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
technology10 nm10 nm
FeaturesQuickSyncQuickSync
Date of Announcement28.05.2020 11.01.2021
Displays3 Displays (max.)
PredecessorUHD Graphics 600
CPU in UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i3-L13G45 x 800 MHz, 10 W200 MHz500 MHz
CPU in UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Celeron N50954 x 2000 MHz, 15 W450 MHz750 MHz
Intel Celeron N62112 x 1200 MHz, 6.5 W250 MHz750 MHz
Intel Celeron N45052 x 2000 MHz, 10 W450 MHz750 MHz
Intel Celeron N45002 x 1100 MHz, 6 W350 MHz750 MHz
min. - max.200 - 450 MHz500 - 750 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
0.3 pt (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 145     avg: 192.4     median: 203 (1%)     max: 210 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 129     avg: 168.2     median: 178 (0%)     max: 182 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 43067     avg: 44131     median: 43609.5 (5%)     max: 46236 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 15477     avg: 18377     median: 17921 (2%)     max: 22189 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 3022     avg: 4251     median: 4596.5 (5%)     max: 4845 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 4210     avg: 4863     median: 4910.5 (1%)     max: 5217 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 378     avg: 595     median: 626 (1%)     max: 658 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 392     avg: 613     median: 645 (1%)     max: 679 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 23782     avg: 32522     median: 35101 (4%)     max: 38682 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 591     avg: 935     median: 975.5 (1%)     max: 1028 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 554     avg: 819     median: 854 (1%)     max: 894 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
3411 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
2969 Points (2%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
12573 Points (14%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
3DMark 06
min: 5796     avg: 6344     median: 6438 (8%)     max: 6704 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
3.5 fps (1%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4674     avg: 5514     median: 5649.5 (4%)     max: 6082 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 19.02     avg: 19.5     median: 19.3 (7%)     max: 20.53 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 11.8     avg: 24.5     median: 26.2 (2%)     max: 28.9 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
1.4 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3.2     avg: 4.9     median: 4.9 (1%)     max: 6.5 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 7.8     avg: 12.7     median: 12.7 (1%)     max: 17.5 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 10     avg: 14.2     median: 14.2 (2%)     max: 18.3 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 8.2     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (0%)     max: 24.7 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 18     avg: 30.7     median: 30.7 (2%)     max: 43.4 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 38     avg: 56.3     median: 56.3 (0%)     max: 74.5 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
1452 Points (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 96     avg: 106.3     median: 111 (1%)     max: 112 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 206     avg: 220     median: 226 (0%)     max: 228 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 536     avg: 549     median: 548 (1%)     max: 564 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 11.1     avg: 14.4     median: 15.2 (2%)     max: 16 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
0 Watt (0%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
13.1 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
12.7 Watt (5%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
30.4 dB(A) (49%)

Average Benchmarks Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
0 (!)  fps
low 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
5.2  fps
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
19  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
15.2  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
7  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
16.2 16.2 ~ 16 fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
6.5 6.6 ~ 7 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
6 6.5 ~ 6 fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
7  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
10.1 10.8 11 13.2 13.3 15.1 ~ 12 fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
7.5 8.4 9 9.2 9.2 ~ 9 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
7.1 7.9 8.3 8.6 8.6 ~ 8 fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
2.2 6.9 6.9 6.9 7.1 7.2 ~ 6 fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
3.2 3.3 3.3 ~ 3 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
2.3 2.3 ~ 2 fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
18.9 36.2 47.7 57.3 58.3 58.6 61.2 ~ 48 fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
20.7 22 22.8 26.6 26.9 26.9 ~ 24 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
11.6 11.8 11.8 11.8 12 12 ~ 12 fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
10.8 10.8 10.9 10.9 11.2 11.2 ~ 11 fps
low 1024x768
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
4 13.5 14 ~ 11 fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
0 (!) 25.1 ~ 13 fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
25  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
5.6  fps
low 1024x768
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
57.6  fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
48.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU):
17.8  fps
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 22
Elden Ring5.18
F1 202119
Total War: Three Kingdoms15.2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider7
Strange Brigade1676
Far Cry 57
X-Plane 11.111298
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark632
Dota 2 Reborn48241211
The Witcher 311
GTA V13255.59
Counter-Strike: GO57.648.117.8
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
10
2

5
1

5


2








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 04:10:42

#0 checking url part for id 10408 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10644 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.104s ... 0.105s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.105s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.105s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10408 +0.027s ... 0.132s

#8 got single benchmarks 10408 +0.006s ... 0.138s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10644 +0.02s ... 0.158s

#10 got single benchmarks 10644 +0.034s ... 0.192s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.192s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.136s ... 0.328s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.334s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.334s

#15 Got 74 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.351s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.351s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.01s ... 0.361s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.03s ... 0.391s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.391s

#20 return log +0.037s ... 0.428s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)