Notebookcheck Logo

Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs Intel UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU)

Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, not to be confused with the A1000, P1000 or T1000, is a lower-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 2,560 CUDA cores and 6 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. It would be fair to say that this is a GeForce RTX 4050 (Laptop) in disguise; consequently, both are powered by the AD107 chip and are fast enough to handle most games at 1080p with quality set to High. The product was launched in February 2024; it leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and the Ada Lovelace architecture. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 35 W to 140 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gamers. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here; under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different way to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of proprietary Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI applications.

The RTX 1000 Ada features 20 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 80 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 2,560 CUDA cores. Increase those numbers by 20%, and you get the RTX 2000 Ada - as long as we pay no attention to clock speed differences, of course. Unlike costlier Ada Generation professional laptop graphics cards, the RTX 1000 comes with just 6 GB of non-ECC VRAM; the lack of error correction makes this card less suitable for super-important tasks and round-the-clock operation. The VRAM is just 96-bit wide, delivering a not-so-impressive bandwidth of ~192 GB/s.

The RTX 1000 Ada Generation makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol, just like Ampere-based cards did. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs may prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

While we are yet to test a single laptop powered by an RTX 1000 Ada as of late February, we have plenty of performance data for the RTX 4050 Laptop. Based on that, we expect a run-of-the-mill RTX 2000 Ada to deliver:

  • a Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA score of around 54 seconds
  • a 3DMark 11 GPU score of around 27,000 points
  • around 50 fps in GTA V (1440p - Highest settings possible, 16x AF, 4x MSAA, FXAA)
  • upwards of 30 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 (1440p - High settings, Ultra RT, "Quality" DLSS)

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 12.1 TFLOPS" of performance, a downgrade compared to 14.5 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 2000 Ada.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 1000 Ada is.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is exactly the case with the RTX 1000, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 35 W while the highest is 300% higher at 140 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). The slowest system built around an RTX 1000 Ada can easily be half as fast as the fastest one.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 1000 is built with makes for decent energy efficiency, as of early 2024.

Intel UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU)

► remove from comparison Intel UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU)

The Intel UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 with 48 EUs) is an integrated graphics card in the Lakefield SoCs (e.g. Core i3-L13G4) for laptops. It offers no dedicated graphics memory (no eDRAM cache like the Intel Iris Graphics 655 predecessor of the Coffee Lake SoCs). The clock rate ranges between 200 MHz (guaranteed base clock) up to 500 MHz (boost). The TDP of the whole SoC is specified at 7 Watt.

Intel Gen.11 Graphics CardsCoresBaseBoost
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice-Lake64 EUs300 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice-Lake48 EUs300 MHz1050 MHz
Intel UHD Graphics G1 Ice-Lake32 EUs300 MHz1050 MHz
Intel UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield 64 EUs200 MHz500 MHz
Intel UHD Graphics G4 Lakefield 48 EUs200 MHz500 MHz

The GPU performance should be a bit slower than the old Intel HD Graphics 620 and therefore only some low demanding games like League of Legends should run with the UHD Graphics.

A special new feature of the Gen11 graphics card is the new Variable Rate Shading (VRS) support. With it game designers can decide where to spend shading time and e.g. shade object in the background or behind fog with less resolution (up to using only one source for a 4x4 block). With this technique early results show up to 1.3x performance in Unreal Engine POC and 1.2x speedup in Civ 6. Up to now VRS is only supported by the new Nvidia Turing architecture (GTX 1650 and up).

The Lakefield SoCs and therefore the integrated GPU are manufactured in the modern 10nm process at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process of TSMC.

Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPUIntel UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU)
Gen. 11 Series
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) 48 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.35 - 0.9 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.4 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compare 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) compare 16 @ 0.25 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) compare 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
CodenameGN21-X2Lakefield GT1
ArchitectureAda LovelaceGen. 11 Ice Lake
Pipelines2560 - unified48 - unified
TMUs80
ROPs32
Raytracing Cores20
Tensor / AI Cores80
CacheL2: 12 MB
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width96 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6DDR4
Max. Amount of Memory6 GB
Shared Memorynoyes
Memory Bandwidth192 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)7 Watt
technology5 nm10 nm
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement27.02.2024 28.05.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.com
Core Speed200 - 500 (Boost) MHz
FeaturesQuickSync
CPU in UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i3-L13G45 x 800 MHz, 10 W200 MHz500 MHz

Benchmarks

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 16. 02:23:06

#0 checking url part for id 12424 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10408 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 May 2024 05:40:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.132s ... 0.134s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.134s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.134s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12424 +0.029s ... 0.162s

#8 got single benchmarks 12424 +0s ... 0.163s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10408 +0.002s ... 0.164s

#10 got single benchmarks 10408 +0.006s ... 0.171s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.171s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.171s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.171s

#14 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.173s

#15 return log +0.083s ... 0.255s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)