Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 2 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 9

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

► remove from comparison Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 (GT3e) is a processor graphics card for Kaby Lake models announced in January 2017. As the successor to the Intel Iris Graphics 550 (Skylake), the Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used for 28-Watt models and is equipped with 64 MB eDRAM cache. There should not be any big changes compared to the Iris Graphics 550.

The so called GT3e version of the Kaby Lake GPU probably still has 48 Execution Units (EUs), which can reach up to 1100 MHz depending on the model. Besides eDRAM cache, the Iris 650 can also access the system memory (2x 64 Bit DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400) via processor interface.

Compared to the Iris Plus 640 from the 15-Watt models, the Iris 650 only has a slightly higher maximum clock as well as almost twice the TDP, which allows a better utilization of the Turbo Boost potential.

Performance

The exact performance of the Iris Plus Graphics 650 depends on the CPU model, because maximum clock as well as the size of the L3 cache can differ a bit. The system memory (DDR3/DDR4) will influence the performance as well.

The fastest chips are high-clocked Core i7 models like the Core i7-7567U. Depending on the game, the Iris Plus 650 will probably be on par with a dedicated GeForce 930M and can handle smooth gameplay in modern titles in low up to medium settings.

Features

The reworked video engine now fully supports hardware decoding of H.265/HEVC videos. Contrary to Skylake, however, Kaby Lake can now also decode H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The video output is possible via DP 1.2/eDP 1.3 (up to 3840 x 2160 @60 Hz), whereas HDMI is also supported in the older 1.4a standard. An HDMI 2.0 output can be added via converter from DisplayPort. The GPU can drive up to three displays simultaneously.

Power Consumption

The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used for 28-Watt processor and therefore medium-sized notebooks.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 2

► remove from comparison AMD Vega 2

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 2 is an integrated GPU for laptops. It is used for the entry level Athlon Silver 3050U APUs, which were launched in early 2020. The GPU is based on the Vega architecture (5th generation GCN) and has 2 CUs (= 128 of the 704 shaders) clocked at up to 1100 MHz. The performance depends on the configured TDP (12-25 W at launch), the clocks, the cooling, and the memory configuration). The GPU should benefit from fast dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM (contrary to DDR4-2133 single-channel, which is also possible).

The Vega architecture offers some improvements over the Polaris generation and now supports DirectX 12 Feature Level 12_1. More information is available in our dedicated article about the Raven Ridge architecture.

The performance should be clearly lower than the Radeon RX Vega 3 with 3 CUs and therefore in the lowest performance region of modern GPUs. That means, demanding current games may not be playable fluently.

Thanks to the 12nm process and clever power-saving features, the power consumption is comparatively low (according to AMD), so the graphics card can also be used for slim and light notebooks.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 9

► remove from comparison AMD Vega 9

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 is an integrated GPU for notebooks. It is used for the Ryzen 5 APUs, which were launched in the end of 2019. The GPU is based on the Vega architecture (5th generation GCN) and has 9 CUs (= 576 of the 704 shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz (Ryzen 5 3580U). The performance depends on the configured TDP (12-25 W at launch), the clocks, the cooling, and the memory configuration). The GPU should benefit from fast dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM (contrary to DDR4-2133 single-channel, which is also possible).

The Vega architecture offers some improvements over the Polaris generation and now supports DirectX 12 Feature Level 12_1. More information is available in our dedicated article about the Raven Ridge architecture.

The performance of the integrated graphics card should be between the Vega 8 and Vega 10. Therefore, demanding games like Control or Borderlands 3 should be playable in lowest settings and 720p. Less demanding games like Fifa 20 or League of Legends can be played fluently in 1080p and highest settings. See e.g. our Vega 8 page for additional benchmarks.

Thanks to the 14nm process and clever power-saving features, the power consumption is comparatively low (according to AMD), so the graphics card can also be used for slim and light notebooks.

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650AMD Radeon RX Vega 2AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
RX Vega 2000/3000 Series
Iris Plus Graphics 655 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics P630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P630 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 620 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
HD Graphics 620 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 617 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 615 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 615 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
Vega 10 640 @ 1.3 GHz
Vega 9 576 @ 1.3 GHz
Vega 8 512 @ 1.2 GHz
Vega 6 384 @ 1.1 GHz
Vega 3 192 @ 0.6 - 1.2 GHz
Vega 2 128 @ 1.1 GHz
Vega 10 640 @ 1.3 GHz
Vega 9 576 @ 1.3 GHz
Vega 8 512 @ 1.2 GHz
Vega 6 384 @ 1.1 GHz
Vega 3 192 @ 0.6 - 1.2 GHz
Vega 2 128 @ 1.1 GHz
CodenameKaby Lake GT3eVega Raven RidgeVega Raven Ridge
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 Kaby LakeVegaVega
Pipelines48 - unified128 - unified576 - unified
Core Speed300 - 1100 (Boost) MHz1100 (Boost) MHz1300 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR4
Shared Memoryyesnono
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4DirectX 12_1DirectX 12_1
technology14 nm12 nm14 nm
FeaturesQuickSyncTiled Rasterization, Shared Memory (up to Dual-Channel DDR4-2400)Tiled Rasterization, Shared Memory (up to Dual-Channel DDR4-2400)
Date of Announcement03.01.2017 07.01.2018 26.10.2017
Power Consumption15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4.5 Billion4.5 Billion
CPU in Iris Plus Graphics 650GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-7567U2 x 3500 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Core i5-7287U2 x 3300 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Core i5-7267U2 x 3100 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1050 MHz
Intel Core i3-7167U2 x 2800 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1000 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz1000 - 1100 MHz
CPU in Vega 2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U2 x 2300 MHz, 15 W? MHz1100 MHz
CPU in Vega 9GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U4 x 2100 MHz, 15 W? MHz1300 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Vega 9
1.3 pt (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
623 Points (2%)
156%
1 Vega 9 +
974 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
555 Points (1%)
157%
1 Vega 9 +
872 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
161538 Points (18%)
82%
1 Vega 9 +
131922 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
100%
1 Vega 9 +
70492 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 8403     avg: 9150     median: 9149.5 (10%)     max: 9896 Points
148%
1 Vega 9 +
13582 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
13153 Points (3%)
146%
1 Vega 9 +
19255 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1586     avg: 1655     median: 1655 (3%)     max: 1724 Points
153%
1 Vega 9 +
2524 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1698 Points (2%)
164%
1 Vega 9 +
2789 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
100%
1 Vega 9 +
94659 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
100%
1 Vega 2 +
3110 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
100%
1 Vega 2 +
3450 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
2924 Points (4%)
151%
1 Vega 9 +
4424 Points (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2762 Points (2%)
159%
1 Vega 9 +
4380 Points (4%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
100%
1 Vega 9 +
12628 Points (4%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
100%
1 Vega 9 +
11100 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
3DMark 06
15175 Points (20%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
88%
1 Vega 9 +
13365 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
8773 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
79%
1 Vega 9 +
6966 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
45.2 fps (16%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
103%
1 Vega 9 +
46.6 fps (16%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 41.21     avg: 59.1     median: 59.1 (3%)     max: 77 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
93%
1 Vega 9 +
55 fps (3%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.3 % (99%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
99%
1 Vega 9 +
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
100%
1 Vega 9 +
49 fps (6%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
100%
1 Vega 9 +
57.4 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
100%
1 Vega 9 +
73.1 fps (4%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
100%
1 Vega 9 +
192 fps (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
336 Samples/s (2%)
71%
1 Vega 9 +
239 Samples/s (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
813 Samples/s (1%)
72%
1 Vega 9 +
588 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1730 Points (2%)
162%
1 Vega 9 +
2806 Points (3%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
51.4 Watt (7%)
101%
1 Vega 9 +
42.2 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
51.4 Watt (7%)
102%
1 Vega 9 +
40.3 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
100%
1 Vega 9 +
45.1 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
100%
1 Vega 9 +
0.2 fps per Watt (16%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 Vega 9 +
0.2 fps per Watt (17%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
39.1 dB(A) (63%)
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
100%
1 Vega 9 +
39 dB(A) (62%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
998 MHz (39%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
848 MHz (34%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon RX Vega 2 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
Vega 9:
28.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
Vega 9:
13.5  fps
high 1920x1080
Vega 9:
7.8  fps
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
Vega 9:
51  fps
med. 1920x1080
Vega 9:
21  fps
high 1920x1080
Vega 9:
18  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Vega 9:
12  fps
low 1280x720
Vega 9:
60.7  fps
med. 1920x1080
Vega 9:
20.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Vega 9:
18  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Vega 9:
14.5  fps
low 1280x720
Vega 9:
29  fps
med. 1920x1080
Vega 9:
8  fps
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
Vega 9:
48  fps
med. 1920x1080
Vega 9:
22.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Vega 9:
15.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Vega 9:
9.1  fps
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
64  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
21.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
14.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
113  fps
89%
Vega 9:
100.7  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
56.8  fps
81%
Vega 9:
46.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
38.9  fps
78%
Vega 9:
30.4  fps
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
51.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
20.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
25.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
10.5  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
17.6  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
39.7  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
15.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
15  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
32.4  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
54.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
37.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
36.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
19.9  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
46.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
29.5  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
42.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
20.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
19.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
14.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
8.2  fps
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
79.2  fps
117%
Vega 9:
92.3  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
57.4  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
25.6  fps
142%
Vega 9:
36.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
21.4  fps
90%
Vega 9:
19.3  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
30  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
32  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
15  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
25.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
18.3  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
54.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
35.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
20.8  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
95  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
64  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
29.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
25  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
21.4  fps
196%
Vega 9:
41.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Vega 9:
13.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Vega 9:
8.1  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
56.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
49.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
11.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
5  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
84  fps
140%
Vega 9:
117.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
54.4  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
46.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
13.3  fps
154%
Vega 9:
20.5  fps

Average Gaming Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 → 121%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 124%

AMD Radeon RX Vega 9lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Borderlands 328.313.57.8
F1 201951211812
Apex Legends60.720.91814.5
Shadow of the Tomb Raider298
Fortnite4822.315.79.1
Rocket League100.746.230.4
Overwatch92.336.319.3
The Witcher 341.913.38.1
BioShock Infinite117.920.5
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
3
4
5
1

5
2

6








Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dirt 46421.314.2
Rocket League11356.838.9
Prey51.420.2
Mass Effect Andromeda25.810.5
Ghost Recon Wildlands17.6
For Honor39.715.2
Dishonored 215
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare32.4
Titanfall 254.137.9
Farming Simulator 1736.819.9
Battlefield 146.129.5
Civilization VI42.220.2
Deus Ex Mankind Divided19.214.68.2
Overwatch79.257.425.621.4
The Division30
Far Cry Primal3215
Rise of the Tomb Raider25.918.3
Rainbow Six Siege54.235.620.8
Dota 2 Reborn956429.725
The Witcher 321.4
GTA V56.549.911.65
BioShock Infinite8454.446.513.3
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
6
10
5
9
6
1
6
3

5








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.27
log 17. 15:35:51

#0 checking url part for id 7655 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10052 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9952 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:38:48 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.153s ... 0.154s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.154s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.154s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7655 +0.037s ... 0.191s

#9 got single benchmarks 7655 +0.009s ... 0.2s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10052 +0.002s ... 0.202s

#11 got single benchmarks 10052 +0.014s ... 0.216s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9952 +0.017s ... 0.234s

#13 got single benchmarks 9952 +0.006s ... 0.24s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.24s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.274s ... 0.514s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.514s

#17 Got 79 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.524s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.524s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.017s ... 0.541s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.046s ... 0.587s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.587s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.589s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)