Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-13900K vs Intel Core i9-8950HK vs Intel Core i5-8400H

Intel Core i9-13900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900K

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a fast high-end desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3 - 5.8 GHz and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.2 - 4.3 GHz.

Thanks to the faster P-cores and more E-cores, the i9-13900K is significantly faster than the old i9-12900K (especially in multi-threaded workloads). Compared to the Raphael AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (Zen 4), the 13900K offers a slightly higher multi-thread-performance and a slightly lower single core performance. In games, the Intel CPU is currently the clear winner (at the time of announcement of the 7950X).

The 13900K is rated at 125 Watt TDP base power (PL1) and 253 Watt Turbo Power (PL2) and therefore slightly higher than the old i9-12900K.

Intel Core i9-8950HK

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i9-8950HK is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced early 2018. The processor clocks at between 2.9- 4.8 GHz (4.3 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 4.8 GHz can only be reached using the "Thermal Velocity Boost" which allows one core to boost to 4.8 GHz (+200 MHz) as long as the CPU temperature is below 50°C. Multiple cores can be boosted +100 MHz below 50°C.

According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The i9-8950HK is the fastest model of the Coffee-Lake-H series at the time of announcement and offers an unlocked multiplier for overclocking of the CPU.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to a similar clocked Kaby Lake processor.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

Intel Core i5-8400H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-8400H

The Intel Core i5-8400H is a high-end processor for laptops with four cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and will be announced early 2018. The processor clocks at between 2.5 and 4.2 GHz (4.1 with 4 cores) and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

The Intel Core i5-8400H should perform similar as the older Core i7-7920HQ (3.1 - 4.1 GHz). The faster Coffee Lake CPUs, like the Core i7-8750H offers two additional cores and is therefore up to 50% faster in multithreaded benchmarks. Still, the performance of the i5-8400H should be sufficient for even demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz (rumored). The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i5 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelIntel Core i9-13900KIntel Core i9-8950HKIntel Core i5-8400H
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameRaptor LakeCoffee Lake-HCoffee Lake-H
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
Intel Core i9-13900K « 3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK « 2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H « 2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Clock3000 - 5800 MHz2900 - 4800 MHz2500 - 4200 MHz
L2 Cache32 MB1.5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache36 MB12 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 32
8 x 5.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.3 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
6 / 124 / 8
TDP125 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm14 nm
Die Size257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700FCBGA1440FCBGA1440
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$589 U.S.$583 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache384 KB256 KB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900K
59.3 pt (82%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 32592     avg: 37310     median: 38271.5 (36%)     max: 40103 Points
4657 Points (4%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2203     avg: 2238     median: 2238.5 (95%)     max: 2272 Points
1128 Points (48%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 828     avg: 849     median: 849.5 (94%)     max: 870 Points
min: 387     avg: 442.5     median: 442.5 (49%)     max: 498 Points
393 Points (44%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 13415     avg: 14459     median: 14620.5 (36%)     max: 15181 Points
min: 2379     avg: 2652     median: 2651.5 (6%)     max: 2924 Points
1793 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5321     avg: 5798     median: 5805.5 (37%)     max: 6191 Points
min: 1051     avg: 1220     median: 1223.5 (8%)     max: 1391 Points
min: 753     avg: 762     median: 761.5 (5%)     max: 770 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 299     avg: 314.1     median: 318 (96%)     max: 328 Points
min: 185     avg: 195.9     median: 195 (59%)     max: 206 Points
min: 168     avg: 170.4     median: 170.4 (51%)     max: 172.8 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 62.2     avg: 67     median: 67.5 (88%)     max: 70.78 Points
min: 11.95     avg: 13.6     median: 13.2 (17%)     max: 15.14 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.8     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (96%)     max: 3.93 Points
min: 2.1     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (56%)     max: 2.34 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 11661     avg: 11989     median: 12017.5 (73%)     max: 12259 Points
min: 6978     avg: 7282     median: 7149 (43%)     max: 7735 Points
6659 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 85342     avg: 88253     median: 87738 (64%)     max: 92192 Points
min: 32438     avg: 36321     median: 36591 (27%)     max: 39380 Points
21711 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 132000     avg: 134526     median: 133567 (93%)     max: 138969 Points
41678 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 17418     avg: 17943     median: 17998.5 (22%)     max: 18355 Points
9576 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 79.738     avg: 84.6     median: 84.2 (1%)     max: 90.13 s
245.4 s (3%)
230.8 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 1.818     avg: 2.1     median: 2 (0%)     max: 2.305 s
8.1 s (2%)
7.2 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 13210     avg: 14265     median: 14271 (23%)     max: 15309 Points
min: 6401     avg: 6421     median: 6420.5 (10%)     max: 6440 Points
5391 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 127201     avg: 142777     median: 146984 (84%)     max: 148053 MIPS
22023 MIPS (13%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7176     avg: 7343     median: 7272 (87%)     max: 7539 MIPS
5080 MIPS (61%)
4553 MIPS (54%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 247.5     avg: 261.5     median: 264.8 (92%)     max: 269 fps
min: 69.1     avg: 77.9     median: 77.9 (27%)     max: 86.7 fps
45.3 fps (16%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 412     avg: 419     median: 419.3 (97%)     max: 425.5 fps
min: 216     avg: 224.9     median: 224.9 (52%)     max: 233.8 fps
185.2 fps (43%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 34.5     avg: 39.9     median: 40.7 (72%)     max: 42.6 fps
8.8 fps (16%)
6.5 fps (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 2.6     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (0%)     max: 3 GB/s
min: 0.688     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (0%)     max: 0.79 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 5.2     avg: 5.4     median: 5.4 (93%)     max: 5.4 GB/s
min: 1.1     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (21%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
0.8 GB/s (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 20.5     avg: 23.3     median: 22.9 (60%)     max: 27 GB/s
min: 6.6     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (19%)     max: 7.8 GB/s
4.6 GB/s (12%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 136     avg: 145.2     median: 140.5 (2%)     max: 174 Seconds
1151 Seconds (15%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 80     avg: 85.7     median: 84 (1%)     max: 101 Seconds
410.8 Seconds (3%)
596 Seconds (4%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3468     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3911 sec
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 19989     avg: 20578     median: 20192 (43%)     max: 21934 Points
min: 9478     avg: 11037     median: 11055 (24%)     max: 11682 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 5.655     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (1%)     max: 5.86 s
min: 8.217     avg: 8.4     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.6 s
9 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 12.287     avg: 12.6     median: 12.5 (1%)     max: 13.193 s
min: 18.11     avg: 18.7     median: 18.7 (1%)     max: 19.2 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 289.628     avg: 296.6     median: 293.3 (1%)     max: 310.125 s
min: 451.8     avg: 466.5     median: 466.5 (2%)     max: 481.1 s
498.3 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 86915     avg: 97290     median: 96473 (84%)     max: 112434 Points
min: 37453     avg: 41216     median: 41216 (36%)     max: 44979 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 29023     avg: 31289     median: 31187.5 (84%)     max: 33181 Points
min: 9974     avg: 12990     median: 13112 (35%)     max: 14879 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 79257     avg: 97847     median: 97246.5 (79%)     max: 111988 Points
min: 57291     avg: 62439     median: 62509 (51%)     max: 72135 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 80320     avg: 96904     median: 97919.5 (79%)     max: 102987 Points
min: 57931     avg: 59811     median: 59810.5 (49%)     max: 61690 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 83056     avg: 98634     median: 97311 (82%)     max: 105981 Points
min: 24411     avg: 49357     median: 61055 (51%)     max: 62605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 26626     avg: 29034     median: 29044.5 (73%)     max: 30955 Points
min: 6733     avg: 10551     median: 10817 (27%)     max: 12404 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 46013     avg: 51456     median: 51140 (91%)     max: 54226 Points
min: 10277     avg: 15847     median: 16455 (29%)     max: 18605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 16236     avg: 20507     median: 20037 (84%)     max: 22794 Points
min: 4293     avg: 5791     median: 6191.5 (26%)     max: 6481 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1493 Points (40%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
4963 Points (20%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2106     avg: 2237     median: 2286 (96%)     max: 2290 Points
1097 Points (46%)
1127 Points (48%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 22448     avg: 23743     median: 24033 (43%)     max: 24157 Points
5205 Points (9%)
4352 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2148     avg: 2191     median: 2197 (10%)     max: 2246 Points
1118 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 22024     avg: 23446     median: 23664 (75%)     max: 24021 Points
4211 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9218     avg: 9542     median: 9598 (96%)     max: 9683 Points
min: 5464     avg: 5645     median: 5665.5 (57%)     max: 5785 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 77347     avg: 84105     median: 85336 (94%)     max: 86695 Points
min: 21980     avg: 23919     median: 24399.5 (27%)     max: 24898 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 21023     avg: 23100     median: 23881 (42%)     max: 24397 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 4511     avg: 4592     median: 4567 (89%)     max: 4698 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
22018 Points (34%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4888 Points (73%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 423     avg: 430.6     median: 432 (1%)     max: 438 ms
min: 598     avg: 935     median: 989 (1%)     max: 1024 ms
987 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 72.1     avg: 173.9     median: 173.9 (2%)     max: 275.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 37397     avg: 41732     median: 40726 (37%)     max: 52403 Points
49389 Points (44%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 304     avg: 317.6     median: 316 (91%)     max: 335 Points
155.3 Points (45%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 338     avg: 364     median: 368 (77%)     max: 382 Points
209 Points (44%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2263     avg: 2497     median: 2580 (99%)     max: 2589 Points
1127 Points (43%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 228     avg: 354.3     median: 359 (62%)     max: 471 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 349     avg: 392.5     median: 370.5 (68%)     max: 480 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 12.9     avg: 15     median: 15.2 (11%)     max: 16.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900K → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-8950HK → 55% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8400H → 50% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 03. 15:20:37

#0 checking url part for id 14625 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9900 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9572 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14625 +0.017s ... 0.048s

#8 got single benchmarks 14625 +0.044s ... 0.092s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9900 +0.003s ... 0.096s

#10 got single benchmarks 9900 +0.045s ... 0.141s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9572 +0.003s ... 0.144s

#12 got single benchmarks 9572 +0.007s ... 0.151s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.151s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.477s ... 0.628s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.628s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)