Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

► remove from comparison AMD Z1 Extreme

The AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series and fastest model of the U-series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports SMT (hyperthreading , 16 threads). The cores clock from 3.3 (base) up to 5.1 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

The performance of the R7 7840U is, depending on the workload, only slightly below the Ryzen 7 7840HS (higher base clock speed and TDP). Compared to the previous generation Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, the 7840U is clearly faster thanks to the Zen 4 architecture and higher clock speeds. Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 7840U, the Z1 Extreme offers no AI engine.

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.7 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 15 and 30 Watt.

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is a powerful Phoenix family chip that saw the light of day in H1 2023. The processor features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at 3.8 GHz. The highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.1 GHz.

Not only does this APU has full might of the Zen 4 architecture at its disposal, it also comes with the new Ryzen AI technology that's set to make generative AI more ubiquitous than ever before. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is coming after Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies; time will tell if this move by AMD is a good idea.

Perhaps more importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is set to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

Elsewhere, the 7840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7840HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-12700H, Core i7-12850HX, Core i9-12900H, Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The 7840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 7840U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series and fastest model of the U-series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 3.3 (base) up to 5.1 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the consumer Ryzen 7 7840U, the PRO models offer additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments.

The performance of the R7 PRO 7840U is, depending on the workload, only slightly below the Ryzen 7 7840HS (higher base clock speed and TDP). Compared to the previous generation Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, the 7840U is clearly faster thanks to the Zen 4 architecture and higher clock speeds.

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.7 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 15 and 30 Watt.

ModelAMD Ryzen Z1 ExtremeAMD Ryzen 7 7840HSAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
CodenamePhoenix (Zen 4)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)Phoenix (Zen 4)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) Phoenix (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Clock3300 - 5100 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 168 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP30 Watt35 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2178 mm2
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Z1 Extreme
43.8 pt (61%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7840HS
45.6 pt (63%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 7840U
42.7 pt (59%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 101     avg: 104.5     median: 105 (73%)     max: 107 Points
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 880     avg: 918     median: 918 (17%)     max: 956 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13004     avg: 13982     median: 13982 (13%)     max: 14960 Points
min: 15515     avg: 16393     median: 16194.5 (15%)     max: 17214 Points
min: 12929     avg: 13952     median: 13869 (13%)     max: 15142 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1733     avg: 1756     median: 1756 (75%)     max: 1779 Points
min: 1718     avg: 1770     median: 1775 (75%)     max: 1812 Points
min: 1703     avg: 1721     median: 1717 (73%)     max: 1747 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 672     avg: 682     median: 682 (76%)     max: 692 Points
min: 668     avg: 687     median: 689 (77%)     max: 705 Points
min: 652     avg: 669     median: 670 (74%)     max: 684 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5109     avg: 5467     median: 5467 (13%)     max: 5825 Points
min: 6061     avg: 6395     median: 6346.5 (15%)     max: 6744 Points
min: 4970     avg: 5450     median: 5424 (13%)     max: 5981 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2050     avg: 2224     median: 2223.5 (14%)     max: 2397 Points
min: 2473     avg: 2592     median: 2573 (16%)     max: 2729 Points
min: 2014     avg: 2223     median: 2229 (14%)     max: 2418 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 268     avg: 274     median: 274 (83%)     max: 280 Points
min: 270     avg: 277.7     median: 278.5 (84%)     max: 286 Points
min: 263     avg: 267     median: 266 (80%)     max: 273 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.7     avg: 30     median: 30 (39%)     max: 30.25 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (82%)     max: 3.33 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7574     avg: 7642     median: 7641.5 (46%)     max: 7709 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 45602     avg: 47933     median: 47933 (35%)     max: 50264 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 83726     avg: 85395     median: 85395 (59%)     max: 87064 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14015     avg: 14096     median: 14096 (17%)     max: 14177 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 71.922     avg: 72.4     median: 72.4 (1%)     max: 72.819 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.626     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (1%)     max: 2.658 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6428     avg: 7064     median: 7063.5 (11%)     max: 7699 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 56966     avg: 59812     median: 59811.5 (34%)     max: 62657 MIPS
min: 59538     avg: 69127     median: 70330 (40%)     max: 73035 MIPS
min: 57056     avg: 59146     median: 58603 (34%)     max: 62320 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6316 MIPS (76%)
min: 6049     avg: 6561     median: 6618 (79%)     max: 6754 MIPS
min: 5633     avg: 5846     median: 5881 (70%)     max: 5988 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 144.1     avg: 146.7     median: 146.7 (51%)     max: 149.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 281.5     avg: 289.8     median: 289.8 (67%)     max: 298 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 16.3     avg: 17.4     median: 17.4 (30%)     max: 18.4 fps
min: 11.7     avg: 19.8     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 21.8 fps
min: 15.9     avg: 16.8     median: 16.7 (29%)     max: 17.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14.7     avg: 14.8     median: 14.8 (39%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 366     avg: 406     median: 406 (5%)     max: 446 Seconds
min: 298     avg: 324.4     median: 318.5 (4%)     max: 463 Seconds
min: 354     avg: 384.8     median: 387.5 (5%)     max: 410 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
213 Seconds (2%)
min: 185     avg: 198.6     median: 196 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
min: 217     avg: 234.3     median: 236 (2%)     max: 248 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4447     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4662 sec
min: 0.4184     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4739 sec
min: 0.4658     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4807 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15312     avg: 15685     median: 15663 (33%)     max: 16073 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.112     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (2%)     max: 8.774 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.697     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (1%)     max: 21.271 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 655.388     avg: 690     median: 689.9 (3%)     max: 724.411 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 76708     avg: 82457     median: 83358.5 (73%)     max: 85884 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 15202     avg: 18389     median: 19181 (52%)     max: 20784 Points
min: 17320     avg: 22172     median: 22611 (61%)     max: 25584 Points
min: 16111     avg: 17318     median: 17331.5 (47%)     max: 18499 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 77280     avg: 89035     median: 91414 (74%)     max: 93910 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 84349     avg: 89853     median: 91645 (74%)     max: 93208 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 84416     avg: 91454     median: 92596 (78%)     max: 95508 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
15761 Points (40%)
min: 13602     avg: 19764     median: 20637 (52%)     max: 21602 Points
min: 16274     avg: 17360     median: 17641 (45%)     max: 18165 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 19305     avg: 23686     median: 25255 (45%)     max: 26499 Points
min: 24338     avg: 27673     median: 27816 (50%)     max: 29343 Points
min: 21327     avg: 23216     median: 23745 (42%)     max: 24045 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6281     avg: 8857     median: 9704 (41%)     max: 10587 Points
min: 8903     avg: 10942     median: 11131 (47%)     max: 12218 Points
min: 8245     avg: 8428     median: 8405.5 (35%)     max: 8657 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2530     avg: 2534     median: 2534 (68%)     max: 2538 Points
min: 2585     avg: 2661     median: 2670 (72%)     max: 2721 Points
min: 1896     avg: 2330     median: 2467 (66%)     max: 2491 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 10872     avg: 10931     median: 10931 (43%)     max: 10990 Points
min: 12111     avg: 12994     median: 13112 (52%)     max: 13498 Points
min: 7596     avg: 10604     median: 11375.5 (45%)     max: 12069 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1896     avg: 1917     median: 1898 (80%)     max: 1956 Points
min: 1837     avg: 1966     median: 1963.5 (83%)     max: 2017 Points
min: 1740     avg: 1806     median: 1801 (76%)     max: 1881 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9589     avg: 10103     median: 9803 (18%)     max: 10917 Points
min: 8446     avg: 11674     median: 11874 (21%)     max: 12339 Points
min: 9663     avg: 10365     median: 10437.5 (19%)     max: 10920 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1834     avg: 1891     median: 1895.5 (8%)     max: 1936 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8572     avg: 11483     median: 11905 (38%)     max: 12278 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7924     avg: 8100     median: 8148 (81%)     max: 8166 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47599     avg: 48417     median: 48498 (53%)     max: 48906 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
556 ms (1%)
min: 485     avg: 509     median: 512 (1%)     max: 544 ms
min: 526     avg: 557     median: 565.5 (1%)     max: 571 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
86617 Points (78%)
min: 91356     avg: 91588     median: 91577 (82%)     max: 91831 Points
min: 85772     avg: 87443     median: 87442.5 (79%)     max: 89113 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
277 Points (80%)
min: 232     avg: 263.8     median: 263 (76%)     max: 319 Points
234 Points (67%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 300     avg: 366     median: 366 (76%)     max: 432 Points
min: 288     avg: 317.1     median: 321 (67%)     max: 339 Points
min: 259     avg: 283.5     median: 279 (58%)     max: 317 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1718 Points (66%)
min: 1566     avg: 1763     median: 1801 (69%)     max: 1891 Points
min: 1533     avg: 1595     median: 1588 (61%)     max: 1669 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
42.2 Watt (7%)
min: 64.7     avg: 93.2     median: 87.2 (15%)     max: 137.9 Watt
min: 39.7     avg: 51.8     median: 54.9 (9%)     max: 57.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 74.7     avg: 98.9     median: 88.8 (16%)     max: 135.7 Watt
55.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.8 Watt (8%)
min: 4.73     avg: 13.9     median: 11.6 (8%)     max: 59.2 Watt
min: 5.18     avg: 6.9     median: 6.7 (4%)     max: 8.88 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.95     avg: 8.6     median: 8.6 (10%)     max: 12.3 Watt
min: 7.09     avg: 13.7     median: 12.6 (14%)     max: 35.5 Watt
min: 4.4     avg: 5.4     median: 5.1 (6%)     max: 7.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 20.1     avg: 28.1     median: 29.7 (22%)     max: 33.2 Points per Watt
40 Points per Watt (30%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS → 108% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U → 97% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 17. 12:22:13

#0 checking url part for id 15017 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14948 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15058 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.035s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.035s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15017 +0.019s ... 0.054s

#8 got single benchmarks 15017 +0.01s ... 0.064s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14948 +0.017s ... 0.081s

#10 got single benchmarks 14948 +0.064s ... 0.145s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 15058 +0.018s ... 0.163s

#12 got single benchmarks 15058 +0.014s ... 0.177s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.177s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.411s ... 0.588s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.588s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)