Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 165H vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

Intel Core Ultra 7 165H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 165H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H is a high-end laptop processor of the Meteor Lake series. This 1st Gen Core Ultra chip has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. The 16 cores are comprised of 6 HT-enabled Performance cores running at up to 5.0 GHz and 10 Efficient cores (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) running at up to 3.8 GHz. Two of the 10 E-cores are located in the Low Power Island.

The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.30 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 165H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 165H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official Intel performance data, then the 165H is about as fast as the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.30 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is almost as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. A powerful cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 165H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is a powerful processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new laptop chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 7 7840U with a slightly higher wattage as well as higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8840HS has eight Zen 4 cores running at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz that are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads, while the great Radeon 780M is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties. Compared to the consumer 8840HS, the PRO variant supports AMD PRO technologies with management features and usually longer availability and support.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs, making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more useful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the R7 PRO 8840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and therefore with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving NVMe SSDs up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around this Ryzen 7 series APU are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since this is a 7840U in disguise that we are dealing with here, it is safe to expect the 8840HS to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to tune to their liking, with values between 20 W and 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 185H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is the top-of-the-line Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 6, are SMT-enabled and run at up to 5.1 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.8 GHz. The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.35 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while the rest of the chip is turned off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes that this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 9 185H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 185H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official Intel performance data, then the 185H is not a whole lot faster than the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.35 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is about as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 9 series processor has a "base" power consumption of 45 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. A powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 185H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 7 165HAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HSIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
CodenameMeteor Lake-HHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Meteor Lake-H
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)Intel Meteor Lake-H
Series: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H « 3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 H 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5000 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB16 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 22
6 x 5.0 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP28 Watt28 Watt45 Watt
Technology7 nm4 nm7 nm
max. Temp.110 °C100 °C110 °C
SocketBGA2049FP7/FP7r2/FP8BGA2049
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3DDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2300 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB
Die Size178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 165H
37.6 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 8840HS
39.2 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 185H
39.2 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
103.3 Points (58%)
103.7 Points (58%)
min: 103     avg: 108.2     median: 108.1 (61%)     max: 112.2 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 616     avg: 690     median: 690 (13%)     max: 764 Points
869 Points (16%)
min: 828     avg: 1003     median: 1021 (19%)     max: 1096 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14055     avg: 14783     median: 14551 (14%)     max: 15743 Points
min: 14621     avg: 14784     median: 14784 (14%)     max: 14947 Points
min: 12688     avg: 18030     median: 18338 (17%)     max: 19851 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1668     avg: 1731     median: 1759 (74%)     max: 1766 Points
min: 1712     avg: 1724     median: 1724 (73%)     max: 1736 Points
min: 1620     avg: 1818     median: 1812 (76%)     max: 1912 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 674     avg: 681     median: 683 (74%)     max: 687 Points
min: 671     avg: 673     median: 673 (73%)     max: 675 Points
min: 622     avg: 701     median: 702 (76%)     max: 735 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5471     avg: 5640     median: 5545 (14%)     max: 5904 Points
min: 5760     avg: 5820     median: 5819.5 (14%)     max: 5879 Points
min: 4843     avg: 6957     median: 7192 (18%)     max: 7651 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2467     avg: 2583     median: 2641 (17%)     max: 2642 Points
min: 2427     avg: 2458     median: 2458 (16%)     max: 2489 Points
min: 1581.9     avg: 2762     median: 2853 (18%)     max: 3165 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 257     avg: 258     median: 257 (71%)     max: 260 Points
min: 271     avg: 271.5     median: 271.5 (75%)     max: 272 Points
min: 238     avg: 267.1     median: 268 (74%)     max: 281 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
26.4 Points (34%)
min: 33.95     avg: 34.7     median: 34.6 (45%)     max: 35.55 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.6 Points (61%)
min: 3.11     avg: 3.2     median: 3.1 (75%)     max: 3.27 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5809 Points (35%)
min: 9719     avg: 9994     median: 9977.5 (60%)     max: 10300 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
39747 Points (29%)
min: 59935     avg: 63422     median: 63273.5 (46%)     max: 67204 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 88902     avg: 90904     median: 91265.5 (58%)     max: 92183 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 13892     avg: 14147     median: 14161 (17%)     max: 14374 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
362.5 s (4%)
min: 87.408     avg: 215.6     median: 165.1 (2%)     max: 441.275 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.9 s (2%)
min: 3.254     avg: 4.3     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 8.1 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
21172 Points (34%)
min: 6724     avg: 9769     median: 7940 (13%)     max: 17856 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 54741     avg: 58029     median: 56997 (33%)     max: 62349 MIPS
min: 63624     avg: 63845     median: 63845 (37%)     max: 64066 MIPS
min: 52522     avg: 70203     median: 71934 (41%)     max: 76331 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4939     avg: 5200     median: 5273 (62%)     max: 5387 MIPS
min: 6261     avg: 6289     median: 6289 (74%)     max: 6317 MIPS
min: 4502     avg: 5480     median: 5560 (66%)     max: 5781 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 153.6     avg: 159.7     median: 159.9 (53%)     max: 165.6 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 300.5     avg: 322.4     median: 326.3 (75%)     max: 336.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.4     avg: 15.2     median: 15.2 (27%)     max: 16 fps
min: 17.8     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (31%)     max: 18 fps
min: 14.1     avg: 20.1     median: 20.6 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
min: 0.96     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (32%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
min: 1.4     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (31%)     max: 2.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.2 GB/s (37%)
min: 7.9     avg: 10.8     median: 11.3 (29%)     max: 12.1 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 406     avg: 435     median: 435 (6%)     max: 464 Seconds
min: 345     avg: 354.5     median: 354.5 (5%)     max: 364 Seconds
min: 280     avg: 331.7     median: 309 (4%)     max: 538 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 231     avg: 246     median: 246 (2%)     max: 261 Seconds
min: 212     avg: 217     median: 217 (2%)     max: 222 Seconds
min: 163     avg: 188.6     median: 177 (1%)     max: 285 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4565     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4686 sec
min: 0.4568     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4747 sec
min: 0.4313     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.503 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9854     avg: 13153     median: 13074 (28%)     max: 15529 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.7 s (2%)
min: 6.6     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 7.256 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.7 s (1%)
min: 14.786     avg: 14.9     median: 14.9 (1%)     max: 15.15 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
571 s (3%)
min: 304.446     avg: 358     median: 366.9 (2%)     max: 402.742 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 73186     avg: 76512     median: 75742.5 (58%)     max: 80494 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 18101     avg: 20276     median: 20275.5 (50%)     max: 22450 Points
min: 20839     avg: 20940     median: 20940 (52%)     max: 21041 Points
min: 12693     avg: 21337     median: 22169.5 (55%)     max: 24629 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 74638     avg: 81658     median: 76996.5 (63%)     max: 100241 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 73618     avg: 82055     median: 75494 (61%)     max: 100192 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78677     avg: 89559     median: 91059 (73%)     max: 102469 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13733     avg: 14430     median: 14429.5 (37%)     max: 15126 Points
min: 14341     avg: 18938     median: 18896 (48%)     max: 21425 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 23240     avg: 23582     median: 23582 (42%)     max: 23924 Points
min: 23922     avg: 24665     median: 24664.5 (44%)     max: 25407 Points
min: 21106     avg: 28071     median: 28964.5 (52%)     max: 30623 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 7617     avg: 8260     median: 8259.5 (35%)     max: 8902 Points
min: 8914     avg: 9434     median: 9433.5 (40%)     max: 9953 Points
min: 6307     avg: 10957     median: 11454.5 (48%)     max: 12209 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2358     avg: 2429     median: 2421.5 (60%)     max: 2513 Points
min: 2594     avg: 2607     median: 2607 (65%)     max: 2620 Points
min: 2199     avg: 2483     median: 2495 (62%)     max: 2573 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 11616     avg: 12341     median: 12230.5 (47%)     max: 13288 Points
min: 12118     avg: 12481     median: 12480.5 (48%)     max: 12843 Points
min: 12825     avg: 13823     median: 13974 (54%)     max: 14540 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2410     avg: 2931     median: 3105 (99%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12735     avg: 18936     median: 21003 (86%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1688     avg: 1782     median: 1793.5 (70%)     max: 1853 Points
1925 Points (75%)
min: 1700     avg: 1828     median: 1852 (72%)     max: 1902 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11733     avg: 12010     median: 12051.5 (22%)     max: 12204 Points
min: 11318     avg: 11430     median: 11430 (20%)     max: 11542 Points
min: 10441     avg: 13368     median: 13566 (24%)     max: 14230 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1695     avg: 1788     median: 1799 (8%)     max: 1830 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13228     avg: 13612     median: 13736 (43%)     max: 13972 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7040     avg: 7372     median: 7422 (74%)     max: 7602 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47960     avg: 49362     median: 49781.5 (50%)     max: 49924 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 514     avg: 518     median: 517.5 (1%)     max: 521 ms
min: 537     avg: 538     median: 537.5 (1%)     max: 538 ms
min: 494     avg: 524     median: 522 (1%)     max: 594 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
86267 Points (63%)
min: 90543     avg: 95362     median: 96090 (70%)     max: 98144 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 259     avg: 263     median: 263 (72%)     max: 267 Points
min: 226     avg: 238.5     median: 238.5 (66%)     max: 251 Points
min: 237     avg: 258.7     median: 260 (71%)     max: 271 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 291     avg: 293     median: 293 (53%)     max: 295 Points
min: 298     avg: 304.9     median: 304.9 (55%)     max: 311.8 Points
min: 237     avg: 279.4     median: 286 (51%)     max: 301 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1690     avg: 1751     median: 1692 (63%)     max: 1872 Points
min: 1648     avg: 1701     median: 1701 (64%)     max: 1754 Points
min: 1589     avg: 1774     median: 1770 (66%)     max: 1971 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 55.7     avg: 58.2     median: 58.2 (10%)     max: 60.6 Watt
min: 59.1     avg: 61     median: 61 (11%)     max: 62.8 Watt
min: 44.4     avg: 113.4     median: 123.8 (21%)     max: 176.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 64.8     avg: 79.7     median: 79.7 (15%)     max: 94.6 Watt
61.6 Watt (11%)
min: 88     avg: 129.5     median: 124.6 (23%)     max: 171.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.51     avg: 4.6     median: 4.6 (3%)     max: 6.73 Watt
min: 6.65     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (5%)     max: 7.55 Watt
min: 5.1     avg: 12.4     median: 11.7 (8%)     max: 21.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.01     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (6%)     max: 7.51 Watt
min: 6.31     avg: 6.5     median: 6.5 (7%)     max: 6.62 Watt
min: 5.18     avg: 13.7     median: 11.9 (13%)     max: 28.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 27.9     avg: 33     median: 33 (25%)     max: 38.1 Points per Watt
39.4 Points per Watt (29%)
min: 17.8     avg: 27.4     median: 24.2 (18%)     max: 67 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 165H → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS → 106% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 185H → 115% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 15. 01:32:36

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16905 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18727 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 16921 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755214356s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Aug 2025 05:18:40 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16905 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 16905 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18727 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#11 got single benchmarks 18727 +0.005s ... 0.025s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 16921 +0.001s ... 0.026s

#13 got single benchmarks 16921 +0.004s ... 0.03s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.054s ... 0.084s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.084s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)