Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 8840U vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8840U

The Ryzen 7 8840U is a powerful laptop processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new APU; instead, the R7 8840U is a rebadged R7 7840U with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. Its eight Zen 4 cores run at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz and are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads. The great Radeon 780M iGPU is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are promised to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more powerful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to deliver a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8840U has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving fast NVMe SSD up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around the 8840U are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8840U is a 7840U in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This means the chip is fast enough to make 99% of consumers happy, as of December 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W. Laptop makers are free to change that value significantly, with values as low as 15 W and as high as 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840U is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The APU comes with 12 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.1 GHz, the 16 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 890M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support.

Of the 12 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores and 8 are smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter run at significantly lower clock speeds than the former.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the HX 370 supports LPDDR5x-8000 and DDR5-5600 RAM, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

Given the IPC improvement, we expect 4 Zen 5 cores combined with 8 Zen 5c cores to perform about as well as 16 Zen 4 cores meaning there is a real chance of the HX 370 dethroning the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a laptop powered by the HX 370.

Graphics

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer right now. It features 16 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) running at up to 2,900 MHz. We expect the graphics adapter to deliver gaming performance good enough for playing 2023 and 2024 games in 1080p (Low detail settings).

Naturally, the 890M is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The HX 370 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of mid 2024, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 8840UAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
CodenameHawk Point-U (Zen 4)Strix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-U (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 7 250 compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250 compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z2 compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 230 compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 230 compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640U compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3300 - 5100 MHz2000 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB12 MB
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3DDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8840U
38.1 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.1 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
98 Points (55%)
min: 113.6     avg: 116.4     median: 116 (65%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
748 Points (14%)
min: 621     avg: 1048     median: 1107 (21%)     max: 1284 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10162     avg: 12191     median: 12972 (12%)     max: 13563 Points
min: 10435     avg: 20303     median: 21625 (20%)     max: 23902 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1088     avg: 1619     median: 1703 (72%)     max: 1740 Points
min: 1921     avg: 2010     median: 2018.5 (86%)     max: 2049 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 427     avg: 621     median: 665 (74%)     max: 680 Points
min: 753     avg: 789     median: 791 (88%)     max: 804 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3987     avg: 4817     median: 5067 (12%)     max: 5336 Points
min: 6449     avg: 8319     median: 8817 (21%)     max: 9280 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1539     avg: 2003     median: 2024 (13%)     max: 2453 Points
min: 2498.13     avg: 3206     median: 3371 (21%)     max: 3551 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 176.6     avg: 249.7     median: 266 (75%)     max: 275 Points
min: 293     avg: 306.2     median: 307 (86%)     max: 315 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
24.1 Points (31%)
min: 38.84     avg: 40.2     median: 40.7 (53%)     max: 41.17 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.2 Points (76%)
min: 3.68     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.7 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7381 Points (45%)
min: 8639     avg: 8701     median: 8668 (52%)     max: 8797 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
41306 Points (30%)
min: 53766     avg: 55510     median: 56074 (41%)     max: 56689 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
71128 Points (45%)
min: 96857     avg: 100361     median: 100569 (64%)     max: 103657 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13618 Points (17%)
min: 15698     avg: 15853     median: 15927 (19%)     max: 15935 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
84.3 s (1%)
min: 50.536     avg: 69.8     median: 79.4 (1%)     max: 79.442 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
min: 2.701     avg: 3.1     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.743 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4008     avg: 4286     median: 4090 (6%)     max: 4759 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 47579     avg: 54539     median: 57550 (33%)     max: 59549 MIPS
min: 66154     avg: 77874     median: 80277 (46%)     max: 83714 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4168     avg: 5727     median: 6012 (71%)     max: 6469 MIPS
min: 5859     avg: 6151     median: 6143 (72%)     max: 6497 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
118.7 fps (40%)
min: 169.8     avg: 175.5     median: 171.5 (57%)     max: 185.1 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
267 fps (62%)
min: 304.5     avg: 313.5     median: 306 (71%)     max: 330 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 12.5     avg: 15.2     median: 15.8 (28%)     max: 16.5 fps
min: 20.3     avg: 25     median: 26 (46%)     max: 28.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
min: 1.6     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (47%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.7 GB/s (29%)
min: 2.5     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (45%)     max: 2.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.5 GB/s (30%)
min: 15.3     avg: 15.7     median: 15.3 (40%)     max: 16.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 383     avg: 423.6     median: 405 (5%)     max: 517 Seconds
min: 208     avg: 242.4     median: 225 (3%)     max: 306 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 239     avg: 264.4     median: 246 (2%)     max: 315 Seconds
min: 139     avg: 156.9     median: 148 (1%)     max: 192 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4514     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.678 sec
min: 0.3892     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.529 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13841     avg: 14195     median: 14245 (30%)     max: 14498 Points
min: 13761     avg: 16184     median: 16571.5 (35%)     max: 17466 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.8 s (2%)
min: 8.224     avg: 8.3     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.43 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21.3 s (1%)
min: 17.504     avg: 17.6     median: 17.6 (1%)     max: 17.767 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
754 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 67701     avg: 68184     median: 68141 (52%)     max: 68709 Points
min: 66119     avg: 73944     median: 75793 (58%)     max: 77565 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 13875     avg: 16398     median: 17132 (42%)     max: 18587 Points
min: 17129     avg: 20174     median: 20630 (51%)     max: 23282 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 51143     avg: 64986     median: 64712.5 (53%)     max: 79375 Points
min: 50952     avg: 59510     median: 61220 (50%)     max: 67655 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 51152     avg: 61249     median: 51313 (42%)     max: 81282 Points
min: 50955     avg: 60322     median: 61072 (50%)     max: 67802 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78859     avg: 83002     median: 84626 (70%)     max: 85520 Points
min: 48351     avg: 58447     median: 59313.5 (49%)     max: 66810 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10973     avg: 14368     median: 13601 (34%)     max: 17112 Points
min: 16960     avg: 19395     median: 19571 (50%)     max: 21349 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17856     avg: 20716     median: 21341 (38%)     max: 23864 Points
min: 24918     avg: 29430     median: 29812.5 (53%)     max: 33146 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6208     avg: 8025     median: 8271 (35%)     max: 9004 Points
min: 8866     avg: 10457     median: 10533 (44%)     max: 12293 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1654     avg: 2354     median: 2528 (63%)     max: 2607 Points
min: 2780     avg: 2881     median: 2876 (72%)     max: 2965 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 9609     avg: 10699     median: 10366 (40%)     max: 12664 Points
min: 11973     avg: 14488     median: 14896 (58%)     max: 15994 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2384 Points (76%)
min: 2645     avg: 2952     median: 3105 (99%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
10532 Points (43%)
min: 12664     avg: 18473     median: 21003 (86%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1278     avg: 1761     median: 1879 (73%)     max: 1937 Points
min: 1957     avg: 2081     median: 2097 (82%)     max: 2160 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8205     avg: 9600     median: 9258 (17%)     max: 11296 Points
min: 11394     avg: 13976     median: 14246.5 (26%)     max: 15759 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1817 Points (8%)
min: 1827     avg: 1941     median: 1947 (8%)     max: 2041 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8056 Points (25%)
min: 12962     avg: 14070     median: 14244 (45%)     max: 14828 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7480     avg: 8044     median: 8033.5 (80%)     max: 8628 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 42842     avg: 52269     median: 54586.5 (54%)     max: 57060 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 515     avg: 581     median: 539 (1%)     max: 779 ms
min: 419     avg: 440.9     median: 436 (1%)     max: 503 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 64079     avg: 104849     median: 106618 (82%)     max: 124105 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 170.4     avg: 225.3     median: 240.8 (66%)     max: 249 Points
min: 210     avg: 255.2     median: 259 (71%)     max: 277 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 216     avg: 286.2     median: 303 (54%)     max: 306 Points
min: 252     avg: 305.7     median: 317 (57%)     max: 347 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1541     avg: 1639     median: 1625 (61%)     max: 1766 Points
min: 1402     avg: 1757     median: 1771 (66%)     max: 1981 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 31.5     avg: 43.2     median: 48.2 (8%)     max: 50 Watt
min: 45.6     avg: 88.1     median: 89 (15%)     max: 128.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28.2     avg: 41.9     median: 41.9 (8%)     max: 55.5 Watt
min: 46.3     avg: 92     median: 97.6 (18%)     max: 130.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.47     avg: 9.5     median: 6.2 (4%)     max: 16.9 Watt
min: 4.89     avg: 8.5     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 19.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.93     avg: 10.8     median: 9.4 (10%)     max: 22.5 Watt
min: 6.31     avg: 9.3     median: 8.8 (10%)     max: 12.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
54.6 Points per Watt (41%)
min: 26.9     avg: 36.8     median: 32.4 (24%)     max: 54.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8840U → 100% n=50

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 → 131% n=50

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 24. 18:52:21

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16401 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17543 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1748105540s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 22 May 2025 05:16:49 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16401 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 16401 +0.01s ... 0.018s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17543 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#10 got single benchmarks 17543 +0.025s ... 0.047s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.047s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.064s ... 0.111s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.113s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)