Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

Zotac Zone review: Display galore with class-leading inputs

The first Windows-based handheld with a 120 Hz OLED.

With its first-ever mobile Console, Zotac is venturing into completely new territories, and while the Zone comes with many fresh ideas and simply the best inputs you can get your fingertips on right now, the 7" OLED-equipped handheld might need a bit more refinement in the software department.
Anubhav Sharma, 👁 Alexander Wätzel Published 🇹🇷 🇩🇪 ...
Gaming Handheld

Verdict - an amazing gaming experience, that needs some polishing

The good folks from Zotac have clearly seen a Steam Deck (OLED) before and may even held a ROG Ally X or MSI's Claw since their very own first-ever handheld clearly draws some inspiration from the established competition. So, while the overall shape and size is quite similar to the competition, the Zone manages to add enough unique features and fresh ideas to the Windows-based handheld formula to create its own identity. Zotac is off to a good start with a gorgeous 120Hz OLED screen, amazing and basically class-leading inputs, a solid selection of well-priced accessories, and comparable performance.

Unfortunately, right out of the box, you will not get the best performance out of Team Red's Ryzen APU, and the software experience needs some work, but considering this was a problem for almost all manufacturers at launch, we expect some major improvements for the final product.
The launch price is also very close to the Ally X, which may lack the OLED but offers a bigger battery, a VRR screen, and a much more streamlined and polished software experience.
So let us see if the Zotac Zone still has a place in today's handheld market. 

Pros

+ very bright, 120Hz OLED
+ classleading d-pad and switchable hall-effect triggers
+ extensive customization and tuning potential
+ good performance in our 30W custom setting ...

Cons

- ... slower than the competition in standard mode
- no performance presets
- control overlay can be finnicky

Price and Availability

The Zotac Zone is not available internationally yet but will start at around 850 Euros in Germany (Amazon).

Comparison of potential rivals

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Height
Display
1.
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U ⎘
AMD Radeon 780M ⎘
16 GB Memory
849 Euro692 g7.00"
1920x1080
315 PPI
2.
84.6%
Asus ROG Ally X
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme ⎘
AMD Radeon 780M ⎘
24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
899 Euro685 g36.9 mm7.00"
1920x1080
315 PPI
IPS
3.
84.9% v7 (old)
Lenovo Legion Go
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme ⎘
AMD Radeon 780M ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
800 Euro845 g41 mm8.80"
2560x1600
343 PPI
IPS
4.
77.4%
MSI Claw
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
849 Euro672 g33 mm7.00"
1920x1080
315 PPI
IPS
5.
88.9% v7 (old)
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU ⎘
AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
679 Euro640 g49 mm7.40"
1280x800
204 PPI
OLED

The handheld gaming market is pretty hot right now, and Zotac has thrown its hat into the ring with its new Zotac Zone. This Windows-based handheld features an OLED display, Hall-effect triggers, and considerable computing grunt courtesy of AMD. Though the market is quite crowded already, especially with devices like the Asus ROG Ally X and the Steam Deck (OLED) leading the charge, the Zone has some standout features that may give it a competitive edge. With the incredibly bright display and customizable controls, the Zone is looking to carve a niche for itself, even though performance and the overall software experience left us with mixed feelings.

At launch, only one configuration will be available, which will cost you 849 Euros. We have no word on dollar prices yet, but we will update our article as soon as this information becomes available. 

As a disclaimer, this is a relatively early sample and not a full and final review model. However, Zotac was still confident enough to let us do quite a bit of testing, so we can give you some proper numbers nonetheless. We have not been able to run any display measurements with HDR enabled, there are some issues with the battery for our sample, and the touchpads are also getting tweaked for the final release. 

Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U 8 x 3.3 - 5.1 GHz, Hawk Point-U (Zen 4)
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
7.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 315 PPI, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB
Weight
692 g ( = 24.41 oz / 1.53 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
849 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - shades of grey

The Zone is about on par with other Windows competitors like the previously mentioned Ally X or the MSI Claw when it comes to its overall shape, size, and weight. Zotac nailed it in the ergonomics department right away, and this one is very comfortable to hold, with deep enough grips and well-laid-out controls. We especially enjoyed the chassis's rounded lower edges, which allowed for very natural hand positioning even during longer gameplay sessions. 

The Zone also comes with a small stand which is not the sturdiest but is definitely very handy if you simply want to watch something on your shiny new OLED handheld. 

A customizable RGB lightbar adds some eye candy to the back of the Zone.
A customizable RGB lightbar adds some eye candy to the back of the Zone.
The silver-coloured accents do add some "bling" to the otherwise relatively bland exterior.
The silver-coloured accents do add some "bling" to the otherwise relatively bland exterior.

The small handheld's overall feel is quite good. Of course, it's plastic all over, but it feels dense and premium enough, even though I would say the Ally X has a slight edge.
The dark grey colour might not be for everyone, but with the lighter, almost silverish accents, Zotac managed to create a unique appearance that stood apart from the mostly plain black competitors.

The rounded lower edges of the chassis felt great during out testing.
The rounded lower edges of the chassis felt great during out testing.

Size Comparison

311 mm / 12.2 in 135 mm / 5.31 in 43 mm / 1.693 in 876 g1.931 lbs325 mm / 12.8 in 140 mm / 5.51 in 22 mm / 0.866 in 942 g2.08 lbs298 mm / 11.7 in 117 mm / 4.61 in 49 mm / 1.929 in 640 g1.411 lbs299 mm / 11.8 in 131 mm / 5.16 in 41 mm / 1.614 in 845 g1.863 lbs294 mm / 11.6 in 117 mm / 4.61 in 33 mm / 1.299 in 672 g1.482 lbs280 mm / 11 in 111 mm / 4.37 in 36.9 mm / 1.453 in 685 g1.51 lbs280.44 mm / 11 in 111.2 mm / 4.38 in 21.22 mm / 0.835 in 611 g1.347 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Connectivity - above and below with USB 4.0

When it comes to I/O, the Zotac Zone features a pair of USB-C 4 ports, which offer a fair amount of flexibility for charging and connecting peripherals. Additionally, the Zone comes with a headphone jack and a microSD card reader, which is pretty standard for this class of device. 

On top, you get the first USB-C 4.0, the headphone jack, the power button with a fingerprint reader, and a volume rocker.
On top, you get the first USB-C 4.0, the headphone jack, the power button with a fingerprint reader, and a volume rocker.
Below you can find the second USB-C 4.0, and the micro SD-card reader.
Below you can find the second USB-C 4.0, and the micro SD-card reader.

Accessories - well-priced dock for all of your steam library.

Should you want to use the handheld as your main computing device, Zotac also sells a dock at a very reasonable price (79 Euros). This dock adds even more functionality, including an additional USB-C port, a pair of USB-As, HDMI, networking capabilities, and an NVMe slot. This makes the setup ideal for productivity and can also serve as a new home for your games library.

In addition to the Zone itself, Zotac also sells a high quality carrying case and the dock.
In addition to the Zone itself, Zotac also sells a high quality carrying case and the dock.
More ports for wireless dongle, for example.
More ports for wireless dongle, for example.
Turn your handheld into the centerpiece of your setup ...
Turn your handheld into the centerpiece of your setup ...
... for a proper big-screen experience.
... for a proper big-screen experience.

Input Devices - rivals the best controllers on the market

Zotac definitely did their homework with the inputs on the zone, not only regarding the overall quality and placement, but also considering the sheer number of options you have at your disposal.
The D-pad is amongst the best you can find on a handheld right now. With super tactile, almost mouselike clicks, it's both incredibly satisfying and precise. 

The hall-effect joysticks also feel smooth, with just the right amount of resistance for nuanced control. An additional feature is the rings around the joysticks, which act as radial inputs that can be mapped to different functions in Zotac's software. By default, these rings control display brightness, RGB intensity, or system volume, which worked all right during our testing, even though it did not feel particularly direct. 

With the triggers (also hall-effect), Zotac also added a little party trick. As a first for handhelds, you can choose between the classic analogue travel, which allows for precise control, for example, in racing games, or, with a flick of a little switch, you can change them into a sort of rapid-fire trigger mode, which is great for when you need instant inputs, in shooters or something like Black Myth: Wukong.

Again, the actuation feels almost mouselike and has the same tactile feel as the d-pad.

The d-pad offers a tactile feel with mouselike clicks.
The d-pad offers a tactile feel with mouselike clicks.
Hall-effect joysticks with additional radial inputs.
Hall-effect joysticks with additional radial inputs.

Touchpads - for the finer movements

The Zotac Zone does include a pair of touchpads, similar to Valve's Steam Deck or Lenovo's Legion Go. These touchpads are designed to mimic mouse inputs—a feature that is a godsend for the Windows desktop or strategy games. Unfortunately, the clicks feel a bit cheap, and movement has been tough to control. But Zotac told us they are working on improvements for the final release.

Navigate Windows with ease with a pair of touchpads.
Navigate Windows with ease with a pair of touchpads.

Display - its all about those "inky" blacks!

The Zotac Zone's display can be manually calibrated to refine the color balance as per the user's preference, which is a neat little feature as well.
The Zotac Zone's display can be manually calibrated to refine the color balance as per the user's preference, which is a neat little feature as well.

The Zotac Zone is equipped with an OLED display, running at 120Hz, which delivers a stunning visual experience. Our measurements even exceeds Zotac’s brightness claims with over 800 Nits allowing for outdoor gaming sessions despite the glossy screen. As is typical for the display tech, the contrast is fantastic, providing deep blacks and vibrant colors, which is great for games and Netflix shows alike.

However, factory calibration leaves room for improvement, with a very noticeable blue tint in the default color settings. While some users may not find this distracting, it could be a major nitpick for those who prefer more accurate color reproduction. Thankfully, manual calibration can be used to polish the color balance, and we hope for Zotac to address this issue in the final retail model.

One notable disadvantage of the OLED display is its low PWM frequency of 120Hz, which could potentially cause eye strain for sensitive users during extended gaming sessions. If you can live with that, though, you got access to one of the best display experiences on the market right now, at least on the windows side of things. 

With great Contrast, glaring highlights, and rich colours, the Zone has a lot going for it for display aficionados.
With great Contrast, glaring highlights, and rich colours, the Zone has a lot going for it for display aficionados.
837.42
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 837.42 cd/m² (Nits)
Contrast: 20936:1 (Black: 0.04 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.9
ΔE Greyscale 9.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.19
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz
Asus ROG Ally X
TL070FVXS01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz
Lenovo Legion Go
Legion Go Display, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8", 144 Hz
MSI Claw
TL070FVXS02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz
Ayaneo Kun
Ayaneo 2K, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4", 60 Hz
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
ANX7530 U, OLED, 1280x800, 7.4", 90 Hz
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
FLQ8423-24L0, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4", 60 Hz
Display
Display P3 Coverage
66.2
65.6
92.1
67
93.52
99.6
91.9
sRGB Coverage
93.4
92.1
99.56
94.4
99.4
100
99.3
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
68.5
67.9
90.09
69.4
91.2
96.1
81.6
Response Times
-380%
-419%
-466%
-362%
4784%
-177%
-1203%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
1.08 ?(0.54, 0.54)
9.7 ?(4.4, 5.3)
-798%
10.5 ?(5, 5.5)
-872%
20.8 ?(9.4, 11.4)
-1826%
9.2 ?(4.6, 4.6)
-752%
24.2 ?(13.8, 10.4)
-2141%
9 ?(4.5, 4.5)
-733%
25.5 ?(11.5, 25)
-2261%
Response Time Black / White *
9.3 ?(8.7, 0.6)
5.7 ?(2.5, 3.2)
39%
6 ?(2.7, 3.3)
35%
14.4 ?(7, 7.4)
-55%
6.6 ?(3.1, 3.5)
29%
16.2 ?(7.6, 8.6)
-74%
9 ?(4.5, 4.5)
3%
22.73 ?(11.05, 11.67)
-144%
PWM Frequency
120
700
483%
20000
16567%
360 ?(100)
200%
Screen
-99%
-143%
-136%
-86%
-159%
29%
-22%
Brightness middle
837.42
484
-42%
513
-39%
411
-51%
477
-43%
680
-19%
485
-42%
318
-62%
Black Level *
0.04
0.35
-775%
0.38
-850%
0.42
-950%
0.32
-700%
0.5
-1150%
0.03
25%
0.1118
-180%
Contrast
20936
1383
-93%
1350
-94%
979
-95%
1491
-93%
1360
-94%
16167
-23%
2844
-86%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.1
2.9
59%
3.7
48%
5.94
16%
2.6
63%
4
44%
2
72%
4.81
32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
12.7
7.1
44%
8.3
35%
10.56
17%
5.8
54%
9
29%
5
61%
6.93
45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.9
1.4
64%
2.95
24%
1.5
62%
1
74%
1.53
61%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
9.1
4.5
51%
5.1
44%
0.92
90%
3.9
57%
9
1%
2
78%
6.12
33%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.24 98%
2.14 103%
1.93 114%
2.17 101%
2 110%
2 110%
2.003 110%
CCT
7946 82%
7534 86%
7732 84%
8064 81%
7250 90%
7188 90%
6336 103%
7707 84%
Brightness
456
474
413
461
678
482
287
Brightness Distribution
88
84
80
88
91
98
48
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-240% / -161%
-281% / -212%
-301% / -235%
-224% / -147%
2313% / 1324%
-74% / -40%
-613% / -285%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
9.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.7 ms rise
↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.08 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.54 ms rise
↘ 0.54 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Performance - it depends!

Given that we are not really dealing with a new CPU here, you should not expect any surprises. Contrary to most competitors, the zone does not come with any performance presets but allows for some in-depth tinkering, if you want to. I did most of our initial testing in the standard profile, which runs the Ryzen 7 and the 780M at around 16-18W, and to give you more info about what the Zone is capable of when you push it or want to conserve even more power, we created some custom profiles at different wattages.

Review Settings

We would assume Zotac opted for the relatively conservative standard setting to keep both temperatures and fan noise in check, basically trying to find the sweetspot between wattage and the resulting performance. 
But since you do get the option to tweak everything in Zotac's management application, we created three additional profiles at 10 Watt increments to see how performance scales up to the Zone's maximum 30W.

Zotac's management application allows for custom wattage settings between 10-30 Watts.
Zotac's management application allows for custom wattage settings between 10-30 Watts.
Energieprofil APU TDP CB R23 Multi Time Spy Graphics CP 2077 1080p Low
Standard 18/16 W 10198 Pkt. 2680 Pkt. 32.49 FPS
30W(Custom) 30W 13563 Pkt. 3057 Pkt. 40.53 FPS
20W(Custom) 20W 11300 Pkt. 2804 Pkt. 35.60 FPS
10W(Custom) 10W 7500Pkt. 1646 Pkt. 17.73 FPS

Prozessor

When it comes to pure CPU grunt, which is arguably not that important for a gaming handheld, Zotac's first handheld either trails behind the competition or lands somewhere in the middle between its competitors.

With 30W the Ryzen 7 8840U performs quite competitve, while it trails behind in the Zone's Standard setting.
With 30W the Ryzen 7 8840U performs quite competitve, while it trails behind in the Zone's Standard setting.
CPU Performance Rating: Percent | Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
CPU Performance Rating
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
99.5 pt
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
98.7 pt
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
97.6 pt
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
94.7 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
92.4 pt
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
92 pt
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
91.7 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
86.1 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
 
85 pt
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
81.8 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -1!
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
26.3 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
15120 Points +48%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
15074 Points +48%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
14960 Points +47%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
14463 Points +42%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
13563 Points +33%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
13224 Points +30%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
13004 Points +28%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
  (10162 - 13563, n=6)
12053 Points +18%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3984 - 15120, n=11, last 2 years)
12051 Points +18%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
10198 Points
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
3984 Points -61%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1779 Points +4%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1770 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1733 Points +1%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1733 Points +1%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1731 Points +1%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
1712 Points
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
1679 Points -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1088 - 1770, n=10, last 2 years)
1647 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
  (1088 - 1740, n=6)
1605 Points -6%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1597 Points -7%

GPU Performance - not new, but still competitive

In our synthetic GPU tests, it's pretty much the same story. The Zone’s very conservative standard settings definitely do not give you what Team Reds 780M is capable of. But if you push it to the maximum 30W, it can easily outpace most of the other handhelds we tested so far. However, it does come with a very significant trade-off when it comes to fan noise, but more on that later.
To be quite honest, we do not quite understand why Zotac is not offering more performance profiles. While it's great for enthusiasts to have a lot of options to fine-tune performance to their specific needs, the majority of users will most likely not have the ability or patience to get into it that deep.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
99.1 pt
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
95.8 pt
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
91.5 pt
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
89.4 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
86.5 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
85.8 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
85.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
83.3 pt
Average AMD Radeon 780M
 
83 pt
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
80.9 pt
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
8775 Points +18%
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
8618 Points +16%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
8373 Points +12%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
8370 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
7974 Points +7%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7971 Points +7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6683 - 8775, n=11, last 2 years)
7891 Points +6%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
7865 Points +5%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (4550 - 8816, n=58)
7747 Points +4%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
7459 Points
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3491 Points +30%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
3196 Points +19%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
3057 Points +14%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2913 Points +9%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2866 Points +7%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2854 Points +6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2444 - 3491, n=11, last 2 years)
2853 Points +6%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (1496 - 3196, n=58)
2713 Points +1%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
2680 Points
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2646 Points -1%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6787 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
2954 points
Help

Software Experience - for the enthusiast

While we are on the subject of software, Zotac's overlay and management solution does come with everything you would expect, but it definitely lacks the polish and snappiness of Asus’ Armory Crate SE, for example, and things that are standard by now are missing, like an FPS counter or basic telemetry.
Sure, you can easily get third-party software for it, but it's not a very streamlined experience. 

The control overlay is also a bit cumbersome to use, and some inputs do not work right away, or you get kicked out of your game when adjusting settings. So, while the hardware is great, I would say Zotac still has a bit of homework to do regarding the software side of things. But to be fair, that is something all manufacturers struggled with at first, and with enough user feedback and a little bit of time, we will hopefully see some improvements here.  

With the launcher, you get instant access to your installed games and many options to adjust settings.
With the launcher, you get instant access to your installed games and many options to adjust settings.
The overlay is functional but not without problems.
The overlay is functional but not without problems.

Gaming Performance

When it comes to real-world gaming performance,  its the same situation as before:
either very low numbers in standard mode, or very, very competitive results with the ryzen running at 30W.
In general, you will get roughly the same performance experience as with the other handhelds, and as is typical for all of them you will have to do some tweaking to get an fps experience that works for you. 

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
91.7 pt
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
91.3 pt
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
88.9 pt
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
86.7 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
84 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
82.3 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
77.8 pt
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
73.9 pt
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
64 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
53.2 pt
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
52.1 (9.9min) fps +60%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
44.1 (37.1min) fps +36%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43.9 (24.5min) fps +35%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43.4 (30.1min) fps +34%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
41.9 (33.5min) fps +29%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
40.53 (34.47min) fps +25%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
40.53 (34.47min) fps +25%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
39.1 fps +20%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25 - 52.1, n=16, last 2 years)
38.1 fps +17%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
32.49 (25.2427min) fps
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
30.9 (26.2min) fps -5%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
25 fps -23%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Medium Preset
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
48 fps +17%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
47 fps +15%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
43 fps +5%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43 fps +5%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
42 fps +2%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
41 fps
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
40 fps -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (27 - 48, n=11, last 2 years)
39.6 fps -3%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
33 fps -20%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
28 fps -32%

FSR & Frame Generation - supercharge your handheld

That said, FSR and frame gen on AMD made quite a bit of improvements in the last few months and just as one example, while Black Myth: Wukong gets you pretty choppy framerates, rendered natively at low settings, you can easily get beyond or around 60fps with upscaling and frame generation, and its a great experience, playing on of the most demanding games you can get right now on this one, especially with the OLED.
I am also playing a lot of DIABLO IV right now to prepare for the upcoming expansion, and with FSR I was hovering just a smidge below 60fps, and again, with the gorgeous screen and super tactile inputs, this is peak handheld gaming if you ask me.

Rendered natively Black Myth: Wukong only gave us barely playable results with just 26 fps on average.
Rendered natively Black Myth: Wukong only gave us barely playable results with just 26 fps on average.
Adding FSR in its quality setting and with Frame Generation we got 63 in the games integrated benchmark.
Adding FSR in its quality setting and with Frame Generation we got 63 in the games integrated benchmark.

Emissions - silent and slow, or loud and fast

System Noise

As discussed earlier, the fan noise of the Zotac Zone depends on the chosen performance settings. In the standard settings (16-18W), the fans run relatively quietly, with only a slight hum during typical use. This makes it more comfortable to use in quieter environments without any major noise distractions.

However, when the TDP is pushed to 30W to maximize performance numbers, the fans become much louder to compensate for the increased heat. At this setting, the fans are pretty audible, which might bother some during extended gaming sessions.
In our corresponding YouTube Review, we added some more subjective noise examples (at 9:20) at different wattage settings and in different use-case scenarios. 

Battery Runtime

With its 48,5Wh battery, the Zone seems likely to deliver competitive runtimes despite its bright OLED.
With its 48,5Wh battery, the Zone seems likely to deliver competitive runtimes despite its bright OLED.

Zotac has stated that the battery situation is not final for this early sample of the Zotac Zone, so the battery life cannot be fully evaluated yet. So we just did a quick and dirty test, running Cyberpunk 2077 in low settings at maximum brightness. This netted us around 1 hour and 38 minutes, which is actually not too bad compared to the majority of the competition. 
The Ally X shook the market quite a bit with its 80Wh battery; this will be the standard from now on, and all other contenders must compete with. 

Lean back and enjoy: Our Zotac Zone review video

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Read all 3 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Zotac Zone review: Display galore with class-leading inputs
Anubhav Sharma, 2024-10-13 (Update: 2024-10-15)