NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro P5000 Max-Q (official Nvidia Quadro P5000 with Max-Q Design) is a mobile high-end workstation graphics card for notebooks. It is the power efficient variant of the normal Quadro P5000 for laptops and offers slightly reduced clock speeds (1101 - 1366 MHz versus 1164 - 1506 MHz) and a greatly reduced power consumption (80 versus 100 Watt TGP). Similar to the consumer GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (Laptop), it is based on a slimmed-down GP104 chip with 2048 shaders. The graphics card is designed for the Kaby Lake generation.
The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers , which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.
Performance
The theoretical performance should be slightly below the normal Quadro P4000 due to the reduced clock speeds.
Power Consumption
With an TGP of 80 Watt, the P5000 Max-Q is only slightly higher rated (5 Watt) as the much slower Quadro P3000 (75 Watt) and therefore similar sized laptops can use the P5000 Max-Q.
NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia T550 Laptop GPU (formerly known as Quadro T550 Mobile) for laptops is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer GeForce MX550 and features the same 1024 cores and a 64 Bit memory bus. The card offers 4 GB GDDR6 with a maximum bandwidth of 112 GB/s and no dedicated display outputs (iGPU display outputs used via Optimus). The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC.
The professional GPUs offer certified drivers , which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.
The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards, the T550 does not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro P2000 is a mobile mid-range workstation graphics card for notebooks. Similar to the consumer GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop) , it is based on the GP107 chip with 768 shaders. The graphics card is designed for the Kaby Lake / Coffee Lake generation.
The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers , which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.
Performance
The theoretical performance should be similar with the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (if the clocks did not take a massive hit).
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Quadro P Series Codename N17E-Q5 Max-Q TU117 GP107GL Architecture Pascal Turing Pascal Pipelines 2048 - unified 1024 - unified 768 - unified Core Speed 1101 - 1366 (Boost) MHz 1065 - 1665 (Boost) MHz 1215 - 1468 (Boost) MHz Memory Speed 6006 MHz 12000 effective = 1500 MHz 6008 MHz Memory Bus Width 256 Bit 64 Bit 128 Bit Memory Type GDDR5 GDDR5, GDDR6 GDDR5 Max. Amount of Memory 16 GB 4 GB 4 GB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 DirectX 12_1, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6 DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 Power Consumption 100 Watt 25 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP) technology 16 nm 12 nm 14 nm Features Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus Notebook Size large medium sized medium sized Date of Announcement 11.01.2017 27.05.2022 05.07.2017 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.com nvdam.widen.net Theoretical Performance 7.2 TFLOPS FP16, 3.7 TFLOPS FP32 Memory Bandwidth 112 GB/s Information Optimus only
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro P2000
3.1 pt (9%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2031 avg: 2187 median: 2066 (6%) max: 2465 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 83% 100%
2259 Points (7%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 92% 83% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1882 avg: 2021 median: 1928 (5%) max: 2252 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 85% 100%
2046 Points (5%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 91% 85% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
350317 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
75457 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 17399 avg: 17614 median: 17614 (19%) max: 17829 Points
min: 23632 avg: 24335 median: 24335 (26%) max: 25038 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 72%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 32743 avg: 33219 median: 33218.5 (9%) max: 33694 Points
min: 42598 avg: 43566 median: 43565.5 (11%) max: 44533 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 76%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 4559 avg: 4786 median: 4581 (8%) max: 5218 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 88% 100%
min: 6116 avg: 6160 median: 6160 (11%) max: 6204 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 74% 85%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4816 avg: 5100 median: 4890 (6%) max: 5593 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 87% 100%
min: 6741 avg: 6847 median: 6847 (8%) max: 6953 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 71% 82%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
51884 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3530 avg: 3590 median: 3589.5 (4%) max: 3649 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7405 avg: 8160 median: 8160 (11%) max: 8915 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 83% 100%
min: 8660 avg: 8699 median: 8699 (12%) max: 8738 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 98% 83% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7432 avg: 8067 median: 8066.5 (7%) max: 8701 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 85% 100%
min: 8201 avg: 8387 median: 8387 (7%) max: 8573 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 96% 85% 100%
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
25155 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro P2000
32964 Points (10%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 76%
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
24697 Points (14%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro P2000
31451 Points (18%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 79%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
31003 Points (41%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000
33795 Points (44%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 92%
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
34.6 fps (11%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
86.1 fps (16%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 278 avg: 282 median: 283 (42%) max: 285 Seconds
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 102%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 256 avg: 263.3 median: 265 (99%) max: 269 Seconds
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 650%
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 103.8 avg: 103.9 median: 103.9 (26%) max: 104 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 65.8 avg: 66.7 median: 66.7 (10%) max: 67.6 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 30.42 avg: 30.6 median: 30.6 (7%) max: 30.73 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 22.84 avg: 23 median: 23 (6%) max: 23.11 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 59.2 avg: 59.8 median: 59.8 (16%) max: 60.3 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 5.27 avg: 5.4 median: 5.4 (5%) max: 5.62 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 65 avg: 65.1 median: 65.1 (26%) max: 65.2 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 69.6 avg: 70.2 median: 70.2 (12%) max: 70.8 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
71.9 fps (13%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 95 avg: 98.8 median: 95.8 (26%) max: 105.68 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 90% 100%
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000
96.1 fps (26%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 91% 90% 100%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 95.8 avg: 101.7 median: 99.7 (11%) max: 109.67 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 89% 100%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000
121.9 fps (14%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 80% 90%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 24.8 avg: 26.1 median: 25.3 (6%) max: 28.06 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 89% 100%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000
30.3 fps (7%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 83% 93%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 34.5 avg: 37.2 median: 36.2 (8%) max: 40.74 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 87% 100%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000
18.5 fps (4%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 45% 87% 100%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 77.5 avg: 82 median: 80.9 (9%) max: 87.57 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 90% 100%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000
89.3 fps (10%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 89% 98%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 11.7 avg: 12.4 median: 12 (4%) max: 13.37 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 89% 100%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000
5.3 fps (2%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 39% 89% 100%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 82.4 avg: 86.2 median: 85.5 (13%) max: 90.66 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 93% 100%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000
82.1 fps (12%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 91% 93% 100%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 104 avg: 110.4 median: 109 (12%) max: 118.22 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 90% 100%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000
104 fps (12%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 88% 90% 100%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 61.6 avg: 63.7 median: 63 (11%) max: 66.38 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 94% 100%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000
71.7 fps (12%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 87% 93%
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 46.3 avg: 54 median: 54.3 (11%) max: 61.38 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 82% 100%
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 84 avg: 99.4 median: 99.3 (16%) max: 114.82 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 80% 100%
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 13.5 avg: 15.6 median: 15.4 (11%) max: 17.87 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 81% 100%
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 86.9 avg: 98.2 median: 98.1 (14%) max: 109.68 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 84% 100%
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 10.6 avg: 12.1 median: 12 (10%) max: 13.56 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 83% 100%
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 44.5 avg: 46.2 median: 45.7 (23%) max: 48.5 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 98%
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 22.4 avg: 25.6 median: 24.9 (16%) max: 29.58 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 80% 100%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 28.3 avg: 30 median: 29.6 (13%) max: 32.03 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 90% 100%
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6782 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
133.3 fps (46%)
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 184.9 avg: 193 median: 189.2 (11%) max: 205 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 91% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro P2000
min: 165.5 avg: 180.9 median: 180.9 (11%) max: 196.2 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 88% 91% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro P2000
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 100% 100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
19 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
43.5 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
118.3 fps (13%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
172.6 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
229.9 fps (13%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
449.9 fps (4%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 870 avg: 1075 median: 1075 (5%) max: 1280 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2636 avg: 2692 median: 2691.5 (5%) max: 2747 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
5190 Points (6%)
min: 4723 avg: 4859 median: 4858.5 (5%) max: 4994 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 94% 100%
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 34.2 avg: 34.7 median: 34.7 (5%) max: 35.1 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 41.2 avg: 41.3 median: 41.3 (6%) max: 41.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 42.9 avg: 44.1 median: 44.1 (10%) max: 45.3 Watt
76.5 Watt (17%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 109%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4393 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (40%) max: 0.4569 fps per Watt
0.3 fps per Watt (31%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 76% 100%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.4734 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (40%) max: 0.483 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 38.2 avg: 40.4 median: 40.5 (65%) max: 42.5 dB(A)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 93% 100%
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro P2000
46.5 dB(A) (74%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 85% 91%
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU → 0% n= Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro P2000 → 0% n=
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
T550 Laptop GPU:
73 75 78 ~ 75 fps
T550 Laptop GPU:
39 40 43 ~ 41 fps
NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 22 69 62 43 31 F1 2021 153 74 59 37 Strange Brigade 131 52 42 36 Far Cry 5 75 41 38 35 X-Plane 11.11 70 63 57 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 62 31 22 Dota 2 Reborn 117 105 95 88 The Witcher 3 128 75 41 21 GTA V 116 114 62 29 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 6 3 3 6 1 6 2 2 4 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.27
log 16. 09:58:02
#0 checking url part for id 8084 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 11429 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 8886 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:38:48 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.141s ... 0.143s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.143s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.143s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8084 +0.042s ... 0.185s
#9 got single benchmarks 8084 +0.001s ... 0.185s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11429 +0.002s ... 0.188s
#11 got single benchmarks 11429 +0.021s ... 0.209s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 8886 +0.022s ... 0.231s
#13 got single benchmarks 8886 +0.021s ... 0.253s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.253s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.399s ... 0.651s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.651s
#17 Got 239 rows for game benchmarks. +0.032s ... 0.684s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.684s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.023s ... 0.707s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.074s ... 0.781s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.781s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.784s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)