Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron J4125 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3550H vs AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

Intel Celeron J4125

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4125

The Intel Celeron J4125 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive mini PCs and was announced late 2019. It runs at 2-2.7 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform (2019 refresh). Compared to the predecessor, the refresh offers slightly higher clock speeds. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessors, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, partial Wi-Fi 5 support, all in a smaller package. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The processor is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture is still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average J4125 in our database outguns the AMD 3050e just slightly, the latter being a dual-core, Zen-based, entry-level processor of nearly the same energy efficiency, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This means the Celeron is a very basic CPU that's good for basic day-to-day activities only.

The Beelink GK Mini is one of the fastest systems built around the J4125 that we know of. It can be roughly 70% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power consumption

Like most J-class Intel processors, the Celeron has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 10 W. This is low enough, allowing laptop makers to ditch fans while building a passively cooled laptop, tablet or mini-PC around the chip.

The Intel Celeron J4125 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 3550H

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3550H

The AMD Ryzen 5 3550H is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.1 GHz to 3.7 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics adapter with 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1,200 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 5 3500U, the 3550H offers a 20 Watt higher TDP and therefore a better performance under long periods of load. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12 nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

Performance

The average 3550H in our database proves to be a solid mid-range CPU, its multi-thread benchmark scores hovering close to those of the Intel Core i7-10710U and the Core i5-8257U. Which is a little slow for an H-class processor, as of late 2021, but still more than enough for the vast majority of apps and games, provided one is fine with having to wait a little longer than usual for that 4K video encoding job to get completed.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and sufficiently high CPU power limits, the Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng is among the fastest laptops powered by the 3550H that we know of. It can be more than 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 35 W. Laptop makers are free to reduce that value significantly with 12 W being the minimum AMD-recommended value. Clock speeds and performance would take a hit as a result; either way, that's a little too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

Last but not the least, the AMD Ryzen 5 3550H is built with a 12 nm process for lower-than-average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3750H

The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 3700U, the 3750H offers a 20 Watt higher TDP and therefore a better performance under long periods of load. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements.

Performance

The average 3750H in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-10610U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a fairly good result, as of early 2022.

The ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU is among the fastest laptops built around the 3750H that we know of. It can be about 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP of 35 W (also known as the long-term power limit). Laptop manufacturers are free to change that value to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly. These values are comparatively high, making an active cooling solution pretty much a necessity.

Last but not the least, this AMD APU is built with a rather old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron J4125AMD Ryzen 5 3550HAMD Ryzen 7 3750H
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameGemini Lake RefreshPicasso-U (Zen+)Picasso (Zen+)
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Picasso-U (Zen+)
Intel Pentium Silver J50402 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50301.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 « 2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41201.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40252 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N40201.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H « 2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Clock2000 - 2700 MHz2100 - 3700 MHz2300 - 4000 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 84 / 8
TDP10 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Technology14 nm12 nm12 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1090FP5FP5
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 750 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron J4125
17.8 pt (25%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3550H
26.7 pt (37%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 3750H
27 pt (37%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 860     avg: 1203     median: 1186 (1%)     max: 1563 Points
min: 3646     avg: 3930     median: 3929.5 (4%)     max: 4213 Points
3897 Points (4%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 392     avg: 425.3     median: 438 (19%)     max: 446 Points
min: 850     avg: 886     median: 886 (38%)     max: 922 Points
971 Points (41%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 155     avg: 166.2     median: 170 (19%)     max: 174 Points
min: 331     avg: 354.3     median: 359 (40%)     max: 370 Points
min: 340     avg: 363.8     median: 364.5 (41%)     max: 386 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 304     avg: 449.2     median: 430 (1%)     max: 610 Points
min: 1421     avg: 1596     median: 1621 (4%)     max: 1728 Points
min: 1514     avg: 1691     median: 1713 (4%)     max: 1825 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 148     avg: 223.4     median: 243 (2%)     max: 271 Points
min: 635     avg: 717     median: 742 (5%)     max: 769 Points
min: 672     avg: 743     median: 734 (5%)     max: 805 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 63.1     avg: 72.5     median: 75.3 (23%)     max: 79.1 Points
min: 77     avg: 137.9     median: 144 (43%)     max: 146 Points
min: 135     avg: 143.9     median: 144 (43%)     max: 157 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.13     avg: 2.8     median: 3.1 (4%)     max: 3.09 Points
8.6 Points (11%)
9.2 Points (12%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.84     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (21%)     max: 0.92 Points
1.7 Points (41%)
1.6 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2070     avg: 2159     median: 2112 (13%)     max: 2295 Points
min: 4575     avg: 5413     median: 4592 (28%)     max: 7893 Points
min: 4527     avg: 4732     median: 4770 (29%)     max: 4898 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4102     avg: 6188     median: 7128 (5%)     max: 7335 Points
min: 19002     avg: 19535     median: 19520.5 (14%)     max: 20097 Points
min: 19290     avg: 20242     median: 20687 (15%)     max: 20750 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 9697     avg: 10201     median: 10201 (7%)     max: 10705 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 3669     avg: 3690     median: 3690 (4%)     max: 3711 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 566     avg: 608     median: 603 (7%)     max: 654.159 s
209.2 s (2%)
197.1 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 17.3     avg: 18     median: 17.4 (3%)     max: 19.42 s
7.7 s (2%)
7.4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1019     avg: 1069     median: 1048 (2%)     max: 1140 Points
2929 Points (5%)
2866 Points (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 5694     avg: 7248     median: 7494 (4%)     max: 8399 MIPS
min: 16683     avg: 17967     median: 17978 (10%)     max: 19409 MIPS
min: 17077     avg: 18318     median: 18689 (11%)     max: 19187 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2237     avg: 2358     median: 2369 (28%)     max: 2444 MIPS
min: 3472     avg: 3554     median: 3547.5 (42%)     max: 3652 MIPS
min: 3511     avg: 3641     median: 3659 (44%)     max: 3752 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 11.31     avg: 13.7     median: 13.1 (5%)     max: 16.75 fps
44.3 fps (15%)
48.6 fps (17%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 52.6     avg: 64.3     median: 61.4 (14%)     max: 78.9 fps
146.8 fps (34%)
139.4 fps (32%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 0.95     avg: 1.4     median: 1.5 (3%)     max: 1.61 fps
min: 3.7     avg: 4.1     median: 4 (7%)     max: 4.43 fps
min: 4.14     avg: 4.3     median: 4.4 (8%)     max: 4.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.163     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.182 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (0%)
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.196     avg: 0.2     median: 0.3 (5%)     max: 0.266 GB/s
0.7 GB/s (12%)
0.7 GB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 1.8     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (5%)     max: 1.9 GB/s
4.7 GB/s (12%)
5 GB/s (13%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
7856 Seconds (100%)
1297 Seconds (17%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 2198     avg: 2772     median: 2391 (17%)     max: 3860 Seconds
min: 612     avg: 675     median: 659 (5%)     max: 759 Seconds
min: 584     avg: 630     median: 633 (4%)     max: 672 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.525     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (34%)     max: 1.579 sec
min: 0.732     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.752 sec
min: 0.6902     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.723 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2373     avg: 3327     median: 3740 (8%)     max: 3869 Points
min: 7123     avg: 7227     median: 7174 (15%)     max: 7385 Points
min: 7187     avg: 7715     median: 7431 (16%)     max: 8812 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 24.57     avg: 31.6     median: 24.6 (5%)     max: 45.52 s
11.9 s (3%)
11 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 55.9     avg: 68.9     median: 57.4 (2%)     max: 93.4 s
27.7 s (1%)
25.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1332.53     avg: 3652     median: 1845 (8%)     max: 7778 s
695 s (3%)
650 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 3522     avg: 5431     median: 5430.5 (5%)     max: 7339 Points
24607 Points (22%)
25143 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2348     avg: 2705     median: 2706 (7%)     max: 2986 Points
min: 6321     avg: 6969     median: 6803 (18%)     max: 7724 Points
min: 6360     avg: 7609     median: 7878 (21%)     max: 8648 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 10102     avg: 19782     median: 19782 (16%)     max: 29462 Points
min: 52657     avg: 54549     median: 54658 (44%)     max: 56221 Points
min: 39182     avg: 48304     median: 48251 (39%)     max: 57479 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 11105     avg: 23313     median: 29231 (24%)     max: 29602 Points
min: 53643     avg: 54868     median: 55096 (45%)     max: 56566 Points
min: 44524     avg: 50874     median: 51438 (42%)     max: 56661 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 17507     avg: 26606     median: 26606 (22%)     max: 35705 Points
min: 60469     avg: 61391     median: 61297 (52%)     max: 62057 Points
min: 55479     avg: 58242     median: 55515 (47%)     max: 63731 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1196     avg: 2273     median: 2485 (6%)     max: 2804 Points
min: 2848     avg: 6157     median: 6734.5 (17%)     max: 8124 Points
min: 5698     avg: 7447     median: 7716 (20%)     max: 8117 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1602     avg: 3372     median: 3689 (7%)     max: 4271 Points
min: 10096     avg: 10671     median: 10554 (19%)     max: 11617 Points
min: 10095     avg: 11205     median: 11316 (20%)     max: 11900 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 876     avg: 994     median: 984 (4%)     max: 1122 Points
min: 2996     avg: 3268     median: 3363 (14%)     max: 3534 Points
min: 2861     avg: 3318     median: 3344 (14%)     max: 3574 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 435     avg: 454.2     median: 455 (19%)     max: 466 Points
min: 880     avg: 896     median: 899 (38%)     max: 907 Points
874 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1198     avg: 1367     median: 1394 (2%)     max: 1512 Points
min: 3162     avg: 3316     median: 3281 (6%)     max: 3486 Points
3537 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 451     avg: 455.7     median: 453 (2%)     max: 463 Points
min: 806     avg: 886     median: 902 (4%)     max: 914 Points
min: 853     avg: 895     median: 884 (4%)     max: 959 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1163     avg: 1388     median: 1482 (5%)     max: 1519 Points
min: 3034     avg: 3238     median: 3250 (10%)     max: 3562 Points
min: 3007     avg: 3467     median: 3571.5 (11%)     max: 3718 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1922     avg: 1948     median: 1924 (19%)     max: 1997 Points
min: 3623     avg: 3797     median: 3807 (38%)     max: 3938 Points
min: 3898     avg: 4104     median: 4166 (42%)     max: 4186 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4246     avg: 5158     median: 5468 (6%)     max: 5761 Points
min: 11183     avg: 12118     median: 11926 (13%)     max: 13441 Points
min: 11396     avg: 12985     median: 13403.5 (15%)     max: 13738 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13474     avg: 14342     median: 14437 (26%)     max: 15114 Points
min: 14478     avg: 14749     median: 14748.5 (26%)     max: 15019 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3348     avg: 3420     median: 3353 (65%)     max: 3558 Points
min: 3717     avg: 3768     median: 3768 (74%)     max: 3819 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2216     avg: 2258     median: 2276 (3%)     max: 2291 ms
min: 1042     avg: 1145     median: 1173 (1%)     max: 1229 ms
min: 1132     avg: 1170     median: 1160 (1%)     max: 1228 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
117.8 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 28324     avg: 28827     median: 28811.5 (26%)     max: 29361 Points
min: 29949     avg: 30479     median: 30626 (28%)     max: 30714 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
68.2 Points (20%)
124.3 Points (36%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 86.2     avg: 89.2     median: 88.7 (18%)     max: 93.2 Points
min: 151.3     avg: 161.1     median: 162 (34%)     max: 174 Points
153 Points (32%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
340 Points (13%)
832 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 7.87     avg: 12.5     median: 12.4 (2%)     max: 17.4 Watt
min: 39.9     avg: 50.3     median: 50.3 (9%)     max: 60.6 Watt
min: 43.3     avg: 106.8     median: 95 (16%)     max: 182 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 9.24     avg: 11     median: 11.4 (2%)     max: 12.3 Watt
35.2 Watt (6%)
min: 40.7     avg: 68.1     median: 66.4 (12%)     max: 97.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.2 Watt (2%)
11.2 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 13     avg: 18.4     median: 19.8 (15%)     max: 22.4 Points per Watt
18.3 Points per Watt (14%)
min: 8.29     avg: 12     median: 11 (8%)     max: 16.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4125 → 100% n=43

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3550H → 225% n=43

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3750H → 232% n=43

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 04. 02:07:08

#0 checking url part for id 12749 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11151 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11131 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:34:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.047s ... 0.048s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12749 +0.017s ... 0.065s

#8 got single benchmarks 12749 +0.022s ... 0.087s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11151 +0.018s ... 0.105s

#10 got single benchmarks 11151 +0.047s ... 0.152s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11131 +0.016s ... 0.168s

#12 got single benchmarks 11131 +0.06s ... 0.228s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.228s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.652s ... 0.881s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.881s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)