Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-13900HX vs Intel Core i5-13450HX

Intel Core i9-13900HX

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900HX

The Intel Core i9-13900HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and looks like it is based on the desktop Core i9-13000K with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading that clock between 2.2 GHz (base) and 5.4 GHz (single core boost, 4.9 GHz for all cores) and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading (1.6 - 3.9 GHz).

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13900HX).

The performance should be higher than the old Core i9-12900HX due to more E-cores and probably higher clock speeds.

The CPU is still produced in a further improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds. The power consumption is specified at 55W base power up to 157 Watt max. Turbo power.

Intel Core i5-13450HX

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13450HX

The Intel Core i5-13450HX is a fast mid-range mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023. The CPU integrates 6 fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and 4 Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading. The P-Cores clock between 2.4 GHz (base) up to 4.6 GHz (single core boost, all-core 4.5 GHz). The smaller E-Cores clock between 1.8 and 3.4 GHz. All cores can access the combined 20 MB L3 cache (compared to the 36 MB of the i9 models).

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i5).

The performance should be below the Alder Lake based Core i5-12650H (10 cores, 4.7 GHz, 45 Watt) and therefore similar to the old high end model Core i9-11980HK (other than single threaded workloads).

The CPU is still produced in a further improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds. The power consumption is specified at 55W base power up to 157 Watt max. Turbo power.

ModelIntel Core i9-13900HXIntel Core i5-13450HX
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HXIntel Raptor Lake-HX
CodenameRaptor LakeRaptor Lake
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX compare1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX « 1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX compare1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX « 1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock1600 - 5400 MHz1800 - 4600 MHz
L2 Cache32 MB
L3 Cache36 MB20 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 3210 / 16
TDP55 Watt55 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1450 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Raptor Lake-HX i9-13900HXIntel Raptor Lake-HX i5-13450HX
SocketFCBGA1964

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900HX
74.6 pt (83%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 26407     avg: 28824     median: 28358.5 (46%)     max: 32623 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2035     avg: 2071     median: 2077 (91%)     max: 2095 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 756     avg: 790     median: 794.5 (91%)     max: 805 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 9992     avg: 11157     median: 11153.5 (47%)     max: 12541 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4302     avg: 4688     median: 4819 (50%)     max: 4970 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 278     avg: 296.4     median: 299 (91%)     max: 301 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
55.1 Points (78%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.6 Points (12%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
11618 Points (70%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
81881 Points (59%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
12956 Points (75%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 94649     avg: 116006     median: 117084 (72%)     max: 127283 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6800     avg: 6925     median: 6921.5 (83%)     max: 7070 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
217.7 fps (79%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
387.7 fps (91%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 25.2     avg: 30.5     median: 30.9 (66%)     max: 34.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.4 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
4.4 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
18.8 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 175     avg: 201.3     median: 197 (3%)     max: 275 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 101     avg: 113.1     median: 111 (1%)     max: 153 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.375     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4049 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 16591     avg: 17649     median: 17884 (38%)     max: 18235 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.2 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
13.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
315 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 74788     avg: 76276     median: 76275.5 (71%)     max: 77763 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 22494     avg: 24560     median: 24629 (67%)     max: 25681 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
101046 Points (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16532     avg: 21662     median: 22490.5 (57%)     max: 23601 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 34344     avg: 37978     median: 38285 (71%)     max: 43004 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 13899     avg: 15069     median: 14910 (74%)     max: 17729 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1988     avg: 2051     median: 2049 (89%)     max: 2093 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19425     avg: 20370     median: 20350 (71%)     max: 21075 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1982     avg: 2023     median: 2023 (9%)     max: 2064 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 20138     avg: 20366     median: 20366 (64%)     max: 20594 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8706     avg: 8816     median: 8823 (91%)     max: 8912 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 71048     avg: 71260     median: 71146.5 (79%)     max: 71700 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 453     avg: 459.6     median: 458 (1%)     max: 470 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 103988     avg: 104796     median: 104874 (99%)     max: 105526 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 283     avg: 298.3     median: 303 (90%)     max: 304 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 321     avg: 335     median: 327.5 (80%)     max: 358 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1991     avg: 2095     median: 2119 (82%)     max: 2195 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 106.1     avg: 157     median: 162.9 (28%)     max: 200 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 193.5     avg: 222.6     median: 225 (47%)     max: 247 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 13.9     avg: 23.6     median: 24.9 (21%)     max: 28.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 15     avg: 17.9     median: 17.8 (21%)     max: 22.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 19.5     avg: 20.7     median: 20.7 (24%)     max: 21.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900HX → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.22
log 31. 04:30:36

#0 checking url part for id 14659 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14673 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 30 Mar 2023 15:08:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.022s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14659 +0.009s ... 0.032s

#7 got single benchmarks 14659 +0.031s ... 0.063s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14673 +0.002s ... 0.064s

#9 got single benchmarks 14673 +0s ... 0.065s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.065s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.122s ... 0.187s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.211s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)