Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-12900HK vs Apple M1 Pro vs Intel Core i9-12900H

Intel Core i9-12900HK

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900HK

The Intel Core i9-12900HK is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.5 to 5 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.8 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. As a K-variant, the CPU offers an open multiplicator and therefore the possibility to overclock the CPU cores. Compared to the similar i9-12900H, the 12900HK only offers the "Essentials" features of vPro.

Performance

The average 12900HK in our database is in the same as the Core i9-13900H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. It's also almost as fast as the Ryzen 7 7745HX and the Core i5-13500HX. This is a super-fast processor, as of mid 2023; it will have no issues running any app or any game for at least two more years.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 134 W, the Alienware x17 R2 P48E is among the fastest laptops built around the 12900HK that we know of. It can be more than 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.45 GHz.

Power consumption

This Core i9 series chip has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W, with 45 W being its Base power consumption. The maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sits at 115 W.

The i9-12900HK is manufactured on Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower-than-average, as of mid-2023, energy efficiency.

Apple M1 Pro

► remove from comparison Apple M1 Pro

The Apple M1 Pro is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the late 2021 MacBook Pro 14 and 16-inch models. It offers  all 10 cores available in the chip divided in eight performance cores (P-cores with 600 - 3220 MHz) and two power-efficiency cores (E-cores with 600 - 2064 MHz). There is no Turbo Boost for single cores or short burst periods. The cores are similar to the cores in the Apple M1. The entry level model offers only 8 cores.

The big cores (codename Firestorm) offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 24 MB shared L2 cache (up from 12 MB in the M1). The four efficiency cores (codename Icestorm) are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. CPU and GPU can both use the 24 MB SLC (System Level Cache). The efficiency cores (E cluster) clock with 600 - 2064 MHz, the performance cores (P cluster) with 600 - 3228 MHz.

The unified memory (16 or 32 GB LPDDR5-6400) next to the chip is connected by a 256 bit memory controller (200 GB/s bandwidth) and can be used by the GPU and CPU.

The integrated graphics card in the M1 Pro offers all 16 cores.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine, a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), a unified memory architecture, Thunderbolt 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders (including ProRes).

The M1 Pro is manufactured in 5 nm at TSMC and integrates 33.7 billion transistors. The peak power consumption of the chip was advertised around 30W for CPU intensive tasks. In the Prime95 benchmark the chip uses in our tests (with a MBP16) 33.6W package power and 31W for the CPU part. In idle the SoC only reports 1W package power.

Intel Core i9-12900H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900H

The Intel Core i9-12900H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.5 to 5 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.8 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12900HK, the 12900H does not offer the open multiplicator (for overclocking) but the full "Enterprise" set of vPro features (for remote management).

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.45 GHz.

Performance

The average 12900H in our database proves to be an outrageously fast CPU, ripping the Ryzen 9 6900HX to pieces as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Perhaps surprisingly, the i9's multi-thread performance is not much higher than that of the Core i7-12700H, suggesting the latter might be a better bang for the buck.

With its decent cooling solution and a long-term Power Limit of 110 W, the Asus StudioBook 16 H7600ZW is one of the fastest laptops built around the i9-12900H that we know of. It can be more than 80% faster than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, depending on the circumstances.

Power consumption

The Core i9 has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W, with 45 W being its Base power consumption. The CPU's maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sits at 115 W.

The i9-12900H is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower than average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i9-12900HKApple M1 ProIntel Core i9-12900H
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-PApple Apple M-SeriesIntel Alder Lake-P
CodenameAlder Lake-HAlder Lake-H
Series: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-H
Intel Core i9-12900HK « 1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Apple M1 Max2.06 - 3.22 GHz10 / 10 cores48 MB L3
Apple M1 Pro « 2.06 - 3.22 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core2.06 - 3.22 GHz8 / 8 cores16 MB L3
Apple M12.06 - 3.22 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900HK1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H « 1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock1800 - 5000 MHz2064 - 3220 MHz1800 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache1.2 MB2.9 MB1.2 MB
L2 Cache11.5 MB28 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache24 MB24 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 2010 / 1014 / 20
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm5 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1744BGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAARMv8 Instruction SetDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)
Architecturex86ARMx86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Transistors33700 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900HK
44.8 pt (62%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900H
44.1 pt (61%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 105     avg: 109.5     median: 109.5 (76%)     max: 114 Points
112 Points (78%)
min: 96     avg: 103.7     median: 104.5 (73%)     max: 111 Points
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 746     avg: 811     median: 811 (15%)     max: 876 Points
824 Points (15%)
min: 371     avg: 588     median: 571 (11%)     max: 734 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13410     avg: 17662     median: 18373 (17%)     max: 19282 Points
12370 Points (11%)
min: 7359     avg: 15091     median: 15906 (15%)     max: 19648 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1586     avg: 1797     median: 1901 (81%)     max: 1940 Points
1534 Points (65%)
min: 1634     avg: 1825     median: 1863 (79%)     max: 1921 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 596     avg: 679     median: 685 (76%)     max: 739 Points
393 Points (44%)
min: 624     avg: 706     median: 715 (79%)     max: 738 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5168     avg: 6742     median: 7040 (17%)     max: 7366 Points
2721 Points (7%)
min: 2681     avg: 5696     median: 6053 (15%)     max: 7471 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1975     avg: 2695     median: 2836 (18%)     max: 2944 Points
1690 Points (11%)
min: 1395     avg: 2456     median: 2586 (16%)     max: 3077 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 226     avg: 258.1     median: 270 (81%)     max: 279 Points
209 Points (63%)
min: 235     avg: 261.9     median: 265 (80%)     max: 277 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 23.44     avg: 27.9     median: 27.3 (35%)     max: 33 Points
min: 12.08     avg: 23.6     median: 25.3 (33%)     max: 32.77 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.69     avg: 3.1     median: 3.3 (81%)     max: 3.28 Points
min: 2.83     avg: 3     median: 3 (74%)     max: 3.3 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7710     avg: 8840     median: 9397 (57%)     max: 9412 Points
min: 7952     avg: 8475     median: 8235 (50%)     max: 9498 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 48838     avg: 51988     median: 49924 (36%)     max: 57202 Points
min: 24313     avg: 43425     median: 47767 (35%)     max: 60567 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 75223     avg: 75585     median: 75585 (52%)     max: 75947 Points
min: 48178     avg: 66910     median: 70976.5 (49%)     max: 77409 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12378     avg: 13841     median: 13840.5 (17%)     max: 15303 Points
min: 12846     avg: 13385     median: 13227.5 (16%)     max: 14567 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 186.394     avg: 193.7     median: 193.7 (2%)     max: 201.062 s
min: 187.176     avg: 206.8     median: 197.8 (2%)     max: 265.116 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.375     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 3.454 s
min: 3.421     avg: 4.1     median: 4 (1%)     max: 5.062 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7387     avg: 8565     median: 8735 (14%)     max: 9573 Points
min: 7620     avg: 8202     median: 7937 (13%)     max: 9328 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 55620     avg: 68839     median: 72836 (42%)     max: 75564 MIPS
min: 34684     avg: 60674     median: 64899 (37%)     max: 76677 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5257     avg: 5769     median: 5803 (69%)     max: 6186 MIPS
min: 5302     avg: 5845     median: 5881 (70%)     max: 6289 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 113.7     avg: 132.8     median: 125.1 (44%)     max: 159.6 fps
min: 67.5     avg: 105.8     median: 111.4 (39%)     max: 126.7 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 276     avg: 298     median: 300.4 (69%)     max: 317.5 fps
min: 225     avg: 266.6     median: 263.3 (61%)     max: 317 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 15.7     avg: 19.4     median: 20.5 (36%)     max: 21.6 fps
min: 8.05     avg: 17     median: 17.7 (31%)     max: 22.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (0%)     max: 1.5 GB/s
min: 0.864     avg: 1.1     median: 1 (0%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.2     avg: 2.4     median: 2.3 (40%)     max: 2.6 GB/s
min: 1.5     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (33%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 13     avg: 14.5     median: 14.1 (37%)     max: 16.3 GB/s
min: 8.6     avg: 10.5     median: 10.3 (27%)     max: 12.8 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
413 Seconds (5%)
min: 273     avg: 426     median: 377 (5%)     max: 850 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 172.5     avg: 191.9     median: 181 (1%)     max: 234 Seconds
183.3 Seconds (1%)
min: 160     avg: 232.6     median: 210 (1%)     max: 451 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4155     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4997 sec
min: 0.4218     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.506 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13096     avg: 15289     median: 15597.5 (33%)     max: 16864 Points
min: 10122     avg: 13153     median: 13453 (29%)     max: 14655 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.281     avg: 7.7     median: 7.3 (2%)     max: 8.438 s
min: 7.3     avg: 7.7     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 8.329 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.1     avg: 17.2     median: 16.5 (1%)     max: 18.844 s
min: 16.373     avg: 17.3     median: 17.2 (1%)     max: 18.439 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 383.9     avg: 405.7     median: 397.4 (2%)     max: 435.936 s
min: 385.4     avg: 410.8     median: 398.6 (2%)     max: 474.148 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 59882     avg: 65775     median: 60056 (53%)     max: 77386 Points
min: 33640     avg: 52620     median: 53621 (47%)     max: 62706 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17378     avg: 22097     median: 22297.5 (60%)     max: 25556 Points
min: 10552     avg: 21220     median: 22093 (60%)     max: 26126 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 66129     avg: 78262     median: 71995 (58%)     max: 96663 Points
min: 70655     avg: 87893     median: 91477 (74%)     max: 103016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 65657     avg: 78481     median: 72055 (58%)     max: 97730 Points
min: 71651     avg: 89380     median: 91745 (74%)     max: 103757 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 75600     avg: 88980     median: 88770 (75%)     max: 102779 Points
min: 81857     avg: 89973     median: 89999 (76%)     max: 100472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16214     avg: 18700     median: 18585 (47%)     max: 21231 Points
min: 9262     avg: 17871     median: 19114 (48%)     max: 22123 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 23308     avg: 27794     median: 28300 (50%)     max: 31045 Points
min: 9703     avg: 25476     median: 26686 (48%)     max: 31176 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9449     avg: 12247     median: 12430.5 (52%)     max: 14252 Points
min: 5062     avg: 11513     median: 11941 (50%)     max: 14424 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2611 Points (70%)
2409 Points (65%)
min: 1893     avg: 2340     median: 2368.5 (64%)     max: 2582 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
10721 Points (42%)
12440 Points (49%)
min: 9258     avg: 10349     median: 10229.5 (40%)     max: 12044 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1596     avg: 1793     median: 1868 (79%)     max: 1918 Points
1768 Points (75%)
min: 1631     avg: 1797     median: 1820 (77%)     max: 1892 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10378     avg: 13176     median: 13682.5 (25%)     max: 14294 Points
12499 Points (22%)
min: 8519     avg: 11903     median: 12233.5 (22%)     max: 14376 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1795     avg: 1834     median: 1848 (8%)     max: 1859 Points
min: 1553     avg: 1695     median: 1710 (7%)     max: 1838 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10276     avg: 12524     median: 13538 (43%)     max: 13757 Points
min: 8374     avg: 10525     median: 9892 (31%)     max: 12717 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7925     avg: 7957     median: 7932 (79%)     max: 8015 Points
min: 7191     avg: 7533     median: 7650 (76%)     max: 8015 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 39510     avg: 46971     median: 50218 (55%)     max: 51184 Points
min: 30682     avg: 36787     median: 36900 (40%)     max: 41134 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 490     avg: 520     median: 499 (1%)     max: 582 ms
405.4 ms (0%)
min: 490     avg: 520     median: 507.5 (1%)     max: 608 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 102.4     avg: 107.1     median: 107.1 (1%)     max: 111.7 ms
100%
1 M1 Pro +
75.6 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94352 Points (85%)
66203 Points (60%)
min: 84027     avg: 87439     median: 86645 (78%)     max: 92438 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 249     avg: 259     median: 259 (74%)     max: 269 Points
min: 239     avg: 261.4     median: 264 (76%)     max: 279 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 285     avg: 303.2     median: 300 (63%)     max: 331 Points
342 Points (71%)
min: 263     avg: 297.6     median: 297 (62%)     max: 332 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
43.3 MB/s (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
2539 MB/s (78%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
81.5 MB/s (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
3600 MB/s (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
20584 Points (95%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1727     avg: 1945     median: 1944.5 (74%)     max: 2138 Points
1556 Points (60%)
min: 1515     avg: 1845     median: 1872 (72%)     max: 2108 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 82.3     avg: 117     median: 117.5 (20%)     max: 174.7 Watt
116%
1 M1 Pro +
41.5 Watt (7%)
min: 52     avg: 108.3     median: 101.2 (17%)     max: 180 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 77.7     avg: 130.6     median: 138.5 (25%)     max: 166 Watt
122%
1 M1 Pro +
48.3 Watt (9%)
min: 74.6     avg: 126.6     median: 124 (23%)     max: 222 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 M1 Pro +
19.9 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 13.2     avg: 38.1     median: 38.1 (25%)     max: 63 Watt
128%
1 M1 Pro +
6.4 Watt (4%)
min: 4.05     avg: 28.3     median: 26 (17%)     max: 96.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 M1 Pro +
9.9 Watt (11%)
min: 7.99     avg: 18.1     median: 14.8 (16%)     max: 34.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17.2     avg: 20.3     median: 19.4 (14%)     max: 25.4 Points per Watt
180%
1 M1 Pro +
35 Points per Watt (26%)
min: 13.6     avg: 19.8     median: 19.4 (14%)     max: 27.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900HK → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Apple M1 Pro → 85% n=17

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900H → 94% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 29. 16:20:48

#0 checking url part for id 14041 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13845 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14043 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 May 2024 05:33:54 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.038s ... 0.04s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.04s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14041 +0.018s ... 0.058s

#8 got single benchmarks 14041 +0.037s ... 0.094s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13845 +0.003s ... 0.097s

#10 got single benchmarks 13845 +0.007s ... 0.104s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14043 +0.015s ... 0.119s

#12 got single benchmarks 14043 +0.097s ... 0.216s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.216s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.463s ... 0.679s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.679s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)