Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-12450H vs Intel Core i9-12900H

Intel Core i5-12450H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-12450H

The Intel Core i5-12450H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 4 of the 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture) leading to 8 cores in total (octa core CPU). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2 to 4.4 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.5 to 3.3 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12500H, the 12450H offers less E-cores, lower clock rates, a slower iGPU and no vPro support.

Performance

Due to the combination of P-cores and E-cores, the combined multi-threaded performance should be similar to a Tiger Lake-H octa core with similar clock speed. Therefore, the Core i5-11500H with six cores should be slower. Due to the architectural improvements, single-core performance is also better than similar or higher clocked Tiger Lake CPUs. 

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 48 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.2 GHz.

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (95 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7.

Intel Core i9-12900H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900H

The Intel Core i9-12900H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support HyperThreading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.5 to 5 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.8 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12900HK, the 12900H does not offer the open multiplicator (for overclocking) but the full "Enterprise" set of vPro features (for remote management).

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.45 GHz.

Performance

The average 12900H in our database proves to be an outrageously fast CPU, ripping the Ryzen 9 6900HX to pieces as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. Perhaps surprisingly, the i9's multi-thread benchmark scores are not that much higher than those of the Core i7-12700H, suggesting the latter might be a much better bang for the buck.

With its decent cooling solution and the long-term Power Limit of 110 W, the Asus StudioBook 16 H7600ZW is one of the faster laptops built around the i9-12900H that we know of. It can be more than 80% faster than the slowest system with the same chip in our database, depending on the circumstances.

Power consumption

The Core i9 has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W, with 45 W being its Base power consumption. The CPU's maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sits at 115 W.

The i9-12900H is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower than average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-12450HIntel Core i9-12900H
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-PIntel Alder Lake-P
CodenameAlder Lake-HAlder Lake-H
Series: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-H
Intel Core i9-12900HK compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H compare1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H compare1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H compare2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H compare1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H « 1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900HK compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H « 1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H compare1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H compare1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H compare2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H compare1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock1500 - 4400 MHz1800 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache704 KB1.2 MB
L2 Cache8 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1214 / 20
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1744BGA1744
FeaturesThread Director, UHD Graphics (48 EUs)DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1200 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Alder Lake-P i5-12450HIntel Alder Lake-P i9-12900H

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900H
48 pt (70%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7647     avg: 15902     median: 16460.5 (27%)     max: 19648 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1698     avg: 1838     median: 1867.5 (82%)     max: 1921 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 653     avg: 712     median: 724.5 (83%)     max: 738 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2922     avg: 5985     median: 6084 (26%)     max: 7471 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1561     avg: 2578     median: 2626.5 (27%)     max: 3077 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 243     avg: 264.4     median: 271 (83%)     max: 277 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 25.96     avg: 29.4     median: 29.4 (41%)     max: 32.77 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.86     avg: 3.1     median: 3.1 (78%)     max: 3.3 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8083     avg: 8791     median: 8790.5 (53%)     max: 9498 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 48018     avg: 54293     median: 54292.5 (39%)     max: 60567 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
77409 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
12846 Points (70%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
189.1 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7937     avg: 8633     median: 8632.5 (17%)     max: 9328 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 37614     avg: 63631     median: 65618 (41%)     max: 76677 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5302     avg: 5869     median: 5905.5 (71%)     max: 6289 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
125.3 fps (46%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
245 fps (58%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.16     avg: 18.1     median: 18.9 (41%)     max: 22.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.974     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (40%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.7     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (34%)     max: 2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 8.6     avg: 9.2     median: 9.2 (28%)     max: 9.7 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 273     avg: 360.1     median: 348 (4%)     max: 495 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 160     avg: 214.7     median: 196 (1%)     max: 415 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4218     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.503 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12799     avg: 13441     median: 13440.5 (29%)     max: 14082 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.3     avg: 7.3     median: 7.3 (2%)     max: 7.328 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 385.4     avg: 385.5     median: 385.5 (2%)     max: 385.531 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
54143 Points (51%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11793     avg: 22215     median: 23202 (63%)     max: 26126 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 77848     avg: 92620     median: 94808 (78%)     max: 103016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 77796     avg: 92547     median: 94317.5 (78%)     max: 103757 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 82492     avg: 90421     median: 89359 (75%)     max: 100472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13206     avg: 18976     median: 19627 (50%)     max: 22123 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 9703     avg: 26524     median: 27407 (51%)     max: 31176 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6033     avg: 12096     median: 12532 (62%)     max: 14424 Points
Geekbench 5.2 - 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1647     avg: 1815     median: 1843 (80%)     max: 1892 Points
Geekbench 5.2 - 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8519     avg: 12461     median: 12710 (44%)     max: 14376 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1673     avg: 1763     median: 1769.5 (8%)     max: 1838 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9663     avg: 11459     median: 11727 (37%)     max: 12717 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8015 Points (83%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
36692 Points (41%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 490     avg: 512     median: 506 (1%)     max: 577 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 84027     avg: 87439     median: 86645 (79%)     max: 92438 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 246     avg: 266.8     median: 268 (80%)     max: 279 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 263     avg: 299.7     median: 299 (62%)     max: 332 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1664     avg: 1898     median: 1894.5 (73%)     max: 2108 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 52     avg: 113.9     median: 107.2 (18%)     max: 180 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 75.6     avg: 133.1     median: 130 (27%)     max: 222 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.05     avg: 20.7     median: 21.7 (18%)     max: 40.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.99     avg: 18.1     median: 14.8 (18%)     max: 34.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 13.6     avg: 20.1     median: 20.2 (15%)     max: 27.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900H → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.25
log 02. 06:35:15

#0 checking url part for id 14057 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14043 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Sep 2023 15:16:16 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.028s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14057 +0.002s ... 0.03s

#7 got single benchmarks 14057 +0.025s ... 0.055s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14043 +0.015s ... 0.07s

#9 got single benchmarks 14043 +0.071s ... 0.142s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.142s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.163s ... 0.305s

#12 return log +0.027s ... 0.332s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)