Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs Intel Core i9-12950HX

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The APU comes with 12 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.1 GHz, the 16 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 890M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support.

Of the 12 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores and 8 are smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter run at significantly lower clock speeds than the former.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the HX 370 supports LPDDR5x-8000 and DDR5-5600 RAM, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

Given the IPC improvement, we expect 4 Zen 5 cores combined with 8 Zen 5c cores to perform about as well as 16 Zen 4 cores meaning there is a real chance of the HX 370 dethroning the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a laptop powered by the HX 370.

Graphics

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer right now. It features 16 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) running at up to 2,900 MHz. We expect the graphics adapter to deliver gaming performance good enough for playing 2023 and 2024 games in 1080p (Low detail settings).

Naturally, the 890M is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The HX 370 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of mid 2024, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-12950HX

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12950HX

The Intel Core i9-12950HX is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in mid 2022 and offers 8 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 24 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.3 to 5 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.7 to 3.6 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 30 MB L3 cache. As a HX-variant, the CPU offers an open multiplicator and therefore the possibility to overclock the CPU cores. Compared to the similar i9-12900HX, the 12950HX supports vPro and ECC memory (successor of the Xeon line) but the CPU overclocking is limited.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800 and DDR4-3200. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU supports 48 PCIe lanes consisting of 16 Gen5 (x16 or 2x8), 20 Gen4 and 12 Gen3.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.55 GHz.

Performance

The average 12950HX in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-13650HX, Core i7-13700HX, Core i9-13900HK, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of early 2023.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 82 W, the ThinkPad P16 G1 is among the fastest laptops built around the 12950HX that we know of. It can be 30% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption is 45 W. Its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to go over 157 W and its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 55 W. Most laptop makers will probably go for a higher value than 55 W to get better performance.

The i9-12950HX is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370Intel Core i9-12950HX
CodenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)Alder Lake-HX
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)Intel Alder Lake-S
Clock2000 - 5100 MHz1700 - 5000 MHz
L2 Cache12 MB14 MB
L3 Cache24 MB30 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
16 / 24
8 x 5.0 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
8 x 3.6 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP28 Watt55 Watt
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP8BGA1964
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ADDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM (with ECC supp.), PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1550 MHz)
NPU / AI50 TOPS INT8
Chip AI80 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
Series: Alder Lake-S Alder Lake-HX
Intel Core i9-12950HX « 1.7 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900HX compare1.7 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12850HX compare1.5 - 4.8 GHz16 / 24 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800HX compare1.5 - 4.8 GHz16 / 24 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650HX compare1.5 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450HX compare1.8 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
L1 Cache1.4 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.2 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12950HX
40.9 pt (68%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 113.6     avg: 116.9     median: 116.9 (58%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 621     avg: 1083     median: 1165 (22%)     max: 1299 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10435     avg: 20655     median: 21897 (20%)     max: 23902 Points
min: 16277     avg: 19930     median: 20263 (19%)     max: 23113 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1921     avg: 2010     median: 2015 (82%)     max: 2049 Points
min: 1465     avg: 1835     median: 1885 (77%)     max: 1922 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 753     avg: 789     median: 791 (86%)     max: 804 Points
min: 703     avg: 727     median: 727 (79%)     max: 741 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6449     avg: 8385     median: 8817 (21%)     max: 9280 Points
min: 6625     avg: 7689     median: 7744 (19%)     max: 8777 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2498.13     avg: 3256     median: 3448 (22%)     max: 3551 Points
min: 2464     avg: 3090     median: 3107 (20%)     max: 3530 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 188.8     avg: 291.6     median: 307 (85%)     max: 315 Points
min: 167     avg: 257.4     median: 274 (76%)     max: 276 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 38.84     avg: 40.1     median: 40.1 (52%)     max: 41.17 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.59     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.7 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8437     avg: 8635     median: 8653.5 (52%)     max: 8797 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 52505     avg: 54759     median: 54920 (40%)     max: 56689 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 96857     avg: 99802     median: 99347 (63%)     max: 103657 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 15381     avg: 15735     median: 15812.5 (19%)     max: 15935 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 50.536     avg: 73.5     median: 79.4 (1%)     max: 84.476 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.701     avg: 3     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.743 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4008     avg: 4416     median: 4424.5 (7%)     max: 4806 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 66154     avg: 78603     median: 80868 (46%)     max: 84735 MIPS
min: 65637     avg: 77515     median: 77003 (44%)     max: 85019 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5859     avg: 6174     median: 6179 (73%)     max: 6497 MIPS
min: 6022     avg: 6174     median: 6197 (73%)     max: 6318 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 164.85     avg: 172.8     median: 170.6 (4%)     max: 185.1 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 300     avg: 310.1     median: 305.3 (8%)     max: 330 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.3     avg: 25.5     median: 26.3 (46%)     max: 28.7 fps
min: 18.6     avg: 22.3     median: 22.5 (40%)     max: 26.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.6     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (47%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.5     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (46%)     max: 2.8 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 15.3     avg: 15.6     median: 15.3 (40%)     max: 16.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 208     avg: 236.9     median: 221 (3%)     max: 306 Seconds
min: 273     avg: 307.8     median: 302 (4%)     max: 337 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 139     avg: 155     median: 147.5 (1%)     max: 192 Seconds
min: 138     avg: 171.4     median: 175 (1%)     max: 193 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3892     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.603 sec
min: 0.4251     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4515 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13761     avg: 16238     median: 16563 (35%)     max: 17466 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.224     avg: 8.4     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.482 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.504     avg: 17.7     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 17.914 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 66119     avg: 74245     median: 76054 (58%)     max: 77565 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17129     avg: 20511     median: 20777.5 (51%)     max: 24599 Points
min: 20830     avg: 22817     median: 23129 (57%)     max: 23711 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 50952     avg: 60316     median: 61356.5 (50%)     max: 67655 Points
99481 Points (81%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 50955     avg: 61354     median: 63791.5 (52%)     max: 67802 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 48351     avg: 58447     median: 59313.5 (48%)     max: 66810 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16960     avg: 19488     median: 19578 (50%)     max: 21349 Points
min: 20257     avg: 21525     median: 21525 (54%)     max: 22793 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24918     avg: 30140     median: 30538 (54%)     max: 33844 Points
min: 28197     avg: 30872     median: 30270 (54%)     max: 34733 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8866     avg: 10437     median: 10533 (44%)     max: 12293 Points
min: 12049     avg: 13302     median: 13303 (56%)     max: 14615 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2780     avg: 2889     median: 2884 (67%)     max: 2965 Points
2603 Points (60%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 11973     avg: 14700     median: 15059 (58%)     max: 16311 Points
12986 Points (50%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2645     avg: 2748     median: 2766 (88%)     max: 2844 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12289     avg: 13899     median: 14313 (59%)     max: 15017 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1957     avg: 2091     median: 2101 (71%)     max: 2175 Points
min: 1847     avg: 1891     median: 1886 (63%)     max: 1945 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11394     avg: 14349     median: 14562 (26%)     max: 16322 Points
min: 14028     avg: 15046     median: 15229 (27%)     max: 16009 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1827     avg: 1936     median: 1942 (8%)     max: 2041 Points
min: 1798     avg: 1845     median: 1855 (8%)     max: 1881 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12962     avg: 14257     median: 14353 (45%)     max: 15009 Points
min: 13575     avg: 14070     median: 13908 (44%)     max: 14728 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7480     avg: 7996     median: 7804 (78%)     max: 8628 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 42842     avg: 52953     median: 54787 (54%)     max: 57060 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 307.8     avg: 434.4     median: 433.5 (1%)     max: 503 ms
min: 498     avg: 502     median: 502 (1%)     max: 506 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 64079     avg: 112489     median: 122618 (81%)     max: 125813 Points
94008 Points (62%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 189.2     avg: 255     median: 259 (67%)     max: 345 Points
min: 272     avg: 276.2     median: 274 (71%)     max: 286 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 252     avg: 310.9     median: 317 (57%)     max: 363 Points
min: 298     avg: 310.4     median: 311 (56%)     max: 324 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1307     avg: 1777     median: 1785 (67%)     max: 2040 Points
min: 1801     avg: 1930     median: 1889 (71%)     max: 2112 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.6     avg: 92.1     median: 95.2 (16%)     max: 133.7 Watt
min: 106.4     avg: 133.5     median: 128.7 (22%)     max: 165.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.3     avg: 96.4     median: 104 (19%)     max: 130.3 Watt
min: 150     avg: 173.6     median: 172.2 (31%)     max: 198.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.58     avg: 8.9     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 19.6 Watt
min: 11.2     avg: 19     median: 19.6 (13%)     max: 25.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.31     avg: 9.5     median: 9.2 (11%)     max: 12.8 Watt
min: 9.54     avg: 17     median: 18.2 (22%)     max: 22.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 26.9     avg: 35.4     median: 31.4 (23%)     max: 54.9 Points per Watt
min: 13.9     avg: 15.9     median: 15.7 (12%)     max: 18.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 → 100% n=28

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12950HX → 97% n=28

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 27. 23:26:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17543 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14403 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761603991s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:54:47 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17543 +0.005s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 17543 +0.033s ... 0.043s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14403 +0.004s ... 0.047s

#10 got single benchmarks 14403 +0.009s ... 0.056s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.056s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.054s ... 0.11s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.111s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)