Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is a powerful Phoenix family APU that saw the light of day in H1 2023. Its 8 cores are powered by the Zen 4 architecture and are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads. 4.0 GHz is the base clock speed and the highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.2 GHz.

The 7940HS introduces Ryzen AI which is AMD's answer to Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies. The Radeon 780M serves as the integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is set to give applications such as DaVinci Resolve and Photoshop quite a bit of generative AI magic.

More importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

The 7940HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600, including ECC-enabled memory). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7940HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-12900HK and also, somewhat disappointingly, the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 80 W, the ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY is among the fastest laptops built around the 7940HS that we know of. It can be about 15% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding most video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1, but more importantly it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 7940HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

► remove from comparison AMD Z1 Extreme

The AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series and fastest model of the U-series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports SMT (hyperthreading , 16 threads). The cores clock from 3.3 (base) up to 5.1 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

The performance of the R7 7840U is, depending on the workload, only slightly below the Ryzen 7 7840HS (higher base clock speed and TDP). Compared to the previous generation Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, the 7840U is clearly faster thanks to the Zen 4 architecture and higher clock speeds. Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 7840U, the Z1 Extreme offers no AI engine.

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.7 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 15 and 30 Watt.

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is a powerful Phoenix family chip that saw the light of day in H1 2023. The processor features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at 3.8 GHz. The highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.1 GHz.

Not only does this APU has full might of the Zen 4 architecture at its disposal, it also comes with the new Ryzen AI technology that's set to make generative AI more ubiquitous than ever before. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is coming after Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies; time will tell if this move by AMD is a good idea.

Perhaps more importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is set to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

Elsewhere, the 7840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7840HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-12700H, Core i7-12850HX, Core i9-12900H, Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The 7840HS is buit with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 7940HSAMD Ryzen Z1 ExtremeAMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
CodenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Phoenix (Zen 4)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock4000 - 5200 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 168 / 16
TDP35 Watt30 Watt35 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7940HS
46.2 pt (64%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Z1 Extreme
43.8 pt (61%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7840HS
45.7 pt (63%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 104     avg: 106     median: 106 (74%)     max: 108 Points
min: 101     avg: 104.5     median: 105 (73%)     max: 107 Points
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 824     avg: 912     median: 937.5 (17%)     max: 972 Points
min: 880     avg: 918     median: 918 (17%)     max: 956 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15556     avg: 16952     median: 16985 (16%)     max: 18131 Points
min: 13004     avg: 13982     median: 13982 (13%)     max: 14960 Points
min: 15515     avg: 16432     median: 16282.5 (15%)     max: 17214 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1733     avg: 1787     median: 1791 (76%)     max: 1832 Points
min: 1733     avg: 1756     median: 1756 (75%)     max: 1779 Points
min: 1737     avg: 1771     median: 1775 (75%)     max: 1812 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 680     avg: 701     median: 702 (78%)     max: 714 Points
min: 672     avg: 682     median: 682 (76%)     max: 692 Points
min: 661     avg: 686     median: 689 (77%)     max: 705 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6277     avg: 6635     median: 6640 (16%)     max: 7111 Points
min: 5109     avg: 5467     median: 5467 (13%)     max: 5825 Points
min: 6061     avg: 6418     median: 6361.5 (16%)     max: 6744 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2470     avg: 2687     median: 2663 (17%)     max: 2848 Points
min: 2050     avg: 2224     median: 2223.5 (14%)     max: 2397 Points
min: 2473     avg: 2592     median: 2565 (16%)     max: 2729 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 277     avg: 283.7     median: 284 (86%)     max: 288 Points
min: 268     avg: 274     median: 274 (83%)     max: 280 Points
min: 270     avg: 277.9     median: 279 (84%)     max: 286 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.8     avg: 30.3     median: 30.3 (39%)     max: 30.88 Points
min: 29.7     avg: 30     median: 30 (39%)     max: 30.25 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.34     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (85%)     max: 3.46 Points
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (82%)     max: 3.33 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7798     avg: 7881     median: 7880.5 (48%)     max: 7963 Points
min: 7574     avg: 7642     median: 7641.5 (46%)     max: 7709 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 47982     avg: 48914     median: 48913.5 (35%)     max: 49845 Points
min: 45602     avg: 47933     median: 47933 (35%)     max: 50264 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 84721     avg: 86625     median: 86625 (60%)     max: 88529 Points
min: 83726     avg: 85395     median: 85395 (59%)     max: 87064 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14300     avg: 14516     median: 14515.5 (18%)     max: 14731 Points
min: 14015     avg: 14096     median: 14096 (17%)     max: 14177 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 66.801     avg: 82.5     median: 82.5 (1%)     max: 98.222 s
min: 71.922     avg: 72.4     median: 72.4 (1%)     max: 72.819 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.648     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 2.698 s
min: 2.626     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (1%)     max: 2.658 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7439     avg: 7465     median: 7464.5 (12%)     max: 7490 Points
min: 6428     avg: 7064     median: 7063.5 (11%)     max: 7699 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 66408     avg: 70832     median: 70707 (41%)     max: 73434 MIPS
min: 56966     avg: 59812     median: 59811.5 (34%)     max: 62657 MIPS
min: 59538     avg: 69052     median: 70243 (40%)     max: 73035 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6417     avg: 6643     median: 6642 (79%)     max: 6776 MIPS
6316 MIPS (76%)
min: 6049     avg: 6559     median: 6632 (79%)     max: 6754 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 140.8     avg: 145.8     median: 145.8 (51%)     max: 150.8 fps
min: 144.1     avg: 146.7     median: 146.7 (51%)     max: 149.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 292.5     avg: 298.5     median: 298.5 (69%)     max: 304.5 fps
min: 281.5     avg: 289.8     median: 289.8 (67%)     max: 298 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.1     avg: 21.1     median: 20.9 (37%)     max: 22.6 fps
min: 16.3     avg: 17.4     median: 17.4 (30%)     max: 18.4 fps
min: 11.7     avg: 19.8     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 21.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.3     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (0%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
1.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14.8     avg: 15     median: 15 (39%)     max: 15.1 GB/s
min: 14.7     avg: 14.8     median: 14.8 (39%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 287     avg: 306.9     median: 305 (4%)     max: 331 Seconds
min: 366     avg: 406     median: 406 (5%)     max: 446 Seconds
min: 298     avg: 324.8     median: 318 (4%)     max: 463 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 182     avg: 190.4     median: 188.5 (1%)     max: 202 Seconds
213 Seconds (2%)
min: 185     avg: 198.7     median: 196 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4159     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4467 sec
min: 0.4447     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4662 sec
min: 0.4184     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4739 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14891     avg: 15553     median: 15689 (33%)     max: 15851 Points
min: 15312     avg: 15685     median: 15663 (33%)     max: 16073 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.058     avg: 7.3     median: 7.3 (2%)     max: 7.442 s
min: 7.112     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (2%)     max: 8.774 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.513     avg: 18     median: 18 (1%)     max: 18.402 s
min: 17.697     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (1%)     max: 21.271 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 529.929     avg: 531     median: 531.4 (2%)     max: 532.8 s
min: 655.388     avg: 690     median: 689.9 (3%)     max: 724.411 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 74246     avg: 80834     median: 80476.5 (70%)     max: 86583 Points
min: 76708     avg: 82457     median: 83358.5 (73%)     max: 85884 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 16799     avg: 22601     median: 22587.5 (61%)     max: 25006 Points
min: 15202     avg: 18389     median: 19181 (52%)     max: 20784 Points
min: 17320     avg: 22184     median: 22615 (61%)     max: 25584 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 79935     avg: 88670     median: 89772 (73%)     max: 96559 Points
min: 77280     avg: 89035     median: 91414 (74%)     max: 93910 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 79450     avg: 88483     median: 89602 (73%)     max: 96418 Points
min: 84349     avg: 89853     median: 91645 (74%)     max: 93208 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 85305     avg: 91108     median: 92030 (78%)     max: 96047 Points
min: 84416     avg: 91454     median: 92596 (78%)     max: 95508 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13400     avg: 19703     median: 21112 (53%)     max: 21353 Points
15761 Points (40%)
min: 13602     avg: 19711     median: 20681 (52%)     max: 21602 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24034     avg: 28329     median: 28504 (51%)     max: 30876 Points
min: 19305     avg: 23686     median: 25255 (45%)     max: 26499 Points
min: 24338     avg: 27680     median: 27921 (50%)     max: 29343 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 10388     avg: 11211     median: 11210 (47%)     max: 12212 Points
min: 6281     avg: 8857     median: 9704 (41%)     max: 10587 Points
min: 9433     avg: 11035     median: 11145 (47%)     max: 12218 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2426     avg: 2618     median: 2630 (80%)     max: 2746 Points
min: 2530     avg: 2534     median: 2534 (77%)     max: 2538 Points
min: 2585     avg: 2662     median: 2670 (81%)     max: 2721 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 9899     avg: 12185     median: 12249 (48%)     max: 13470 Points
min: 10872     avg: 10931     median: 10931 (43%)     max: 10990 Points
min: 12111     avg: 12974     median: 13100 (52%)     max: 13498 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1823     avg: 1982     median: 1994.5 (84%)     max: 2032 Points
min: 1896     avg: 1917     median: 1898 (80%)     max: 1956 Points
min: 1837     avg: 1968     median: 1967 (83%)     max: 2017 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11207     avg: 11870     median: 11837.5 (21%)     max: 12500 Points
min: 9589     avg: 10103     median: 9803 (18%)     max: 10917 Points
min: 8446     avg: 11651     median: 11872 (21%)     max: 12339 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1764     avg: 1874     median: 1906 (8%)     max: 1918 Points
min: 1834     avg: 1896     median: 1900 (8%)     max: 1936 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11232     avg: 11567     median: 11454 (36%)     max: 12127 Points
min: 8572     avg: 11439     median: 11933 (38%)     max: 12278 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7410     avg: 7856     median: 7904 (79%)     max: 8253 Points
min: 7924     avg: 8100     median: 8148 (81%)     max: 8166 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 45905     avg: 46966     median: 46270 (52%)     max: 48723 Points
min: 47599     avg: 48417     median: 48498 (54%)     max: 48906 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 481     avg: 497.2     median: 499 (1%)     max: 515 ms
556 ms (1%)
min: 485     avg: 508     median: 508 (1%)     max: 544 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
89067 Points (80%)
86617 Points (78%)
min: 91356     avg: 91588     median: 91577 (82%)     max: 91831 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 234     avg: 261.2     median: 263 (76%)     max: 271 Points
277 Points (80%)
min: 220     avg: 261.3     median: 263 (76%)     max: 319 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 302     avg: 319.9     median: 317 (66%)     max: 349 Points
min: 300     avg: 366     median: 366 (76%)     max: 432 Points
min: 288     avg: 316.9     median: 322 (67%)     max: 339 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1674     avg: 1784     median: 1792 (69%)     max: 1861 Points
1718 Points (66%)
min: 1566     avg: 1770     median: 1801 (69%)     max: 1993 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 70     avg: 103.1     median: 105.2 (18%)     max: 130.1 Watt
42.2 Watt (7%)
min: 64.7     avg: 94.4     median: 89.6 (15%)     max: 137.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 73     avg: 107.5     median: 110.4 (20%)     max: 134 Watt
min: 74.7     avg: 102.2     median: 93 (17%)     max: 135.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.81     avg: 13.3     median: 15.5 (10%)     max: 20.1 Watt
12.8 Watt (8%)
min: 4.73     avg: 14.6     median: 11.8 (8%)     max: 59.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 9.82     avg: 15.9     median: 15.6 (17%)     max: 21.5 Watt
min: 4.95     avg: 8.6     median: 8.6 (10%)     max: 12.3 Watt
min: 7.09     avg: 13.7     median: 12.6 (14%)     max: 35.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 21.9     avg: 26.5     median: 25.5 (19%)     max: 33.8 Points per Watt
min: 20.1     avg: 27     median: 28.4 (21%)     max: 33.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme → 92% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS → 100% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 05. 17:17:14

#0 checking url part for id 14946 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15017 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14948 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.038s ... 0.04s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.04s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14946 +0.018s ... 0.057s

#8 got single benchmarks 14946 +0.051s ... 0.108s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15017 +0.017s ... 0.125s

#10 got single benchmarks 15017 +0.01s ... 0.135s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14948 +0.012s ... 0.148s

#12 got single benchmarks 14948 +0.066s ... 0.213s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.213s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.483s ... 0.696s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.696s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)